Hardened adrresses still have an extended public key it's just that it's harder (could be impossible) to find a private key given another private key of the wallet and the extended public key.

I think the derivation path is for electrums internal compatibility and probably doesn't mean much but I could be wrong.

I got some funds on an exchange I can convert to ltc if you want - I've been thinking of transferring the funds elsewhere anyway so it might sage me the fees...

It's one of those metrics carried over from shares where I think it's helpful for determining things like pe ratios for stocks..  (especially for working out if something is priced too high).

And a lot of the time people just like to produce as many figures as they can to try to work out how a certain asset could look. Much like big data analysers storing more data then they might ever need to process because the storage space was empty anyway (or something).

Yes because they're using let's encrypt to generate the certificate so they don't have to kyc with anyone.

But it also means the attacker can do the same and just push connections through to them via a non ssl protocol (http).

You're  just want to see me give up on bitcoin . When that happens I'll either sell for ethereum or litecoin or do a 50/50 split.

Potentially you could argue if the sec rules to back usdc, usdt or make a new coin similar then that'd count but I think that's a while away - but a bill can be passed within months.

There will only be less than 21 million bitcoins in existence, why try to predict the number?

I'd reckon personally at least 10 million bitcoin should still have keys available,.. Assuming you're excluding all the lost but still potentially findable keys.

The real figure will almost be impossible to quantify.

Edit: a lot of investors probably take the 21 million as straight facts and don't bother looking into lost coins so it ought also be reasonable to use that as the cap in some cases.

Is it the banner with the search box in it? Because I have that one and I can't work out what's different on the other Web pages at the top? They all seem to just have that one banner.

Edit: I am on mobile though.

I suspect a housing crash globally could occur in 2021 I. Don't imagine it happening before now.

The 2019 call on oil price dropping coupe be impressive tjough. Everyone suspected a stocks and housing crash around this time though (since 2018 its felt like a crash was coming of some sort).

The euro is strong and its economy weakened and I think the UK economy was strong in 2019 (you may have meant 2020 though). At which I think it's bouncing back nicely now (but not sure - the drop came from the nonmain industries as manufacturing still seems quite strong).

I thought the tradeoff with capitalism is that they never do...? Depending in who you're referring to that is.

Yeah it's just consolidating and has been for about 36 hours now afaik.

Most speculators are probably waiting for us to drop out of oversold terratory on the rsi and stoch rsi before they have the confidence to invest. Hopefully this'll be a good excuse to test the 10500 support again and get a rejection to the upside but it wouldn't be unhealthy to just make another leg up to 13-14k...

Troll drops may also be likely if someone trys to offload here if its made news somewhere and they've just been holding and forgetting about it.

Well all the money has to go somewhere and people should've been treating crypto as speculative.

I think I got a notification of a 38% gdp drop for the US which is really huge - I think their economy relies a lot on the people spending a lot more than they do in other countries (such as places in Europe) - because they have to work more.

With rbf enabled the network is designed to essentially ignore your last transaction and favour the one with the higher fee (default mempool consensus anyway). The number of inputs and outputs don't have to be the same.

I've done it in the past when making a mistake transferring funds somewhere I didn't want them to end up and used a version of electrum to sign a new transaction while offline (that didn't know of the other transaction) and broadcast it without a problem.

It's probably invalid, can you see what address received the funds that were spent again.

The funding address of your transaction doesn't hold any funds. If the others are confirmed then the funds are lost.

Contact who sent you them.

You also get the label and it's a way to support the forum - if you want to.

Once you're a member it gives no perks and if you don't need it for anything instantly then it may not be worthwhile... Since you already have merits.

I'd try with viabtc, it used to be on the hour you had to submit to get a transaction accepted.

Unless you can pay a higher fee as a double spend or own an output of the transaction.

Yeah it's not within the scope for a normal user, might have been better to say site settings are normally findable from where you can hit the padlock and hit settings or options to delete data.

If you sweep using electrum with the addresses individually then you'll be sending funds individually. If you just import the private keys to a new wallet, you'll have to get a receive address and click each you're trying to spend in turn, right click and press spend from for each... A new return address should be generated each time you send a new transaction but memorising the last 3 characters for example or even the last one shouldn't hurt too much.

What wallets are you looking at using? They'll normally have an inbuilt fee estimation engine in them.

You can't have a few too low to never get confirmed technically but most places drop a transaction after two weeks so you'd have to remake the transaction. Until a transaction is confirmed those funds are still technically in your wallet (but harder to return back to yourself until the 2 weeks are up).

No I was talking about the console you get by hitting f12 in most browsers, isn't that still available in tor.

I'm not sure on running a js app from a your own machine either in tor - I thought that was allowed as there are no outward connections.

What did they say, did they just not reply?

They're the only people that can help you if you don't already have a copy...

For simplicity purposes, I'm going to say that money is considered anything that is legal tender by countries...

Money includes fiat cash (issued by the government) but it also includes items such as gold and silver (some gold collections like the britannias are accepted by the UK government as legal tender for example). There's the potential argument that gold and silver are money as most central banks will readily convert it to cash in its face value (or you'll find someone who can fairly easily). But gold is considered to not be splittable which is very much the case (if 0you heat gold up it can lose some purity - you're also paying a high transaction fee).

Currencies on the other than are things that it's possible to break up into smaller pieces easily - like fiat money and Cryptocurrencies.

Fiat coins often have inflation but most things outside of the fiat world are deflationary by nature in the outer money circle.