It is good to be smart in life, even if the end is not good, I am not saying it is good to be bad, but to just be smart. Before wedding, it is not bad to have bitcoin holdings that your spouce will never know about. After you wed, it is not bad to have some holdings your wife will not be entitled too but your hirer, these are things you will never tell your spouse.
Call me naive but honestly that sucks, that prior to wedding you hide part or all of your crypto holdings from your future wife. I mean, why the hell would I marry someone if I can't trust her in the first place?
|
|
|
Awesome tool, thanks @COOLCRYPTOVATOR! I wish I knew about this when I was more active in scam busting as this bot really makes reverse image search more convenient. There are a few website that you can use to do the same for free. From what I could notice, this bot is free as well.
|
|
|
Da li znate da postoje agencije, ljudi koji nude usluge da se placa listanje na CMC i CG? E pa ima ih jako puno i cijene su urnebesne. CMC i CG nisu true to blockchain. Oni nisu decentralizacija, oni nemaju veze s kriptom osim sto listaju za jako puno novca vase i nase projekte da bi dobili exposure. Stvorili su si takav monopol da ih nista drugo ne zanima osim novca 🤮
Istina je da postoje svakojake agencije koje nude listanje na Coingecko i Coinmarketcap, ali samo listanje na tim stranicama je totalno besplatno za sve, ne placa se nista, to znam 100%. Druga stvar je sto postoje te agencije koje nude kobajagi brze listanje, ali to je vec druga stvar. Nije samo listing, nego i CMC, CG trending i jos puno toga. Svima im je do zarade, a nemaju veze s blockchainom.
Trending je vec neka druga stvar, tu sigurno da ima mucki i da se placa . Sto se tice Ivana Vrdoljaka, i on ulaze nesto u kripto jer i podrzaje nas projekt. Prijatelj je jako dobar s njim, pa je rekao da nas podrzava i da moze dobro doci. Nekad politika moze dobro doci, a nekad ne. Iskreno, ime Vrdoljaka nije neki bonus jer brijem da se vecini domace ekipe smuci kad vidi to ime. A posto je on totalno nebitan po pitanju kripta mislim da vam on moze samo odmoci. Uglavnom, sretno sa projektom, nece biti lako uzeti dio kolaca Coingecku i CMCu ali konkurencija je dobra stvar.
|
|
|
Yep, looks like you are right. Honestly, if I was redirected to the site with domain looking like that, I would be absolutely sure that it's phishing site as I had no idea Binance is using other domains. Since I lost everything I had back in 2017 due phishing I tend to check the address bar before logging into exchanges or anywhere else where I have some money, still have PTSD from that incident. Then again, better safe than sorry.
|
|
|
Are you sure that you are trying to log in https://www.binance.com? Looking at your address bar, looks to me like you are trying to log into scam site. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.postimg.cc%2FY0FKRQTh%2FScreenshot-2022-02-01-at-20-40-13-Can-t-login-to-Binance.png&t=663&c=5nipjeB07C_o_w) edit: just checked, seems like you are trying to log in some sort of fake Binance website that has been around for a couple of years. https://www.binancezh.top Domain Name: binancezh.top Registry Domain ID: D20190911G10001G_18654977-top Registrar WHOIS Server: www.gandi.net/whoisRegistrar URL: http://www.gandi.netUpdated Date: 2021-09-08T14:45:02Z Creation Date: 2019-09-11T09:07:11Z Registry Expiry Date: 2023-09-11T09:07:11Z Registrar: Gandi SAS
|
|
|
The main account I have is on the Binance. I agree that Binance is probably the most reliable platform, which is why I keep most of my funds there.
Wait a second. Just a couple of days ago you said that Binance stole your money, that you are not using them anymore and now you changed the tune and its the most reliable and the one where you keep most of your funds etc. Which one is it buddy? Let me share the quotes for others to see: Binance was my favorite until he stole the money.
When withdrawing funds from Binance, they charged 2 times the withdrawal fee. I tried to figure it out through the support service, but they have a bad one, they did not help. I left an investment account with them, but the sediment remained, even if it was a small amount, but it was still stolen.
Caught in the web of your own lies...
|
|
|
But let, to be honest, how much bounty hunters really help the project? by that, I mean to introduce the already well-established method for bounty campaigns. Zero, nada, nilch. Bounty campaigns have absolutely no effect on a success of the altcoin projects. Maybe they had long time ago so all this is just a remnant of some different times, but at the moment its a sham. short post quote (plus they added some hashtags, probably defined by campaign manager and campaign rules) Wonderful project. This project is top listed. This project is perfect from every angle. I recommend you to see their announcement and work. I think there is a demand,draft want growth. Immediately seen a cool project, a tough team that knows what to do for the success of the company! The project has a clear development plan, An experienced team does everything to make the project the best. So, can anyone say this is a promotion worth paying for? This is pure spam. This doesn't make you buy some of that shitcoin they are promoting? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Joke aside, his is a good example of that "hard work" that we keep hearing about every time bounty hunters get rekted, like in this case. Rule of thumb: every time you see some altcoin starting this kind of bounty campaign, you can be absolutely sure that they have no clue about marketing meaning altcoin will fail because let's be honest, 99.99% of the altcoins are only about marketing, nothing tangible.
|
|
|
Sure I am a potential buyer. But only if someone providers a rational answer to my questions.
Bullshit. There is no answer that will satisfy you, even if Satoshi himself comes here and answers all your questions. As I said, your mind is set and it giving any sort of pro bitcoin argument would be a total waste of time.
|
|
|
Looking at some of your previous threads ( "Bitcoin Doesn’t Exist, Or How Satoshi Nakamoto Tells Lies To People", "Bitcoin is like a token of Trump's bankrupt casino" and "Bitcoin Exists Only in Satoshi's Imagination" ), you are not potential bitcoin buyer, so no point really getting into any sort of argument with you, your mind is set. Or to quote Satoshi, "If you don't believe it or don't get it, I don't have the time to try to convince you, sorry."
|
|
|
I can't understand also why you are so trigger about the platform. You seems to be the only one here who knows about it .
Reason is pretty obvious to everyone but he thinks that he is being subtle in his shill attempt. I mean, newbie account fiercely defending completely unknown exchange that absolutely no one here ever heard of (expect one other member that looks like his alt account). That's a giant red flag for anyone that has any experience on bitcointalk. No need, I don't need your main wallet balance information even though it's worth 1k BTC, I just want to prove that what you have claimed is not your hallucination, unless it's true. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) To be honest, even he proves that he owns shit load of BTC, it doesn't make Fybit any more legit.
|
|
|
For December 2021, the number of merit distributed at the Indonesian Local Board was only 243 merits. But I believe in January we will have an increase. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Looking at Merit Dashboard and incomplete data for January (up until January 28th), seems like you are having a great month, merit wise. As a matter of fact, it will be your best month in almost two years, since April 2020. Did you finally get a new merit source, or the current ones became more active? There is merit source applications way back in 2018 crwth merit source application but it's almost 4 years and nothing gonna happen I think theymos will not accept a merit sources application for now. It won't hurt to have another merit source application, if there is someone from your board willing to submit one. If other users from the Philippines decide to apply for merits source I think they will struggle to choose 10 quality threads posted within 3 months old or younger. You don't have to submit 10 quality threads but 10 posts you think deserve more merit, as simple as that. Collect TEN posts written in the last couple of months by other people that have not received nearly enough merit for how good they are, and post quotes for them all in a new Meta thread. The point of this is to demonstrate your ability to give out merit usefully.
|
|
|
It's not fine to use paraphrasing tool, still the content he posts is not his, just copied in a tool to scramble the words and pasted again, but it's more difficult to catch this king of activity, it's still plagiarism. Yep, paraphrasing and text spinning is considered plagiarism as well and so its far from fine and it shouldn't be accepted as a valid bounty submission. They break rule 33. 33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.[e] ~ 33. This includes both copying parts or the entirety of other users' posts or threads and copying content from external sources (e.g. other websites) and passing it as your own.
Question here is whether bounty hunters submit their work via google form. If that's the case, I don't think that rule nr 33 is applicable here. many managers present themselves as anti-spam fighters and then set such a rule like weekly reports on the bounty thread. thus they themselves are responsible for generating spam. i'm even very suspicious that most even check all links on report to validate it.
That's another thing I don't understand really, why bounty managers force bounty hunters to submit their work via bounty thread instead just using simple google form. Seems like a double work, to make bounty hunters submit their work in the thread, and then manually update their data. The only reason I see is to keep bounty thread at the top, making it more visible for other bounty hunters.
|
|
|
At least there should be consideration,. right! because this is just a small mistake, similarity article,,,if I am proven to have violated the <ALT ACCOUNT> campaign rules then I am ready to be TAG,,.! but this is just a resemblance article, .! Yeah yeah, small mistake.. we heard all possible excuses for plagiarism. Looking at the very first sentence of your article ("AIIP is the best project of the cryptocurrency blackchain world") no wonder that you decided to plagiarize since you are obviously incapable of writing a simple sentence in English, let alone whole article. I don't understand who gave him the rights as a DT, .!
Other members who put him on their trust list.
Altcoin bounty campaigns are a joke, but this idea that articles written by illiterate people will somehow attract investors is even crazier.
|
|
|
Thank you so much Rikafip for the monthly update and now we know the merits stats per month for our local board. But sad to say my local board was one of those slower merits cycles in this forum. Even though our local merit sources will not active anymore but still the users mentioned above trying to circulates their merits. Once again thanks for the updates.
In that case, it's probably the time for some of your active members to apply for a merit source status. When I first started doing these overviews Philippines board was one of the most merited one so it sucks to see it so low on the chart. Hopefully that changes though, but you (members of your board) have to donate something about it.
|
|
|
Plagiarism should not be an error, but tagging the account is not right, the account supposed to be reported to moderators for ban.
He didn't plagiarize on the forum, he plagiarized on Medium for which he got tagged by the bounty manager. @OP Since you are ready to copy/paste someone else's work I would definitely consider you as a trading liability so no surprise there that you got tagged. And I love that "mistake" argument that all of you cheaters likes to use, like someone else's text can appear in your article by a wrong click.
|
|
|
Zadnji dan u mjesecu, krajnje je vrijeme za jos jedan pregled stanja domaceg boarda. Sve je napravljeno uz pomoc @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboarda te @TryNinja Ninjastic.spacea. Broj postova u periodu 01.12.-31.12Tijekom 12/2021 napisano je 451 postova sto je solidno povecanje u odnosu na 11/2021 kad je napisano 396 postova, sto nam je bio najgori rezultat uopce. Nadam se da se tao bude nastavilo i u pregledu za ovaj mjesec. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.postimg.cc%2FqvGxzcmW%2FScreenshot-2022-01-31-at-18-32-01-Bitcointalk-Merit-Dashboard.png&t=663&c=PiWzyVmxDPa8ew) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.postimg.cc%2FYS9D7ypd%2FScreenshot-2022-01-31-at-18-36-58-Bitcointalk-Merit-Dashboard.png&t=663&c=tvJEeyrSi6tXhQ) A ovako to izgleda kad se usporedimo sa ostalim boardovima. Unatoc padu, i dalje se drzimo u gornjoj polovici tako da situacija i nije toliko losa. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.postimg.cc%2F0NPFcXGc%2FNumber-of-posts-per-local-board.png&t=663&c=Myf8ve-OcG340Q) Analiza merita za period 01.12 -31.12Kao sto se vidi iz charta dolji, 12/2021 je bio nesto sitno bolji od 11/2021. S obzirom na nas broj posova mislim da je to odlican broj merita. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.postimg.cc%2Fry9k8sxs%2FScreenshot-2022-01-31-at-18-34-43-Bitcointalk-Merit-Dashboard.png&t=663&c=putgPR9hlnUdYw) Evo i liste onih koji su poslali merite, te onih koji su primili merit. Na vrhu su naravno nasi merit sourcevi, ali ima tu jos par imena koji su podijelili fakat solidan broj merita. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.postimg.cc%2Fgj59fXL2%2FScreenshot-2022-01-31-at-18-40-27-Bitcointalk-Merit-Dashboard.png&t=663&c=Ih0pQu6B4DOPpA) Kad se usporedimo sa ostalim lokalnim boardovima po pitanju podijeljenog merita, i tu stojimo dosta dobro, cak i bolje nego kad su u pitanju postovi ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.postimg.cc%2FN0KP0ytv%2FNumber-of-merits-per-local-board.png&t=663&c=K4UbJ4fG9hbitA) Po pitanju perit/post ratia, sa 0.45 tijekom 12/2021 jedan smo od najboljih boardova, sto je misim i zasluzeno kad se uzme u obzir da su nasi clanovi redom u najboljim kampanja te immao jako malo spama i pizdarija. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.postimg.cc%2FQxWtcmqF%2FMerit-per-post.png&t=663&c=Y1LMo19Yjch7yg) Lista aktivnih clanova naseg boarda u periodu 1.12-31.12I za kraj, lista onih koji odrzavaju nas board na zivotu. Slackovic je ostao na vrhu unatoc nikad manjem napisanom broju postova. Ako ga se sada nije svrgnulo sa trona, ne znam kad ce. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) 1. slackovic [64]2. Trofo [42]3. casperBGD [38]4. btcltcdigger [36]5. Daniel91 [35]6. dkbit98 [30]7. FatFork [26]8. Pmalek [26]9. Bajpas [23]10. cryptofrka [18]11. Rikafip [16]12. Domchi [14]13. sbogovac [14]14. badger27 [11]15. CroBoy12 [8]16. Bitcoin Store [6]17. Dikka [4]18. Franczeck [4]19. MikeCro [4]20. Pixavz [4]21. adamcro [4]22. rkorade [4]23. Gamefi Corner [3]24. Stalker22 [3]25. big_daddy [3]26. freigeist [2]27. Coffey_Dark [1]28. Krastavac [1]29. Robertocar [1]30. Tigerw [1]31. atjiat [1]32. campi91 [1]33. dzoni [1]34. ovcijisir [1]35. ringtonezone [1]
|
|
|
I know how hard is to update all those graph and analysis, so I encourage you to keep i the good work!
I am a master procrastinator, that's the main issue. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Indeed, what actually happened to the Pilipinas section of the forum?
Seems like November (170 merits shared in that period) was nothing but an exception for their board, as they have pretty much similar numbers to Decmeber in the last 6-7 months. I hoped that situation changed back in November, but I guess they still have the same issue. Are their merit sources became inactive so it’s time for some new merit sources? Yeah, that could be the case as I doubt that their post quality fluctuates that much. In the end, only their members can say what's exactly going on there, we can only guess.
|
|
|
PM some users who are not currently participating in that voting thread, I think it will save you more time to get at least 200 votes from different users. The forum also raised user awareness after the news section was announced about this vote, so maybe PMing to some users would also help a lot. This is just a suggestion, you decide.
Why would he do that? Honestly, if someone sends me PM about something like this, I would be really annoyed and probably wouldn't even vote, even if I initially planned to. Additionally, threads in Meta and Reputation are constantly close to the top of the boards so anyone that is even remotely interested in voting will eventually see it. Give it a time, some are probably having issue deciding so they are still waiting. Same thing happened to me last year.
|
|
|
This time it took me a little bit more than usual, but monthly overview of the local boards activity is finally here. Charts and tables are made with he help of @DdmrDdmr Merit Dashboard and @TryNinja Ninjastic.space. Communities marked with * (Pakistan, Nigerian, Bangladesh) don't have their own local boards. At least not for now, but hopefully that changes in the future. Post activity per local board during December 2021This month we had an increase of posting activity: from 19413 posts written in November to 20817 written during last month, which is a solid ~7 percent increase. No changes when it comes to top 6 boards, with Russian board far ahead of the others, as usual. Turkish board recovered a little bit compared to November, but still their numbers are far from where they were ~6 months ago. Looking at Merit Dashboard, part of the reason for their decline might a big decrease in " Konu Dışı" board activity, which is some kind of "Off-topic" board, unless I am mistaken. Merit shared per local board during December 2021Unfortunately, increase in post count wasn't followed by merit increase in the same period. During December 6633 merits were shared which is almost 8 percent decrease compared to November and 7148 merits shared. Standard names are at the top: Russian, Turkish, German, Italian and Spanish. Majority of boards had decrease with merit shared, but Pilipinas was the most drastic: from 170 merits shared in November to only 29 in December, which makes it a ~82 percent decrease. What's even weirder is that they were way more active in December than in November ( iirc ~90 percent increase). Maybe someone from their board can say more what happened there. Merit senders and receivers per local board during December 2021As its expected, more merit shared means more people being part of the merit system. Pilipinas board sticks out here, with quite a few people being part of merit shared despite very low amount of merit. Merit/Post ratio per local board for December 2021Compared to November, numbers in December are slightly lower but still much higher than the 12 months average so all good. Monthly merit/post ratio numbers tend to fluctuate a lot so nothing out of ordinary. The most active members per local board during December 2021Last but not the least, list of the most active members across 18 boards. This month we have a new champion, @willi9974 who wrote 321 posts in German board, beating November champion joker_josue by only 3 posts. Kudos to both of them!
|
|
|
Da, ali zato možeš dobiti i temp-ban od moderatora samo ako si malo više tvrdoglav kao npr nutlidah ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Hah, na vecini ostalih foruma su stvari nemjerljivo gore po tom pitanju. Kakav god da je, bitcointalk pruza vise slobode od ijednog foruma na kojem sam ja ikad bio aktivan, a aktivno drljam po forumima dvadesetak godina.
|
|
|
|