 Boys, it's been two days since... Do you think we will recover? |
|
|
|
I can say that your account used to be mine to, does that mean it was? Welp, you can do/say whatever you please.
Anyway, was just comparing posts from 2014 and today. I have to admit that writing style, vocabulary and grammar does not match up. It's like day and night. |
|
|
|
There are also reports that this account was compromised back in 2015. see Page 230 I can verify that the oringinal lin0spice is Pho. I've know him from 2014 when we were trading saffroncoin. If you have the patience, scroll through my older posts and youll see it all there. Someone got hold of his bitcointalk account since it probably had been inactive with legendary status and looked more appealing for this scam of a shitcoin theyre trying to sell you. https://twitter.com/Cryptovestments/status/1000153196684300288So do you mean to say that his account has been compromised or something? And this project may not be legit? Cause that changes a lot of things Yes , i did not here to fud but lin0sspice was my account and got hack since 2015
Everything should be for this scam ico.
Ao watch out.
My reputation is legendary status that is why .
|
|
|
|
Since theymos has introduced the new merit requirement So, you have merited 11 people (8/9 of which have just woke up) in the span of 4 minutes...hmm i wonder why it took you 9 months to give your first merit?...to posts like this: any news of velox going to be listed on major websites?
vlx give me a home to live in
lol burn @quentinn |
|
|
|
Do you read or just post with a blindfold? Which part did i miss? That you have no idea/relation to accounts shilling in your thread?  Ah huh, let me put that blindfold back again. |
|
|
|
Photoshopper forgot to skin match face and neck.  Will further look into this later today. |
|
|
|
I was negative trusted for awarding contributing members to my thread. Let me fix that sentence for you. I was negative trusted for awarding recently woke up from a long period of inactivity/likely hacked accounts to shill my thread |
|
|
|
Let's not be naive here. Looks like mass grave excavation, all these accounts recently woke up from a long 7 month period of inactivity. OP about to bring back to life 69 more zombies. edit. 2011 account as well  sareea |
|
|
|
What if theymos will increase the merit requirement? Bounty camps will be shut down > which will lead to increased unemployment rates > street riots and government takeover > occasional mass suicides in Southeast Asia. The events of 17th September 2018 will be nothing compared to what will happen if you require 5/10 merits to rank up. Bounty warriors will set META on fire and burn it to the ground. sorry  Nostradamus signing off |
|
|
|
I see ~snip~ Don't give them any ideas  I'm sure they fill figure it out but still... The Merit system isn't airtight, but it reduces the problem from "unlimited" to "a few thousand".
Totally, we just have to get through this spam i want to help topics/posts which are spreading like wild fire through entire forum. My fav board - Scam Accusations is now filled with these recently demoted users. 
On a side note, i know it's probably bad, but i'm having a great time seeing these shitposters beg/cry for merit. It's just feels right. lol |
|
|
|
There are 200 000 recently demoted newbies that need 1 merit to rank up. Work on that list.. Sorry for spamming your thread, i just couldn't help myself. |
|
|
|
I imagine we'll be catching a few alt accounts meriting each other in the next few days. Exactly, already seeing full members randomly giving 1 merits, a bit surprised i haven't seen someone offer rep up service in 'Marketplace' yet. lol.
Just when I thought the endless merit posts in Meta were over.... 40ish 60 i give up type of number new merit-related topics and it's been just a couple of hours. God have mercy. I'm afraid to ask, but how many Jr.Members did we have...24hrs ago?
Wonder what will be the long term effect. I struggle to believe that signature campaign abusers with thousands of accounts, will be stopped by the new ranking requirements. Possibly a minor inconvenience for them, as they are likely to find a way, whether it's buying/trading merit or hacking accounts. We can expect countless jr.members accounts with 200+ activity and single merit hoarding signature campaigns again in less than 5 months. edit: It didn't take long:  Already reported, a troll?
 |
|
|
|
theymos just killed meta  |
|
|
|
Jr. Members waking this morning like:   /checkmate |
|
|
|
It's better to have more eyes on the game field than less in order to increase chances of decent posts being spotted I don't necessarily agree, more people/eyes does not guarantee you good posts being seen/acted upon. But sure does mean more work for theymos to select/approve and monitor these new merit sources. |
|
|
|
What do you think about this? https://icoholder.com/ru/nel-25396 ... 5 members of team was VERIFIED - Evan Devis, REnato ITO, Hans Muller, Andrew Busby, and Ayato Ishida. I saw this today... Why IcoHolder.com verified this members? Verified @ ICOHOLDER means absolutely nothing, you can find countless examples in this section alone, where fake identities are being marked as verified. Your best bet is to : Problem solved |
|
|
|
|
Voted yes, but I do not mind if they are being left as it is now.
I do not think chasing ranks is a good thing in general, nor motivation to be an active user and to contribute in whatever way you want/can should necessarily be justified by receiving 'points'. Good posters are being merited and will continue to be rewarded regardless of the volume and quantity of merit sources.
I have a slightly different/crazy idea though,..what about instead of increasing merit sources to actually cut them in half to 40 or 50. Тhe main complaint to some of them is that they are not active enough, regardless of the reasons. How about giving 30% or 50% more sMerits to those active ones? I've noticed that by the end of each month certain MS of are being left without sMerits to give, that would definitely help.
|
|
|
|
One of the reasons why other players still stay at old age.
1. Love of the game.
2. They are acquiring enough money for retirement.
You can add - chasing their first ring by signing a 1 year vet. minimum deals to a contending teams with stacked rosters. Also, most teams, if not all, need a veteran presence in their locker room. Apart from chasing rings and money, being able to help/mentor young players is what some of the old dudes like to do. |
|
|
|
Try (harder) again.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
