> I strongly disagree for a number of reasons.  That Assange told a reporter
> he gets annoyed with false conspiracies like 9/11 is the apogee of
> disrespect for truth and justice.  9/11 being the fulcrum event launching
> the genocidal war on terror and the rise of the global police state was
> single most important thing he could have focused on.
>
>
> I will not try to convince youof this.  Believe what you want to believe.

Let me quote Hillary in response, "What difference does it make!".

Who cares if he is consciously evil and part of a diabolical plan, or if he is just influenced by his youth and following an ideology that resulted from being abused as a child. Aren't we all?

The human condition is becoming more apparent to me. I see myself now. Reactionary. Ideological. Fighting daemons from my past. All of us are.

Success is stripping away that addiction and focusing on production. Put the blinders on, we have a horse race to win. Everything else will fall where it may.

It seems you derive a lot of self-worth and satisfaction by knowing how evil others are. That you understand very well all the interworkings. I am a curious guy, so I bit on that.

But I don't like to know how evil we all are. The only person I want to know more objectively about the evil inside is myself. I want to solve the evil inside of me. Other people have to deal with theirs.

I hope we could be friends on a different topic. I see no benefit whatsoever from analyzing the evil of others. I am not in control of them. I can't do anything about it. I can only effect myself and the life around me.

Regarding your specific point, people have an ideology and they will justify anything because the ideology overpowers their evaluation of facts which would otherwise conflict with their goal(s) and ideology. Also Assange may think "what difference does it make now" about 9/11. He may be practical and realize that people like you (and me) accomplish absolutely nothing w.r.t. to all the analysis. It is a masturbation.

And/or he may have fake empathy like Clinton and be a functioning high-level autistic. I don't know. There are lots of weird people on this planet. and there is no way that you nor I can control them. They reach positions of power and influence and this will always be the case. There is nothing we can ever do to stop that.

I am moving on to what I can do. Seems more sane.

It is not a question of what I believe, because I don't even know the man. It is question of having a sane set of priorities of what I should expend my effort on in what remains of my life.

---

I am not shooting you. I am saying that you AND I went through a phase of analyzing everything. And I did it with the hope of finding a cure. And you apparently did it because it fits your research interests to analyze the minds of sociopaths.

I am just saying now that for me, there is nothing in that which can help me. Maybe for you, you want to continue that for research reasons. But I also perceive that maybe you are sort of addicted to that as if it makes you feel something superior or some benefit to yourself for knowing that you know.

But for me, it doesn't seem to benefit me to know that information. All I can see is that it made me crazy paranoid and caused me to lash out trying to find solutions for problems that can't be solved.

I am an engineer. It means I want to creatively find solutions to problems or improvements that can be made to our quality of life.

I don't see any point to analyzing something if I can't do something about it or if doesn't help me make some decision.

I don't see how any of my decisions would change based on knowing the shenanigans of the evil globalists. I don't think it impacts where I would choose to live. I don't think it impacts which projects I should work on. Well actually maybe by being so paranoid I would work on projects that are unrealistic instead of ones that could actually generate a profit.

Maybe that could be a contributing reason to why I am in a difficult situation now, because of not having good priorities about what I should be focusing my energies on thinking about and working on.

I am in a desperate situation right now. And I need to make quick
decisions on how to rectify it. So it seems to me that deciding to let all this globalist hell on earth stuff go away from my consciousness as much as possible is one of the better quick and easy decisions I can make.

What bothers me is you aren't even thinking about my well being.

I reached out to you again because I'm in a stage of great upheaval and uncertainty. And I reach out to those who may have some wisdom and can help me. Just as if someone reached out to me, I would try to help them (at least that was my pattern in the past before I became so depleted).

I didn't reach out to you trying to help you. I am the one who needs help right now. Maybe in the future I'll be ready to help others again.

So if I agree Assange is a horrible evil person, how does that help us? What do we do with that? Does that make us feel good? Have we accomplished something useful? What is the utility. As a research on sociopaths I guess. But I didn't choose that as my field of interest.

And again, I haven't met him and I don't have a complete record of all his actions, and writings so I can't really form a certain judgement of all his psychology. And even if I could, why would expend so much effort to know that much about another person? I don't even know that much about my gf. I have always been sort of the geek who is too busy doing some creative work to analyze people in depth. I get around to analyzing people when I need to, such as when they are causing a problem. I've learned later in life to be a bit more circumspect so as not to enter another relationship from hell.

As I remember you are very empathetic person and took care of someone for a long time who was ill. And I think that person was very much into this sort of analysis that you enjoy. So perhaps there is some emotional connection for you in that. I would understand if so. I apologize if I am not a suitable surrogate for the reasons I stated above. There was a time for me to be curious about that, but now it needs to come to a close.

I hope we are still cordial and friends. I appreciated your friendship from 2005 until my health got bad in 2011 or so. We exchanged a lot of ideas. It was fun and informational and we had a rapport for while.

But I think the actual shit is hitting the fan now. I don't want to be depressed all the time, because that is one of the psyops as you know. They try to wear us down.

My wishes for you is hoping you are still out on your bike and enjoying God's creation. And hoping you having good social interactions that are healthy.

Please  I am not against you. I hope you understand I am trying to make decisions based on mental, emotional, and physical health, as well as maximizing production.

My warmest and sincerest to you. Take care.

---

I realize my statement was very abrupt to cut off giving mental and emotional
energy to globalism.

I just realize it is a waste. It is intractable. It has been part of the
human condition since Mesopotamia. Yeah the devices of enslavement have
changed from whips and rope, to digital control, yet it is the same shit.

It won't ever stop. It is part of humanity. The epipheny is to not wrap
my life around that. Uninteresting now that I think about it from that
perspective.

Here comes the escalation with Russia:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/the-winds-of-war/

Here comes the escalation with Russia:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/the-winds-of-war/

This isn't the Altcoin Discussion thread for higher enlightenment. Can't you read, it says "Altcoin Scams Newbie Funnel".

Seriously though I think mprep just misinterpreted or got a little overzealous. But maybe our apocalypse tangent was what set him off. I can somewhat understand why it might.

I think he'd like us to keep the focus on altcoins and not end of the world. Sort of makes sense. Especially for me if I want create an altcoin.

That will very likely continue and boom after China bottoms in 2020 and starts heading back up. Latin American has the youth and needs to develop. China and Asia will be investing in Latin America.

Don't get yourself in trouble with the powers-that-be. You have a stable business already.

I still think the big market not tapped by Bitcoin is something combining blockchains and social media. I think this is still an area to explore. But I think it needs to accomplish spreading crypto-currency to millions and millions of users, especially those in the developing world if possible. At least that is likely where my focus will be if I ever get something developed in altcoin land.


My guess is they both doubles or triples over the next year or two.

Yeah living in the wilderness with no shelter isn't easy. I mean living off the land such as a small rural house and farm.

I wouldn't count on that.

I wouldn't hold Bitcoin unless you need to. You need a strong reason to hold it. Such as potential liquidity in a coming crisis and also for speculating in Altcoins in order to make larger gains.

Gold for long-term if you don't intend to sell it.

Otherwise Dollars (perhaps cash $20 bills) short-term.

I think much better to be thinking about an incoming generating business or vocation (or living off the land) than investing Bitcoin. I see Bitcoin not as an investment but as another source of liquidity and cash that I can use in ways I can't use my miniscule dollar bank balance, nor my even more miniscule pesos cash here.

When I was telling you all what would happen from the start of this thread? Ditto when I said what would happen to Ethereum. I don't understand how anyone could have bought SP and locked up their funds for 1 year time weighted average.

Well it is useless for you to power down, you might as well hold and hope it recovers someday meanwhile all your captured inflation ongoing. My balance is 4000+ SP and it is hardly worth powering, since I get about $15 per week now and declining.

Assange could have potentially developed Bitcoin.


1. Decentralization:


2. Double-hashing paranoia all over Bitcoin:


3. Okay to attain the small market of goldbugs which the Bitcoin white paper targeted:


4. Permissionless:


5. Employing a Merkel tree:



6. Hash based blockchain ordering of events:



7. ecash patents being unacceptable

Assange wanted justice, respect for all cultures, and sees governments as laden with corruption:

http://marc.info/?l=cypherpunks&m=95280154632982&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=cypherpunks&m=95279215920449&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=cypherpunks&m=101854398232228&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=cypherpunks&m=101757473900715&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=cypherpunks&m=102106096623372&w=2
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fa.caml/dsuqMp3So9U

He also wrote somewhere it would be better to be under attack of robberbarons than be unable to have any other choice. He clearly sees globalism as an improvement for the plight of humanity because it enables more competition and openness in his view.

I think for Assange he sees individuals trapped in local situations as more horrific than any macro effects of globalism. Perhaps this came from him being isolated in a cult by his mother in his youth.

It seems to he is still fighting the localized chains what were put on him as a child. So he sees the main problems of the world are the evil of local monopolies. Read the posts above.

Who agrees with me that the goal of defeating the powers-that-be with a blockchain should not be the goal?



Create something popular with a viable business model. Even use a blockchain for the properties it can provide such as being both a speculation and a unit-of-exchange, but just forget about this nonsense ideology of defeating Soros with a blockchain. It isn't going to happen.

Help them spread crypto-currency over the globe, then maybe they won't mind you are offering an alternative to their Bitcoin plan. But don't go in thinking you can defeat the powers-that-be with technology.

Decentralization for enabling a huge ecosystem because no one has to trust the a centralized entity is good. Decentralization for trying to defeat the globalists is suicide.

Any agree or disagree?

Who agrees with me that the goal of defeating the powers-that-be with a blockchain should not be the goal?



Create something popular with a viable business model. Even use a blockchain for the properties it can provide such as being both a speculation and a unit-of-exchange, but just forget about this nonsense ideology of defeating Soros with a blockchain. It isn't going to happen.

Help them spread crypto-currency over the globe, then maybe they won't mind you are offering an alternative to their Bitcoin plan. But don't go in thinking you can defeat the powers-that-be with technology.

Decentralization for enabling a huge ecosystem because no one has to trust the a centralized entity is good. Decentralization for trying to defeat the globalists is suicide.

Any agree or disagree?

r0ach, we are headed into a new normal. Surviving and profiting in this new paradigm as the global economy shifts to Asia is going to be challenging. Crypto-currency is perhaps going to play a role. But you don't think Rothschild created Bitcoin so he could enable you to be free?

It has been an important learning process for me.

There is absolutely no way you could get the Trump supporters to believe their savior Wikileaks is actually the source of their enslavement. You wouldn't even be allowed to get the message out to them.

There is no way you could create a popular Internet service and prevent it from being be co-opted by the elite.

You simply won't be allowed to.

We all here pretend we could be free. We won't succeed. None of us. Look yourself in the mirror and ask if you've come to grips with your enslavement or if you are still in denial.

If you've swallowed the blue pill, then there is nothing to say to you. If you've swallowed the red pill as I have, then its time to realize you are only free when you need nothing, not even to eat. When you walk away with nothing into the wilderness, then you are free. Free to die, free to be attacked by parasites and predators, and free to go hungry.

Start here:

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1561197/pg1?disclaimer=1
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/wikileaks-assanges-lawyer-has-connections-to-rothschilds/

Don't miss the video where Rothschilds says, "maybe they will have to learn".


I have also confirmed that Reddit is censoring the following information. There are no popular Trump forums where you will be allowed to post this information. I tried and was banned and deleted from evrey one of them.

The sheepeople are being totally manipulated. That includes the Trump supporters on the various forums. You will not be allowed to speak about the following truth.

The remaining question is whether Trump is complicit?

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/580h7f/is_wikileaks_setting_up_trump_to_be_blamed/

For me, this confirms we are doomed to globalism. The world I live in is a charade. Beam up Scotty! I am ready to end this experience I had on earth. I've had enough.

Rigged CNN poll lies Clinton widening leading by 8%.

This is to make Liberals feel as they were cheated by Russian hacking when Trump wins the popular vote. So they will swallow the blue pill and agree with some provocation with Russia.

Rigged CNN poll lies Clinton widening leading by 8%.

This is to make Liberals feel as they were cheated by Russian hacking when Trump wins the popular vote. So they will swallow the blue pill and agree with some provocation with Russia.

Ah ha. It is coming into full view now why the guy without a USA birth certificate was groomed for the Presidency:


Sunni vs. Shiite internal conflict within Islam. Russian supported Assad is Shiite. Obama comes from a family of Sunni Muslims.

Do the Rothschild's plan this well and that far ahead  

Digging and finding ... Arkancide with a Julian Assange Wikileaks connection:

Thanks for the clarification.

Moving very fast here, have 100 tabs of research open, no time to check if the thread is self-moderated, and besides I don't know if r0ach didn't message mprep asking for deletions, i.e. "deletion" in a general sense can also include provocation to delete. In all likelihood mprep deleted those without any provocation from r0ach.[1] Lastly it didn't register to me until moments later that "forum moderator" would maybe be distinct from "thread self-moderator" (and I did indeed have that thought when I was already in the middle of jogging trying to beat the rain when was threatening to pour down) and by the time I returned and ate. It just didn't seem worth digging back in to find this post, etc..

Look when I write a sentence and not a paragraph, it likely means I was not trying to make a perfectly accurate statement, but rather just quickly deal with something that I wanted off my plate immediatley, becuse I was in middle of doing somehting else.

basically wanted to ask or suggest if we needed to move the discussion that veered away from altcoins to a thread in Economics or Politics & Security.


[1] And that is surely the case, now that I noticed that mprep deleted the entire conversation about economic collapse, including r0ach's posts. Note I agree economic collapse is off-topic from altcoins (or is it? Monero is betting anonymity on economic collapse to some extent), but mprep should have an alternative means of encouraging diversionary discussion to move to another sub-forum of Bitcointalk, instead of just nuking the entire discussion. Does he think we post here to waste our fucking time? Mprep have a little bit more respect of us please. We take time from our work to post here and when you destroy our effort, you are stealing from us. Can you institute some means of forking the thread to "Off topic" or other forum of your choice? 51 year old men don't like being spanked by other men. It's really silly way to handle moderation, especially when no one was trying to abuse your moderation powers in this case.