|
If you talk about bubble, there is only one bubble, it is cryptobubble and it includes all of cryptocurrencies, so yes, every crypto is in bubble, because they rise and fall together.
|
|
|
|
If account sales are prohibited then there will be no special place to sell accounts in this forum. I also did not find a ban on buying and selling accounts.
It is not prohibited nor deserves a ban. It is similar to playing soccer in your garden, your parents didn't explicitly prohibit you from playing but they might get the ball at any moment if they are afraid that you will break the window. Well, the bad news is that your parents are always afraid. Lauda has 2 negative ratings, doesn't that mean he is not to be trusted? Yet his is still in DT2, it goes to show how stupid the system really is.
I can have 100 ratings, and it wouldn't change a thing. Accounts will continue to be tagged, with or without my name. The latter part of the statement does not show the stupidity of the system, but rather your own ignorance. I agree that selling highly trusted accounts would be bad but only highly trusted ones which by the way, in the recent past they were being sold too and no one was marking anyone red.
Liar or intentionally deceptive. Surprise, surprise. 
Even if Lauda is removed from DT, other people will take their place and continue marking them with red.
This. At least someone around here deserves a merit or two (or 7). ''Liar or intentionally deceptive. Surprise, surprise. '' I'm not the one tagged red twice by trusted members, am I? You give negative ratings because you believe that person shouldn't be trusted yet you have negative ratings yourself from trusted members so why should we trust your ratings then? You see how it makes no sense? Thank you guys for your support, I really appreciate that, but now my account is totally devaluated. Probably Lauda and Thepharmacist is one person, why when Lauda is online and Thepharmacist is not? After Lauda posted here, I received negative from Thepharmacist, is that accident? Big joke these moderators here. |
|
|
|
If you are giving a negative rating, it is because you have done something. It may or may not be right. You owe a duty to explain yourself to whoever rated you the true position of the matter. If the person is convinced, he will remove the negative trust. It is as simple as that.
Are you kidding, it is Lauda, he wont take his negative, because for him it is only what he can do in his life... |
|
|
|
Lauda has 2 negative ratings, doesn't that mean he is not to be trusted? Yet his is still in DT2, it goes to show how stupid the system really is.
I can have 100 ratings, and it wouldn't change a thing. Accounts will continue to be tagged, with or without my name. The latter part of the statement does not show the stupidity of the system, but rather your own ignorance. I agree that selling highly trusted accounts would be bad but only highly trusted ones which by the way, in the recent past they were being sold too and no one was marking anyone red.
Liar or intentionally deceptive. Surprise, surprise.
Even if Lauda is removed from DT, other people will take their place and continue marking them with red.
This. At least someone around here deserves a merit or two (or 7). Okay, Lauda, I know that I made a mistake, but how could I know that I can't do this? In rules there aren't any informations about multi accounts/ buying accounts. I havent bought any account, only asking. So, please tell me how to improve my trust. |
|
|
|
Like you said, plenty of campaigns will instantly reject you if you are a negative trusted user, but there are a few that don't, often these are the most shady ICOs however trying to get as much advertising of possible, regardless who is advertising.
I think if you are an exceptional poster, you may be able to contact the bounty manager and request an exception. If you are the same old shitposter as everybody else, then expect to be denied.
I tried this many times before and not working, because there is no exception, I do not understand why many people care about this, I am honest member, I didnt break the rules, only Lauda thinks that he is a god and judges people. |
|
|
|
Hello, thank you for your reply, but only bounty from Needmoney - Tokensuite accept members with negative trust, Sylon and other donīt. In my opinion, you need to go with needmoney regardless if you have negative trust status or not. Needmoney is an excellent manager with project usually hit big. OS be thankful that there are still managers out there and ICOs that accepts account with negative trust rating. Actually there are many others that don't require with trust rating. Needmoney is actually the best manager, he continuously updating spreadsheets, care about good content in blog bounty campaingns, and I never have a problem with receiving tokens.. Longlife to Needmoney! |
|
|
|
|
Oh, and could you kindly share with us how to get this nice amount of money? Do not invest it, keep your ethers in your wallet and this will be the best investment.
|
|
|
|
|
There are no red tagged members? Or they do not care about this problem?
Red tag doesnt mean that we are bad people...
|
|
|
|
|
And somebody know the calculation? When I have -2 negative trust, how many positive feedbacks I need to be at least neutral?
|
|
|
|
|
Paticipated in redBUX articles campaign with the username I am writing at this moment. My ETH20 wallet is: 0xcFf253930778F3Cfc606a79565b46A79b215F7e4
|
|
|
|
Don't worry about it, I suspect lauda on stay for too long on DT and you will get the trust rating automatically on untrusted feedback.
Why do you think? Many people love him too much, because he are "cleaning" this forum from sh*t posters. I am worried, because I see that many people are doing signatures here and I canīt with my negative  . (only some campaigns accept red tagged members) He already has 2 negative trust ratings himself from other DT members, trust me, he wont last long. This will be so nice for me and for many others people, I I did not do anything wrong, so I hope that justice exists. How many negative feedbacks he can get to keep him DT? |
|
|
|
I'm curious about the reasons you been given negative trust. What was you doing? Suggesting something illegal? How does it works?
I received for that I was interested in buying accounts, but I didnt buy anything... Is it fair? |
|
|
|
And why ban signature? I think that it brings more activity on this forum.
Not all activity is good. The whole point of the new merit system is to reduce much of the forum activity. It seems to be working as well, as it is now possible to find threads that are worth reading. Yeah, there are many spam posts in altcoins section, because all bounty hunters writing their posts here, they do not read previous posts and only spam their ideas. |
|
|
|
There are many of us here who believe that signature campaigns should be banned, or at least subject to scrutiny and approval.
They are not controlled? I think that bounty managers really care about that. And why ban signature? I think that it brings more activity on this forum. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
its hard to find sig campaign with a negative trust.
