You're forgetting between week 35 and week 73 LV8 only had nine UID's he trusted, so he was self discounted from eligibility.  (and even then the nine he choose were safe DT1's)


The previous week he removed all sixty from his trust list.


So his ineleigability was self imposed for 38 weeks.

*Ahem*

Nice to see you good people have caught up to where I was weeks ago:


Remind me why you're on DT?

Has anyone reached out to any of these people?  There's still a DT1 in the list (and they're active on the Forum as we speak)


The DT1 on this list has also swapped 40+ merits each way between the two of them.

---

---

Interestingly enough both changed their passwords on the same day:

theyoungmillionaire



finaleshot2016

Trying to find escrows to handle games that would be over in ?? minutes when the conversing alone might take hours.  If you engaged a "two of three" wallet then that *might* speed up the process.

There *was* an automated escrow site the used this method, but got taken down on it's first run due to a scam.  Shame really.  I don't know of any other sites that do this method of automated escrow.

I've tried some of those online chess sites - I hadn't realised the players expect the game to be over in a matter of minutes and they get very aggressive in the Troll Boxes if you actually stop to think about your moves for a few seconds.

Other than people hospitalised with a terminal disease or a person on "death row" (or on battle fields) we usually don't know when we're going to die.  Imagine being told you have years to live, not bothering to get a Will drawn up much less bother to put in place a Crypto handover then being involved in a car crash and dying before you can put any of those plans in place.

Now it's my turn for a silly question, are


and


the same given the capitalisations are different?  I admit I don't know too much about those types of wallet addresses, but I always thought the capitalisations made a difference.

Although there are well over two million (and closing in on three million) registered users here on bitcointalk, the actual numbers of day-to-day participation is closer to around ten thousand UID's (and that includes all the scammers with the farmed accounts)

You can make $24 in one week participating in a SigCamp.


Not to mention the temporary phone number services already offered here in the bitcointalk forum "services" sub-section and probably other places, less obvious.

Time to fire up the popped-corn machine...


@Zemomtum feel free to scroll back through this thread and you will see numerous other people claiming to be married, engaged, parent, sibling, cougar and cub (that last one I made up ) and each and every time the answer will be that we don't have any way to verify that assertion.  Not really, given how much is fake online with regards to identity theft.

Whether you are, or are not, related doesn't matter.  Your accounts are connected in the evidence presented by @lovesmayfamilis - the harder you sequel, the harder those in this thread will see that you are one and the same person, not two.

---

---

By the way @Zemomtum - your own words give you away, you say Vicoma is male, but then *you* ( Zemomtum ) say "she is the mother of our children..."

Archive [1a], [1b]

---

---

Vicoma - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1090369 Archive [2a], [2b]



( You're the wife ... [3a] [3b] ) 

If your thread and the other thread relate to the same occurrence of scamming, then your thread (being the later created) is invalid no matter how golly-gosh!! you think you can do a better job creating threads.

You can have AA the guy next to you AK and I'm holding 93 (my two cards are the same suit).

AA goes all in, the flop is QJ7 (the J7 are the same suit as my 93 so I call)

AK goes all in on the turn with a ten (AK now has all four suits)

on the river I get a suited card 5 so out of the three of us I win with a flush beating the unsuited straight and the lonely pair of AA's (my highest card is the Jack).

Waiting to see what cards come out goes a long way to determining whether or not to go all in no matter how attractive the cards might look.

---

---

From my point of view, AK could have just as easily had 98 making a queen high unsuited straight, but I still know that my suited flush beats his unsuited straight.

Another suggestion I'd agree with is to withdraw the Copper Membership in it's entirety - Newbies just see it as a fast track to post with images and then boost their accounts with bells and whistles while lacking substance in their posts.

Am posting to follow and also to say up till now I've simply been clicking the "report to moderator" - surprisingly, they will take almost instantaneous action on malware, but won't take any action on shit posters, or dozens of instances of bump posting (that the mods leave "unhandled" through indecision  )

SMF has the capabilities to do email verification at the time of registering along with questions/answers and enter text in a box, waiting times after registering (then again a scammer will be in no hurry) even waiting for approval from a mod/admin - those kinds of capabilities can be enabled with just a few key strokes by an admin/mod.

Suggesting a white list or similar brings us backwards to the very early mega threads "please sir, can I be whitelisted?"

There are units of evil (or, at least there *was*) for those utilising the same IP to register too many UID's too quickly, but if they are spaced out time-wise then that's not a concern for scammers.

All of the things that can prevent scammers creating scores of UID's have been quietly disabled over time.

Anyone seriously considering engaging in a wager with this person would be advised to utilise the services of an escrow and also set out a clear set of agreed scenarios for play and payment/refund.

You could pump the topic even better if you were to answer the questions put to you by other outside of your avatar gang such as mine in this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5252442.msg54538738#msg54538738

I've lost the bookmark now, but somewhere on this Forum is a thread titled "why yes I have changed my password" - couldn't find it just now and this post jogged my memory about it.

Checking act's BPIP page we have this:



Which tells me s/he has done a routine password change.  Nothing more.

---

---

Cross referencing with the DT change log we see:



Again, no radical changes.

---

---

Going three-for-three:

This is prior to the password change: http://loyce.club/trust/2020-05-30_Sat_12.05h/465017.html Week 72.

as with weeks 73, 74 and now 75.  No changes at all.

---

---

There's no activity to suggest actmyname's account has changed hands.

I think your question has been answered through a lack of an answer - I don't feel that people place that great an importance on who did what, when to the minute.  The weekly DT update is a good example of how an update each week is sufficient.  The only people who would need such information on a minute by minute basis are those either trying to garner support for or against a fresh flag.

The novelty wears off after a while.

I really can't see myself sitting in a Casino and blurting out "Hang on people, I'll just check the odds of these two cards against the app in my pocket."

It *might* help you playing online, but I've seen Texas Hold Em can get pretty quick, so by the time you've entered details it's back to your turn again and everyone is waiting.

As an educational tool for someone starting out it could be ok, but people should familiarise themselves with the odds in play ahead of game day.