i am not going to pay 22,125$ to get VIP status
Don't see it as $22,125 but rather as 50 BTC, now and then. i would like to donate
You can donate any amount you want to if you feel the urge to donate something to the forum. they need to update the price
Already discussed each 2 sites of this thread, several reasons speaking against it, the main ones are 1) it would be unfair to all current donator/vip users and 2) the forum doesn't depend on donations anymore.
|
|
|
And i suggest don't use it for your Primary Paypal Account
In that case I'd question how legit this 'method' is.
|
|
|
I am a man of my word and you will get repaid the full 0.12 bitcoin within the 2 weeks (or less).
I guess you're not offering any sort of collateral, since you're 'a man of your word', or are you? Things don't work like that here. Unless you are a fairly trusted user, there's one basic rule for you: No collateral, no loan. If you can do the loan, please send it to 1Dyyp7oxDnyPJV7hiUkpqh61YLyydZYwrQ Then PM me with your repayment address.
I highly advise anyone against giving out a loan/sending a repayment address in private (as long as you're not lending to people you know/trust). The reasons should be obvious, but if I have to, I can also dig up a recent loan where things...escalated a bit.
|
|
|
Well I think that's the problem, he can't join a sig campaign with neg trust.
OP doesn't have (default trusted) negative trust anymore.
There's always this but in certain conditions time is of the essence.
Like when rushing to join a signature campaign in order to earn the maximum from your time here? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
HE BLACKMAILED ME FOR A VOUCH COPY, "GIMME VOUCHE COPY AND I REMOVE NEG TRUST"
Wanna show me that PM?
|
|
|
After I sent you a message yesterday , I noticed your last active and I am sure you read my message then I created my thread.
Last active means nothing. And nope, I had not read your message when you created that thread. in any case I have read other member threads about your negative trust and seems there is no useless from discussion with you. thank you
Oh yeah, all those threads with people crying, where did they go again? I wondere why moderators permit to person like Lutpin to hustle members in this forum.
You're right, I'm the problem this forum has. Oh wait, I'm not. People like you are. I can't believe that I had negative trust just for using referral link in my signature.
The problem wasn't that it was a ref, but you wouldn't understand. Go run to YoBit and earn your share.
|
|
|
Now I removed my signature and sent a message for lutpin but he didn't reply. I hope he will be here.
You've waited an awesome hour after messaging me, I'm not online as much these days. some of us have a life which means we can not play kindergardner 24/7 on btct.
What can I do if he didn't reply my message
The only two things that you can usually do is: 3) Be a little patient and wait.
You simply have to negotiate with Luptin.
It's Lu tpin, nice to meet you.
I was under the impression that lutpin isn't giving negative trust for ponzi supporters anymore.
There's a difference between the scum quality users that advertise discuss ponzi schemes Investor-based games in their own hellhole subforum And those who advertise them in their signature, displayed under each and every post, regardless of the section they post in. Anyway, you should try to discuss the issue with Lutpin, ~snip~
Word, however, for a discussion you need two parties. What doesn't work is shooting me a message, waiting an hour, and then creating a thread saying 'doesn't reply to my messages'.
|
|
|
Blockchain.info? Because there's a difference between the service 'blockchain.info' and 'the blockchain'.
|
|
|
How will an escrow protect you from the other party charging back their paypal payment? Will you require the ecrow to hold the bitcoins for 180 days?
|
|
|
I have 10 boxes. 8 boxes are not identical and 2 boxes are identical. What are the chances to find the 2 identical boxes (only 2 picks allowed)?
The chance for the first one is 2/10, the chance for the second one is 1/9, hence the total chance is 2/10*1/9= 0.0222 (or 2.22%).
|
|
|
And you trust looks a little fishy with the "???"
That's your custom trust list, mate. Just because you've left me negative feedback. That doesn't make me 'a little fishy' for anyone but you. You yourself on the other hand...
|
|
|
Chinese miners block Bitbet's transaction intentionally no matter how much fees Bitbet put in that transaction to force Bitbet to use different inputs. then they "double spent" the first transaction they used to block. They can attack Bitbet, they can attack anyone. this is just the start.
BitBet screwed up, that's the fact, simple as that. This is just the start of what? Users being too dumb to use bitcoin? Making a mistake should not be confused with 'an attack'.
How can they do it? because they have more than 70% hash power plus most nodes.
Dream on. 1. United States - 2383 (33.87%)
|
|
|
Best they can do is to ban both scammers.
You might be suprised, but it's actually not against the forum rules to scam people. Scams are not moderated, hence no one will be banned over a scam (attempt). That's what we've got the trust system for (at least in theory).
|
|
|
Clickbait title, non-sense text, double-spending attacks are deposit attacks, not withdrawal ones (or withdrawal problems/casino fails, as they are shown here). For everything else, read above.
|
|
|
User took my eBook and stole it. This post is being reported
Scammers getting scammed? Oh, the irony. Report all you want, the forum (/moderators) won't do anything about it.
|
|
|
Maybe I should try using the Bitcoin Core and electrum.
No offense but I'd suggest you to use traditional wallets (e.g. blockchain.info old web wallet) ATM. After educating yourself, you can go for modern wallets for sure IMO. Traditional wallets? More modern wallets? QT/Core is the original bitcoin client, and if you're abled to run a node/keep up with the blockchain, there's not much speaking against it. As a matter of fact, I'd suggest against using web wallets, and keep being the sole person in control over your private keys.
|
|
|
Gotta love ethereum for all its 'pyramids'. I don't even browse the Altcoin section, but I can only agree to move them into their own scum scam sub section.
|
|
|
Funny you wouldn't mention the ban evasion afterwards...
|
|
|
|