Whether we agree or not, we cannot do anything about this; these are all just part of any leveraged market hence we need to just move on by accepting such kind of manipulations. Yeah, this kind of spikes are usually happening to trap small traders but those small traders (whales may not get liquidated for a $12k pump) must need to accept those losses because they are entering into leveraged the market after getting know about such a whales' manipulations.

This is most probably not a binance's thing but some whales manipulation in biannce markets. All leveraged traders must need to accept wherever they are trading as no one could assure these things will not happen outside binance markets.

I speculate a new ATH within this August month .

Yeah, I am still in favor of reaching $100k/$280k within this year hence we must need to get back into usual form to ensure there will be lesser deviation from the final ATH of 2021.

Nothing got changed due to the recent corrections hence I believe we do not need to change in the final price levels of this year. So, we need bitcoin gets into stronger bull run as early as possible. It means if bitcoin gets into another rally then we can easily get into $60k levels within this month and in coming months will be enough time to get into $100k regions.

I am seeing lots of people here from Bangladesh and all of them must be happier on this news. A country 171 million population definitely will bring good changes into crypto ecosystem if bitcoin will be made legal for them compared what El Salvador and its 6 million populations. At the same time when neighboring countries like China and India are still delaying and having negative stand on cryptos, I am really surprised on seeing Bangladesh' stand on crypto.

At least on study purposes, governments must allow people to make use of bitcoin as a legal tender and from that they must develop policies to run a positive economic by taxing crypto transactions. I hope Bangladesh's decision on crypto may trigger many other countries for a conclusion about crypto legality.

I do not think Toto or any Mercedes staff would be really excited about that situation. I mean I get it, dude is rich and that means that Strolls daddy could pay Mercedes a ton of money to get his son to race there and even give Aston Martin seat to Bottas so everything in paper looks like a great deal.

However why would Mercedes allow a driver like Stroll into their team when they could have George Russel? I feel like he is clearly the better driver compared to Stroll and that is why I would say Mercedes would prefer him. About money, there will be a cap soon enough and Mercedes already spends 4 times more than that cap, so they are not a team that needs money, they are not like Haas, so I think it would not make any sense for Mercedes to take Stroll just because his daddy has money, that is really not the type of team Mercedes is and will never become.

I honestly believe that there is a good chance we could end up with other coins as commodity as well. Think about it, does it have more similar stuff with things like gold and silver and copper type of things? Or does it have more common things with dollar and euro and so forth? I have to say that it is definitely more like gold and so forth. I do not know what USA calls them, I do not know if that means asset or commodity, but it is definitely similar to that and both bitcoin and all other coins should be considered the same way as well.

I hope that we could one day see all the world coming together and finally figure out ONE rule/law whatever for crypto as a whole and then we can all work properly. They did that whole KYC swiftly like crazy and that was amazing, but now I am looking at other stuff and each nation goes on another pace.

I still prefer Cake by far compared to many many others, it is just not even close. I can see that people like some other stuff because they give better returns and they are not horrible coins neither so it looks like it is going to be quite good according to most of you guys. However I still care about credibility and longevity a lot more than anything else, and Cake is so great that it is undeniably great and that is what I like to focus on because it is basically as secure as anything else and there is absolutely nothing that can be as credible as Cake.

I personally really like it a lot but that is nothing to do with why I like to invest into it, the reason why I really love investing into it is simply just because it gives that comfort of knowing it is not going to crash or it is not going to be a scam, it is the most trustworthy coin out there in the world (in defi world).

We are forgetting that even in games there are "boxes" and "loots" and "skins" and all that which turns into some sort of gambling. Netherlands banned those type of things in games because of how horribly gambling like they are.

Fifa and NBA 2k and all that can't do it on Netherlands and it is banned there, normally you buy points from Fifa, then get deck of cards and then hope that a great player comes out of it, if you fail you try again, if you succeed you either have a great player or you can sell and have a lot of money. Tell me that doesn't sound like gambling for you? It is basically full on gambling if you ask me. This is why gambling and gaming is very close and very little kids start gambling in games from very early age.

Shorters are always doomed in the crypto market, think about it you are in crypto that is going against the inflation, in the long run every single time dollar gets weaker crypto gets higher and the first thing on your mind is to short it? Yeah sure that may have worked once or twice in the past but let's be honest, it has lost 100 times before it won once.

You have to be like a sniper hitting a target walking in a very crowded street from a 300 mile away distance. That is seriously something that should not be considered a logical decision to do, not saying it is impossible, I am sure there must have been some people who made the correct call each time and rarely loses money on shorts, but for every one good short caller, there is probably ten thousand that gets it wrong. Which is why I believe we should not be considering this as viable investment at all.

As a market I believe that we do not see the same thing in all of them. ICO is a thing that allows people to basically just invest into one coin and one coin only, you are not given anything else regarding the coin at all. IEO on the other hand is still a coin but usually on an exchange, well it doesn't "have to" be on exchange right away, but if the offering is on an exchange that means 99.99% of the time the coin itself will be listed right afterwards as well.

This is why you at least get a coin AND get it listed on that exchange and you know about it. Like for example if Binance does it then you know what you are going to get. There are other types as well but these small changes makes a big change over long period of time.

I still think that this is ETF but at the same time I still do not understand why normal ETF doesn't get accepted at all? Yeah there is risks involved but this is the same place that accepted the mortgages to be combined together in thousands so that people could make more money together.

Think about it, it wasn't enough for banks to make money from the mortgages, they were already making a very good hefty profit from those anyway, but they also ended up making a ton of profit from combining them together and selling them once again. That is the type of craziness that happened in the market before and it caused soooo much debt and crash that even Spain and Italy and Greece nearly all went bankrupt because of it, can you imagine the greed of wall street? Same place says crypto is too volatile and risky to have an ETF? That is just bullshit if you ask me.

I feel like people need to stop thinking what will be next ethereum and start thinking about what a certain can coin become all by itself. Think about it this way, did bnb reach to what ethereum was? Easily, right now BNB is a lot bigger than what ETH was 2 years ago, that much is obvious, does that make BNB "new ethereum" I do not think so.

I think it is obvious that BNB is "what ethereum was" and that is it meanwhile ETH kept going up as well. Comparing it, in start of 2020 ETH was around 100-150 dollars, bnb is twice more than that, even a bit more, but eth is reached as high as 4k at some point and still nearly 10x bigger than BNB, so that shows that even though BNB became better than what ETH was, ETH also kept improving a lot.

"How it is considered legal" is a whole another question from betting. If it is legal to box and legal to gamble on that box then what we are doing is legal and there is nothing to care afterwards, I am not a doctor, I am not a trainer, I am not a boxer because those are the people that should be considering this as a risk and if they are not caring about it and they just completely ignore it then we should not consider this as an unethical problem.

Think about it there are thousands who work in this field, and every boxer needs to get checked out before every single fight, how come they are giving greenlight for fighters and then it is unethical for me to just gamble? I think it is totally fine. How fighting is allowed is a whole another topic of course.

I honestly believe that the works that require people to be in offices will develop the most. How? They are going to allow more people to keep working at home, because why not? Give them a laptop, or maybe they have one and they won't take yours, ask them to come in for the first week, give them some sort of training and put stuff in their laptop that they will need, and after that just let them work at home, maybe go to work 2 times a week?

This doesn't mean that they will not be working, it is an office job and as long as they can do it, then why not do it at home? I had a friend who worked in a call center, their computers were tricked to pieces and she worked during her vacation with us, think about it, she literally went up and left the whole city and we went where there were beaches and sun and we had fun meanwhile she just worked during mornings and she hanged out with us at nights. So, this is definitely something that will 100% happen.

I still seriously consider that crypto will be alternative payment method in the world. I know we are long way further from it, I know that there is still a lot of things that need to be fixed before that happens, mainly the fees considering how high they are and they are a big reason why we do not have a daily stuff, but at the end of the day we are talking about something that should not even be a question, it is such an easy way to store your money away from the bandits that are banks and governments. Isn't it sad that instead of being afraid of criminals, we are more afraid of the wealthy and the powerful?

Those people like politicians and bankers and big corporation CEO's are more dangerous than all of worlds criminals combined, you can take out every single criminal in a jail and put them in congress and put every congress member in jail, and the world will not be "that" different compared to today.

Everyone explained it well enough, I mean there isn't much to explain at this point about it. You can also check https://academy.binance.com/en/articles/what-is-a-stop-limit-order here as well, this will show you and explain to you as professionally as it gets from the best place in exchange world as well.

At the end of the day how good stop loss is only thing that we could argue about here, and I believe if you use it wrongfully then we are going to end up with something horrible in the long run as well, you should learn how to use it properly and without knowing how awesome it could be then you will use it horribly and that will make you think that stop loss as a bad thing. So, what you should do is not to just read about it, but then we should study it on live action as well, test it with small amounts, test it in demo game places and you will get the power of it eventually.

Eventually? I mean it is unthinkable to imagine bitcoin will never go down, of course it will go down, what we can't do however is the fact that price will not be going up forever, it is impossible for us to go up and up and up without ever going down.

It means that we should be seeing the shorts getting their revenge one day, the price will drop significantly one day and in that day whoever shorted their position will be making a profit. Will that be anytime soon? I can't know, nobody can know, if we "knew" what will happen then we would be rich, I will put all my money into 150x leverage towards the position I think it will go and I will make so much money, 3 times being right like that and you are one of the richest person on earth, because even 1k could become 100k+ in one try, and 100k could become 10+ million in second try, and 10+ million will become 1 billion on third try (not enough volume to cover that of course) so nobody really knows, if they did they would be richest man on earth in 3-4 tries.

Isn't the total supply a good enough reason? I mean we are talking about 1 quadrillion dollars, if you think that ANYTHING can reach that level, then go ahead and invest into it, then you can be super rich. In that case even if you invested just 100 dollars into this, you will become richer than you have ever imagined just from that, if you invest a bit more? You will be richer than Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk combined.

So, what are you waiting for? Go ahead and invest few thousand dollars into it so that when it reaches 1 dollar you can be richer than you ever dreamed. You will not, many will not, even the ones who do will not do it for that reason, all because it can't reach to 1 quadrillion dollar level. Even if we are talking about 10% of that, it is still 100 trillion dollars, yes that's right 100 TRILLION dollars, hell even the 1% of that is 10 trillion! which is 5 times higher than the peak of ALL crypto total cap.

I hate this kind of journalism, it doesn't give you the real source, it gives you source of the source so that you go to source that got it from the source that you go to eventually. Just show me the tweet, the web page, the article or whatever that official coca cola written, just put it under the whole article and say that "here is the source we got it from" and we can go there and see it ourselves, instead we are moved to another news website that sends us to another website that says "go check coca cola about it", really man? That is the main source? Go check coca cola?

What is wrong with journalism these days, I didn't become a journalist just so I could see these type of idiotic stuff, I work tirelessly just to find interesting news with proper sources that I can present if needed be, not "yeah we heard that..." type of journalism. I do not believe in this coca cola thing at all until I am shown some proof, and only after that I will... well still not care at all.

This is exactly why I am not trading. I am a very busy person, I work nearly 12 hours a day (I have to say I take breaks longer than a normal worker, probably can finish it in 8 if I worked with less breaks but I want to make a quality work so I give breaks in the middle) and sleep 8 hours a day, that means I already have only 4 hours a day for myself, which is usually at night, from around 11 pm to 3 am I am all to myself and have nothing to do.

To become a trader, I would have to spend that period to get better and keep checking stuff and constantly trading, which I will not be doing at all, I rather spend that time to relax and enjoy life because I am going to live only once so I rather not throw all of that away at trading, that 4 hours is the only part of my life that I can consider myself actually living, which is very precious to me.

I do not deal with timeframe at all, is that bad? I mean I am a long term investor and rarely trade and even while trading I only trade with things that I see a hype in, so timeframe never really gets into play at all. I know that it is not going to be ideal and I know that many people say that I am doing it wrong but I feel like time frame only gives one side of the picture and what the community is saying factors in a lot more.

I get that it is not really that "cool" to just invest into it because you see a big hype around something but I rarely invest a big sum into trading so I do not care even if I lose all my money with that trade, because I know I spent only a small portion of how much I have. So basically for me timeframe is not something I like to use, I just completely ignore it and move on with my life the way I like to which has provided me a good amount of profit.