Only here is the question: is the signatory campaign participant who does not invest in the ICO project, his client and should he pass a KYC check and provide his personal data with copies of his documents in order to advertise the implementation of this ICO project? After all, the conduct of such a check was conceived in order to avoid the laundering of dirty money. The requirement to provide their personal data with copies of their documents violates the norms that exist in almost every state, the protection of personal data. If someone requires these data from me in violation of my national laws, they should at least indicate a specific legal and regulatory document that obliges them or grants them the right of such a claim. None of the rules for joining the ICO campaign, where there is a mention of the possibility of conducting a KYC check, do not indicate how they are making such a claim. And why then do we have to do this? And maybe they collect our personal data, then sell them? We do not know to whom we are passing these data. Photographs as members of the team can be inserted any and there are already many examples of this. I am categorically against the provision of my identity to someone who does not act as an official person and does not have the appropriate authority.

Crypto currency for banks is a strong and worthy opponent in the field of financial relations. Banks have always enjoyed the support of the state, since they are practically an integral part of it. Therefore, until now, real banks have not had any real competitors. Crypto currency is a strong competitor for banks, and due to the fact that it is decentralized, banks can not pressure the crypto currency by an administrative method, as they used to do earlier. Considering that many people stopped using the services of banks and the same operations began to be carried out independently in the crypto currency without the participation of banks, banks began to lose their profits. Banks have nothing to do either to compromise the crypto currency or by warning that it is a very risky investment of funds, or to organize the appearance of false negative information about the crypto currency in the media, as it was recently observed with one of the banks in Poland.

In India, no crypto currency was banned. The Reserve Bank of India for some reason issued recommendations to its banks to stop providing services in the crypto currency, that is, while the ban is effective for various banking services that deal with crypto currency. However, the crypto currency is still free in the country and there are no restrictions for citizens there. I do not think that in the future the rules on crypto-currency will be toughened in India. Recently, the same bank announced that it is going to issue its own centralized crypto currency.

#Joined Signature Bounty
Bitcointalk username:  Vektrum
Forum rank:  Member
Posts count: (including your registration post)  217
ETH address: 0xB3bA02163e66f574A5D4Ac754D1F4A32dC15FeC0

The crypto-currency market is a bit more dynamic than the stock market. He, I think, is able to recover much faster than conventional currency markets. It seems to me that for several months, up to six months, it is quite enough for restoration. So now he can already be ready to start growth, he needs only a good push, which can be any good news.

On this occasion, several studies have been carried out, which have led to the fact that the younger generation is better at perceiving new technologies than the old generation. Older people already very seldom want to change something in their lives, they find it difficult to rebuild and start working in a new way. This explains why they are not so eager to perceive new technologies, and in particular, the emergence of the crypto currency. In order for the crypto currency to be actively introduced into our lives, indeed, younger legislators and, in general, any specialists in the field are needed.

I understand that you suggest, in order to avoid fraud from the ICO team, that they list tokens to signatory campaign participants immediately after they joined the ICO campaign and provided their wallet addresses? Then the participants in the signature campaign will cheat. What will prevent them from leaving the ICO campaign immediately after receiving the tokens, and failing to fulfill their obligations? No, this option is not suitable, it is also not ideal. In my opinion, all the same, it is necessary to regulate the ICO by state bodies or a recognized public organization.

If the situation was bad with specific altcoyins, we could consider selling them. However, here we are dealing with a general decline in the market. This means that when the market goes up again, your coins will also grow in value along with everyone. Therefore, in this situation, these coins should be retained and expected to increase the market.

If I had to choose only one kind of crypto currency to invest in it, I would probably choose ethereum. This is one of the most reliable and popular coins. Perhaps, too much profit, it will not, but in its prospects and growth, I'm absolutely sure.
Investing in bitcoin now has its difficulties, it has not yet completely eliminated its shortcomings and lost a lot in popularity. Its further growth is difficult to predict, and given that after September Tokyo Gox can put up for sale its 180,000 bitcoins, by the end of the year, bitcoin may again depreciate.

I do not know how in social networks, however, with participation in the campaign signature , there are no problems with the number of participants. Only in some projects ICO participants sometimes gather several hundred, and in most such ICO projects they are usually several dozen. For the ICO team, a large number of participants, on the contrary, is very profitable. Their project is being promoted by a larger number of people, and the amount of payments is not increasing. Therefore, it is unlikely that the ICO team will take the initiative in this regard.

Payments to signatory campaigners for their promotion of the ICO project in ethereum would be very beneficial to all ICO project participants and his team. This would save many problems from absolutely everyone. Those same members of the generosity campaign who would like to get the tokens could already at any time when the token goes down in price, buy it for the received ethereum. Either when completing the participation form, indicate what he wants to receive a payment - ethereum or released token. It would also be very convenient.

If the token does not have a passive profit in the form of dividends from storage, then you can use the profit from increasing the growth rate of this token. To do this, you only need to take the number of coins in its overall increased price to sell it. However, I do not think that this way will be permanently profitable. Today, the token grows in price, and tomorrow it may fall.

The Crypto currency has only just begun to develop and this process will last a very long time, since this is a completely new phenomenon and not all of them can immediately perceive it. In the course of development, it will necessarily be regulated by the states, without it its advance is impossible. Therefore, the regulation of the crypto currency should be perceived not as something unusual and bad, which can destroy it. This is a natural process, which must go through in order to walk freely in the territory of various states. Of course, you need to be prepared for the fact that we are required to identify on exchanges and exchangers and pay taxes. This may be inevitable, but it can not kill the Crypto currency.

As far as I know, the Central Bank of Russia and the Ministry of Finance are categorically against recognizing the crypto currency as a means of payment. They say that according to the Constitution, only their ruble can be a single means of payment on the territory of this country and therefore they support the introduction of criminal liability for using crypto currency as a means of payment. I still see that in Russia they are trying to ban and prohibit crypto-currency sites. Is this how the preparation for the legalization of the crypto currency is going? I really doubt. that this year's crypto currency will be free to walk through the territory of Russia.

This ICO company is struggling with several accounts of signatory campaign participants by deceiving not to pay the earned tokens? If the ICO team wants to prevent double accounts, it can conduct such a check before joining them to the signature campaign. Then who does not want to join by passing the KYC check, they will leave. This is clearly not the case for this purpose. Since it is actually conducted after the end of the ICO before the payment of the earned tokens, then the goal is clear - do not pay the earned tokens. From the point of view of the ICO team, it turns out that you can join multiple accounts to their campaign, write messages and advertise their project also. They at the same time counted the messages and put the earned shares, and when it comes to the payment, then you need to check here if someone wrote here several accounts? Somehow it is illogical and similar to deceit from the company ICO.

I participated in the DENARO project in the signature campaign. While I can not say that this project is fraud. I was paid DNO tokens within a few days after the end of the ICO. I read here that their group of Telegrams closed, went in, everything works there. Unclear. Maybe someone intentionally overtakes this panic? Calculation to sell their tokens?

I would like to know whether it will be possible to participate in this project as a participant in the signature campaign. I did not find an ICO campaign at this forum. If possible, leave a link to the ICO campaign itself.

In my opinion, this project is worthy of support. Indeed, the crypto currency, which is based solely on the supply-demand relationship, leads to a dead end in its development. We see that bitcoin takes off in price and is simply inflated in its financial bubble due to speculative rush demand. This will ultimately lead to its drastic depreciation at a stage when it will be at a high price level. We need other options to address this issue. Perhaps the creation of such a bank can lead to the stabilization of the course of the crypto currency. The volatility of the crypto currency is the main reason why the crypto currency is not perceived by the states and causes distrust in them.

Nothing terrible happens. The usual, however, prolonged over time correction of the crypto currency. True, it is probably not without outside help aimed at the collapse of the crypto-currency market and restraining its growth. However, now the market can begin to grow on any given day, as all objective reasons for restraining its growth have disappeared. Perhaps a good reason for this was yesterday's decision of the Financial Stability Board to reject calls by some countries for the regulation of the Crypto-currency at the G20 countries' tomorrow summit.

In Russia, some Orekhov filed a $ 32 million lawsuit on March 15 to a Google office in Russia to reimburse him for lost profits due to the fact that Google banned the advertising of crypto-ala. It would be nice if, in other countries, we used judicial opportunities in relation to Twitter and facebook. In practice, this can be regarded as restricting citizens to receiving information.