And before that there was Francisco Scaramanga (Christopher Lee) in Ian Fleming's The Man with the Golden Gun, along with James Bond (Roger Moore) who donned an extra tit temporarily, just to make his way through the bad guys' world.

Hi, blackjag. Nice to hear from you again. 

I already stated, it's your online image I insult,

Since my online image is very similar to me, it is me you insult when you insult my online image.


because to me your statements, mostly from the bible are worth the words I throw back..

Not sure what this means.


Your word's are more insulting to me, because it's very clear you are quoting or using a book as your defence, not what you personally think..

Actually, much of what I think has come from books.


the fact you cant answer the plethora of questions proves you are brainwashed..

What does someone not being able to answer some questions have to do with brainwashing? Does it mean you are brainwashed because there are millions of questions you only fake answers for?


You claim you are trying to save me, thus, are trying to sell god, albeit for free, you are still hoping to gain a customer, client, which ever term you prefer..

My goals for salvation for you are the same as God's. At this stage of the game in your life, it is your choice.


We in britain do not have guns, and more importantly, would not dream of suggesting that we buy a gun to defend ourselve's..

Didn't realize this would offend you.


we are quite fine knowing if you cant fight with your fists or a stick, you should'nt fight at all.. You sit there as if you god is the almighty, but wont write your gods name in this thread to show the world how proud you are of him.

What does writing the NAME have to do with showing pride in God? You seem to know the NAME already. You have even written it in one of your posts. What does my repeating it have to do with anything? I haven't even been set in the direction of writing it, or against writing it. It just never came up as an idea or need for me to do.


I have produced the facts with regards to the controlling factors on this earth that ARE more powerfull than a god who says we can grow our own food.

Don't know what you mean exactly, but many of the things that you say are so peppered with cursing and swearing and some form of old English (Irish? Scottish?), that it is difficult to follow what you are talking about.


You argue the facts that I have pointed, yet refuse to aknowledge that, all of them come from your book, yes, believe it or not..

I didn't realize I was doing that. It sounds more to me that you are arguing with yourself most of the time. You make all kinds of assumptions about something, suggest that I am the one stating your assumptions, and then argue with them.


I know more than you, simply because I am still searching, and honestly dont like what I know so far...

Well, if you don't like what you know so far, maybe if you stopped searching, you could be at peace. This little section must be important for you, because you ended it in 3 dots rather than 2.


you accept your god, this I would not insult you for, but the fact you have found what you prefer to be your god has created in you, a lackin of the facts you either intentionally with-hold from the mass's, or simply dont want to know because it is the truth.

Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say here. If you checked the Bible in detail, you would find that it is a unit, with salvation as the goal.


I only insult you for how you blindly go about saying everything will be good and dandy if I take god into my heart, but LAWS prevent me growing food, so no, taking YOUR god into MY heart, will not save me in my afterlife, which begins anew every day.

Again, I don't entirely understand what you are getting at here. Accepting God as your Savior for the "afterlife" definitely is what it is all about. Nobody likes pain and trouble in this life. Yet everyone dies. Death is pain and trouble, at least a little.


Lets say hypothetically that I go with you and follow what it is your trying to get me to do, or lets say I allow you to save me. Ok, so god is in my heart. What next, huh? I leave church after prayer, and go back to my cardboard box? I sit and pray you might pass me, and throw me a cent or two? Will that prayer actually work? No. Because you need every cent you can get as much as the next man, thanks to the corruption of your religion. The Key here, is we all have at least a wee bit sense in that we can go fishing..

I don't save anyone. People need to go to God for that. If they go to a god that doesn't include Jesus, they have the wrong god. If they get the right God, they will have peace in knowing that this short life will be gone soon, and they will be accepted into a wonderful life of joy where there is no pain or trouble.


but first we need a permit.

Actually, you don't need a permit. If you studied this http://www.unkommonlaw.co.uk/ as much as you study your god, you will find out how to overcome the whole UK government by going to court at Queen's Bench.


We can grow our own food, but cant, because your church owns the land, and the governments have to pay that church tax..

I kinda wish my church owned something of value. As it is, my church's possessions are quite limited, and don't seem to include any land at all... except in a tiny way that I won't go into.


in effect, removing our god given right to eat. Unless of course, we join a masonic club, for only then do we NEED faith in the hope they are charitable to give us a decent fuckin meal. If we think of any other way, as is evidenced throughout this thread, the person who shows the way a: to the truth is b: cast down by you yourelf, not forgetting the rest..

I sure don't feel like I am doing any of this. But if I am, and especially if it isn't called for, please explain how I am doing it. More than likely, what has happened is, you have fallen in love with cursing and other foul language, and you are receiving back what you are doing.


me, I sit here, knowing god cant do anything about the laws seperating the rich from the poor..

Do you really know it? Or do you just believe it?


you are most likely in a well off state with nothing better to do than assume god can indeed help those who take him into their hearts, and this is why I think you are an epic fail in regards to arguing FOR god, when in fact, you put people aginst you, and hence, him.

God takes care of me. He takes care of you, even in your state of unbelief.


When was the last time you sat with a man in a cardboard box,

You have a wireless broadband connection? How do you charge your batteries? solar panels?


and stayed out with him a while, breaking bread with him, and even getting a wee bit drunk yourself, just to find out how cold you are in the morning? You have'nt. Even if you did, you'd still have a home to go to, he does'nt.. you will never see why people hate bible bashers..

Actually, Bible bashers are the ones who put down the Bible, and the God that it talks about.


it's simply because god CANT help..

You got it. god can't help, but God can. God is the only reason any of us are alive and able to do anything.


so pray tell me, now that I have god in my heart, as a man in a cardbord box, what would you suggest I do now?

What? Your wee sister kicked you out?


Get a masonic job?

Well, that might be better than the moronic one you seem to have now.


Put on a shirt and TIE, (symbol of the fool who joined freemasonry, shame on those that dont know) and keep looking for a job, knowing that the jobs are being filled with automatons? Get a grip..

Pray for me, for what I am, you shall become.. Wink

Edit: In case it escapes you, I've been arguing the case for god, NOT the bible..

Nor the God of the Bible.


I have shown a few of the many guises or forms he is shown to the world as, and all you have done is read from one book, and indeed, it is a very watered down book indeed.. shame on you.

With your ability to research, you could have long ago researched that the Bible is way more than what you make it out to be. Oh well. Devil's got you.




Seems that you are filled with assumptions about me. Sounds like you are feeling sorry for yourself at the same time you are trying to humiliate me. No wonder you have trouble in life. Isn't it about time you headed back to the bottle where you can feel sorry for yourself some more, and dream up more ways to attempt to humiliate me?

No. Way before 2020. Even before 2000. I watched the movie way before 2000.   

Yes. Michael J. Fox and Christopher Lloyd.   

I believe in everything that I think is true, but don't have any proof of. The things I have proof for, I don't believe in any more. Why not? Because they are fact to me. I KNOW they are true. I don't have to simply believe it any more.

I hope you get your wish, because that's probably the most efficient way to change your mind.   

Just be careful. For example, if you went back 10 minutes in time, you would be out in empty space, simply because the earth and the whole solar system was millions of miles away, and hasn't gotten to this location yet.

""  

I watch them come up over the border.   

Yes, except for 007. "You only live twice, Mr. Bond."   

No. I was simply posting in general. 

On the other hand, maybe it was your going back that made world history what it is. If you DON'T go back, you will change world history.

 

Everyone would think that you faked the evidence you brought back from the past or the future, even if it was evidently proof.

And when it breaks down - we all know that companies limit the proper operation of their equipment so that they can sell you a new one - who is going to air the place out?

Just as you allow your country to be in league with mine.

Who in the world is trying to sell God? If a person is unwilling to acknowledge the evidence for God in nature, and the examples for Him provided by science, I completely accept that persons decision. Why would I accept? Because God accepts.

I am not obliged to call you "idiot." Why not? Simply because there may be some hidden aspect of yourself - hidden even from you - that will allow you to finally wake up to God. God, Himself, doesn't call you idiot because of this same reason.

Play your game.

Personally, I would like to see the 14th Amendment amended in such a way that it expresses 100% total freedom for all citizens subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, except that anyone harming another person, or damaging his property, be held liable up to and including the death penalty, according to the harm or damage he did. Other than that, government hands off ALL the people in every way. And that government be required to warn the people of dangers it believed to be attributed to certain actions that the people might take in the exercise of their freedom.

For example. Everyone can drive without licensing, etc. And the speed limit signs are not restrictions. Rather, they are warnings. If you disobey the warning, and you kill someone by your neglect, execution for you.

Example 2: Government warns about the dangers of smoking marijuana. Smoke all you want. If you harm or kill someone while under the influence, you get executed, depending on the amount of harm or damage. If you turn yourself into a blubbering idiot by smoking it, your family better take care of you, otherwise you die on the street. Government is required to supply strong warnings or the government people are liable. You aren't required for anything in any way except if you harm or damage. (Some evident threats may be included in the harm or damage.)

It's Sunday. Church has let out. You and some of your fellow church goers are at the restaurant. Everyone is packing, in plain sight... the women as well as the men. Everyone is sitting around chatting like they do at the restaurant every Sunday after church.

Personally, I would feel much more comfortable knowing that if an armed bandit came in to rob the restaurant, I would be backed by all my fellow church people, and I would back them. In addition, I know that other customers, from other churches, would back us up just as we would back them up.

Tell you what. I would feel WAY more comfortable with this scenario than one of a bunch of cops coming in to stop the armed bandit.

If the law was, open carry required, we wouldn't have need for cops, and the bandits would naturally know better.



EDIT: ... or they would be dead.

Cops are people. You stand a much greater chance of being murdered by cops, or your own government in general, than by terrorists.

Cops are people, armed and trained people. But you can't train a cop to be a human being, while you can train just about anyone to be a good, armed peace officer.

Make it a law that everyone open carry while off his/her own living property. Train all people with general police training. Get rid of the cops. Get rid of the government in so much as they take your freedom to do anything away... except in one area. If you harm someone, or damage his property, then you are liable, up to and including the death penalty. Otherwise, 100% government hands off the people.