Can you try to use the Wallet ID Reminder? Since it will ask you for an email address to send you the ID.
Just to see if you receive the email.
(I suppose you already checked if by mistake you haven't added the domain to a blocklist or a filter? and you're able to receive emails from other domains)
If you don't receive it, it comes from blockchain.com, the thing is if there are not a lot of people with the same problem "All is fine" for them.


Hushmail is popular among the paid services

@TryNinja @Bitmover @Lucius @franky1

you need to be crypto swag and follow the trend lol.

Yes, the keys are pre-generated but hey, in the earlier days when we discovered Bitcoin, weren't we using a web wallet and alike, a place where we needed to trust a company with our keys? Coinbase for example.

The product is new, the site too, but it has to start somewhere, they can't earn their reputation in 1 month. Everyone deserves a chance. I doubt B. Lee is going to scam people

I wouldn't use it to store my vault but you know, we all have different wallets for different purposes. For example, you can create a wallet that you only use for your shopping online, another to pay the escort girls and so on. You usually keep a minimum on it, just enough to pay 1 or 2 shots.
It's the type of card I would use as an alternative wallet for this.


I don't remember who talked about the price but I think the price is decent. If you compare with a similar website, ColdKey is at $35 and Satochip $25

Tu devrais trouver assez de renseignements ici https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=188.0 En fouinant dans les discussions.
Il y a quelques topics qui en parlent. Quoi et comment declarer... ou pas...
Je ne connais pas de site expliquant de manière claire, ils ont déjà du mal à expliquer tout court
Sinon sérieusement, tu gagneras ton temps je pense à chercher ici directement

Bienvenue sur le forum

Decentralization doesn't apply to finance only, and something can be decentralized but still in control of an entity/person/group. In economy, the term decentralization doesn't really mean, we're safe with personal information nor it is the main goal, as some people tend to think.
There are DEXs, which people call it decentralized but they're not. Who control servers, who takes decisions, etc? Not you!


There are centralized exchanges without the KYC, they're still centralized


Who's dumb enough to not give accurate bank numbers. If they don't want to receive money that's fine lol

Mixing platforms do not store your coins, they obfuscate the transaction history. He got scammed by a service, still, it doesn't mean they store your coins.


It would be stupid for an exchange to block CJ, for multiple reasons (too long to explain but an example, it's like if the banks refuse deposits in cash because the banknotes are tainted with cocaine) But if they do, it's not difficult to bypass it, just need to add a few "hops"
Aantopnop was wrong by saying CJ is illegal, simply because it's not a centralized service but rather a mixing protocol (or a transaction model). But he corrected himself later about this

The video concerned is this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soeFxWkM5qI

Moi j'avais pas compris ca comme ca. En fait c'est à nous de créer un wallet, c'est pas comme l'on a l'habitude de voir ou les cartes contiennent dejà les clés privées.
Sinon non, les cartes bleues ne sont pas réellement gratuite, c'est juste que le prix est inclus dans les frais de tenu de compte. Si tu change de carte tu verra que tu paiera plus cher de frais.
Sinon oui, c'est plus un RIB qu'une carte de paiement.

Je pensais que c'était un truc comme avec ma banque, je donne un code a quelqu'un et elle peut ensuite aller dans un DAB du CIC et retirer l'argent
J'ai vérifié et les seules annonces qu'il y a en France, c'est toujours de personne à personne (dans la catégorie "espece au DAB) alors je vois pas comment le risque de faux billets part. Ou c'est juste un moyen pour LBC de contourner le probleme?

(When you bought your device on Amazon you bought it from Ledger, so no risk)



We say it because you need to be a bit paranoid in the crypto world, but when it will be used massively we won't need to be. When you buy a smartphone you don't buy it from the manufacturer but from the retailer and you don't check if your phone has tampered. Right? Or you don't trust your local retailer to sell your hardware wallet but you trust it to sell you fake meat.
So, it will be the same, why should it be different?

Il faut que la donation soit faite par la personne elle même. Hors dans le cas que tu cite, la donation serait faite par toi via le compte en séquestre. Ca peut pas marcher, à moins d'etre toi même une association d'utilité publique. Depuis 4-5 ans, il n'y a plus besoin de justificatif, mais en cas de controle fiscal (et ils seront demandés) ils ne pourra pas justifier, puisqu'il n'a pas fait de donation (c'est toi qui la faite)

I believe it's a limit "per trade" and not "per day" or something.
When you start or take an offer, the limit is the maximum you can trade in one shot. But you can, of course, start or take as many offers as you want (as long it doesn't exceed the limit)

Who cares if he bans cryptos. Even the US citizens will continue to use it as they did before, they just won't mix with their bank account. If he thinks he can control this then this guy is really silly. People will continue to accept BTC and others will continue to use it to pay.

I can guarantee you that the price will decrease, no secret, and perhaps cut by 2, but it will be only for the short term. Whatever, the price will come back after some days or weeks. Why? Because Trump is shit and everyone knows it and with the time Bitcoin becomes immune to "bad news"

The filter doesn't work properly (?)
When you select a country (Filter region) and choose a brand, it displays the results for other countries and so different currencies
For example, when I selected Paysafecard, I got only AED currency/Region AE, and BE, despite I filtered to my country (.fr)
When I tried later it displayed the right currency.

If there is money to be made, believe me, many people are willing to go to an exchange platform with their eyes closed, especially those from Tier 2-3 countries and/or those who don't care about giving their identity for a few bucks. They feel safe in a way by thinking that'it's something serious bla bla bla, you know.

Roger Ver is like cancer, unfortunately, nothing can be done and the domain name is his fatal weapon and he will never let it go. The saddest part is when his site is used to make Btrash look like the real Bitcoin. Its "educational" videos (or rather "introduction") on the website is misleading people at a point that any newbie grabs the story.

Because I'm tired to read about stuff to help the poors to get free money but nothing for those working.
Nah, seriously, it's because in my country we have something similar already taking place, the 'Universal Income' and I supposed the UBI is the same thing more or less.

And we have also another program similar to the universal income. In which people get free money to stay on the sofa all days long. Wake up at 11.00 am from Monday to Sunday in an almost free house. I call them 'Full-time tourists'. Get them a job they will refuse anything. Sure, since they earn near the same as someone working full time. Without to bother to work. When they will be retired, they will again receive a pension from govt. Those who work will get almost nothing. Great life.

Whatever, about UBI. If a day it's really implemented, it sounds fair to ask something in return. Not sure what and how, maybe working 1 hour per day, cleaning dog's shits in the streets, to help in the retirement residences, etc. So many things to do, and in return the government could reduce some costs doing this

@SaintLoup

C'est simple, l'article date du mois de Mai, et à ce moment la on était encore plus ou moins dans le flou (cf: le type de news concernant les impots et BTC les 6 derniers mois de decembre à mai) On savait tout juste que le prélèvement forfaitaire unique allait être appliqué. Le premier décret est apparu seulement apres, en Juin, et celui que tu as posté, la semaine dernière.
Je pense pas que ca soit un hoax, juste que c'est pas permis a tout le monde de voyager dans le futur.


Clairement d'accord.

L'exploit a été découvert il y a une dizaine de jours mais a été rendu publique seulement cette semaine. Il y a plusieurs nodes qui doivent etre mis à jour le plus rapidement possible au risque de perdre des fonds. LND (v0.7.1), C-lightninget (v0.7.1) et eclair (v0.3.1.1)


    * lnd v0.7.1 -- tout ce qui est 0.7 et moins est vulnérable
    * c-lightning v0.7.1 -- tout ce qui est 0.7 et moins est vulnérable
    * eclair v0.3.1.1 -- tout ce qui est 0.3 et moins est vulnérable

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2019-September/002148.html

I find most of the list useless in the way it doesn't improve your productivity, not save your time, or something else. ADB is weak at some point, uBlock Origin works better and consumes less memory in your browser. I prefer to use Noscript because it's a more powerful plugin and if you set up correctly you notice immediately a huge improvement in your surfing experience.
Not even need to then install Privacy Badger, Ghostery, Disconnect, and co.

Purse.io plugin is useless honestly unless you order something every single day, which isn't the case for the majority, nor it's accessible to every country (since Amazon doesn't deliver worldwide)

I generally don't like having many plugins and I stick with NoJs, "I don't care about Cookies" (since I really hate cookies box) and LastPass.
Everything else is either bookmarked or saved in a draft. I read news with RSS, check the value with a bookmarked page, etc
No use of any tool in OP

Anonymous transactions will always exist, either by a service or by technology improvements.
Controlling and regulating are 2 different things and if you think governments can 'control' the cryptocurrencies then good luck, it's pure bullshits. The point of failure starts when the money hits the bank account but who told you Bitcoin can only be used with an exchange platform to convert it to fiats? If I choose to use BTC, it's not be patronized to tell me what I can do or not. Can they "control me" to buy x,y,z? Nope

As for regulating, it's a good excuse to collect more taxes, nothing more, and creating a legal framework is step 1. We were using Bitcoin for years without legislation. If it's about to say Bitcoin is legal, well BTC has always been legal (since nothing was saying it is)

Are you 100% sure? Because if you check out the Press board with the news about Burger King accepting Bitcoin in Germany, they don't accept bitcoins directly but the delivery company (lieferando.de) accepts Bitcoin, and it is a German company (a subsidiary of another German entity actualyl) yourdelivery.gmbh

https://www.lieferando.de/kundenservice-konsument-betreff-bezahlen?fid=831#cs_item_831

Je me suis demandé au début si tu demandais ou on était censé le déclarer, ou alors ou est ce que j'avais vu qu'il fallait le declarer.
Dans le premier cas, nous le savons tous, c'est juste qu'on a pas de formulaire adequat. Soit, je l'accorde.

Dans le deuxieme cas, j'ai cherché le texte pour le poster, mais en fait j'ai découvert un paragraphe qui dit pas tout a fait la meme chose , ou du moins il est pas clair.

C'est sur et certain le fait de déclarer nos comptes, sauf que:
Un compte sur un échange est considéré comme t'appartenant dès lors qu'il y a eu au moins une transaction en fiats (in ou out pas d'importance)

Ce qui voudrait dire qu'en fait un échange ou il n'y a pas de fiats on a pas besoin de le déclarer. Actuellement, je pense qu'on joue avec les mots.