|
252,200,555
Roobet username : AnonymousPig
|
|
|
|
|
Hint: you guys don't have to login to play for fun.
So...
|
|
|
|
^10,000X  it's extremely super lucky! Anyways, I don't want the readers to think big wins in slots are common, it's not!  This thread is just for fun to see the funny videos. As you guys can see, most of them sponsored by casinos. Perhaps it's a good business to be a slot streamer nowadays. Always check RTP before playing, and keep your discipline! No videos from me this week because I'm busy finding "needle in a haystack." |
|
|
|
|
There are not enough resources on this planet earth that can be equally distributed without making everyone equally poor. Even with socialism, we will find the rich and the poor, and the bad thing is, the work does not determine the distribution, but the society, a.k.a the government.
Whenever I heard Marxism, I'm always thinking about beta males who don't want to compete.
In capitalism, most people are also born without wealth (inheritance), but only a small portion of them can be at the top, and the majority will be poor. It's a combination of hard work, smart work, and luck. It's the distribution of resources based on the competition, and the competition will push civilization forward with the new technology and stuff.
Perhaps I'm more in favor of 99% inheritance tax (than socialism), so the sons of the bitches riches, can only inherit 1% of their father's wealth. It's pure competition with a level playing field.
Minimum wage: it's a bad idea because businesses cannot employ more people into the workforce. Assumed without a minimum wage, a firm can employ two new workers with half of the salary, both will get job training (new skills), and both will get the money, compared to only accept one and leave the other one unemployed.
Job discrimination: it's a bad idea because the fittest should get the job, so productivity will increase.
|
|
|
|
Some people might take you seriously on that, so a bit of clarification:
 @stompix you’re absolutely correct because for few minutes I was wondering if this is some new guy we’re talking about, or it’s the old one who’s opinion these days don’t really matter.
These hard times, it's hard to get focused on the infrastructures and school systems. Focusing on one aspect would be good enough right now, the health-care system.
I don't understand what these have to do with stagflation when you have output problems and inflation problems at the same time. If you make a career out of one point of view you eventually make yourself totally irrelevant as you can't give it up and acknowledge what's actually happening.
Even if you're eventually proven right, if you spent all that time repeatedly calling for something that won't arrive for another few years that doesn't make you look like a genius, it makes you look lazy. Almost everyone's proven right eventually if they pound the same points over and over.
Agree, making a prediction is a common thing, it's a 50:50 chance. Right or wrong doesn't mean anything except he got it 10/10. I found economists often make conservative or should I say rather pessimistic predictions. Stagflation is a serious thing if we look at history. |
|
|
|
|
Roobet username : AnonymousPig
|
|
|
|
"op tell truth" you're a person who bought an account on this forum and probably a multi account user please stfu and go be a shill somewhere els clearly they froze me from accessing the site. roobet is scam I'm in contact with the people who gave them there licensing roobet will be shutdown soon
 I immediately regret my decision trying to help you. Bye~ |
|
|
|
@Hhampuz BTW, I just wanted to ask whether we are not allowed to withdraw unless we make a deposit. Because I have never made any deposit but have made several bets with my winnings. When I decided to withdraw some funds today morning, I received this warning. Can we have an exemption   Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5253156.msg54568808#msg54568808Hint: Hh comment is below the #2 champion |
|
|
|
|
^The OP wasn't completely honest, so I doubt it's a valid accusation.
Anyways, I'm more interested in one confirmation for withdrawal. I understand it's safe for a deposit, but not for a withdrawal because of REORG. I never tried to withdraw after one confirmation though since obviously I play for several hours first before withdraw.
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
Global adoption is possible, no adoption is also possible. The future is full of uncertainty.
But why the narrative always, hyperinflation, crisis, doomsday, and then adoption, while it is not mutually exclusive? You can have global Bitcoin adoption without any of that stuff. And you can have no adoption after those events occur.
|
|
|
|
^Coba main-main ke games and rounds: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=71.0Di sana banyak kuis dan kontes-kontes yang menghasilkan duit. Kalau untuk referral itu lebih efektif kalau dikasihkan ke teman-teman agan langsung via japri. Kalau pakai sosmed ga akan ada yang join kecuali agan termasuk "selebritis." |
|
|
|
|
Your next goal should be 1,000 mate. I know it's not easy, but you will get there eventually. If you enjoy reading, creating interesting threads, and posts on this forum, you should enjoy the journey.
"Stay hungry, stay foolish" - The Apple Guy.
Oh one more: keep the positive mental attitude (PMA) as this forum need more positivity.
|
|
|
|
Anyway, I see about the date and wager total on roobet, the video was created on 03/06/2020 so already more than 2-3 weeks.
Good eyes! I didn't notice it. I'd suggest OP to tell the truth and no need to be more dramatic. Try login now and try to withdraw. The site already working from my side  |
|
|
|
You need 1 confirmation for deposit only and not for withdrawal. How many confirmations for withdrawal are different across service providers including exchanges. Generally, you should be able to withdraw after 3-6 confirmations, well most providers that I use pick that number. Not sure what is the Roobet's policy. You should show that in your video so that you have stronger proof.Edit: watched your video till the end, it seems all have more than 6 confs. Waiting Roobet's response - retracted statement based on dishonest OP For logo thing, It currently under maintenance I believe since I can't access the site as well. |
|
|
|
Roubini, the economist that we all love predicts about the future stagflation: Roubini -- known for for warning the International Monetary Fund in 2006 that the U.S. housing market would soon collapse -- painted a picture of a bleak future with so-called stagflation, in which growth stagnates but inflation picks up. “We’re going to be faced now with a significant amount of negative supply shocks in the global economy,” he said, citing deglobalization and slower technological innovation, alongside enoormous money creation to help with debt loads. “Eventually the inflation genie will get out of the bottle.”  Source: https://www.msn.com/en-us/finance/markets/stiglitz-urges-capitalism-rethink-as-roubini-invokes-stagflation/ar-BB15SyLDThe last stagflation in the '70s was quite long and painful, are you ready to go through this crisis once more? Or this guy is just too pessimistic? summon @realDonaldTrump |
|
|
|
AFAIK it has nothing to do with inflation and stuff (macroeconomics), it may explain how the same skills worker in our country got paid significantly less compared to the developed countries, e.g., the US. Is the increase in employee wages intended to offset inflation precisely as a factor that triggers an increase in inflation because it is not offset by an increase in productivity? So that the actual income calculation does not increase but the price of goods is even more expensive. So there is an imbalance between the increase in employee wages and productivity per man-hour.
In a pure free-market system, wages are determined by the labor market (supply and demand for labor), it is not directly affected by inflation. For example, when a worker willingly accepts, let's say $2,000 a month, and then the price of goods and services increases, and he might not want the job anymore. But the firm doesn't have to raise his wage because of inflation. The relationship between wage and inflation is getting more attention is because of socialism's minimum wage. Now, firms MUST raise wages because of inflation. That makes the production inefficient. |
|
|
|
|
Roobet username : AnonymousPig
247,996,669
|
|
|
|
|
Roobet username : AnonymousPig
|
|
|
|
|
True, at the end of the day "it's always been a monetary phenomenon" - Datguy
I see, we can say the total real wages is increasing, but the average real wages can depend on many things, mainly about population and the distribution. Not sure how society can solve this issue (i.e., concentration of wealth) though. Perhaps it will always occur in nature, so we shouldn't try to solve it.
"Freedom will lead to higher equality" - Datguy again.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
