My concern is how often are riggers caught really. Unless they make obvious mistakes, it is very difficult to tell if a player, for example, missed a shot intentionally. It is just not impossible that a player underperforms in a game just because he has a bad day and even if you are suspicious it is very difficult to prove. Soccer is even more difficult in that aspect. Are these blunders? They could be on-purpose.

Blundersssss

Agree, if I were Zidane and could choose, I would try to focus on the international competitions. Atletico de Madrid seems to be quite difficult to deal with this year and it is a team known for fighting hard for every point. International competitions are never easy but on a year like this, they help much more the finances of next year, possibly without the COVID restrictions or with a lesser version of them.

Most people I know use their cells, and that has been pretty much the best alternative during COVID. Now that there seems to be an ease on the restrictions, some of us would like to have some short of in-person gambling. 99% of my betting was social with work colleagues raffles or friends. Now I also added a bit of on-line to the repertoire. I just find it more fun when you compete with people you know even if on-line.

I think the Jackpots are the main feature to start playing the game. I is a lot about winning the big price and all that, but after a while it is more about finding some short of logic and interaction in the game, that is, luck is always there and may be on your side during that day, but having to learn how to use advances and extra perks makes the game more fun to play.

Nope, you actually buy the product with your time, effort and using you means of transport that have a cost. So yes, it is commodities trading, even if is not intraday trading.

This is important because the market for copper sets out a basis price that is likely to be lower than the costs mentioned combined, thus this alternative income idea is most likely not going to work.

Religion is rarely the true origin of war. Even without religion, those who want conflict would find arguments to make people hate each other. If you think of it, the problem is not religion, is the people who cannot live with others that think differently.

Si, he publicado lo mismo en el general - economia. Vi un articulo de alguien diciendo q bitcoin era el ponzi mas largo de la historia y suponiendo q lo fuera, aun no ha llegado a lo de Bernie.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5330581.msg56781646#msg56781646

As usual... any serious evidence of any of your assertions? Other than that, I insist that you start kissing COVID patients to test your theories.

Crap. now that I know that you are 78 proving you wrong is no longer fun.

Any evidence please? Is this like your mucus theory? Did you go to a COVID plant without a mask to test it already?

The passports are a great idea, it will prevent people like you travel untested with people who have opted to get a vaccine to avoid killing others.

That´s just commodities trading. Highly cyclical and, as you put it, highly impractical unless you have the cheapest real state.


I am going to post anyway, so if I get paid, even if it is quite a small bit, the better. For me is simply another way of getting some sats in autopilot. For what I can see, the newer campaigns do require merit and posting quality, nothing to do with the 2018 campaigns.

This depends a bit on the religion, but God in general will not show proof of existence other than miracles, which are dubious at best. A digital signature falls into that category.

Basically, either you believe or you don´t, but you are not to be given "scientific reasons" to believe in any deity. If you ask why you will normally get the standard answer: "We humans cannot understand God´s design / masterplan".

Just for the shake of the argument, you seem to be ok in math, but you would need to be also strong in Philosophy and Semiotics to understand why a document written in words cannot express unequivocally the will of a God or group of deities. In few words, language is subject to interpretation. Thus, signing off a document would not provide a single source of guidance or truth. Also, which language would God/ Gods choose?

If you would rather be "practical", you can observe around you and how the rules of what you can perceive are built. If you believe, that would be God´s signature.

[/quote]

Perks are needed to ccompensate man-made inequality, within reason. Trans people are as sick as everyone. Do you think you do not have any mental issue? Then, that is your first mental issue. You have your views, that is fine, just do not try to impose those views on others. Is the same  for those who think that everyone is in some way gay or that gender identity should define your life.

The bottom problem is the same with football, religion, politics,... This is about people who can learn to live with others that are different and those who can´t. And this also goes for Lesbians who hate man, gays who hate women, Muslims that hate Christians, Christians that hate everything that is not them and such a long etc...

Your first mistake is to label yourself to prove a point, which is the only reason I can think for being "super straight". Why don´t you try with "Straight Maximalist", it sounds even better.

80 years old, kidney failure, the judge did not allow him to go home to die there.

Madoff run what is considered one of the longer lasting Ponzi schemes. It lasted decades and it took with it the saving of many notable citizens, particularly those of the Jew community with whom he had close links. For example the Nobel price laureate Elie Wiesel, whose charity managed to lose in excess of 15M. And all these institutions...




 It is amazing how long a Ponzi may last.

Starting price of nearly 400USD well above the expectations, values Coinbase above 100B. This is nearly double the indicative price of 250 setout just a week ago. It is obviously not a coincidence that bitcoin has an ATH just a day ago is it?

The listing took place a bit later than expected and at a much higher price. Ticker COIN.

Edited: 100B not 100M. At close it was around 85B.

Y no te pierdas el resto de las quotes... GME es Gamestop q sonará a cualquiera q haya seguido las noticias de bolsa recientemente pq un grupo de inversores sociales se cargo un hedge fund entero con el chiste. La gracia es completa porque sube +1T y baja -2T tras el ticker de la Fox.

Y ese también va de coña pq es la cadena de los Simpson ...no tiene desperdicio





Por esa recompensa yo te capturo al tio, le hago confesar que practica el sexo con plantas carnivoras y que de pequeño robo tres manzanas de una tienda. Vamos que no se de cuando es el guión pero no parece que lo hayan actualizado .... hoy a 52k euros cada bitcoin.... 52.000.000 milloncejos de recompensa.

Sound like good news for Felix. There is something to be said for someone able to keep Nadal playing at such a high level for such a long time. I wish I could buy stocks of players because I feel that it is not only about knowing about tennis and PE training, it is a lot about making sure the athlete is able to compete in the long term with minimum injuries. Nadal has been having issues with injuries yes, but not as much as it could be expected from such a level of competition.

You do not need to be a gamble to post in this section, there are many topics that do not require you to gamble, however it would not feel honest to me if I did not at least do some form of gambling. In my case I like Poker, which I do not exactly consider gambling but rather a game of wits. Of course the house takes a cut, they are organising and yes, luck plays a part on it, but overall is quite a hard and perhaps mathematical challenge. Sometimes I also indulge in football betting.

I would say that I am not a spammer, as I intend to contribute in some way to every discussion I take part it.

There are many investments that are also a zero sum game - such as binary options in which for one party to win, the other has to loose necessarily, so that is not a good criteria to discriminate. Investing is not always a wining strategy - there is plenty of money and value to be lost and it is indeed lost everyday since there are companies that go to zero all over. In fact, most do go to zero in the first few years.

Lastly, the organisers of the market usually have built-in advantages, although I admit that small investors do have other advantages that they can use, such as being able to invest in illiquid and small assets.

This is about how do you make sure that you are gambling in full control. There are many people who are easily brought into gambling beyond fun and that is a problem for them and also for the gambling industry, because it is for them that there are limitations in many countries.

Do you actually...
- Have a weekly budget to play and do not ever go over it?
- Not ever get in debt for gambling?
- Have an allocated time for gambling and never exceed it?
- Gamble only socially with friends of relatives?
- Have someone helping you control your gambling?

It is mostly about your conception of life and what triggers your adrenaline and your dopamine. It is said that the worst thing that can happen to a gambling addict is actually winning in the first bets because some people just get a strong push from wins and do not feel much pain when loosing, thus they are easily trapped into playing beyond their initial intentions.

You have to be able to recognise that in yourself. In my case, I know that there are certain videogames to which I can easily play more time than I should to have a life balance so I just either avoid these or I tell someone to tell me to stop after, for example, and hour of play. You may be able to try that with gambling.