Am still waiting for a confirmation that am selected in the campaign or not? If yes, Thanks, if No, I will find another  Hi cryptoforcause, sorry that you did not trade in the site and you also has a negative trust. So please look for another campaign. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Rules: Only constructive posts will be counted. – no spam, single word posts, single image posts, bumps, +1s will be counted. Your enrollment will be cancelled if you remove signature at any time during the period, gain a negative trust, get banned, or break forum rules. We prefer English posts. Posts in Economy section, especially Economics, Speculation and Marketplace encouraged. Participants should have no account (including alternative accounts) with negative rating. Quote from: cryptoforcause on May 20, 2015, 04:52:01 AM Name : Cryptoforcase Activity : 182 Posts : 924 Position : Full Member CoinUT Username : Cryptoforcause Please trade once so that you will be enrolled in and all your existing posts will be counted. Participants should have no account (including alternative accounts) with negative rating. Ok, so, you try to deface me because I used your color. That busted. You tried to claim that you can't have a account with -ve trust to be eligible for the campaign. Your allowing people in I see. So basically, it was just against me right? No problem. At least I got a fan club  Oh, did not notice that he has one negative trust. Just informed him not to join in. |
|
|
|
Guys, please remember change the link in your signature. We are now holding a referral program. We will pay you 10% of the commission earned from those who registered through your link!!!!
you may want to give a small tutorial on how to do that. some of these people may or may not know. also if any sr member slots are open i will take 1. You are welcome to join. The method is shown as the red lines in the first post. |
|
|
|
|
Guys, please remember change the link in your signature. We are now holding a referral program. We will pay you 10% of the commission earned from those who registered through your link!!!!
|
|
|
|
Hi, I just became a hero member. So I changed my forum signature.
People who want to join need to sign up for the site. You can try using the link in my signature.
Just updated the spreadsheet. |
|
|
|
Name: waterpile
Posts: 2524
Activity: 378
Position: Sr.Member
Coinut username: waterpile
Thank you for joining in. Please trade in Coinut.com once. |
|
|
|
Name : Cryptoforcase
Activity : 182
Posts : 924
Position : Full Member
CoinUT Username : Cryptoforcause
Please trade once so that you will be enrolled in and all your existing posts will be counted. |
|
|
|
any space left here or already all full ? i know i must change the name into mine anyway waiting for a mail into my gmail to confirm account...
i see there is a limited spots if all set already i will wait thanks
You are in. Thanks |
|
|
|
Hi. I'll try out this campaign
Name: koshgel
Posts: 2574
Activity: 560
Position: Hero
Coinut username: koshgel
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
Please tell me your address. I'll send to you directly.
|
|
|
|
Rules:
Only constructive posts will be counted. – no spam, single word posts, single image posts, bumps, +1s will be counted.
Your enrollment will be cancelled if you remove signature at any time during the period, gain a negative trust, get banned, or break forum rules.
We prefer English posts.
Posts in Economy section, especially Economics, Speculation and Marketplace encouraged.
Participants should have no negative rating.
This is at your signature campaign thread and this is the only rules listed there. It is not wise to altered your own rules as you wish. Basically you as a CEO of coinut should hold up your words and act based on your set rules. He is not cheating because even if he has 100 accounts or so he should be able to participate at your campaign because there is no rules that state that someone should have no other account Also taht it is stated that participants should have no negative ratings but his account has no negative ratings there P.S : you owe him, perhaps you should pay him up rather than ruining your reputation The reason that I let him in at the beginning is because I did not know he has another account. Later, I found out that and then immediately told him to stop. It is OK for me to pay. But that seems a bit encouraging this kind of cheating, right?
It depends on your interpretation of "Participants should have no negative rating". Anyway, I've decided to pay him and made this clear in my campaign thread. |
|
|
|
|
Good to see that you changed your signature. Now I am going to close this thread. It may not be good to directly post here. But you also should not wait until others to blame or even accuse you. You should avoid that at the beginning like your participation in the signature campaign. However, you will still get paid for your posts for the efforts you spent.
|
|
|
|
I've never accepted any plagiarism. We discussed this quite a few times. Also, I spent money from my own pocket to hold a signature design contest. There is no point for me to accept plagiarism.
True, there is no point, but the fact is you did. It is only fair that you allow others to be "inspired" by your signature design and not post a scam accusation against the guy. Let others judge whether tidus1097 was just inspired by my signature or it is indeed a copy. Both of us and tidus1097 may be biased. So let's say tidus1097 does change his signature (he claims this one was just a work in progress), will you give him the coins he earned in your signature campaign? What's your opinion? We've not yet made the decision. But I think he should not participate at the very beginning. I don't think he should be kicked in the first place. To say that he has access/control of an account that was hacked is a bit of a stretch. You obviously received benefit from him wearing your signature -you got advertising. I don't see any reason why you would think it is okay to not pay him. The reason that I let him in at the beginning is because I did not know he has another account. Later, I found out that and then immediately told him to stop. It is OK for me to pay. But that seems a bit encouraging this kind of cheating, right? |
|
|
|
I've never accepted any plagiarism. We discussed this quite a few times. Also, I spent money from my own pocket to hold a signature design contest. There is no point for me to accept plagiarism.
True, there is no point, but the fact is you did. It is only fair that you allow others to be "inspired" by your signature design and not post a scam accusation against the guy. Let others judge whether tidus1097 was just inspired by my signature or it is indeed a copy. Both of us and tidus1097 may be biased. So let's say tidus1097 does change his signature (he claims this one was just a work in progress), will you give him the coins he earned in your signature campaign? What's your opinion? We've not yet made the decision. But I think he should not participate at the very beginning. |
|
|
|
I've never accepted any plagiarism. We discussed this quite a few times. Also, I spent money from my own pocket to hold a signature design contest. There is no point for me to accept plagiarism.
True, there is no point, but the fact is you did. It is only fair that you allow others to be "inspired" by your signature design and not post a scam accusation against the guy. Let others judge whether tidus1097 was just inspired by my signature or it is indeed a copy. Both of us and tidus1097 may be biased. |
|
|
|
This is funny. The signature design you are using is a copy anyway. You chose to accept plagiarism, and now you complained about other people copying your signature design?  While his sig design is nice, there was no intentions by me to ever even keep what it is now. Like I stated, I was learning how to make my own, you just happened to be who's sig is used to learn from.
Learn from the orginal copy from BitDice ( here) I've never accepted any plagiarism. We discussed this quite a few times. Also, I spent money from my own pocket to hold a signature design contest. There is no point for me to accept plagiarism. |
|
|
|
|
Not interested in defacing you. Regarding the signature campaign, you were approved because I did not know you have another account with negative trust. Later I found that, that's why I informed you. This accusation has nothing to do with that one. Don't try to mix things.
When you participated the signature campaign, you should be honest. I clearly said that the participants should have no negative trust. Trying to hide things is not going to work.
|
|
|
|
|
Guys, we still have a few vacancies. Hurry up!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
