Asking one side to go first = scammer? No.
Just use escrow. If the other side refuses escrow at all cost, then that raises suspicion. In that case, you may open a thread about them in this section. I make over 15k a month, you can suck my dick you old middle aged poor man
This is both pathetic and sad. |
|
|
|
I took a look at: a) The addresses used. b) Their posting history (i.e. twitter accounts submitted). I could not find a connection via 'a', and the only instance where mona55 used the twitter username "m_bukhor" was in this case. It is possibly a bad copy-paste.
This, although a case is not likely here. |
|
|
|
A new definition was submitted. Urban dictionary is literally a dictionary of, often made-up, meanings. Thus, our meaning. I do not care about your nationality/race/religion or whatever useless thing you like to associate yourself with.
Neither does anyone else who used this word recently for the right purpose. |
|
|
|
|
I have tried to find a connection between the two accounts, but was unable to do so. Therefore, either:
a) They are alts, but they did their best to avoid a simple connection.
b) The merit was purchased/sold.
c) Something else.
|
|
|
|
Pajeets like yourself are going to be pleased with any satoshi they earn, thus no actual argument from your side.
The last statement is a definite racial slur and that does expose your mentality. I'm totally disgusted at the thought that people like you are remotely considered worthy of respect. Pajeet is not a racial slur. #DiDYouKnow that: Words can have different meanings? I guess not. In the context of Bitcointalk we have established a new meaning for said word. I do not care about your nationality/race/religion or whatever useless thing you like to associate yourself with. Now, stop spamming the thread with useless nonsense. Optimally, quit the forum altogether. |
|
|
|
KYC was conducted extensively after Bounty Campaign was over and from what I know it entails identity verification of the individual, he even linked all the BCT Bounty Accounts to there verified Gladius accounts.
That has literally nothing to do with actual KYC. Why so much negativity?
Posting facts =/= being negative. I am still waiting for a day when Lauda would show some friendly gesture or simply stop thinking herself to be superior than the world, finger crossed!  The thought of being superior than the people that posted in this thread is not even worth the joules spent on it. Being friendly is most often a waste of time.
Whelp, at least your post history isn't bad enough to be added to the SMAS blacklist. This can't be said for the others. I think what's important is if the ICO team and Bounty Hunters have been satisfied or not. If you can find dissatisfaction among them, I'd consider that as real dissatisfaction.
Pajeets like yourself are going to be pleased with any satoshi they earn, thus no actual argument from your side. |
|
|
|
I'm sorry to say, but you are judging him too harshly.
I am not. There are several mistakes of various types, often mistakes that the browser itself underlines after you write. The most extensive KYC was conducted...
Seriously, you claim that know-your-customer was conducted? Either that campaign was done backwards or you're a liar. Do you even know what KYC is? I doubt that you do. Please don't judge someone by a single post.
I checked some of his posts; very displeased that I've wasted my time on all that trash. |
|
|
|
KevinHD
bruthus
lepricoin**
bitzzer**
BitcoinTurk**
Advicerabi**
Xardasim**
btsjimin**
btsjungkook**
All SMAS review requests have been processed.
A new of additions that crossed my path: allahabadi
Lightful
tikanurqaidah
Olegryz
Piston_82
indo1
Anndrianno
Crypbull
|
|
|
|
|
Your English is severely broken, as is that of almost all the people that replied to this thread. What gives?
I can only assume that shitposters and account farmers are satisfied with the work you did. Hint for next time: Start a self-moderated thread.
|
|
|
|
74 spammers/account farmers voted no.  The merit system won't work on its own, but combine it with moderation that moves threads to the correct boards, and deletes or archives rubbish threads and boards, and it will revitalise the forum.
The current moderation, especially banning, is very inefficient and sometimes almost 'non-existent'. Simple reports of someone spamming the same off-topic content shouldn't take >24 hours to process. |
|
|
|
|
Following the successful completion of the campaign, the escrowed funds have been released.
Sincerely,
Lauda
|
|
|
|
Invalid counter point. That guy is posting in threads about shitcoins. Don't expect rewards when almost all you do is delve in the garbage bin. I just put my thoughts into it based on what i see everyday and yes i do love altcoins!
99.9% of them are scams in one way or another. If bitcoin goes to 30,000 dollars, at no point i want the people who are trading in small quantities like 100 dollars or 500 dollars to be paying a 30 dollar fee to it.
The fee that has to be paid has nothing to do with the USD price whatsoever. Obviously, as expected, a fundamental misunderstanding of cryptocurrencies and no understanding of fee-reduction methods. Bitcoin won't die even if i say so and i have no control over it but i just wanted to engage as to how can bitcoin sustain a 20,000 dollar or even above price tag with so much time delay.
I don't even... just go away. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Being new here, hereto I’d only seen evidence that OgNasty is a slippery jerk. Now, I may know him by the company he keeps. Transitive trust is a double-edged sword, after all. Thank you.
You should watch out for a negative rating though. aTriz got one for using FTFY on one of his statements (but it was later changed to neutral). (OgNasty has “sold items to QS”, but “Risked BTC” is 0.0 and there’s no reference link? Of course.)
I wouldn't give someone that, given their history, even if I had successful deals with them. Hey, I got red-tagged yesterday with 21,000,000 BTC “at risk” due to my “vast generalisations to suit USG narrative”. May I please have some fake evidence that I be a spook or a USG shill?
He got you, just admit it already..or don't. |
|
|
|
When is someone not responsible for another person's actions?
People who knowingly participate in trading bitcointalk accounts are responsible for their actions, regardless if you are the buyer/seller/escrow. If we are going to turn a blind eye for a few pennies, then we are not better than Quickseller. |
|
|
|
The trust system has been being played with heavily for a very long time. Theymos is very reluctant when it comes to removing someone who is obviously abusing it; sometimes he won't even respond to your PM if he doesn't feel like it. The staff members are just pawns, i.e. useless and without any power when it comes to the above.
This is an obvious symptom there's something wrong with the leadership and the community here.
There are a lot of things that are very wrong here, but using Quickscammer as a proof of a broken community is backwards. You can easily see who is siding with who by following the trust and merit system. |
|
|
|
IMO, based on Lauda's responses to this thread, one can reasonably assume Lauda is denying that they take pills: I'd like to know what pills I'm taking as well.
I believe this says "I don't take pills" and is an explicit denial... I can neither confirm nor deny this, but you have good deduction skills.  So, reveal the source & information or this just ends up as mudslinging.
I doubt either one will show up; not even *fake evidence*.
Also looks like QS moved from -1010 to -498 somewhat recently so he may have just slipped underneath amaclin? Although QS is still a bit more active... wonder why the score went up? The Pharmacist was excluded from Tomatocage and OgNasty's trust lists, therefore his trust rating no longer shows at DT depth 2. This is weird. This explains it.   |
|
|
|
You are saying that no one knows anything about you? I know that is not true.
When does knowing something about me equal to being close to me? If you knew my favorite color, you would be close to me  Some people know *some things*, and some think they know *some things*. Nobody is anywhere near *being close to me*. Why don't you go as far as to explicitly deny that you have a pill addiction?
For all the reasons mentioned by others in this. |
|
|
|
My source tells me that he was told by people close to Lauda that Lauda has a serious pill addiction. My source also tells me that Lauda has often talked about drugs in "chatrooms" (which could be a number of things). You knowing who my source is will not really change anything, you knowing who my source is would still make this an anon's word against Lauda's word -- actually Lauda has not actually denied this, so it would be against nothing.
Such a thing does not exist. Therefore, it would be even more interesting to hear the made up lies. We are waiting, mr./mrs./whatever. source. |
|
|
|
Also looks like QS moved from -1010 to -498 somewhat recently so he may have just slipped underneath amaclin? Although QS is still a bit more active... wonder why the score went up? The Pharmacist was excluded from Tomatocage and OgNasty's trust lists, therefore his trust rating no longer shows at DT depth 2. This is weird. |
|
|
|
Not even the same potential consequences and so that's not a fair evaluation.
And I said the consequences are the same.. where? It pretty much applies for any kind of felony. We can't stop all of them from occurring so we won't make them illegal? What. By allowing account sales to take place locally and visibly to others, it's more like a public ledger.
You have no idea what you're talking about. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
