As per the OP and post #9, BitwiseOperator's not even willing to pay for a "mixing service",
why do you think he will even pay for "virgin coins" which is priced about 20% more than it's worth?

Any particular reason why you'd want to restore your addresses despite having Electrum?
That's for members to be able to answer straight to the point.

BTW, you can follow this post from the third link above: /index.php?topic=5253904 Post#19
But that requires you to restore the wallet to Electrum if you didn't have a backup of the master private key.

Which exchange? You should search if they have a "Coin/Token Recovery Service".

If they have, check the minimum recoverable amount and the fee, then contact their support.
If none, you're out of luck.

Sorry for the -snip-~s but I'm sure Viabtc's free accelerator is accepting transactions based from the "Fee Rate" not the total paid fee.
In fact, it's written in their page:

0.0001BTC/KB or 10sat/B

Most likely, the problem with rejected 250Byte transaction with 10sat/B is because they have Witness data (SegWit transactions).
That's because ViaBTC is using the Bytes instead of vBytes for computing the feerate and SegWit transaction have lower 'vBytes' than the size (in Bytes) of the transaction.
While wallets supporting SegWit will display vBytes as the size of the transaction like Electrum (it's displayed as 'Bytes' but it's 'vBytes' actually).

But bitmover is still wrong with his "100sat/B" minimum.

Basically, you need to bruteforce a Private key and Public key pair that will generate a SHA256 Hash then RIPEMD160 hash of that hash that have lots of trailing '0' at start.
And it shouldn't be a P2SH address because the data to be encoded into base58 will start with '05' instead of '0'.

Example: if you luckily get a RIPEMD160 hash like: 000000000000000536DD9030ECAC2E9D57457EBB that begins with 15 zeroes,
It will result to a valid address: 111111113qqRYCfHaQTXy58agJLihjB which is 31 characters long.

Blockchain()com is a non-custodial online wallet; you should search for "custodial wallets" instead.
Interest-paying version requires KYC, you also need to send the funds to your main wallet if you want to send them out so you won't be able to "mix" your coins for obvious reasons.

I can't recommend you any custodial service since most of them have the same policy as Coinbase so you'll like get the same results when you use them for gambling.
Consider using a desktop client like Electrum and use the common privacy measures like never re-use addresses,
you can also send the funds to a couple of different unused addresses before depositing it to Coinbase; or just use a real mixing service.

It's a custodial service that's why it's "commingling" the user's funds?
Basically any other "custodial" online wallet will do that but there's actually no "Mixing" involved in there,
the service itself still has logs of where your account deposited from and where you withdrew into.

Not to mention the limits and the possibility of locked funds for various reasons like "too high deposit" and red-flagged addresses/transactions.

That's 5.49GB worth of cached data, I'd say 12 minutes to write it all in a 5400rpms disk is normal.

Looks like your dbcache is getting filled by the new UTXOs that your client is discovering, and when you close Core, it dumps it in the disk.

That was a lot of UTXO by the way.

Could be your Bank's routing number, it differs per bank. FAQ says that it should be editable in your 'Banking' tab.

BTW, this should be in the "Service Discussion" Board.

It doesn't look like an "approval" to me, I'll stand by what I've said: it's "bumping the news".

It's up to you to stick to a single server.
Me, I'm using any server as long as it's functional and leave it to Electrum's random server selection unless there's a vulnerability in the client's version.

Is there any reference where ThomasV endorsed Blockstream's server?

If it's the link to "Retweet" in the OP, then there's no direct endorsement happened,
it's much more of a bump or news of a new server using a new server implementation though (Esplora?).

Your English is fine, it's not as bad as mine  
The problem is you hadn't stated it clearly and didn't actually replied to the previous posts (but did after answering a question),
What I get is: you've mentioned about a BTC balance in a mining pool then proceeded to mention the wallet.
Then you didn't tell if you have the passphrase for the wallet (in the OP) but given a clue that you didn't in the previous reply.

BTW, it's what I've said in my previous reply.
You need to at least know a couple of possible passphrases or parts to bruteforce it.

Where did you found the address? In a txt file? You shouldn't rely on that.

Have you properly loaded your wallet.dat?
You need to paste it in the data directory\wallets while Bitcoin Core isn't running then it will issue a rescan at start.

I got a feeling that he's one of those "free-electricity guys" in the Altcoin mining section that I've seen before (About 8 of them).
I remember someone who said they are mining in the basement of something and controlling their rigs from home.

1750 kWh sounds enough for a 6-10 GPU Rig. Still, not enough to be called "mining farm".

Hmm, I'm confused with your last reply, is the issue now solved or not?

If it's still in the mining pool's internal wallet, they are the only one that can help you with this.
If it is in that wallet.dat and you have no idea of the possible passphrase, then a mining rig won't be able to bruteforce it unless it's short or common.
If you decided to build a mining rig, make sure that the GPUs are all 8GB so you can mine Ethereum with it at least.

Yeah, dropping Skyrim was a really bad choice  

If it's an 'imported' wallet created using "Import Bitcoin addresses or Private keys",
Electrum will always allow you to add more private keys to that wallet.

If it's another type of wallet, please verify your Electrum's signature to make sure that it's not a fake.

Honestly, you lost me at the last paragraph.

But if the issue is the history and the transactions and balance are somehow fetched correctly;
Check if you've set a "filter" before, a drop-down menu should be displayed above the history, select "All";
if there's none, then it's disabled. Use "Wallet->History->Filter" to re-enable it.

By the way, Coinjoin will be available in the next release  
Although it's not as intuitive as Wasabi's, in Electrum it will be a painstaking manual merging of transactions and distribution of partially signed merged transaction to the other parties.

Here's one testnet coinjoin transaction that I've tried: fe3dde593d428606aab307bc11a179fbfacb416176865d1f7d14276fc25ce597
(merged inputs and outputs from three different wallet types)

The problem with Virustotal is you need to download the file first and upload it to the site before it can scan the actual file; in which case, you can be infected by downloading the file.
Scanning the URL of the direct download link will only trigger a scan to that URL's source/connections, not the file to be downloaded.

Example: If you scan https://download.electrum.org/3.3.8/electrum-3.3.8.exe you'll 1 "Malicious" result by SophosAV.
But if download the actual file and upload it, you'll get six totally different results - for Electrum, bunch of false positives.

OP is talking about the actual P2PK transactions here, not the "donations" to the derived address, so am I.
Of course the owner of the private key can spend those donations using P2PKH script but not the UTXO from the P2PK transaction though that "address".

Additionally for naufragus:
Most clients (like Bitcoin Core) can still spend P2PK if the you have the private key since it is still standard,
but it's not a P2PKH script that can be represented as an address which is the point of the earlier replies.

The Windows version is quite old, but I doubt that it has something to do with the 'age' of your OS...

Ledger live only works with 64-Bit version of Windows10, 2004 version must have a 32-bit version.
Check your PC if it's 32 or 64 Bit in "Search->System Information".

If not, consider upgrading by enabling "Windows Update", Ledger Live 2.5.0 works in my not-so-updated Window10 PC (2015).
Or pair it with Electrum (electrum.org) instead.

What he meant is P2PK scripts are Pay-to-Public-Key (read it literally to understand  ).
You shouldn't derive the address based from that Public Key because the owner wont be able to spend it using the "P2PKH" script even if he has the private key.
Those are only common in the old blocks

New widely used scripts are P2PKH short for Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash which is RIPEMD160[SHA256(Public Key)],
that's where addresses work.