I don't think the accounts recovery team will accept a signature from the stated address because it was posted right before the account was hacked again.

A staked address earlier on, way before the hacks would have been very suitable, but he says he doesn't have any that he can use to sign a message except those that are directly linked to his exchange wallets

Only the accounts recovery team can provide you with the answer on whether the can consider unblocking your account after seeing a couple of vouches. But the said users are still very active here, all you have to do is send them PMs

I think you have been in this forum long enough to know that in the early day recovering hacked accounts even after proo of ownership was almost an impossible task until the cryptios team came in to ease the process but now your account has been compromised so many times in a short period of time to an extent that they have started doubting if the original owner is still in control of the account.

IF i were you, as I am waiting, i would create another account and use it to build my trading reputation

I think someone noticed that the post has lots of repetitions in it all meaning the same thing which is common when someone tries to attain more than number characters so that the post gets counted and decided to report it as low quality.

If you look closely at the phrases i tried to highlight you can agree with me there were some repetitions. So don't take it personally bro. The deletions will help you avoid such mistakes in the future.

My prediction was off by about 7 minutes 

I am happy to have witnessed my first bitcoin halving. By the time the previous one happened I was just getting to know about bitcoin from a couple of friends who were using it for transaction to and from ponzi scheme websites. Luckily i didn't end up joining them.

Wait, they are two? I only saw one, that the timestamp contest 

More details of my findings with other members' in this Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5216071.0
You can also view more victims with similar issues with the platform. A lot of shady and unprofessional work going on with the platform including a ponzi scheme model and plagiarism.

I have never used any wallet to exchange my coins. I regularly use exodus but only for keeping my coins and sending them out. I don't understand why someone would exchange coins through the wallet instead of sending them to an exchange like binance, kucoin or instant exchange like coinplaza.it or Exolix.com where the rates are so friendly compared to the wallet exchange services.

It's probably due to  security vulnerability on the coin you were working on. I would advise you to have a couple of experts in blockchain field help you set up a masternode and also do some security audits to avoid such attacks. Just because yours got attacked doesn't mean all the blockchain techs and the coins run by them are flawed

Based on your description, I am guessing it was 51% attack. That one attack I know where someone can block transactions by invalidating them and it's easy to carry out on small networks without using many resources unlike Bitcoin. There are ways of avoiding such attacks.

This is what i was thinking too. We shouldn't be too quick to judge newbie profiles. Just because the profile is a newbie rank doesn't mean someone doesn't know anything about bitcoin or how forums operate. I checked his posting history and the person seems to be knowledgeable and a bitcoin lover unlike most newbie accounts that just register to make bounty reports or promote scam links.

I don't see anything Odd about the profile.

I don't think he deserves any ban and besides he wanted only the first person who posted which doesn't promote spam in any way.
He was giving way the bitcoins with no strings attached of which the process ended up to donating to the good cause according to the developments in the thread.

There is a bitcoin explorer i got to know about a few of days ago thanks to this guy's Post
It is https://btc.bitaps.com/

If you don't want to stress about figuring out what fee you can use at that very moment then it can be quite helpful to you. It displays fees in three different categories
Their lowest being Minimal (confirmation within 3-6 blocks), then Optimal (confirmation within 1-2 blocks) and lastly Express (confirmation within the Next block)

The transaction fee is analyzed from the last 36 blocks.

What i loved about the explorers is that the best fee is displayed in real time and it keeps changing every second but it's very helpful if you don't want to pay excess fees while at the same time avoiding your transaction getting stuck for hours or even days.

For example this afternoon Electrum showed that you need to use a fee of at least 97.7 sats/byte for your transaction to be confirmed on the next block but this website was showing 30.57 sats/byte at that time from an express transaction.

Your problem is not clear, are you trying to say someone stopped your transaction? To me it seems your transaction has not yet been confirmed can you share the Transaction ID
Nobody can block your coins.

Who threatened you, can you shared details?
Anybody can have anyone's public addresses and won't be able to access the funds in your account. However, if you give them your private key, then they can be able to steal your coins. 

A public address is like a bank account number, anybody can see it but can't access the funds of the account unless if they have the credentials(private Key, seed phrases etc)

Someone if probably lying to you so that they can make you give them your Private Keys

If it was 2017, i would say you have some chance of earning a few hundreds of dollars from bounties due to the ICO hype back then but right now i would advise you not to waste time with bounties. Most of them are scams and don't live up to their promises let alone the tokens having any good value once they hit the market.

Instead of wasting that time on bounties, try to learn about bitcoin and some other skills like trading. You will make a lot more money than from those bounties.

Thank you too for your timely payments and updates since week one 
Forward we go!

The information is readily available if you searched a little online. Maybe lemme share a few links that can be helpful here;
- https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-reveals-ethereum-20-roadmap-to-cointelegraph
- https://docs.ethhub.io/ethereum-roadmap/ethereum-2.0/eth-2.0-phases/
- https://ethos.dev/ethereum-2020-roadmap/

Vitalik Buterin made a tweet in March showing a graphical overview of the road map
- https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1240365047421054976

It's all about money mate otherwise i see no other reason they would be in a hurry to resume the leagues. It's a matter of life and death we are talking about here if one gets infected from the pitch.  The players maybe Athletes and have no much risk factors, but they got families and all other vulnerable people around them who can easily succumb to the virus.

Lots of things that have not yet been looked into in detail.
Imagine if half a dozen first team players catch the virus. Does the team list them as unfit to play like they have usually been doing with injured players and then continue the matches with other reserve players or do all the players in the team get quarantined and the league gets paused once again? 

We all know players catching this virus is inevitable

Rule Number 1: Do not believe or follow exchange ranking data by trading volume reported by coinmarketcap. It's all inaccurate and fake!! Infact never use coinmarketcap at all and instead find alternatives like coingecko. Coinmarketcap are the root cause of all this by ranking exchanges based on their 24-hour trade volume.

Lol, finally the sheep's skin that was covering the wold has fallen 

I never trust reviews from Trustpilot. Getting so may email addresses and then creating accounts to make fake positive reviews isn't hard on Trustpilot. They should do more to curb such practices and warn people who might read the reviews in advance

Sure, they are planning a comeback


The person who created a scam accusation against them deleted the topic instead of editing it probably because he shared too much sensitive information.

Here is the screenshot from Loyce.club minus the sensitive information.

There is no clear information about the criteria that will be used to pick or determine the winners. Is it going to be a random selection or based on the amount of NWC tokens one holds?
If its random selection, are we going to have a chance of seeing the process of selecting the winners for the sake of transparency?