The fun aspect is one of the reasons people get carried away or attached to their games, & never minding the consequences.
I would simply just play and suppress the fun/sad aspect during bets, so that I can make rational decisions and not controlled by emotions. The only games that are probably OK to have fun on are those you are good at and are very beneficial to you

One will likely do better in time of choas and scarcity. In such time, I wouldn’t accept one. I would only accept currency I can do alot of things with.
I believe there are good physical alternatives to gold if it becomes unavailable. I would rather invest alot in "basic assets" that will sustain me & be very valuable in times of crisis, then use alternatives to gold as currencies.
If internet remains the way it is or becomes decentralized, I will use Bitcoin/crypto.

Gold could work fine in cities and town, that is if they(cities & towns) remain safe in time of choas

I would still recommend that the Blockchain/decentralized communities start doing that ^. The more people, the better.


Please save the used old ones, and not buying up the new ones and making things hard for others to buy. No matter how wealthy you are, just stick to saving your used ones or buy the bad ones and get people fix them.
 Hope many people did this already..



^ This is just incase... So, don't panic.

Interesting. The tenants could help the landlords in some ways too in order to convince them easily.. . Better still, both the tenants & landlords could help each other...
 There should be jobs the landlords would love to get done that the tenants could do. In the end, the landlords and tenants serve each other.
But it's better not to expect anything from your tanents especially if they can't afford to pay their rents. Good tanents would work for their landlords without waiting for them to demand for work in return of free rents.




People should also consider living in tents or with family/friends if their landlords refuse to help.

The stack sats principle is quite compatible with the "invest what you can afford to lose" recommendation... So it is a fairly safe way to invest/hold, in my opinion. I would invest maybe 1-5% of what I earn on daily basis if there is a safe way to do so. By safe I mean through methods that are Blockchain-friendly.
In regards to trading, I prefer it because you invest once in a while from fiat to crypto rather than regularly stacking from fiat to crypto.

Interesting. Wish something as important as reviewing is other businesses is done more openly/transparently, and with agreed standard. Besides, there should be people who are good/skilled reviewers in the specific areas of a whole they choose to review. There are many review sites with probably different review results. I guess a good review standard should be developed and used by the online crypto casinos review sites.

They are pretty useful "jokes" to be honest. I guess jokes are not to be taken seriously, but his/hers can be also be recommended as ways to avoid getting infected by "bad thing" or infecting others. The jokes are useful especially in this current situation.

Well, that is not a recommended way to spend one's time at home. I would be busy doing productive things, like, learning good/useful skills, helping others, farming (people who live in cities could try vertical farming in order to utilize small spaces.) etc
If you must play computer games, watch tv, drink and bet... watch good ones, play good games, drink healthy drinks, and bet moderately. Make sure what you do benefit you positively or in good ways.

Some will say "if the bad companies are allowed to "go", our economic growth will reduce"
Well, a good/perfect society should base its economy on the health, happiness, satisfaction, good behavior etc, of its people, and environment. GOD should be pleased with the society too otherwise it is still at risk.


If the world economic growth metrics keeps a society from doing the "right thing", the society should ofcourse change the metrics or stop relying/using it.




✳This too is applicable to crypto or decentralized communities.

I think it's OK to bail out the good ones.

They are not really responsible for the current problem in societies, though they should have anticipated such disaster and planned properly  ahead.

Besides, the bailing out will save alot of jobs and families that depend on the companies.

I wouldn't bail out companies/businesses that produces bad things... Example: cigarettes companies, businesses that make/sell bad foods... basically companies that produce things that harm societies



Lest I forget:
I don't really like the idea of handing cash to people and leaving them to do nothing. They should be given the cash and be encouraged to work or provide values for societies. Any work or value they provide should be good and helpful to others. This is when governments step in and handout more "free" cash.  Besides, instead of handing the cash, why not give that amounts to businesses that provide basic things(good things) that can sustain people during a crisis. People can just go there and get those things for free when they need them till the crisis is over.



✳This is applicable to crypto or decentralized communities in time of serious crisis

Saw alot of coin logos already. Unfortunately, I don't have the time to search deeper for all 32. Besides the picture isn't very clear at my own end. Guess it's due to the browser I use or it's purposely blurred?

I am not sure if this is true.
Better to avoid mostly the processed things, which includes sugar. I believe there are good and bad sugar.. The natural sugar from fruits/vegs are not bad as far as I can tell... Probably few are bad or taking them in excess is bad?
Yesterday I ate something called sugarcane, and I feel great afterwards. But processed/artificial sugar makes sick or a bit sick (depending on how much I eat) whenever I eat it... even a little of it sometimes makes sick. Not so with the natural ones. I ate alot of the sugar cane and felt great later.

I doubt those legal age are really enforced that much in many countries. My first public gambling (prefer to call it betting) was at a very young age in a church compound (probably during something called bazaar or something) yet it was allowed back then. The games were appropriate for kids though and probably traditional.
Many of us likely bet as kids especially in our homes. I guess the problem is indulgence, which is gambling, if it doesn't benefit the kids positively. Kids spending lots of time (without spending money) on nonbeneficial games could be termed as gambling aswell.

Well, the real solution to this is real decentralization, but it seems everyone has his own agenda. I don't see true sincerity anywhere yet. People who should be more concerned are suspicious of each other while creating or encouraging evil that will most likely be used against humanity.
There should be neutral alternatives that are built on solid Bitcoin principles. The alternatives must be well decentralized, anonymous/private, transparent, immutable, trustless, permissionless, censorship resistant, safe, etc. Probably better to start thinking of building local decentralized networks(whether virtual or physical or both) as very few seem motivated to build the real thing for worldwide usage.

Oh, interesting. Probably not a good way to bet especially if kids are involved.




We did similar things a alot as kids. The funny thing is that we still refuse to fulfill our agreement when we lose the bets. We give numerous excuses why the winners don't deserve to get the prize.

Lots of people will probably risk going to casinos if governments allow it, and if there is easy cure or vaccine available. If either cure or vaccine doesn't exist while governments declare places like casinos safe, people will still be very cautious and probably wait long enough to see how the situation is before visiting a casinos in large number as usual.

What does the "take a shot" mean?

Well, it's probably not gambling if the risk involved is little. Wish I know what the "take a shot" means to understand this whole post properly and give a reasonable response.

In my opinion, it is not gambling if the family members benefit more from the game with little to no harm/risk to them.
But spending too much time on the game with little benefits to the family members is gambling

Well, if the moderation is well decentralized, scams like that would be quickly taken care of.
Skillful, anonymous and randomly chosen moderators should be able to delete such things very quickly when rules are broken in well decentralized social media

My favorite ways to travel cheap are on bicycle, horses, train, etc. Public/mass transportation are generally cheaper compared to the private ones... I don't always feel too comfortable in them though.
If it becomes necessary to travel cheap, I will certainly go for walking, cycling horse riding. I enjoy walking alone or with very few people. I also love riding bicycles and will most likely enjoy riding long distance on horses.

I don't really follow any denomination. I follow all the teachings of JESUS CHRIST. That's actually what guides me. And HE dwells in us, especially those who believe and obey HIS Commandment.
Moses prophesy concerning the coming of JESUS:
"For Moses truly said to the fathers, ‘The LORD your God will raise up for you a Prophet like me from your brethren. Him you shall hear in all things, whatever He says to you. And it shall be that every soul who will not hear that Prophet shall be utterly destroyed from among the people. —Acts 3:22-23
JESUS is that Prophet and HIS words will save those who believe and obey from the coming destructions.


The 10 commandant is from GOD but it is not really enough. Read or listen to the Book of Romans to understand why it is not enough.
Book of Romans in NLT:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l2nG_z-0j2Y&list=PLHZp_z2RSv22NTf-Mqsfj9adjWMtuMSIe&index=46&t=0s

Book of Romans in KJV: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tZ4ekulrEPk&list=PLIxhnx0kb33ORn8RQgHH54rdJMmqaRfmd&index=45




Eating the "forbidden foods" (just like not washing your hands before eating) doesn't defile a person, or better still, it does not make you a sinner. It is likely that the food law was given for hygiene/health/safety reasons. You could eat any food if you have the Holy Spirit in you and nothing will happen. It takes faith to do that. When you visit the homes of unbelievers to preach and they offer those foods, accept and eat them. The most important thing is to eat in moderation.
But it's OK to always stick to the food law if you have doubts, don't have faith or the Holy Spirit.