With a Coke
Its shitty posts like this that will kill any respect you may have ever had on this forum.. Get your shit together, start eating steak and stop making useless fucking posts. this is "off topic" here, no need to get angry. Just trying to throw a bit of humor. Sorry if you didn't find it amusing. I ate steak an hour ago btw Sorry to go off on you.. But a 2 to 10 word post makes it look like you are time wasting and hoping to get post counts.. :/ Or buckin' to become a mod. Perhaps the experiences he had had, had had such an effect on him that that is why he is now as he is. |
|
|
|
|
And his films are cerebral. The overt theme, the one which seems so obvious in his films, is in fact counter to the subtext within his films, where the real theme lies, which is essentially the opposite of the overt theme. Ozu was very progressive.
|
|
|
|
Have you watched the three clips (not including the one without subtitles)?
I have learned about friendship honesty & trust Well, I suppose. There was a clip I was going to share with you that featured coke. Look here at the this list, voted by directors worldwide every ten years, and see what film is voted the greatest film ever made, out of all films ever made: http://explore.bfi.org.uk/sightandsoundpolls/2012/directors/Now, you have just seen three clips from three films by that director. There is a reason his films are praised so highly. And I mean highly. His films can be rewatched with undiminished pleasure over and over. And, his themes, despite seeming Japanese, are critically acclaimed as being universal. You now have ten films to watch, and they will change the way you look at cinema, forever. They are: Late Spring Early Summer Early Spring Tokyo Twilight Equinox Flower Late Autumn The End of Summer Good Morning An Autumn Afternoon Floating Weeds |
|
|
|
|
Have you watched the three clips (not including the one without subtitles)?
|
|
|
|
With a Coke
Its shitty posts like this that will kill any respect you may have ever had on this forum.. Get your shit together, start eating steak and stop making useless fucking posts. this is "off topic" here, no need to get angry. Just trying to throw a bit of humor. Sorry if you didn't find it amusing. I ate steak an hour ago btw Sorry to go off on you.. But a 2 to 10 word post makes it look like you are time wasting and hoping to get post counts.. :/ He's receiving something wonderful. You too could be if you'd play along. We're almost there. |
|
|
|
Good. Have you watched all three clips? |
|
|
|
With a Coke
Its shitty posts like this that will kill any respect you may have ever had on this forum.. Get your shit together, start eating steak and stop making useless fucking posts. Go easy on the fellow. He's going to learn about Ozu. This is the one I meant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wI6LfigwYAWho is Ozu? Wisdom? In a way, yes. Keep watching the clips. We're getting close. Try this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D77KYlKEt5I |
|
|
|
With a Coke
Its shitty posts like this that will kill any respect you may have ever had on this forum.. Get your shit together, start eating steak and stop making useless fucking posts. Go easy on the fellow. He's going to learn about Ozu. This is the one I meant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wI6LfigwYA |
|
|
|
|
The ideas for threads Phinnaeus Gage had had had had a negative effect upon his thinking ability.
|
|
|
|
|
Are we dealing with floats?
In such a case, perhaps you meant something like this:
while x >= 3 and x < 4:
|
|
|
|
Where is robot.py? while x == 3 - 4: Do you really mean while x==-1? Robot.py comes within LABY if you see the gist comment; the link to laby is there. Hmm since x is a random generated number I thought I was telling pythin if x equals 3 or 4 then go back to function... Then it should be: while x == 3 or x == 4: In your code, it should be obvious that 3 - 4 is an expression which subtracts 4 from 3. Furthermore, - has greater precedence than ==, thus the expression 3 - 4 evaluates before the equality operator. Finally, 3 and 4 are constants, thus the interpreter can evaluate them at compile time, if it does do a mini-compile upon running, and convert them into the value -1. Now, let's look at some aspects of precedence and predicates. If the == operator had greater precedence than the - operator (which it doesn't), then we would have a statement which attempts to subtract 4 from the value of True or False. If coding in C, which you are not, the equality expression would evaluate to 0 or 1. Interestingly, we could do this: while((x == 3) - 4) { Which would evaluate to -3 if x did indeed equal 3. |
|
|
|
Why do people even give a rat's ass if some computer program stores your email on a harddrive in a basement in the desert in Utah and scans it for some keywords, which if it does percolate to the surface such that some bored agent were to actually read it, he would then realize what you're talking about is quite uninteresting, unless, of course, you're talking about something that might be related to you doing something at some event that maybe most of us wouldn't actually want you to do?
Seriously.
I'm ten times more concerned about a corporation that scans my email, sees that I like product X, and then, while I'm browsing with someone looking over my shoulder, sees an ad related to product X, that might be embarrassing.
Or, I would be more annoyed that some slimeball that doesn't like me somehow hacks my email and then seeks to smear me.
It's the corporations and your enemies and your frenemies that are going to cause you more harm than that which apparently bothers you so much.
Are you a PR agent for the NSA? Absolutely not. I'm stating a practical truth. I'm not bothered by something that has no effect. But I am bothered by the things which do have an effect. |
|
|
|
|
Why do people even give a rat's ass if some computer program stores your email on a harddrive in a basement in the desert in Utah and scans it for some keywords, which if it does percolate to the surface such that some bored agent were to actually read it, he would then realize what you're talking about is quite uninteresting, unless, of course, you're talking about something that might be related to you doing something at some event that maybe most of us wouldn't actually want you to do?
Seriously.
I'm ten times more concerned about a corporation that scans my email, sees that I like product X, and then, while I'm browsing with someone looking over my shoulder, sees an ad related to product X, that might be embarrassing.
Or, I would be more annoyed that some slimeball that doesn't like me somehow hacks my email and then seeks to smear me.
It's the corporations and your enemies and your frenemies that are going to cause you more harm than that which apparently bothers you so much.
|
|
|
|
Or it could just be that, since about 5 other people have come to the conclusion that you are a sociopath, it's really as simple as that.
Funny how in personal messages with other members, the consensus is you're a troll. However, I will admit that you may also have some difficulty with English unless it's spelled out for you, seeing as how it's not your native language. Also, about that sociopath insult. It hardly means anything, since it only originates from the fringe libertarian faction, who seem to have difficulty referring to 90 percent of the public as anything but a 'statist'. |
|
|
|
I am absolutely sure it's because you make a completely incoherent or illogical point, pat yourself on the back about it, thinking you're awesome, and convince yourself that you have made a perfect, indefensible argument, while the rest of us are either trying to figure out what the heel your talking about, or are frantically trying to point out your logic errors, which you refuse to recognize. I mean, you absolutely *insist* that correlation = causation, that law breakers follow laws, etc.
If you understand this, why do you continue to bang your head against a brick wall? You have the patience of a saint. My thoughts exactly with regard to attempting to carry on a discussion with Rassah. Except I don't have the patience of a saint, hence the foul mood the cat puts me in. Holliday, I think you have your answer. And so Rassah admists he's a troll, out to make other people angry. Others know it as well. I prefer a science/math/physics/logic nerd. If you claim bs, I'll step in and say "prove it." I can't help myself  Good for you. To get to what you aspire to, you first have to comprehend the dialog which has transpired. |
|
|
|
I am absolutely sure it's because you make a completely incoherent or illogical point, pat yourself on the back about it, thinking you're awesome, and convince yourself that you have made a perfect, indefensible argument, while the rest of us are either trying to figure out what the heel your talking about, or are frantically trying to point out your logic errors, which you refuse to recognize. I mean, you absolutely *insist* that correlation = causation, that law breakers follow laws, etc.
If you understand this, why do you continue to bang your head against a brick wall? You have the patience of a saint. My thoughts exactly with regard to attempting to carry on a discussion with Rassah. Except I don't have the patience of a saint, hence the foul mood the cat puts me in. Holliday, I think you have your answer. And so Rassah admists he's a troll, out to make other people angry. Others know it as well. |
|
|
|
I am absolutely sure it's because you make a completely incoherent or illogical point, pat yourself on the back about it, thinking you're awesome, and convince yourself that you have made a perfect, indefensible argument, while the rest of us are either trying to figure out what the heel your talking about, or are frantically trying to point out your logic errors, which you refuse to recognize. I mean, you absolutely *insist* that correlation = causation, that law breakers follow laws, etc.
If you understand this, why do you continue to bang your head against a brick wall? You have the patience of a saint. My thoughts exactly with regard to attempting to carry on a discussion with Rassah. Except I don't have the patience of a saint, hence the foul mood the cat puts me in. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
