Remember also that City have a wider squad, which is generally good for a big team that wants to challenge on many competitions,,, but it does not give them the sort of team cohesiveness that Liverpool (or even Spurs did 2 seasons ago which showed us why we beat City in UCL).

Consistency comes with playing with the same guys in training and on matches.

Definitely this is the time to be cautious. On one hand we are seeing new ATH for 2020 time and again. And the charts seem to show us that there is a lot more room to grow,,, but on the other hand we have not seen the much-needed corrections that should give us some safety space to think that we have made consolidations. Still far too early to call anything.

Sites have rules, and they have put it there so people can read them and agree,,, if they do not like it, they leave. Sites can choose to enforce, but then you go down a whole different route of enforcement and have to start implementing blocks to prevent people who want to cheat the system, which not everyone would like. I agree like danshan said, if sites do not know how to detect that, they need to stop any business.

Fairlay is OK for me,,, personally feel no need to change anything.

It has been discussed many many times before and the consensus is that there is no one with any amount of hashpower enough to successfully do this.

And in the worse case scenario that it can happen, the majority of hashpower does not equal the majority of blockchain users. They will simply reorganize and throw out that bad actor.

Agree with above comments that we should not be too overly worried, my post was not meant to do so. I believe the updates coming have always been well thought out, as was every decision, from bringing back investments and also from the point of wager contests.

I have been seeing my referral numbers also stagnant a little,,, still increasing but probably more slowly from before. So I wonder if it is just a period of low activity for anyone and everyone.

Agree with maus also about Lightning (which I mentioned before). Maybe this is the way to do it?

Does anybody ever heard of initial curve bonding method? I read an article about it recently but cannot remember where (Hackernoon I thought but now I cannot find it),,, basically the token supply is not fixed and adjusts to how much people buy. Buy more and more supply is produced. Sell it back and supply is burnt. So apparently price adjusts accordingly. Seems a fair deal for me. Thoughts?

Oh wow the new one is already up so soon. The last 5 games ended up all being favorite winnings at home,,, so I lost many points there in the end. Second place is always the most painful, as a Spurs fan I know that very well so we feel for you arralmuus:)

But we all try again, right?

Leicester to beat Liverpool? The entire defence is injured, plus their captain,,,

I am not a Chainlink hater, this coin cannot even get me to have any passionate emotions about it;) But for me,,, one clue to show that the coin actually really does not have a real utility is when people seem to rise up to defend it. Bitcoin defenders are different,,, they laugh about it and then also just get so unoffended. Because unlike shitcoins, they do not need to be worried about competition. Competition should be good!

What really really gets me about all these so called big clubs is how terrible they have done their normal relationship management. I know in some countries without transparency or where the state sponsors a lot of clubs, you get this lack of clarity about salaries and status but when you hear about things like this in big clubs, it really, really gets to me. They really just do treat humans like meat it seems. I would tell all those players to get out and play where they are considered like real people.

Nah,,, I think there is no difference. In fact, I would rather people who are not convinced at first and negatively view Bitcoin then go through a whole period of education and awareness before finally adopting. Then what you get are people who have been convinced. Even in real life you can see,,, the ones who are most fanatic are those who are converted;)

Not so very sure we can correlate the lowering in userbase and volume to the bankroll of Litecoin,,, after all, I see the same happening even with my referral numbers during the period plus in BTC. I do agree the wager competition probably has to become a lot more interesting for people, although out of curiosity I wagered last week on almost 2 days of autorolls and saw I was in around 44th place. In the old days I remember I can go much higher, so maybe volume is not as low as we think?

Have to really dig through stats but could be a way to look at long term and current effects. It must surely not just be about the bankroll effects though.

People need to get over the hysteria of forked coins,,, BCH to be fair I give credit they actually still survive after 3 years but as you can see from the value it is really just a handful of people. Other than places that already accept Bitcoin, I have never in my life seen anyone ask for BCH payment or even seen a BCH wallet. Sorry but this is unnecessary stress on a limited ecosystem.

Bitcoin shows everyone else again time after time that the true value of crypto lies not in all the hype circles of altcoins of ICOs and STOs and IEOs and DeFI,,, but in actual coins with actual utility.

Of course, we will continue to find other uses and other things. You know people will keep on coming up with them. But you cannot go wrong with faith in the one true coin;)

It seemed so good the first few games, but yes, I picked many draws that did not at all turn out, and it was a night for favorites on Sunday mainly, which means anyone who did not pick them would not have done well.

Congratulations to our topper arallmuus!

Hi guys! I had no idea this thread was discussing about Multi Masters I am sure I looked inside it before, but never really understood (oops sorry),,, I should pay attention to the threads I guess;)

Thanks rdbase for messaging me, I looked through your profile and finally understood this is what you mean!

Anyway, yes, I am a new player for Sportsbet in terms of MultiMaster, and I support Tottenham Hotspurs. Do not mock me;)

I will follow the format of sharing my picks, is this correct?

Colombia - Uruguay - 2
Chile - Peru - 1
Brazil - Venezuela - 1
Santos - Internacional - 1
Sweden - Croatia - 2
Germany - Ukraine - 1
Portugal - France - 2
Switzerland - Spain - 2
Palmeiras - Fluminense - X
Flamengo - Atlético Goianiense - X
Turkey - Russia - 2
Netherlands - Bosnia & Herzegovina - X
Denmark - Iceland - 1
Italy - Poland - X
Belgium - England - 2

I never thought North Ireland would be laughing when they are equally poor in terms of football quality:P But yes, nice to see that and as I commented in another thread, nice to see teams who attack all the way to the end get what they deserve (except North Ireland who drew and then lost in the additional time).

Serbia losing probably is the biggest upset of the night even if because of penalties.

This is that same coin created by that guy whose first coin was a failure right? For me it seems pointless to try and analyze all these defi coins. Especially suspicious when the coin pumps so fast so soon when there really does not seem like there is a future for growth. Lots of opinions and they seem all equal to each other when you look at them. Utility is similar, so is the hype:)

Hmm,,, not my experience. I was requested to confirm the withdrawal manually by email is all that happened but it withdrew almost immediately after that.


I think so, but not for crypto ones. Stake have people actually employed by Stake, same as other support at crypto ones I have used. FortuneJack I think so too as my support email came direct from them and they knew the site unlike normal bookies who seem to not even know their own site.

Hard to say a coin has recovered when it is still only 2% of the ATH. I mean, ETH fell to below 8% of ATH, and others like Litecoin also did the same, and Dogecoin too;) but these to me are what tell us are good coins. They will drop maximum 90% and not for long, and stay long periods in between 10-20% but eventually, they push back.

Ronaldo will play again for Portugal do you think? Some of the best players playing will make it look interesting for Premier League I think. Usually those who play well, come back and play better for their teams (thinking like of my very own Harry Kane for example).

5000 odds for a team to win? I do not think anyone did that anymore after Leicester;)