What the fuck is happening?
Moolah cashing out most likely Why do you keep saying this? Do you have any proof? Sounds like BS! Are you a retard? I still have around 20k XC at Mintpal, and I don't expect to receive them, and a lot more people are still waiting for their withdrawals to "process". Just read his twitter Moolah is processing small withdrawals only |
|
|
|
Only 8btc left until sub 0.00055 ouch doesnt look good.
Agreed it doesn't at all. Arlyn/Teka/Dan: any idea WTF is going on? Investor confidence seems to have dropped quite litterally. Your reassuring comments would be helpful right now. Any update on the overall roadmap? And you name yourself an old time trader?  )) you leak panic my friend all over this place, you are no trader or investor, your patience is = with 0 |
|
|
|
What the fuck is happening?
Moolah cashing out most likely |
|
|
|
It would seem by looking at the price that blocknet is/has effectively killed XC. Quite sad really. Over 70% drop since the beginning of the month. Wow and I bought more at 001, how stupid was I?!?
And how stupid you still are to believe that blockned have something to do with the price...rookies Likely been investing in crypto longer than you mate. The timing of announcing blocknet was a bad one imo. I would have announced it after the officially release of XC. "Likely been investing in crypto longer than you mate..." yeah, right... PS. I can still touch BTC that I bought for 7 USD each...anyway |
|
|
|
It would seem by looking at the price that blocknet is/has effectively killed XC. Quite sad really. Over 70% drop since the beginning of the month. Wow and I bought more at 001, how stupid was I?!?
And how stupid you still are to believe that blockned have something to do with the price...rookies |
|
|
|
Can't you people already see that the one dumping is Moolah?
That shitface is processing a small portion of the withdrawals in order to make people believe that he truly wants to give their money back, but in fact he want to take the remaining altcoins too (~1000 BTC) from Mintpal.
The dump is going to continue for as long as he have remaining XC.
People had not freaking reason to dump XC, and the dump started as soon as Moolah ran away with the coins.
Bad thing - a lot of people will loose XC from Mintpal
Good thing - a better distribution
People who lost XC with Mintpal now have the chance to buy at almost half the price
im not into conspiracy theories, but this pretty much fits the timeline edit: btw, this has to do with the 50k block that was sent to bittrex some days ago. Before that, we had the regular small dumps pattern, after it was mentioned in here, we came to see large dumps(thousands) at night(eu) hours. |
|
|
|
ok, time to dump too.
Yep. Now is the perfect time. You seem to be a skilled crypto trader.  Nope, joke, I bought another ~8000 or so  |
|
|
|
i dont get why this blocknet should be benifitial for me
what use?
0
GTFO already and go buy more silver By the time you are 80 years old you can cash that out for 200% profit... |
|
|
|
Didn't we cover the loljosh thing about 50 pages back??
Geez.
I think its a fair question. If dev has to pay loljosh to launch a basic coin, what gives you faith in the BlockNet project? I know sheeple love to follow hype. Did you all invest in URO, AUR and CRAIG too? You are an idiot LucyLovesShit |
|
|
|
|
Can't you people already see that the one dumping is Moolah?
That shitface is processing a small portion of the withdrawals in order to make people believe that he truly wants to give their money back, but in fact he want to take the remaining altcoins too (~1000 BTC) from Mintpal.
The dump is going to continue for as long as he have remaining XC.
People had not freaking reason to dump XC, and the dump started as soon as Moolah ran away with the coins.
Bad thing - a lot of people will loose XC from Mintpal
Good thing - a better distribution
People who lost XC with Mintpal now have the chance to buy at almost half the price
|
|
|
|
Wow!  This is one of the best projects i have ever seen in Crypto! And one of the most promising to bring Crypto currency to the mainstream. The possibilities in gaming enviroment are endless. Seriously? This is one of the biggest scams ever. No site or licenses yet. Stupid hater. Must be so sad to be a freaking hater, right? |
|
|
|
I still do not get it.. 2500 BTC? 950 000 dollars for some tech that will enable the use of other currencys tech between each other. Now, 95% of all currencys already do have the same tech.
You don't get because you are stupid. 2500 BTC is the maximum. That does not mean at all that the ITO will sell 100% When are you people going to use your brain before pushing that POST button FFS. |
|
|
|
I believe the 1000 minimum was in response to how much they're looking to raise for the whole project.
but even if a refund is offered, you will still need to opt in. since the protocol is distributed and decentralized, everyone in, will be in the Genesis block that I build.
If the coin is being released regardless, what reason would someone have to want a refund? It seems like if fewer people put in BTC, the people who did put in BTC will get even more BRO for their money. Yap, let the party start. I'd love to play some legit poker online with my coins |
|
|
|
 regarding the 1000 minimum the coin is going to launch with all ico investors in genesis block regardless So, the coin will be launched regardless of how many BTC are gathered? That's going to be a plus, since many possible investors fear to invest with a chance that they are going to receive only a refund after 30 days, which is a long period to have your BTC locked into an ICO. This is a very good decision. |
|
|
|
|
Is this a go even if only 500 BTC are being sold for example?
|
|
|
|
I've been reading about the blockNET and I feel like superNET is being misrepresented in your marketing copy. I didn't want to bring this up in your blockNET topic or make a new post out of it but I'd like to hear your opinion on why you chose these three particular points: 1. The way you've represented it makes it sound like BTCD is somehow above all the other coins in superNET. BTCD is to superNET as XC is to blockNET. In superNET BTCD provides the Teleport technology and jl777 as developer. In blockNET XC provides the Xbridge technology and atcsecure as developer. Nothing other than BTCD providing an essential part of the anonymity tech of superNET makes BTCD special. 2. I'm also curious about the p2p claims that are written. Maybe I'm missing something here and if you could enlighten me I would appreciate it. But SuperNET is using an implementation of Kademlia for p2p nodes, which is the same technology that Bittorrent is built on and as far as I know using such a protocol would quality as 'true p2p'. 3. The intention of superNET isn't to have a single centralised enity holding 10% of each coins money supply. SuperNET is intended to be a decentralised organization controlled by shareholders, not one single person. And those coins are meant to be held indefinitely via multiple people using multisig technology. It should function in a similar way as I'm understanding your blockNET foundation to hold. As an aside I'm not sure why the 10% holding are painted in a negative manner in general. The idea of removing 10% of each currencies money supply to add value to the asset is a fairly large benefit to both people who hold the member coins and asset holders. Since you already have established the blockNET foundation which like superNET is not going to be a centralised organization, a similar deal would appear to be in the best interests of everyone. Having 10% of coins bought at market value and then removed from circulation sounds like a win-win scenario for all parties. Applying the appropriate multisig and distributing the keys among the blockNET foundation would seem to eliminate the centralisation part of it. This is just something to consider. I just feel like this arrangement is mutually beneficial and I was surprised that it was presented as a negative aspect of superNET. I'm making this post just to make sure that there's no misunderstandings between blockNET and superNET and so that people don't get the wrong idea. I don't think you intentionally misrepresented those points so I figured just posting this here might persuade you to correct some of the factual errors in the blockNET literature so far. I wish blockNET good luck. Networking coins is an interesting idea and seeing how someone else chooses to do an implementation of the technology will be interesting to see. hi, just for clarification . will two coins on the supernet be able to connect without a BTCD node taking part in the process? Yes, most definitely. ok thank you, so the supenet could theoreticlly function without BTCD. In theory XC could pull out of the blocknet and it would still be running for the rest of the coins. is that possible in supernet too?. As far as I know, yes. You know shit... This is what James said... "100,000+ nodes will do quite a lot of InstantDEX, Teleport, Privatebet, Tradebots, etc. Plus add in dozens of additional services from other coins. In the center of all this is BTCD. We are the center of the spiral. Let other coins make their money, everybody needs money. I think that is why it is called money. BTCD is what allows all this to happen and even if just a small percentage of the overall commerce spills into BTCD revenue share it will be a giant boost to the value of BTCD. I have not worked out all the numbers, but with all this revenues being generated, we can definitely make it a cash positive decision for the other coins, while sharing in the business each coin adds." SuperNET is just a centralized shit, controlled by James alone. Bragging about how is Pumped BTCD, and dumped afterwards it seems if you take a look at the charts. "BTCD was $100,000 marketcap when I joined it. Now it is about 60x more. 6 weeks, 60x. But it was “only” 6 million USD, which if BTC gained that much would be a gain of .001. So the same amount of marketcap is 6000% for BTCD and 0.1% for BTC. The next 60x for BTCD will certainly take a bit longer than 6 weeks" Yea, go SuperNET |
|
|
|
new ICO coin, but without escrow?
only sell the coins in its own websit?
Good point. What about some transparency? For example .....no cap for ipo? well... What if you get 1000 BTC. You can always say that you collected 2000 BTC. Price will be 2x bigger and you can put 50% of your premine in your own wallet. Right? Too scary for me.... I´m not investing with these conditions. You should stay away from any altcoin out there dude, you have no idea... Just check the btc address where all the funds are going. There is transparency 100%, at least for people who have an idea what they are doing in crypto world. Btw, I can trust the people behind the coin more than I can trust some dudes behind an exchange. how can you trust this people behind the coin ? just because of the transparent btc address? it's funny, when the ICO is done, all the btc would be gone. who is your escrow? Well, I have nothing to do with the BRO team, but reading your nonsense I have to jump into this discussion and ask a few questions: what difference the escrow does make in the context of an ICO? Since the escrow exchange (by definition) transfers the fund to the team, how the escrow exactly prevents the BTC "be gone" once the BTC was transferred? Do you understand what escrow means at all? Are you aware there were plenty of scams despite the ICOs were escrowed? The reasons of that is, once the escrow is released the BTC could "be gone" any time. Thank you altcoinUK. NOjust, while escrow used to be popular, it is no guarantee. In addition to what altcoinUK said, just look at the Mintpal/Moolah situation... known public figures > any altcoin escrow/exchange Currently there is no escrow out there on bitcointalk to compete with this alone: https://twitter.com/REALJenHarman/status/511709224775467009https://twitter.com/back2backflack/status/511684185379987456https://twitter.com/ForrestTed/status/511673494455599105https://twitter.com/_DavidBenyamine/status/511745726192578560 |
|
|
|
new ICO coin, but without escrow?
only sell the coins in its own websit?
Good point. What about some transparency? For example .....no cap for ipo? well... What if you get 1000 BTC. You can always say that you collected 2000 BTC. Price will be 2x bigger and you can put 50% of your premine in your own wallet. Right? Too scary for me.... I´m not investing with these conditions. You should stay away from any altcoin out there dude, you have no idea... Just check the btc address where all the funds are going. There is transparency 100%, at least for people who have an idea what they are doing in crypto world. Btw, I can trust the people behind the coin more than I can trust some dudes behind an exchange. |
|
|
|
|
Ok, I'm not going to read this thread anymore. Only a bunch of cheap ass morons crying out loud cause their investment is not returning 237462356% profit fast enough.
I hope the important news gets posted fast enough on the XC official forums.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
