Seeing the laser canon raises some questions given what I am learning about the atmosplane and how light is affected.
It now makes me wonder just how effective these really are. I have been watching some of the videos with people using lasers to show the flat plane and there are issues with that as the light becomes diffused and the conditions dramatically affect the light.
Granted this canon is huge, lot bigger light pattern to start with and much greater power, but given what can see with smaller experiments most of those same challenges would still exist.
Funny part is none of those limitations have anything to do with non-existent curvature of the earth. LOL
Where there's a will there's a way, perhaps use of a pulsed RF MASER could help tighten the beam up. 
In other news, How It's Possible Japans Laser lit Soldier Field. Proving Flat Domed Earth. -- https://youtu.be/F7-NnR0rpncOddly enough the next video in the playlist is "Chicago Live In Japan 1984 _Stay The Night", Bob did you make this playlist? That's like trying to pin a laser to a microwave oven. In this case, the maser would have to be hundreds of times (maybe thousands) larger and more powerful that the laser to even affect the laser beam a little.  What's that, I can use a MASER to focus an optical beam you say? That's not what I had in mind but it's a great idea! |
|
|
|
Seeing the laser canon raises some questions given what I am learning about the atmosplane and how light is affected.
It now makes me wonder just how effective these really are. I have been watching some of the videos with people using lasers to show the flat plane and there are issues with that as the light becomes diffused and the conditions dramatically affect the light.
Granted this canon is huge, lot bigger light pattern to start with and much greater power, but given what can see with smaller experiments most of those same challenges would still exist.
Funny part is none of those limitations have anything to do with non-existent curvature of the earth. LOL
Where there's a will there's a way, perhaps use of a pulsed RF MASER could help tighten the beam up.
In other news, How It's Possible Japans Laser lit Soldier Field. Proving Flat Domed Earth. -- https://youtu.be/F7-NnR0rpncOddly enough the next video in the playlist is "Chicago Live In Japan 1984 _Stay The Night", Bob did you make this playlist? |
|
|
|
I've got an experiment that will prove that the Earth is flat once and for all, I call it the "The Final Experiment". 1. In New York City a giant super LASER is constructed, the most powerful to date. 2. The laser is leveled and pointed in the direction of The City of London at a height of 4 meters. 3. Fire the LASER!  LASER Cannon |
|
|
|
I can't "dream the Earth itself into a different shape" ROFL, but if you view the Nightmare on Elm Street franchise...
But can you dream yourself out of your flat earth dream?  https://youtu.be/6i_msSDvzbg -- They Live | Based on a True Story |
|
|
|
It's not just that heliocentrism is bad science it's a lie crafted by psychopaths as part of a massive conspiracy of faggots spanning generations.
Bundles-of-Sticks are non-sentient. Your entire argument is invalid. Like anything the queers at Vice print has any value (notice that Bob, a degenerate himself is ahead of the curve and has omitted any reference to the Vice article. +1 good goy points for you Bob!), they're probably defrauding their advertisers with fake clicks for fake news like the rest of the MSM. You don't think being a degenerate has any bearing on the honesty and integrity of the material a media outlet produces? If Vice wants to be facetious with their Flat Earth comments then I'm going to call them out for being the faggot kikes they are. IMO I'm making a valid point by linking degeneracy with a lack of honesty and integrity in reporting the news.  I can't "dream the Earth itself into a different shape" ROFL, but if you view the Nightmare on Elm Street franchise... |
|
|
|
Yap, Yap, Yap ...
 If I toss this do you think you could retrieve it and bring it back? |
|
|
|
It's not just that heliocentrism is bad science it's a lie crafted by psychopaths as part of a massive conspiracy of faggots spanning generations.
Bundles-of-Sticks are non-sentient. Your entire argument is invalid. Like anything the queers at Vice print has any value (notice that Bob, a degenerate himself is ahead of the curve and has omitted any reference to the Vice article. +1 good goy points for you Bob!), they're probably defrauding their advertisers with fake clicks for fake news like the rest of the MSM. You don't think being a degenerate has any bearing on the honesty and integrity of the material a media outlet produces? If Vice wants to be facetious with their Flat Earth comments then I'm going to call them out for being the faggot kikes they are. IMO I'm making a valid point by linking degeneracy with a lack of honesty and integrity in reporting the news. |
|
|
|
I'm still not sure what psychological purpose being a flat-earth truther fulfills What psychological purpose does knowing the truth about where you live serve?  Bad SlaveIt serves to free your mind from 500 years of bullshit lies. It's not just that heliocentrism is bad science it's a lie crafted by psychopaths as part of a massive conspiracy of faggots spanning generations. |
|
|
|
 ...
But it isn't a scattered-light void we see. Rather, we see off into space. FE science is way off base.
...
You need to shave those eyebrows, they're limiting your view of the night sky! You know I bet if I did the math I'd find that a really distant star according to the heliocentric conspiracy could have an apparent visual size with a diameter less than the Planck length. At the very least your average visible star would have a diameter of less than 750 nm i.e. the lowest wavelength the eye can see. Stars are close, less than 3,000 miles above us. |
|
|
|
... FE perspective, which essentially suggests that at distances of a few miles, light doesn't go in a straight line anymore, or that there is some other twisting of the medium through which light travels. ...
Thank you for making my Flat Earth arguments for me douchebag, of course atmospheric refraction is what you're trying to twist into looking like nonsense here. Scattering from things like dust & fog, refraction and perspective explain perfectly everything you see from ships over the horizon to the Moon and Sun.  Gotcha. I thought you might do something like this. Sure, there are scatterings in the atmosphere. But they are all relative, and slow to appear... unlike the glass of water (or whatever it is) in your picture. In other words, whatever works to form a different perspective than is generally understood, also works to correct that perspective. The point still is, that even if there are distortions, the ends of the earth would still be able to be seen at times. After all, we see the stars (whatever they are) thousands of miles away (miles rather than light years, if you want to believe FE). Even so, from the nearest points that we travel towards any FE distant ice ring, we would be able to observe the dome at the places it touches down, at least at some times. This info could not be hidden by any conspiracy... just as the scientific proof for the existence of God has always been with us, and millions of people understand it. No you can't see to the ends of the Earth because there's crap in the air that blocks light and enough distance and the air itself becomes opaque, first creating a red filter then darker and darker. Combine that with perspective shrinking things down to nothing and you can't see shit. The globalists have been busy promoting a very dark Satanic conspiracy to make everybody believe total bullshit about everything. |
|
|
|
OK not really but I've read the "rocket scientists" have been lying about how rockets work; I've learned that rocket engines don't actually work in a vacuum.
Of course you ask "but why would they lie, I don't understand". They lie because they're hiding the fact the Earth is flat and there is no space to travel to or in. We're inside a giant underwater terrarium and atmospheric life is an artificially created novelty.
Need proof? Differently shaped rocket nozzles produce varying degrees of thrust depending on atmospheric pressure.
OMG OMG now i know the truth about everything, i always knew the earth is flat but now i have a good conspiracy theory, i am sure the cia, masons and maybe Nicaragua are behind all of this. You forgot the Jews.  Criminals, we're dealing with criminals. |
|
|
|
... FE perspective, which essentially suggests that at distances of a few miles, light doesn't go in a straight line anymore, or that there is some other twisting of the medium through which light travels. ...
Thank you for making my Flat Earth arguments for me douchebag, of course atmospheric refraction is what you're trying to twist into looking like nonsense here. Scattering from things like dust & fog, refraction and perspective explain perfectly everything you see from ships over the horizon to the Moon and Sun. |
|
|
|
Dude, what a load of bullshit it starts off by claiming and I quote directly from the very first thing it says: 1. Introduction
The health of the eye seems to demand a horizon. We are never tired, so long as we can see far enough. — Ralph Waldo Emerson [1]
The first direct visual detection of the curvature of the horizon has been widely attributed to Auguste Piccard and Paul Kipfer on 27 May 1931 [2]. They reported seeing it from a hydrogen-filled balloon at an elevation of 15,787 m (51,783 ft) over Germany and Austria. ...
...
References and Notes
1. R. W. Emerson, Nature: Addresses, and Lectures, new and re-vised ed. (Houghton, Mifflin, 1884), p. 22..
2. Piccard is widely believed to be the first. There are many references to his achievement on the Internet, most of them certainly derivative. I contacted the Piccard family and they were aware of the claim but had no hard evidence or literature citation backing it up.
...
Boom! Here's an article from Popular Science before the existence of NASA that directly quotes Piccard: You've been served.
EDITBonus X-Post: Auguste PICCARD was a professor and scientist at ULB in Brussels: |
|
|
|
Perhaps the best example of flat earth proof is the Bedford Level Experiment. In short, this was an experiment preformed many times on a six-mile stretch of water that proved the surface of the water to be flat. It did not conform to the curvature of the earth that round earth proponents teach.
Definetely the best example of globe Earth proof are the dozens of astronauts who have gone into orbit and took pictures of the planet... all liars? Everything is fake? All CGI? Come on...  Why would NASA, Roscosmos, ESA, CNSA, JAXA etc. spend billions of dollars to trick us into believing the Earth is a globe when everyone can strap a camera on a helium balloon and send it 35k feet high to check if there is a curvature or not? And, please, don't start ranting about fish eye lenses etc., you can do it yourself with a camera you trust, there are plenty of ways to do this without the risk of proofs being tampered by someone else... it is only a matter of effort, time and money. I dare you to see it by yourself... then come back here and apologize for being such an idiot... or troll.  1. These people are organized criminals that use government positions as cover, secret societies like the Freemasons and Jesuits work within need-to-know and compartmentalized frameworks and have access to practically unlimited financial resources and the best artists money can buy. 2. All these agencies are tricking us because criminals are calling the the shots. 3. Every balloon sent up by a YouTuber without a GoPro wide angle lens on it has come back with video of a flat horizon. |
|
|
|
There are people who genuinely believe that the Earth is flat though. They tend to show some weird video and chat about a load of supposed evidence in it which doesn't make sense. Or at least, that's all I've seen of it.
What doesn't make sense to you? |
|
|
|
But how does the sun goes "under the horizon"? If the earth is flat, and the sun still very high in the sky, the sun would always be visible. The same with the moon
The effect of the setting Sun is caused by perspective and the atmosphere. If you've got a telephoto lens you can zoom in on a setting Sun with only half the Sun visible to the naked eye and you can bring the entire Sun back into view well above the horizon. ...[ CRAP REDACTED]... As quacky as it sounds it makes absolute 100% logical sense. Its all a matter of how light mislead our common sense. Come on notbatman its completly idiotic statement that the light somewhat magicly dont work after it travel some fixed distance. ...[ CRAP REDACTED]...    <-- MAGIC FOG <-- MAGIC DUST <-- MAGIC SMOKE <-- MAGIC DIFFRACTION |
|
|
|
But how does the sun goes "under the horizon"? If the earth is flat, and the sun still very high in the sky, the sun would always be visible. The same with the moon
The effect of the setting Sun is caused by perspective and the atmosphere. If you've got a telephoto lens you can zoom in on a setting Sun with only half the Sun visible to the naked eye and you can bring the entire Sun back into view well above the horizon. |
|
|
|
...[crap redacted]...
Why does it take Voyager 1 over fifteen hours to communicate with the nearest node of the DSN ? Tape delay, it's all smoke and mirrors.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
