Du wirst ne Signatur erzeugen müssen, damit du hier aufgenommen wirst. Hab ich versucht, aber iwie klappt es nicht. Habe es genau so gemacht wie oben beschrieben ^^ Irgendwo muss ich einen Fehler gemacht haben, finde ihn aber nicht. Was benutzt Du den für die Adresse? Guck sonst mal hier -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990345.0 |
|
|
|
Is there a way do this?
AFAIK not via the GUI. You can create and sign a raw TX via the console though. |
|
|
|
Du wirst ne Signatur erzeugen müssen, damit du hier aufgenommen wirst. |
|
|
|
|
I think its a good idea for high value deals. Would this be possible over different wallet implementations, e.g. armory & electrum?
|
|
|
|
Just recieved payment (not confirmed yet), thanks. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is shorena from bitcointalk.org and today is 2015.12.30
Please change my payment address to 19Vwjav1zwmuNtHW71GGaRwuBxHSyytLb8 for january, thanks.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1A1cukyPLcNkopsLLeLen8YTYTa1FC6udn
H46M0MAZ9psXvVQo9845o5thuDGbaIKoizg9qVljIJ1oYL0bABNVZbpNU32T5UG4kdoIP0JwmojtpmIxlfAjYP4=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
|
|
|
I have a PC which I used about 10 hours a day. Is it worth setting up a full node on this PC? It is running for 10 hours a day only.
Yes, esp. if you can allow connections from the outside. Every node is helping the network, even if its only running a short time. |
|
|
|
Yes - as mentioned we will make the payment. We just have to make sure with yahoo62278 how it has to be done. Will keep you posted later today.
I think its the right thing to do here, thanks for that. Will the campaign continue despite the loss? |
|
|
|
campaign who managing by yahoo seems all the campaign use master-p as escrow, how about the continues of the campaign ? still running?
BitcoinVideoCasino paid and closed as a consequence (will post an updated pastebin in a second) -snip-
This has shut the campaign from this post. Please all remove your signatures and find a nice paying campaign.
-snip-
Coinbet24 has agreed to pay the participants: To all there are a part of the Coinbet24 signature Campaign.
I see that there is a problem with the escrow for this signature campaign (Master-P).
Just to let you know the situation:
We where contacted with a offer from the campaign manager (yahoo62278), and made a deal for a two week campaign, and all where paid up front! It is of course a disapointing first time experience with a campaign on BTCtalk, but we also know that all you that have signed up for this campaign is with out fault in this.
We will pay every one of you, I will just discuss with yahoo62278 how we do it - because we dont want to pay to an escrow again and risk that the right people never have there payment!
Ore-mining (not listed here, because likely ponzi) seems the only correction: orbit as well service that did not pay their participants or promisse a payment ASAP. Edit: updated OP here -> http://pastebin.com/YFG1Asszits based on the last pastebin by Lutpin which added red asterix to all participants that used master-P as escrow. |
|
|
|
I agree with errorcoin22 (if I understood you correctly here and in other threads) that the participants should be paid by the person running the service that is advertised for. I did a quick check and it seems ore mining is the only correction: orbit has not issued a statement either service that did not offer a payment yet. All other campaigns are either closed and paid in full or promoissed payment ASAP. I herby encourage the participants to offer a scam accusation against sector[1] running ore-mining[2] if payment is not handled within a time period you consider reasonable. Maybe coordinate this here, so only a single accusation is made where all can pitch in. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=371579[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=759702.0 |
|
|
|
|
With only 2 GB of RAM, definitly a Linux over Windows Server R whatever. Have good experience with Ubuntu for running a node.
The GPU seems unneeded for a server if you can add more RAM/CPU instead.
|
|
|
|
It is working fine now. Thank you for your support and suggestions.
I have updated its priority on taskmgr.exe to high.
There is no need to do that. It will - if anything - only make other things slower. Yes Shorena, I changed it back a few minutes after I did it. My fan got too warm. Also, it slowed down the display of my computer and since then, Norton Internet Security has flagged up an error saying it is using high sis usage. However, I assume this is normal! High CPU usage durring sync is normal. If your system overheats because of that you might want to look into that though. If its an older system it might be just dust clogging the air circulation. It is fine. I would expect this from a computer that is around 6 years old. It has been underclocked for its entire use, so that keeps its CPU very well. When new, it was at 2.3GHz dual core - 4.6GHz! As soon as I changed the priority it stopped overheatng. I would also expect for it to go at least 50 megabytes per hour. I think that tht is a reasonable assumption for it. Considering that the blockchain (blocks folder only) currently uses 57.4GB I hope you can do more than 50 MB per hour or it would take you > 40 days to fully sync. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Why not just store all my Bitcoins on blockchain.info? I don't want anyone else to have access to my private keys.
I'll have to poke around with this later and see what we can do...
Vanity addresses can be created without anyone else knowing your private key while at the same time allowing someone else to do the majority of the work. Its called split key vanity gen. Let me know what prefix you want for the address and I can make you an offer. *mind blown* How does that work exactly? The prefix I'd want is Chris. Edit: Wow. I've been going about this all wrong. I could simply make a vanity address on vanitygen on Windows then crack open bitaddress on Ubuntu Live USB. Right?! Oh Shorena... What would I do without you? Edit2: OK so I made my vanity address... But I'm a little confused as to what to do with it on bitaddress.org. Do I punch in The vanity address at all? Or the private key for the vanity address + the private key calculated on bitaddress.org? Neither seem to give me a new vanity address. P.s. The random smelly German oil is on it's way!  I hope it smells good. 1Chris is relativly easy. I have a quick how to in my thread -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1257817.0If you want, I can do the repfix for a donation. |
|
|
|
You have a PM. Due to the nature of the deal Id like to keep this private unless necessary. I probably should have messaged you first instead of only leaving a rating. Sorry. If what you say is true we can surely solve this quickly.
The issue could be resolved via PM. Both parties agreed that the rating is no longer needed. |
|
|
|
Quadtranet, HE.net, AboveNET, Equinox, XO are all major providers and chances are an host you used in the pass or now will be under one of these providers.
We have cage, colo, and racks between locations and providers for private networking use like point to point, doesn't change the fact that we a good host and we own all our servers as you can see in thread was many good feedback's.
Promo is just that and very clear in thread, $1 vps to try then back to reg price. If you like the services stay if you don't within that month welcome to leave. no hard feelings.
Many host out there, don't have to use nocroom. Promo give you an chance to try NocRoom without breaking your wallet.
To use an work "SCAM" when clearly give you the promo details on thread with good feedback sounds to me someone is bored or been kicked for abuse services and looking a way to give nocroom an bad name.
This will be my 1st and last reply on this thread
- enjoy
Thanks, probably just what I needed to hear after I overreacted because you removed my post. Dug a little deeper, rating is changed to neutral to explain why I previously rated you negativ. |
|
|
|
It is working fine now. Thank you for your support and suggestions.
I have updated its priority on taskmgr.exe to high.
There is no need to do that. It will - if anything - only make other things slower. Yes Shorena, I changed it back a few minutes after I did it. My fan got too warm. Also, it slowed down the display of my computer and since then, Norton Internet Security has flagged up an error saying it is using high sis usage. However, I assume this is normal! High CPU usage durring sync is normal. If your system overheats because of that you might want to look into that though. If its an older system it might be just dust clogging the air circulation. |
|
|
|
Sorry I worded that all wrong.
What I am trying to do is extract the private key from an encrypted wallet.dat file. Its turning out to be a lot more complicated then I thought. Any tips?
Open in multibit classic and use the "export private keys" option. If you dont set up a password you will end up with a cleartext file that has the prviate keys. I dont think it gets any easier. |
|
|
|
So did they fix the site? It wasnt working for ages. |
|
|
|
Plus, I worked with Quadranet for a while, and I know it is their datacenter in DALLAS, NOT Miami...
They do have a Datacenter in Miami, nocroom is most likely reselling or colocated with quadranet. http://www.quadranet.com/company/miami/Just be aware of this user. He is selling VPS services for $1 for the first month, which is highly suspicious A low first month is also standard practice as an introductory price then it rises for subsequent months How cool is deleting questions in this direction in your book? A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations. Thats a QuadraNet Dallas IP, whats your affiliation with them? Edit: made a copy of their thread, just in case: https://archive.is/GmHGYEdi2: sorry i like to stay on topic
is one of many downstream provider, our cage is next to them on 5th floor Miami, and another cage on the 4th floor in colohouse we rent power and space which is a standard. I rather do business from companies like quadtranet as they have an point to point between locations private keeping our ovrhead low to give good pricing for our services
|
|
|
|
Just to clearify we are not talking about encryption here as the title suggest, but about compression or information encoding. actually what OP said is posible but not efficient ...
in order to compress sequences of raw data you may use a dictionary like table and address to key numbers (hashes)
parts of those sequences , then is posible to present a little file with reference to all data ...
Yes, but this limits you to the number of entires in your table. It does not allow you to transfer arbitrary data. You can say lookup entry x, but if there is no existing entry for what you want to transfer you cant use the scheme. but then a new problem arises , tables for such references will be bigger than the original file !!!  if sender and receiver already have the dictionary then they are able to transfer those compressed files They dont actually transfer the compressed files, they just transfer a pointer. You cant call "look up shanon entropy on wikipedia" a compression of the actual wikipedia article[1]. Its just a reference that allows you to access the same data I accessed, because you understand the reference "wikipedia" as a specific homepage, you assume the language english and you understand how to search for specific information on that homepage. programs available in the market doing that kind of 'magik' to compress with good ratios already.
some sequences are frequent in text,images and such , those programs have a well-tuned dictionary
in order to compress more those programs will need even TB of help dictionary files ROFL
Constructions of huffmann trees are common yes. They are limited though. As I said above if you want to be able to transfer arbitraty data and not pointers you need to be able to encode everything. Encoding everything is not possible with a limited message length. Error correction is also a thing on the fundamental level of data transportation, which adds more data. happy holidays to all and best wishes for 2016 as well ** but title is misleading - encryption actually making more data and save nothing but provides safety. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(information_theory) |
|
|
|
It is working fine now. Thank you for your support and suggestions.
I have updated its priority on taskmgr.exe to high.
There is no need to do that. It will - if anything - only make other things slower. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
