-snip-
Did you just state that OgNasty scammed someone? I'm assuming this is a made up lie that you're spreading behind his back. I'll notify him. "Self-escrow", also known as a scam attempt. 
This guy is a literal joke, thinking that 5 digits is a lot of money given the amounts that some of the forum escrows have held/are holding. |
|
|
|
|
Horrible idea that will continue to facilitate account farming and spam. Nothing to see here; move on.
|
|
|
|
I am not even talking about trust farming
Yes. I am talking about you questioning my legit transaction accelerator.
As *legit* as Quickseller's escrow service. I can't even understand you anymore, how does it feel to get into pointless arguments online everyday? Get some peace, get some life Lauda.
You are like OP, and tell me to get a life. Is this supposed to be a bad joke? Take a good look in the mirror. Also trust farming? You just totally misinterpreted my wrongly (my mistake) spelled words. What i meant to say was only wasn't trust farming but gaining confidence of people and gaining praises which is what a lot of us want anyways.
Also know as: Trust farming. |
|
|
|
Begging for merit should be treated the same as begging for bitcoin and either threads trashed or posts removed, though I suppose in these circumstances the offending begging part could just be edited out by staff.
Begging for merit should be treated as attempting to trust farm. Therefore, those begging for merit should be permanently neg. rated IMO. |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Username: Xardasim
Rank: Sr. Member
Current post count: 425+1
BTC Address (SegWit): 15CDhHcKri9zHdyUgGTtHDmhonfQv3Ypt1
Bitcointalk Username: btsjimin
Rank: full member
Current post count: 175
BTC Address (SegWit): 3HLxMV9c39jW2JYDzG2raZ58PQMo3omhKj
Bitcointalk Username: btsjungkook
Rank: Member
Current post count: 145
BTC Address (SegWit): 36sihysgLLbHfxzJR1pyrWxEeSquuTRToz
All three permanently blacklisted for obvious reasons. |
|
|
|
20 merit was given by grue, also known as a global moderator. You've failed at basic investigative work.
The post is decent, but I wouldn't have given it any merit points. |
|
|
|
Another one-line shitposter complaining about the new system. How about doing something original for a change?
As you can see that tendence of answers only with legendary status or sr.member "22k posts only with constructive things" . I registered 6 months ago and currently have 143 posts . You are 4.5 years ago and currently 22 000 posts. Just use logic... You only understand shitposter logic, so unless it's an argument that validates your excuses and laziness, you wouldn't understand it. Certainly nothing Lauda says is going to make sense to you. How you ended up with even a single merit point thus far is beyond me. Tell me true, you purchased that merit, didn't you? I don't think he purchased it. Looks to be a gift from his alt account kinki32. They both have the same ETH address on their profile http://archive.is/JGDfu http://archive.is/amCFx Nice work. Tagged both. |
|
|
|
True, Lauda may be "cleansing" the forums by detecting alts and negative trusting scammers but he seem to have gain a wrong sense of judgement in all this process which has led him to straight up misuse his DT2 powers without thinking of consequences from someone else's point of view.
Nope. Also: Sexist. Take my example, he straight up negative trusted me by assuming my bitcoin accelerator service (now closed) is a scam, without any proofs, nothing!
He has ZERO proof to support his negative trust.
Wrong. Plenty of proof and you were trust farming anyway. Nothing further needs discussing. |
|
|
|
You just can not put negative trust as it is for scamming only .
It is not. Lesson : Do not under estimate knowledge .
You have no knowledge, thus example irrelevant. |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Username: isaac_clarke22
Rank: Member
Current post count: 360
BTC Address (SegWit): bc1qeldtzdhmrvthhv03g6kyq37xstw2hxhpuv2mzv
I'll add you on probation. Change your signature. BTC Address (SegWit): 15fUXt8aMopvAGFocj2vnQcs8jgDJzfkMY
Permanently blacklisted. |
|
|
|
A very nice way of facilitating scams. What is the best way to facilitate real projects? Since this is the best way to facilitate scams.  Offer these services separately, but never offer a *full ICO package* of any kind. |
|
|
|
Hello, I'd like to know how can I change the address of the airdrop provided previously? Thanks!
PM the developer. Is the BSD signature campaign still going on?
No. |
|
|
|
A very nice way of facilitating scams. |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Username: DunnDy
Rank: Member
Current post count: 88
BTC Address (SegWit): bc1qgsym3776plp4qzuj28szzkmvpt5sym3pg9zzjx
Bitcointalk Username: haxker007
Rank: Member
Current post count: 85+1`
BTC Address (SegWit): 38YvWFZM4CKQ81BDPZ1aktkzMqDRfAZ5R4
Bitcointalk Username: Noore Najjar
Rank:Full Member
Current post count: 301
BTC Address (SegWit): 3Egykav11nSLFrqy3GK48HgffWjfJn4e5x
Denied. Payment received. I don't understand why you still use blockchain.info tho, it seems they still don't support segwit so the addresses don't show up. Why not use a block explorer which supports it? if you want to support segwit you might as well use an explorer that supports it.
Payment received. I don't understand why you still use blockchain.info tho, it seems they still don't support segwit so the addresses don't show up. Why not use a block explorer which supports it? if you want to support segwit you might as well use an explorer that supports it.
Segwit support =/= bech32 support. You guys don't seem to understand that there is, and what exactly the difference is between encapsulated Segwit and native Segwit. Regardless, that explorer has been traditionally used to post the TX ID. It shouldn't matter to you what link I post as long as the ID is present. |
|
|
|
2) Is there any notification sent to the member after he gets his name listed here.
No. I read that you do not plan to give them negative trust, so how will that member know about this.
It is their responsibility to check. SMAS supporting campaigns usually leave a link to the list. If you apply before checking, then you should be both denied and neg. rated for attempting to cheat. |
|
|
|
How did I spam you? I sent two PMs.... No doubt you get dozens of PMs per day, it was reasonable to assume my first had been buried.
If you PM me more than once within 7 days about the same thing, and I didn't answer at all, and/or you're a random user, then you're spamming me. I don't see how you could think it is fair to move me to back of the list for trying to improve myself, that is a spiteful thing to do.
Cut the bullshit. A spiteful thing to do right now would be to instantly deny you and not look back. You should be grateful that you are being given a opportunity for review (even though odds are that it will be a wasted opportunity). |
|
|
|
As you can see that tendence of answers only with legendary status or sr.member "22k posts only with constructive things" . I registered 6 months ago and currently have 143 posts . You are 4.5 years ago and currently 22 000 posts. Just use logic...
The time of registration does not have anything to do with the quality of someone's posts. I can find you users who have registered later than you, or similarly as you and their post quality can't be compared to your shitposting. |
|
|
|
your post is very important for me... or you bought merits from me...?
Is this an attempt at smearing my reputation? If so, you should know that I don't react kindly to those. |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Username: bigmaster23
Rank:Full Member
Current post count: 225
BTC Address (SegWit): 3ChLRkcuuPyNjq8BVxdT2CoGrLYf19UuQt
Bitcointalk Username: qwertysungit
Rank: Full Member
Current post count:226
BTC Address (SegWit):3Nx36Han71AVTBoc5YGZodyTXXk3U21uF1
Denied. BTC Address : 18ma2N4MB7QGn4kHV6jnfirVDVUzJtJZ88
BTC Address (SegWit): 18tnMVAqhszrg9T946WRcdkz6Z7kpQBwBs
Both permanently blacklisted. |
|
|
|
|
Another one-line shitposter complaining about the new system. How about doing something original for a change?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
