I don't really think that they could win the match even if they have got opportunity to play the whole overs because there were 7 wickets down and Narine was the only player who could hit big shots, and even for him, it doesn't always work and he mostly gets out trying to hit big and fails to lead the charge mostly as we've seen in the past.

It was unfortunate of course, but as you said, their performance wasn't up to the mark. They have conceded a lot of runs and their batsmen too couldn't build any partnerships. They need to work on these couple of things if they don't want to lack behind in the league round.

Even if AI manages to meet up with the requirement of user input, the input wouldn't really be accurate and will probably cause more losses than wins. AI runs with algorithms, and casino games are usually based on visuals, so I don't really understand how AI can be able to play a casino game instead of a human gambler with wide-open eyes.

People used to debate about how AI can be useful in predicting outcomes of sports events for sports betting, but even in that sector, it wouldn't be able to provide accurate predictions because it doesn't have the ability to evaluate things in the way a human can do.

There's nothing wrong in discussing something that you do or like doing in front of your friends in a gathering, and if someone shows interest in that and asks you about how it's done, you should simply tell them everything and then let them know that it involves a lot of risks so they should be careful and should only use money that they can afford to lose if they are ever to gamble.

You shouldn't be the one to blame for what someone does to themselves even after knowing everything upfront. If they can't keep discipline and that causes them serious damage, they are the ones to be blamed for their own actions, they aren't kids after all.

I wouldn't call it a waste of time since it probably is the time when all of you are free from work and stuff, but it obviously is a huge waste of money if you ask me. Having small get-togethers every day isn't an issue if it's not costing anyone any significant amount of money, you can just meet somewhere, have coffee or tea, or even a beer if you want, but having dine-outs with heavy drinking in about 4 days out of the week is excessive.

Such a lifestyle is obviously a huge waste of money, and shouldn't be followed by anyone at all, even you. I understand that they are your friends, but as you said, you all are family men, so you can easily ask them to excuse you whenever you want by saying that your family needs you more. Joining them once or twice in a couple of weeks shouldn't be a problem, but not every time they do it.

Complex problems and queries that the AI cannot solve or accurately respond to can easily be redirected to a human operator or added to a database that a human worker can check later on and solve the issues one by one. That would make things more organized, and the AI will take care of the easy-to-solve problems and queries and send the complex ones forward to be checked and cleared.

If they really get into it, I believe the sky is the limit for customizations of the program as per their needs if their developers can do it. They can make changes and customize the AI to meet their specific needs and requirements.

It's probably true that it wouldn't really increase the odds for players to win more but will only provide a chance for them to increase their chances of getting more bonus spins or maybe higher multipliers, we are yet to know what kind of rules the bonus rounds or the games will have, but at the end of the day, it's still a casino game and they don't always favor the gambler.

And you are right that both normal and skill-based slots should be used side by side, and platforms should include both options for players to try, and they will choose which one they like more.

$35k to $40k by the end of the year? That sounds too low to me, we are only just entering the 4th month of the year, and we have seen pretty clearly that Bitcoin is gradually crossing old resistances and creating new ones like we had $25k as the resistance previously which was crossed and now the resistance is at around $29k which will probably be crossed within the first couple of weeks of the new month.

So for me, $40k wouldn't really be the target for the end of the year, and I have a higher target in mind, and I'm pretty sure it's achievable if Bitcoin continues to grow in value gradually even if the growth rate is low.

The reason you gave at the end for why you are not going to enjoy a pump is why it's better to do DCA and not buy the complete worth of your capital at once and then only keep watching when the price goes down more and more. Those who do DCA gets to buy even at the lowest price positions and get a very good average price for selling when it goes up.

Also, I believe as you said, the price will be pretty high by the end of the year, I'm not expecting it to set a new all-time high as predicted by a lot of people, but I just have a gut feeling that it will be at least 70 to 80% higher than the current price.

Currently, we have two English clubs which are having interest in this transfer with most chances Manchester United will be leading club because Chelsea is already had good spending in last two transfer windows, and they have no success even now they are going to lose European spot for the next season as well which could be big setback for them and Victor Osimhen is also looking for having chance into Champions League for the next season which is now possible in Manchester United now we have to wait for the next step as how Napoli will handle this transfer and Manchester United will invest on this player or if they will be gone ahead with their second choice from Frankfurt and bring Kolo Muani which is also good and have good potential but less in cost, so things are going to be interested in near future for few new rising players and big clubs.

On papers and odds are completely favouring Marseille to win this match but as you already mentioned Montpellier is in great form with currently they are at the top in last five matches performance four wins and one draw mean it's never been easy match for the host team while they fail to win from last four matches at home which is surely not ideal situation for them while they are going to challenge leaders PSG for the title race they have to improve their performance and quality as well because now we have only 10 matches left in this season and both top teams are trying their best for staying at their current level with PSG which is also now having exit from Champions League having not ideal performance which can create some interesting competition for the title race.

The token that guy mentioned is nothing more than just a pump-and-dump token with no liquidity, volume, or market cap, and the guy is a shiller and nothing else. It isn't a proper project to be supported by devs or the team, though you are right that such tokens can have a pump like that once in their total lifespan and it probably already had it.

These shilling activities are proof that a project is not legit and can't get any traders or investors by themselves until they pay a couple of bucks to random people to create new accounts and shill the token in forums like this.

I don't think that the control that they wish to gain is to safeguard users or to prevent them from losses or spending a lot of money on gambling or anything else, but their primary goal will probably be to impose taxes on the users based on their financial activities, and if we use CBDCs, we will literally give them the right to keep an eye on our expenses and finances.

Soon after CBDCs are accepted in gambling and many other places, they will start trying to remove the usage of cryptocurrencies or decentralized digital coins like Bitcoin since they are totally against their goals.

By virtual currency, do you mean cryptocurrency? Because I don't really think that cryptocurrencies are used so widely at the moment, maybe at some places in some countries around the world, but we don't really have a lot of options or places where we can buy food or goods and pay with Bitcoins or any other cryptocurrency.

Global adoption is yet to come, currently, only people know and use Bitcoin, and vendors and businesses are not really into it except for some of them some also use it as an investment for their extra funds but they are not yet interested in accepting it as a payment for their products and services.

I think people mostly get a temp ban for plagiarism if I'm not wrong, so it is not only getting negative trust but a user plagiarizing will lose their account as well. And I just wonder how lazy one can be when he simply just copies something that has been written by someone and pastes it making minor changes or in some cases, with no changes at all.

It's a shame if you are caught plagiarizing others' content and claiming it's your own. Even those having English as their second language do their best to at least write things themselves no matter how difficult it can get for them. Besides, one can simply use writing tools such as Grammarly that can assist them with mistakes and errors within their writing.

Don't you also want a provably-fair system where you can check the authenticity of every bet that you are playing whether they are fair or not? And what about a smaller wagering requirement for those bonuses or even the deposits? Wouldn't that be sweet? I think it would, I don't really disagree that gamblers love good bonuses when they get some, but there are things that add to the flavor.

I would surely love to have a 200% or maybe 300% bonus on my deposit but I would also love to not have a very high wagering requirement for that if I manage to win a few bucks that I might want to withdraw.

Well, though the outcome cannot be predicted, we all know that the house will have its edge most of the time, so chasing losses is basically not a productive way of getting your money back that is already lost. So the mindset of a gambler should be that any money lost in gambling is not recoverable, especially not by trying to chase them.

If luck is on your side, you won't need to chase anything as you won't lose much but win more which doesn't always happen but it happens once in a blue moon and we should enjoy that when it happens.

In round 26, we are going to have few very interesting matches which are going to have big impact on league table as well and here in this match if Schalke beats Leverkusen then surely they could be on verge of coming out of relegation zone which could be one of the best in recent times because in last eight matches they have 12 points with 2 wins and 6 draws which is clearly giving how changes are happening in this team after having one of the worst start of this season now they are on positive development which is amazing stuff from them.

Leverkusen is also doing amazing job after having Alonso as coach because they were also in relegation zone but now having impressive win against Bayern Munich and have fair chance for the sixths pot into league table which will give them another chance for the UEFA competitions in next season and right now they are also having good chance for giving Schalke tough time even prediction is not easy for this match but things looking for another draw which will be good for the both teams.

You can evaluate the value of circulating supply if you have thoroughly researched the tokenomics of a project and understand how they have allocated the tokens in the initial phase. If you see that the circulating supply is way too lower than the max supply, you should think that what if the remaining supply is released in the market later on? That can affect the price for sure.

So it is probably better if a token/coin has a circulating supply closer to its maximum supply which means that there is no chance of the team or some early investors dumping their coins in the market later on and put a huge impact on the price of the coin/token.

I would probably not bet on virtual games as well and rather spend the time and money on a slot machine where I could maybe hit a good multiplier and get a few extra bucks to play later than just betting on a virtual game where I can easily lose the money. I think it is better if someone chooses to bet on a sports event rather than a virtual one as there are more chances of winning in a sports bet.

I don't want to be judgmental about those who place bets on virtual games as they probably know what they are doing, it is just that I wouldn't prefer doing that and would probably go for something else instead.

Lack of available options to spend Bitcoins just like fiat is the reason why people consider Bitcoin an investment more than a source of payment. They don't see it being accepted anywhere, but they can clearly see its price moving up and down, so the fact that if someone buys it low and sells it high makes it more of an investment asset than a payment currency at the moment.

Maybe in the future when vendors and businesses around the globe start accepting Bitcoin as payment and that might change people's perspective of how Bitcoin should primarily be used. But even after that, I believe some people will still use it as an investment opportunity.