i sell my GTX970, and i buy GTX980 . it is a great card .
buy pascal or you'll regret it. when profit goes down, pascal can still mine and maxwell will shutdown. yeah lol, buying a 980 now it's not a thing anyone should do, pascal is much better in everything how much with just 2000 core? i see you reached a crazy core, not so common with all kind of 1070
The point is that the sp-mod is stable on higher clocks than the opensource miner. Rednow just confirmed it with 322MHASH on the gtx 1070. (-i 27) The highest he got with the opensource miner was 290MHASH. (+11%) stability with just one card not always means with 6-gpu rig. that's why it would be nice to see the hashrate with default clock or even with little OC. i concur, i need to see a 6 x 1070 rig in action with your mod sp, to decide if it is worth it to get the miner |
|
|
|
gtx1070 319mhs lbry
Damn slow on my poor gtx750.
with what version this hash? with the sp version? Take a closer look to console window name on the screenshot. )) I've got 322mhs with -i 27 intensity later )) it does not work on win 10, above -i 25 it say illegal memory access This is not the opensource miner. so your is working with win 10? you said early that it does not work it does not work on win 10, above -i 25 it say illegal memory access
The opensource miner cannot go above -i 25. The sp-mod #3 can go to -i 29 stable on the gtx 1070 I think I need one more Palit 1070 )) how much with just 2000 core? i see you reached a crazy core, not so common with all kind of 1070 |
|
|
|
with what version this hash? with the sp version? Take a closer look to console window name on the screenshot. )) I've got 322mhs with -i 27 intensity later )) it does not work on win 10, above -i 25 it say illegal memory access |
|
|
|
So we talk about 10% more than with the opensource miner. Not to mention you have to mine for SP_ for some time
I don't know in which pool you mine but is the reward covering it?
not really 283 + 10% would put this at 311, instead of 300 so only 6& increase, minus 2% fee, = 4% increase on pascal with what version this hash? with the sp version? |
|
|
|
|
i also had a bad run on yiimp(which is still ongoing) only 125 coin with 1.8GH instead of 150-160, but this is true to any pool, so maybe just bad luck...
|
|
|
|
Hey look you regurgitated the part about intensity I posted a couple days ago... Good job bro and you have no idea what intensity actually does. Higher intensity does not mean you'll have better hashrate. Higher intensity can actually produce worse hashrate and use more power.
It's not a magic value too, where you increase intesnity by 5 and it's magically that much better. Your lack of understanding of... well... anything is astounding and you try to use it as 'proof' something is working wrong. Reminds me of the guy complaining that Wolf0 broke his rigs because he purchased a miner that utilized his GPUs better and produced more heat while drawing more wattage... then pretended like his cards would always use the same wattage.
If you don't know what you're talking about, don't act like you do.
You can't do math. What Yiimp lists as actual is what it paid for actual MH/BTC in the last day.
this guy is funny, keep posting retarded sentence, like regurgitating, no what i mean about intensity is that he changed how intensity work, by assigning it other value, but as usual you didn't understood shit, and i was hoping for a code rewrite instead.... and yes you can do the math about any coin, only because you don't know how to do it, it does not mean that it can not be done, please stay away with your ignorance is infecting me |
|
|
|
|
same i hope it's not an hack attempt
|
|
|
|
|
i like the pig tail pcie cable(those that come with 2x 2+6 pin), so with one you can connect two gpu
and the 1300 evga only has two of that, then you need to use two 2+6 pin cable, so 4 in total instead of 3, i like to have less cables as a possible for a clean build
|
|
|
|
all pool payments for lbry is completely fucked, based on a simple math should be way higher, block reward is at 350 now, the diff mean shit basically
what do you mean? yimp has been giving me around 45-50LBC/day for the last several days, or ~90LBC/GH. at 0.00029BTC/ea thats ~0.0261BTC/GH/DAY. yiimp claims 0.0236BTC/GH/DAy in its stats, which is quite close and probably more accurate for the (24hr?) stats period if it is incorrect, its within a reasonable (15%) margin. What do you think it should be (show the math)? it's pretty simply to calculate, the math is easy and it has worked well for any other coin for me, don't know why for those coin that change the BR it does not work what is your hash? 90LBC/GH is correct is what my math tell me, but i'm not getting that at the moment, but just 125 lbry with 1.8GH |
|
|
|
|
all pool payments for lbry is completely fucked, based on a simple math should be way higher, block reward is at 350 now, the diff mean shit basically
|
|
|
|
what setting you use for that hash? because it say 40 is not a multiple of 15 or something, i need to set the correct intensity
read readme.txt and what miner says. I used 32x30 or something like that. something wrong because i get only 80h with that, what drivers are you using? |
|
|
|
|
what setting you use for that hash? because it say 40 is not a multiple of 15 or something, i need to set the correct intensity
|
|
|
|
Yeah it is possible with ccminer by tsiv. I get 450H/s with 1070..
I think ccminer needs updating to support 10 series cards because 450H/s is low for 1070
450 with what setting? i tried 15x60 and only get 360h/s |
|
|
|
what i mean is, that he is not redoing the code, but just tweaking intensity, for paying fee plus donation i was expecting a code redo to boost pascal
it does not amtter how many you have, you just need one to test, and my g1 gaming 1070 can easily do 276, i can post a screen if you want
so saying that 265 is the base value is plain wrong
..
and i'm not even using your core
Yeah, statistics doesen't matter. I've got 30 of them and you know more than any other, with just one model. Keep dreaming, amph  i don't care if you have 30 or 100, that's not the point, the point is that i can do 283 with the right intensity, so saying that the right value from which you add 15% is 265, is stupid and 283 + 15% is basically 300 like i've said, which is exactly what sp is getting , just look above... |
|
|
|
Sp-mod LBRY #3 on a gtx 1070 with -i 29 Messured with a meter to 147Watt in the wall. (inno3d gtx 1070) default 150w tdp  sp are you simply modifying how the intensity work? on the epsylon version you can go as a high as 25 which give you 283, with your 29 so that is your little secret? |
|
|
|
|
well no reason to upgrade if there is no hash improvement of bug fix, i'll wait for the next release or maybe if epsylon want to fix it
|
|
|
|
Amph change driver with 372.70 they are better .
they fix lyura2v2 problem about cpu does not validate? |
|
|
|
Building this on windows is not enough. I have buildt it already. It produce correct hash for 20seconds and then it start to produce incorrect hashes. (cuda 6.5)
The speed is pretty good. 5MHASH on the 750ti, vs 4.3 with the djm34 version.
but still bad on a 1070, it seems that pascal really need a new code rewrite after all |
|
|
|
|
this is the second most profitable now, with the current nethash, so i see it as a nice backup, also the consumption at least is lower than other since the 1070 is not optimized
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
