If you obey any act of a commanding officer, require him to put it in detailed writing. This is so that when he is tried as a man, you won't have the responsibility of proving that he ordered you. You will have it in writing, signed by him. This way he won't be able to use you as his defense at trial. You will be able to show that he gave you the order, and you were simply carrying out your orders as an agent of your commanding officer. Most of the blame will be transferred to him this way.  |
|
|
|
Science can never prove the existence of something that never existed. If the thing some people consider god would just come forward there would be no confusion. Until then, stop believing in fairytales.
Simply put, we are all god, good=god.
 If Jesus made Himself visible to the world in such a way that everybody would really know that it was absolutely, indeed Him, then nobody would believe. They wouldn't believe because firsthand knowledge would take the place of faith. This is why it is so extremely important that people believe in Him now. Faith saves. Knowing doesn't. When He comes, we will know. There will be no more room for faith. Those who have been locked in to Him because they had faith before He came, will remain in Him. Those that didn't have faith, or had too little of it, will have no more opportunity to get faith, because faith will be out of the picture. Believe now, while you have the chance. Love logic. That's why you fuck her. After all, you don't fuck the things that you don't love, even if it is only a love for fucking them. |
|
|
|
Science can never prove the existence of something that never existed. If the thing some people consider god would just come forward there would be no confusion. Until then, stop believing in fairytales.
Simply put, we are all god, good=god.
We are all God? Prove it about yourself by keeping yourself alive for 200 years or more. Stay alive after jumping into a pool of molten lava in an active volcano. Prove it by staying alive and fully able to see after shooting yourself in both eyes with a .357 Magnum. Prove it by flying across the sky like superman. Prove it by healing the sick people that you meet, like Jesus did. At least prove it to yourself. |
|
|
|
Then you come along and say that your info IS about the Christ of the Bible, and that the Bible doesn't have much if any truth about the Christ. So, you attempt to nullify the Bible but keep the Christ, when all along there wouldn't have been any Christ if the Bible hadn't spoken about Him in the first place. People can become very retarded. But you are pushing the limit. I am totally justified in discussing any and all aspects of God in this thread and of making an educated comparison that relates to my faith; in PM I mentioned to you some chapter(s) in Journals relating my point of view on this very topic of "Biblical Christianity" and now I have bolded an astounding statement of yours; i am totally confused. Christ was a being and is still a being!, not a story; Christ energy is not differing from GOD'S ENERGY. He IS ONE WITH GOD and GOD DWELLS WITHIN THE TEMPLE THAT IS YOU! I do not understand why you did not address what was outlined in those chapters; please go ahead and PM me if you prefer. How do you know that you are totally justified in anything? Simply because you can do it doesn't mean that you are justified in doing it. No wonder you are totally astounded. You still can't seem to understand that the Bible is the place that talks about the Christ, and explains Him clearly. Since you are unwilling to come out from your confusion, remain confused. What does the fact that Christ is partially energy have to do with anything? All material is energy, acting and reacting upon itself in complex ways so that we have this stuff that looks like material, but is really interacting energy. Simply because God dwells within a person doesn't mean that the person is God. It may mean that he has some of the attributes of God. But he is simply the temple that God dwells within. Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation? |
|
|
|
Science and God are different .
And i believe in both
Absolutely true. Both exist and both are different, just like a potter is different from the clay that he is molding into a vase. |
|
|
|
I was out at the lake the other day, on a picnic with my girl. There was a boat out on the lake. For some reason the boat started sinking. Soon it was under water. The guy in the boat started hollering, "I don't know how to swim. I don't know how to swim... " I left my girl and the picnic, and took off at a dead run towards the lake, shedding shoes and clothes every which way as I ran. I splashed into the water, and swam out to the drowning man. I grabbed his hand, and pulled him up from under the water. I said, "Grab hold of me and I will swim us to shore." The joker said, "Let me go. I was simply making a statement about not being able to swim. I didn't really want any help." Stop misunderstanding those Islamic Fundamentalists. All they are trying to do is save you even if you have to die in the process! |
|
|
|
Hypothetically, the Phoenix Journals could be inauthentic, but this possibility is eliminated upon reading them. Since you are basically saying the same thing about the Bible and also declaring your book to be literal, I think my rational faith will have more appeal than an ancient book; you are the only one still arguing against the material that I present Humbly and in TRUTH. In fact, Phoenix Journals have the best explanation of all Biblical material, but how would you know if you condemn without knowledge? The scribe Dharma and messengers Hatonn/Aton (who travels with Christ 'irrefutably') and crew scribed the message for our time; it is about being responsible enough to learn the truth about man and God. Since the Journals are more mysterious, it is well worth your "time"; please be aware that all that I am is a point of view. Here is a small part of what Phoenix Journals say about "other speakers". Search Phoenix Journals for "other speakers" --in quotes--here: http://www.phoenixsourcedistributors.com/html/site_search.htmlDude, you could just meditate or read some of the poems of Tagore and come to the truth about God; if I choose to read Journals, who are you to say it is not authentic for me¿¿¿ You do not bother to read much of anything or even to cite an example where these writings are not authentic The fact that you can read, and the fact that you may be reading something if you are, isn't the thing that determines that what you are reading is authentic. Obviously, the fact that you can read is authentic, and the fact that you are reading, if you are, is authentic, and even the fact that somebody put together the materials that you are reading, and the fact that you may actually be able to hold the materials, themselves, in your hands may be authentic. That's not the thing that isn't authentic. What is or may be non-authentic are some of the things that someone (you) might say about the materials that you are reading. If you would start with some explanation of who or what your God is, and then if you explain that your God is described by some writings from India or something, that's okay. It is even authentic. But here is your problem. You take the Christ, Who is explained by the Bible, and Who someone would have to dream up on his own if he didn't have a copy of the Bible, and then you apply to the Christ all kinds of stuff that the Bible says is absolutely NOT what the Christ is about, and then you go around claiming that you have found the truth about the Christ. Meanwhile, a bunch of people who don't know that you are not talking about the Christ of the Bible, start thinking that, hey, maybe I missed something in the Bible. Later, they find out that their discussion with you is about a totally different God, and they wonder why they ever even listened to anything you had to say in the first place. But of course, they know the answer. It is because they believe in the Christ of the Bible. The fact that you are not straight forward with the fact that you are not talking about the Christ of the Bible, makes almost everything you say to be NOT authentic. Then you come along and say that your info IS about the Christ of the Bible, and that the Bible doesn't have much if any truth about the Christ. So, you attempt to nullify the Bible but keep the Christ, when all along there wouldn't have been any Christ if the Bible hadn't spoken about Him in the first place. People can become very retarded. But you are pushing the limit. |
|
|
|
The biggest secret doctrine is one that is right out in the open, one that certain people in and behind the government have hidden by focusing our attention elsewhere. This secret doctrine could be called the secret of the common law. Here's what it says basically. If government ever takes you to court for anything, and you stand as a man or woman not represented but rather present, if your accuser doesn't get on the stand under oath or affirmation so that you can question him/her/it about the harm or damage of property you supposedly did to him/her/it, you win. Case dismissed. But you have to press your rights in the proper way. What will happen in your case? If your accuser is stylized on the complaint as something like THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or THE STATE OF XXXXXX, they can't get on the stand so that you can question them. They are paperwork. They can't swear or affirm. They don't have a voice-box or a brain so that you can question them and get answers back. And, it is standard law that the plaintiff must appear - appear means take the stand under oath or affirmation. http://voidjudgments.com/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-DIf you are accused of something by one of them, do the above if you run out of options. Watch them try to twist out of it. Then you will know that it is truth. |
|
|
|
Part of the reason the Feds are doing this is, they are considering that freedom people of a freedom State are or might be against the drone wars in the Middle East because of freedom ideologies. See this post to understand the real reasons behind the drone wars and our activities in the ME. Read slowly, the bottom of this post. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=967060.msg10630962#msg10630962 |
|
|
|
I think drones will become a big problem in the future. The terrorists could plan t a bomb on them ,and control and manipulate it remotely, to detonate almost anywhere sitting far away.
The "terrorists" have already been doing it for years.   I agree. But the thinking behind the terrorism is something like this. The big bankers and oil people who run the government - the real terrorists - are trying to keep the U.S. dollar strong so that they can continue to control oil and the world through it. Back in the mid '90s, they did to Kuwait, the same things that they are doing to Iraq, now. They took the Kuwaiti dinar, devalued it, then conquered Kuwait, and then revalued the Kuwaiti dinar to be near that of the U.S. dollar. They did this to prop the U.S. up with the oil of Kuwait. This same basic thing is happening in Iraq right now. Iraq is close to becoming the "ally" that the bankers and oil people want. Afghanistan is a problem, but it, too, may finally be showing signs of succumbing. At the time that we started the war with Iraq, the Iraqi dinar was valued at about 3.5 dinars to the dollar. Now it is valued at about 1165 dinars to the dollar. When we finally take over Iraq, and absorb them into our "oil society" so to speak, the Iraqi dinar will be re-valued to approximately equal to the dollar. What does this have to do with the drones? The drones are being used to get rid of the dissidents, the anti-American Al-Qaeda, and others, the ones who are keeping us from the way we own the oil. The innocent people killed in the drone wars, are simply, incidental casualties of war, although their deaths may actually prop up our gains in our war for Middle East oil more than is understood. The point? Twofold. It's all about oil and petro-dollars. If we win Iraq before the dollar crashes, the Iraqi dinar will revalue to near the price of the dollar, and those people who bought 1,000,000 Iraqi dinars for $1,000 USD, will be millionaires or close. |
|
|
|
Sunni Islam’s Top Cleric Blames Israel And America For Islamic Terrorism Sweeping Middle East…The leading “moderate” authority in Sunni Islam has blamed Zionism and the “new colonialism” for the collapse of the Middle East, further undermining western efforts to secure the region’s stability. Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayeb, the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar University, the premier source of religious authority in Islam, was speaking at a counter-terrorism conference in Saudi Arabia, as part of efforts to encourage the Muslim world to join forces against terrorism. However, he seemed to blame Israel and by implication the United States for the chaos in the Arab world. “We face major international plots targeting Arabs and Muslims,” he said. The plots wanted to break up society “in a way that agrees with the dreams of the new world colonialism that is allied with world Zionism, hand in hand and shoulder to shoulder. “We must not forget that the only method used by new colonialism now, is the same that was used by colonialism in the past century, and its deadly slogan is ‘divide and conquer’.” http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/saudiarabia/11430829/Moderate-Sunni-Islam-leader-blames-Zionism-and-new-colonialism-for-Middle-East-collapse.html------------------------- Yea sunnis are the real muslims true ! But wanted to clear something here no one hates anyone without any reason ? Or do ? Islam loves everyone islam is the most polite religion . Where everyone gets equal rights . Quran and Hadith are Islam base. Quran tells Muslims to do much violence. Hadith tells Muslims to do some violence. Sunni Muslims hate violence. Why are Sunni Muslims still Muslims? Sunni people should become something else, some religion that tells them to be peaceful. Christian Bible tells all people to be peaceful. Maybe Sunni Muslims should become Sunni Christians. Islam is the religion of peace and its the only religion will save you but not all muslim have the chance to go to heaven. (it depends on your doing on earth) Your doings on earth only decide the position you will hold in Heaven. The only way to get to Heaven is to do the work of God. This work is to believe on the one He sent, that is Jesus, for the forgiveness of sins. Your good works need to equal perfection to be enough for God to let you into Heaven. Since nobody except Jesus is perfect, nobody will get into Heaven, except Jesus Who is already there, and those He accepts into Heaven because they believe in Him. |
|
|
|
This is deception. If it is done, it is the second country that they will have formed. The first was done by the 14th Amendment, which made the first U.S. citizens. Cince most people accept that they are citizens of the U.S., and have signed paperwork to that effect, they are part or the 14th Amendment country withing the United States of America. You ain't a U.S. citizen. You might be a citizen of the state in which you are domiciled. If you are, you are a State Citizen. Restate your agreements with the Federal government so that it is shown that you are not a citizen of it. Then it won't have nearly the control over your life. |
|
|
|
This is a trick and trap. Many people will believe Obama has the right to control their lives in this way. Rather, it is the other way around. The only possible way that he might have this authority is in the case of a national emergency. But, if that emergency is terrorism, the opposite of this executive action should take place. People should be armed to the hilt, just to protect themselves from the terrorists. As men and women, we have power over government, through the courts, if we only take the time to learn how easy it is to use the courts. Arms and ammo are our property. If we make the arms and ammo from scratch, they are our property that we made from other of our property. We have the right to contract. If we contract with someone, so that we are not making an offer to the public, then we can trade our property - arms and ammo that we have made - for their property - their labor in the form of money. It's about time that we stop making public offers for some of the things that we sell to people. Rather, let's make proper agreements in the form of contracts with others, so that our offer is a private offer. If we do this, we come out from under virtually all the rules and regulations of government. If you weren't selling the marijuana, if you were only using it, and if they take it from you, require and demand in court that the man or woman you have harmed by your action of smoking pot get on the stand and show how your actions harmed him/her. If nobody comes forward, require your property back. Do this even for the property of your body if they have taken you and thrown you in jail. Then sue the pants off them (their bond), individually and personally, for even touching you, a man or woman. You will win if you do it right, so study now, while you have time. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D |
|
|
|
Look at it this way. Imagine that you are a $trillionaire, or even greater (Satoshi?). Imagine, also that you give all your multi-$trillions to help the poor and needy of the world. Are your $trillions enough to keep them alive in joy forever? So far as any of us know, multi-$trillions aren't enough to produce everlasting life. People are going to die of old age if nothing else. In fact, usually the accumulation of the $trillions is what causes the poverty around the world. The only difference might be in the case of Satoshi, if Bitcoin ever goes viral worldwide. Since there are loads of people who are helping the poor children of the world with their money, if you don't have money, the best thing you can do is to tell the kids about the love of Jesus, and the salvation He provides. Why is this best? Because then they have the chance believe, to arise in the resurrection, to be with God in glory, forever, in the New Heavens and the New Earth God is preparing for all those who love Him, and believe in His Son, Jesus. |
|
|
|
The chess match recorded by Eisenbeiss actually happened, so it is true;
the questions were answered correctly, so that part is also true.
Finally, rebirth is a key message of spirituality and it is even in the Bible,
So that part of Eisenbeiss is also true.
What part is actually being questioned?
It seems to me that the source is giving us the truth every time.
Thus the source is not of importance; having an open mind for truth is what is important!
Please use own discernment; I have already referenced for you the "First Christians" audio so that you may follow up on the references/resources therein. I have also posted on the topic of rebirth in the Bible in this thread; I discern that you do not really understand where the Bible came from, nor are you even interested. You have no right to pound on my truth (you have no answer to the problem of the criterion, since you can't explain this presumed knowledge/criteria, you have a fatal flaw in your argument); judge not lest it be in ignorance!
The question isn't about whether mediums and the like can exist or not. The questions have to do with their authenticity and their integrity, as well as questions of the authenticity and integrity of the "spirits" that move the mediums. The larger question has to do with what God wants us to do regarding mediums and "spiritists," and the spirits that they contact. The Bible speaks to these questions several times in various places. God tells us in the Bible to not seek out mediums, spiritists, or the spirits. Why? Because it is God to Whom everyone is supposed to individually go, directly. We don't need a medium with God on the job. In addition, as mentioned above, the authenticity and integrity of the spirits, as well as the mediums, is always in question. Why? Because nobody knows who the spirits are, or what is on their minds and hearts. And the mediums may well be liars, themselves, not having any spirit contact at all, but rather, deceiving the people for their own, selfish, purposes. If somebody who is considered to be a medium doesn't say, "Seek God, not me or the spirits," then he is not of God. If a person who is of God seeks out a medium and hears him/her, that seeker is starting to turn away from God by doing so. It's in the Bible. |
|
|
|
I recognize the wisdom in the Bible, but you call me crazy because I have read more wisdom than you?
BADecker, an educated man makes use of resources and THINKS. An ignorant man cannot see outside of his immediate perception and belief system (B.S.) Since your standard for truth is the Bible, I must ask, which other resources have you used to form your opinion about Saul's doctrine? What about for Phoenix Journals? Is truth really a matter of getting the right book? I do not believe in ' magic books ', only truth; if you like, read Phoenix Journals and see which truth you would rather have on your side--EVERY TIME. And where is your evidence that it even matters what the source is when the message is TRUTH? After all, I recognize truth in your book; I am nOt prejudiced against any source; I read it all to know truth and make use of these resources because God never limits you in your search for truth. Only MAN'S DOCTRINES have such limitations. Do you remember the 2005 movie Serenity, by Joss Whedon? In that movie, the spaceship, Serenity, made a landfall on the planet where Shepherd Derrial Book (played by Ron Glass) had started his "religious" settlement. The second time Serenity made a landfall there, the "outpost" that Shepherd Book had started had just been destroyed by a gunship of the Empire. Shepherd Book, a non-violent man, had shot down the gunship, but was wounded in the fray and was dying. Captain Malcolm Reynolds (played by Nathan Fillion) of the Firefly ship, Serenity, had just found the wounded Shepherd Book among the rubble, and was trying to comfort him: Book: "I shot him down." Reynolds: "Yeah, I see." Book: "I killed the ship that killed us. Not very Christian of me." Reynolds: "You did what's right." Book: "Coming from you, that means... almost nothing." Regarding your post above ^^, "Coming from you, that means... almost nothing." |
|
|
|
Unfortunately, people who have steeped themselves in a particular religion, mostly find it difficult to set it aside when they find out it is a false religion.
Can you compile a list for us all of all these false religions? How do you recognise a false religion? No, I probably couldn't. I would probably miss at least a few. Besides, I don't have the time that it would take to investigate and compile. You could probably search Wikipedia for a list of main ones. Well, with Christianity all around you, and with all the talk about the Bible I have been doing in this thread, start there, the Bible, and ask God to direct you on your journey into this kind of religious seeking. But you have to be sincere in your testing for God. Ask Him to prove Himself to you if He really exists. But do it from the standpoint of really asking sincerely. He doesn't cater to people who are simply playing around or attempting to mock Him. I would be particularly interested to hear you respond *directly* to his question about how you are able to recognize a false religion. The direct instructions for such would probably be similar to the instructions Moses gave the people of Israel for determining if a prophet was a prophet of the Lord, or a false prophet. This would be to match the things that he said with what happened. You could say similar about matching a religion with the way things work. In fact, in this and other threads, I have been pointing out that the things we call science don't always match all the scientific ideas that should be applied to them. A lot of what we call science (I'm not talking about pure science, or the scientific method, here) simply doesn't have enough information behind it to say that it is absolute truth, or often very near the truth. The Bible is full of prophecies that were fulfilled. There are others that have not been fulfilled yet. Other religions have few prophecy listings, and few that are fulfilled. One of the greatest prophesies of the Bible that has been fulfilled is that of the fall of Israel as a nation because they disobeyed God. The fall lasted around 1,900 years. They have only come back according to other prophesy, and not with the glory that they held in the past. Responding in order: 1) Logic fail. You're shooting yourself in the foot again. Let me get this straight - you think that the way to determine whether a religion is true or false is to first assume Christianity is true and then look to it for a method of distinguishing true religions from false ones? What the heck kind of logic is that? You're putting the cart way, way, WAY before the horse. The point here is that you can't just assume Christianity is true before you've subjected it to a method to determine whether it is true or false. The result is that you are self-evidently using an illogical approach to determine whether Christianity is true rather than a logical one. 2) Stop contorting what science is. When you say things like, "...A lot of what we call science (I'm not talking about pure science, or the scientific method, here)..." you are just talking out your rear. The word 'science' has several concrete, established definitions. When you start making up new definitions on the fly, you are simply demonstrating an inability to effectively communicate with others. Type in "science definition" into Google and check the result. The definitions that pop up are the only definitions applicable to 'science.' When you use the word 'science,' it must be used according to those definitions. If you don't, then you're simply not talking about science. Period. And, when you say "...the things we call science don't always match all the scientific ideas that should be applied to them..." I would remind you that you continue to demonstrate that you have no idea what science is (because you continually invent definitions for it). It's pretty hard for the "things we call science" to match the "scientific ideas that should be applied to them" when you change the definition of what 'science' is but not the definition of 'pure science' or 'the scientific method.' Your reasoning here is shockingly terrible. 3) Talking about prophecies is irrelevant if you can't subject Christianity to the same method used to determine whether a religion is true or false. Lol. A fall that lasted 1900 years? Haha what the hell? Are you joking? Do you have any idea how stupid this sounds? You finally came up against something that shows you what God is all about, and you just can't take it. I can accept that. Is this in response to my post? This isn't even relevant to anything I said. I did not "come up with anything" in my post that shows me what God is all about, nor can't I take it, and so therefore you are "accepting" whatever you just imagined. Care to respond directly to my points, or would you like to continue making up my point of view for me, ignoring me when I tell you that's not my point of view, and then believe you are the victor for winning (and somehow, still losing) an argument against yourself? Please be specific about your ideas. I truly have no idea what the hell your post was about. Keep on trying. You just might figure it out. Of course, nobody figures anything out that they don't want to, right? |
|
|
|
Alrighty then.
It does depend on your definition of zombies. Some people would say that we are already zombies with all our focus on technology in our lives, or thanks to the economy, etc.
However I'm going to take the educated guess that you're talking about Hollywood/The Walking Dead zombies, based on the information of your post.
If such an event does happen, what are your recommendations to survive it? Apparently a lot of thought was put into this, so I'm curious as to how you would survive the various diseases/biological weapons that you're making reference to.
nope go to a metro in Tokyo, watch everyone on their screens... do you believe they do finance? trade? LooooL. furthermore most of us have to work all the time, the rest time, is made to rest, when to think? when to breath? when to love? none, by design... but fuck fuck fuck... west 101. I think I need a translator for this forum now. "Ok, I see your point. That was very insightful, but not quite what I was looking for." On the plus side maybe you should consider amateur poetry. do get paid by the ctrl+p? are fucking you nuts. death is better, sweeter and last forever. Many American, Chinese and Russian Patriots said it like that... most people are stupid, but don't want to admit it, because most of their inner values come from their perceived smartness... you don't need to be smart to love right. Death only lasts forever temporarily.  |
|
|
|
I'm sorry. You are the one who is right. It is I who is wrong. Thankfully, Jesus will forgive me.
Not only will He forgive you, but, at His request, His Father, God almighty, has already forgiven you. There is only one thing that God doesn't forgive. Some people think that this thing is "unbelief." This is not true. If it were, none of us would be forgiven. Why not? Because we ALL were and are in unbelief to some extent. No. The thing that is not forgiven is the sin of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. This sin is the sin of locking one's self into unbelief so strongly that even the Holy Spirit can't get in and at least have a chance at changing the person's mind. In this life, few people can really block the Holy Spirit this strongly, although there are some that might be able. This is why Decky and the others have the strength that they do. The forgiveness of Jesus is maintaining them, even in their unbelief. If they don't change, a time will come that they will be locked into their unbelief unchangeably. This will be at the time that they die. Once they have died, there is no way that they can change from unbelief to faith, or vice versa. They are out of the reach of the Holy Spirit. They are locked into whatever position they were in at the time of death. The best we can do for them is pray. I mean, I certainly would like to meet all these people in Heaven in friendship forever and ever. |
|
|
|
Imagine if you were raised a Christian, you felt you knew the truth and was very passionate about your beliefs. Then you find out most of the Beliefs of the Christian religion are based on older versions of Paganism, Astrology and other Secret Orders.
Actually, the first 5 books of the Bible are, among other things, a summary of the things that happened in and prior to the formation times of the ancient Israel. The first 5 books are the most solid understanding that we have of what happened in the beginnings of the world. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
