Yep I got tipped a little bit, not much, 0.005 for giving a good advice to a member Thanks!
|
|
|
A monkey is a monkey, cant blame for it. But people acting like monkeys, only prove that some people havent evolved past the Neanderthal phase, and are still primitive and retarded. Humanity is not homogeneous, some are wise and smart, most are childish and moronic, this is our species
|
|
|
There can be no free market. Humanity cannot become free from reality. The market must create a state to protect itself from reality.
Just stop with your poetic posts, you make no sense, sorry. Have you ever been to a grocery store? It is usually a free market there (if it werent for the regulations and taxes the owners had to pay). I have bought food from farmers, barely regulated, and it tasted good, fresh, and no I wasnt poisoned from it. Yet when you buy stuff from shops, that are "regulated" & "health inspected" you often find poisonous chemicals in them, additives, preservants ,and GMO. So your regulated economy is very efficient, at destroying itself apparently. Sorry but free market is the way to go: tiny or no regulations, and tiny or no taxes
|
|
|
If in case an emergency happened and I need to get quick funds, why wouldn't I sell some of my bitcoin holdings? I believe that bitcoin will go big in the future, but in the recent times, bitcoin has only a small scope of application in real life; you can't pay mortgages and medical bills through bitcoin.
Just wait my friend... Patience, Rome wasnt built in 1 day. Watch this map carefully https://coinmap.orgIt is spreading like wildfire i try searching nearby from my place but im not found it https://coinmap.org/#/world/-12.31853594/109.95117188/5 Where do you live ? Or atleast in what continent? I`m from Europe and it's obvious that Netherlands , UK & USA are the flagships of Bitcoin, plus you got tons of Russians and Chinese in bitcoin too, but less shops there.
|
|
|
The hardest part for me was actually kinda recent it was following the Malleability Attacks. I find it odd someone who has spend a lot of time to craft this getting to know the inner workings would want to hurt bitcoin. ( http://cointelegraph.com/news/115374/the-ongoing-bitcoin-malleability-attack) It makes me wonder if they are trying to get BTC at a lower price and quick profit. Or if someone who just does it to get attention like DDOS attacks. I hope we learn more about the person or persons doing it and their motive. Yep probably some organized pump and dump cartels trying to manipulate price, they push it down , buy it up , then unload for profit. Seems like an easy way to manipulate the market because its very susceptive, until they get caught obviously.
|
|
|
I`m no surprized, too many clowns walk the planet today , you just cannot take these idiots seriously, and cannot care about them. Look when a clown in a circus performs, you also dont care about him personally, you just laught at him and his performance.
|
|
|
Ah c`mon man, i was just about to eat, you messed up my apetite No low IQ moron photos on this forum please
|
|
|
Nice tits bubbles Pop them ...
|
|
|
There is no free market.
Yes currently there isn't, unfortunately, you you are right on that. But if there would be one, then the economy would work a lot better.
|
|
|
In either case, the stars are there. We know they are there because we have both seen them. What exactly are you thinking about when you look at that rocket video? Do you think the stars are no longer there or something? There's nothing suspicious about this whatsoever. It's an amateur launching a rocket, and stars aren't captured on video; this is not only what we expect to happen, but it's consistent with all other similar videos in which a large body (e.g. the earth/moon) would reflect enough light so as to wash out the rest of the stars, like if you're standing on the moon.
I dont know, i dont have an explanation to it, but it seemed very strange and suspicious. I heard some theories where the stars were holes in the firmament from where the light comes out, but it is not always open. It may sound crazy, but if the Earth is flat then there is no better explanation that comes to my mind currently. I`m a very rational person, but i`m also very open minded, so unless I see proof or counterproof, I cannot determine which is true and which isnt.
|
|
|
Fantastic. I'm brazilian and I didn't know this fact. I will look for some bitcoin accepting stores in my city. Let's see what I could buy! Yea definitely help and support those innovative businesses, they deserve it. Do these 150 stores have websites and facebook pages? If not then better tell them to make one to be competitive, and gain more customers... Yes! Today bitcoin is my second way to profit. I work with bitcoins everyday. Of course I will support these business accepting bitcoins! In some days I will share my experience here. Yea thats cool, keep up the good work, bitcoin needs more people like you. I hope more shops will open around me, looks like the brazilians are very lucky!
|
|
|
Can you post your pic? I wanna see what a smart person looks like. Here: This is what a smart person looks like
|
|
|
I`m on the 8th floor, trust me there is no light here if i go out at night on my balcony, the street light below have a radius of maximum 10-20 meters, why i`m at about 50m altitude, the sky is usually black at night, and i saw it last night, there was no clouds nor nothing, just pollution. So if it is the smog in the city, fine. But why I can see it in the countyside, yet not outside space, its still a mistery, and this light pollution effect doesnt doesnt seem enough proof.
|
|
|
I'm not sure if you're serious? CFB is getting ready to release a coin from scratch to support his JINN hardware project for a decentralized IOTs. Not to mention his bizarre and twisted heavy involvement in nxt and before that, developing (not sure if finished) another innovative coin- qubits on the Quorum platform.
His IQ is well above 74/47. Everything he says has to be questioned. I don't know what he is trying to accomplish but half of his posts are riddles and have hidden messages.
CFB is trolling you OR You are trolling each other AND THEREFORE You're both trolling me?
No I just exposed some irony how the sheeple cant understand cryptocurrencies and they always need something simple to use. Most people are dumb enough to barely use a PC, yet they can use a smartphone, because its designed for dumb people, just as Steve Jobs said , all Apple products are oriented towards simplicity, thats what made its success, why: because the sheeple is dumb, and you will only achieve success with something that is easy to use. So I guess the cryptocurrency that is the most "dumb" and "easy to use" will win the crypto race.
|
|
|
Yes stars emit light, but that light is not going to be registered by the camera when it's being washed out by the light of the Earth which is thousands of times brighter by comparison. Like I suggested, see how many stars you see around a full moon. You won't, because the light from the moon washes out the light from the stars. Or, go near a metropolis and see how many stars you can see with all of the light pollution, and then compare that to when you're out in the country.
I dont know, even if earth has a glow around it, it should not be 360 degree, yes maybe it glows a few kilometers and you dont see a few starts that are behind the edge of the "globe" but not the whole sky. You didnt saw a single star, not a single one, even Venus the brightest object, nothing. Haha the metropolis vs countryside analogy sucks, you dont see stars in the metropolis because of the smog not because of the light, my city is ultra polluted, yet you barely see that many lights at night, and i never see any stars. But when I used to visit my grandma in the countryside it was full of stars, and the countyside was so poor back then that they didnt even had roads, so its was 0 pollution there. You actually expect to see satellites? Why? Satellites are tiny little things flying at >17,000 mph in orbit 1.91 mi/s in geostationary orbit. They occupy such a tiny volume and are flying around so fast (compared to that rocket which is going virtually straight up)...you actually expect to see them? Are you kidding?
Yes I do,you can see the peak of a mountain easily from that point, so thats what about a 200-300 meter radius, you should also be able to see a 10 meter satelite too even some point that is moving around fast, it should be visible, especially if it's moving fast. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_pollutionIf there was a metropolitan blackout, you would see the stars just fine. If light pollution didn't exist, you would see all the stars during the daytime (from the sun, not from cities). As far as satellites, geostationary orbit is 1) about 22,236 miles above earth, and 2) above the equator. All geostationary satellites orbit in a ring around the equator. So, not only is this rocket more than 22,000 miles away from those satellites in terms of altitude, it is also x miles away from the equator depending on where this guy was when he launched the rocket. Again, I ask the question, you expect to see satellites in that video, which are probably ~25,000-30,000 miles away from a moving, wobbly camera, which are so tiny, and whose light would also be washed out from the light pollution of the earth? Seriously...think about this! Ok but trust me my city is nothing like NY or Las Vegas, there are only a few street lamps on and a few light from windows where people dont sleep, the sky is black, no light, and no stars...(it's the smog man) Yes when I go to countryside, I can see stars, it is very strange.... So it's the smog. I`m skeptical about this glow theory hiding the stars. ---------------- Ok on the satelite question you have a plausible answer, I`ll accept that for now. But I`m still skeptical about the earth glowing hiding the stars, and the dark dark void at that high altitude.
|
|
|
I watched this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlJ7kdJOTUIWhy are there no stars at all visible, and no satelites at that high altitude? Plus the void looks ultra dark, in all other images it used to be shows as more colored, in this one its looks ultra dark and scary. Video is interesting - The moon is visible from a place from which it should not on a globe.
- The lack of anything "hanging" up there (Satellites)
- The invisible stars
- The Rocked hitting the "soft" donat style dome barrier at the end and instantly stops spinning (no chance of getting to the hard barrier)
Yes thats all true but the most impressive/scary thing is the void, I mean the universe is fucking dark, not like in CGI photos: They make the background gray, or dark gray, or some blurred other tinting color, but never dark dark. While the real video, it is totally dark, dark as you havent seen before and empty: THE VOID
|
|
|
Yes stars emit light, but that light is not going to be registered by the camera when it's being washed out by the light of the Earth which is thousands of times brighter by comparison. Like I suggested, see how many stars you see around a full moon. You won't, because the light from the moon washes out the light from the stars. Or, go near a metropolis and see how many stars you can see with all of the light pollution, and then compare that to when you're out in the country.
I dont know, even if earth has a glow around it, it should not be 360 degree, yes maybe it glows a few kilometers and you dont see a few starts that are behind the edge of the "globe" but not the whole sky. You didnt saw a single star, not a single one, even Venus the brightest object, nothing. Haha the metropolis vs countryside analogy sucks, you dont see stars in the metropolis because of the smog not because of the light, my city is ultra polluted, yet you barely see that many lights at night, and i never see any stars. But when I used to visit my grandma in the countryside it was full of stars, and the countyside was so poor back then that they didnt even had roads, so its was 0 pollution there. You actually expect to see satellites? Why? Satellites are tiny little things flying at >17,000 mph in orbit 1.91 mi/s in geostationary orbit. They occupy such a tiny volume and are flying around so fast (compared to that rocket which is going virtually straight up)...you actually expect to see them? Are you kidding?
Yes I do,you can see the peak of a mountain easily from that point, so thats what about a 200-300 meter radius, you should also be able to see a 10 meter satelite too even some point that is moving around fast, it should be visible, especially if it's moving fast.
|
|
|
I watched this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlJ7kdJOTUIWhy are there no stars at all visible, and no satelites at that high altitude? Plus the void looks ultra dark, in all other images it used to be shows as more colored, in this one its looks ultra dark and scary. http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae323.cfmTL;DR: Starlight is too faint and it gets washed out by the brightness of Earth. Look around a full moon and see how many stars you see...or, rather, won't see. Thats bullshit, the stars emit light too,directly, according to the traditional theories, you dont need the sun's light to refract from it and lighten it. What about the satelites? The video showed more or less a 360 degree shot of earth's orbit up/down/left/right and not a single satelite.
|
|
|
NAME PLEASE! She is such a cute babe I would totally want her, what a hot asian babe
|
|
|
I got this (looks like I also have bad memory, it's 74, not 47):
Yea but IQ tests on the internet are not standardized, i mean do a real one to measure it correctly. Dont bust yourself down like this, the mean fact that you are in bitcoin proves that you have atleast 100 IQ, and possibly more.
|
|
|
|