Interesting question.
I guess people are already doing this "illegally". I imagine a situation where players use bots in poker tournaments that allows only human to human games. It should probably be bot to bot OR human to human for the game to be fair.

OP is probably not interested in developing a useful token. I guess most developers of such tokens are more interesting in their own pockets than those in need of help.. By the way, is this a temporal token? Considering that the crisis won't last too long it will be eventually abondoned... so not sustainable.

Define "Dark Economy" so we know exactly what you're trying to pass across.

Real cryptocurrency is pretty much transparent than fiat, so it doesn't really qualify as "Dark". Such classifications are based on emotions not facts.
If you mean Crypto-based economy vs fiat-based economy, they are almost thesame in my opinion. Cash is private/anonymous...and there is huge economy based on cash where I live.. that can be both good and bad thing?

Well, I wish only real crypto organizations are doing this. Seems these are indirectly promoting their companies in the process. So, it is not really a selfless donation in my opinion. A donation should be made without expecting anything selfish in return.
Some donate to be seen, admired, respected, etc. We should be donating in secret and not expecting sometimes "selfish" in return...That is true sacrifice!

I tend to avoid games I can't learn much from. My ideal crypto game would be very competitive, beneficial/educational, can be applied in real world, privacy-friendly, safe, rewarding, easy to play on standarded devices etc. I choose these because if I end up not winning or getting paid enough, the knowledge gained from spending time/money on the game will compensate

The problem is that when you become used to the enjoyment & you have no other place get more or equal enjoyment, you'll most likely become addicted to gambling. I think I wouldn't be betting regularly if I am not earning consistently from it.
Maybe the successful bettors should enjoy betting.

A forum poll will probably be a nice way to to know if most people here prefer the crowded ones or not. Will be interesting to see the result.
I never really liked crowded places. It's one of the reasons I never really liked typical physical schools. I think the distractions of noisy environment is one of the main problems. We just need alot of quiet time to help us focus on what is important.

Interesting. I guess such rigging could be avoided with maybe by playing virtual reality based chess or playing on neutral platform (platform not controlled by both challengers) And there will probably be ways to verify that both players are playing according to rules and not cheating on anyway.

The features of Bitcoin is actually what makes it antifragile, in my opinion... Features such as decentralization, immutablity, deflationary currency, censorship resistant, privacy/anonymity, transparency etc... If you keep weakening or strengthening any of the feature, the antifragile strength of Bitcoin will be weakened or strengthened.

I was a bit convinced that this is just a joke but then I said I have seen stranger things that people/societies do
Well, rather than scraping, we could  just deduct with a pen and issue new coin that reflects the final balance. I like physical Bitcoin idea. I think physical Bitcoin/Blockchain that operate completely without the internet would be interesting.
I guess it should worth something if you have you private keys safely printed on the coin?

Well, I am not bother by the take over. Coinmarketcap is a centralized platform and need some good ordering.
If I were to order things on the platform, the well decentralized projects will be at the top while the centralized ones will be at the bottom. But I will develop a Blockchain standard for cleaning up the space. I will probably filter out the good projects and leave out(not delete) the substandard/bad ones on a different section. Decentralized projects will be probably labeled same as centralized ones.

By the way, relying too much on these centralized platforms not good for cryptocurrency long-term. There are lots of ways they can be abused and used against real projects.

Well, after this comes something else. The bad will become more desperate. The bad are currently under control. When the HAND controlling  them is taken away, violent/evil will be unleashed.  I don't know a better way to say this without causing fear. 
One of the most important thing now is to successfully build decentralized projects that can keep alot of people safe during choas.

Ofcourse.
I read somewhere you can increase your winning chances in some luck-based betting by pooling funds together in a group or something. You share the risks, profits and losses with the group. That is probably an interesting strategy for luck-based games.

I guess keeping track of ones bettings could actually help people avoid the addictions, betting without being profitable and betting with amount they can't afford to lose.
By the way, I thought online casinos keep these records for bettors? They could be useful for addicts and those without profitability in mind.

I think it's just better to verify their claims and not just wave them off because you think it can't be done in Crypto space. I believe there are other decentralized ways to get things like that developed without necessarily using a Blockchain. I suspect there will always be very few real solutions out of hundreds of fakes/scams. So, it's better for investors or hunters to research and verify the claims.

It's definitely betting (on price) but risker than the usual day trading. I wonder if it's luck or skill-based betting. Probably luck-based considering that people hardly win it as far as I can tell. Don't know much about it though

Another important thing is that if anonymity wasn't necessary or part of Bitcoin goal, satoshi wouldn't have used tor and we probably would have identified his coins by now. Same as people developing auxiliary anonymity tech for Bitcoin. If anonymity is not necessary developers won't be in hurry to build anonymity tech.
In my opinion, It's possible to buy bitcoin today and nothing man-made will be able identify who bought them. Very few can do this I guess

High risk and unskilled bettors are certainly gamblers. Bettors who are consistently profitable aren't really gamblers especially if betting with what they can afford to lose.

Analogy:

✳Drink  but don't get Drunk.

—Bet but don't Gamble.

"Responsible gamblers"... Interesting combination! Why not responsible bettors? You can't easily win your case in court with this one, you know?
You are gambling if you drive your car without seat belt and other safety devices. You can't easily convince the traffic police with responsible gambling excuse

I guess if he continue repeating this, some may begin to believe him... especially those who have no real interest in Crypto and its principles.
People who have their mind fixed on the real thing will easily spot the lies/fakes.

Be suspicious when an admired inventor of open source/transparent tech all of a sudden becomes pro closed/opaque tech and start hating on the real thing. People who truely believe in open source will easily spot the contradiction. while those who are after money alone won't care that much.