Definetely. The terms and conditions must be visible when you register and not click the sitemap to see them! LOL

But there is anyway no legally binding agreement, because they don't state the operator in the ToS and you can not have a contract with a domain name.

I read scam accusations every day and I can not say that they rised recently.

In dice and roulette, experience will not help you anyhow to win!

You can send a complaint to Skrill's regulator FCA https://www.fca.org.uk/contact and you can give your case also to http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/ , it is cost free.

Please ask them based on which paragraph in the ToS they reversed the transaction?

According to Skrill's ToS, transactions are irreversible:


Here is another guy: [UNIQUARK][570 eur skrill chargeback]

Alexa Global Rank: 318,893 -36,198

You can not have a legally binding agreement with a domain! Legally binding agreements are only possible between natural or legal persons. They must state the operator Direx N.V. in this "terms and conditions", to be juridical valid.

How is his statement related to Ezugi, while the word Ezugi is not mentioned  

1) You have no terms and conditions, because legally binding agreements are only possible between natural or legal persons. Fun-casino is a name and none of them.

2) The civil laws say that you have to pay out winnings immediately. Terms and conditions which are not in accordance with the civil laws, are invalid!

Did you ever hear about microgaming network policy?

They kicked Muchos Poker, because they breached it!

Based on what is having more accounts on a same ip prohibited?

They have issues with balances. How much did you deposit?

Satoshidice scam, 500+ Bitcoins defrauded and disappeared!

Only because you are not able to read, does not mean my info is not valid! 

Yes, because they are the contract partner with the player. But the victims can also sue the provider who committed the criminal offense.


Where is proof that BetOnine used Ezugi?

Peeps Place claims that the Chico Poker Network was the Blackjack live dealer provider.

O.k., I will try to speak slowly:


1) Where in the "details" is it stated that Overunder Holdings is operator of the website betbtc.co?

2) Where on the website betbtc.co is it stated that Overunder Holdings is operator of the website?

Did not find anything about Chico Poker Network, but Global Gaming Labs

Thank you for the info, but so far I have seen only proof in regards to BetOnline. Where is proof that Ezugi live dealer cheat?


Quote: "Their licensing for operating is listed right here: http://www.livecasinos.com/software/ezugi "

No, it says their studio is in Costa Rica. Ezugi is licensed in Curacao.


Quote: "And since having the casino provider located there they know are safe and can not be touched by United States laws if they do ever have someone who is wanting to sue them."

Yes, they can not be touched by United States, but they can be touched by own authorities. Each country in this world has own laws and own authorities.

No, they are not safe if they breach own laws.


Quote: "Why do you think sites such as Betbtc.com online gambling sites register their license there?

I have not seen any proof that BetBTC would have a license in Costa Rica.


Quote: "They want to protect them selves from future lawsuits from any incidents that may occur in the imminent future during their casinos operation."

If you breach local laws, it is difficult to protect yourself, if someone is going after you.


Quote: "If they decide not to they just let the license expire and write off the company."

If they decide not to what? If they have a license, then their identities and addresses are at least recorded and you can request it from the court, if they committed criminal offenses.


Quote: "This is what Cloudbet is planning on doing since they have let their prior license expire on the blackjack tables already not being available any further as of Feb 17th after a server licensing update (when their system reset to show if the operator paid already to renew their licensing agreement for continue of service they provide to the operator, Cloudbet). They are just letting their site die slowly this way."

I am not aware that cloudbet has or had any license? They might let their site die, but this does not necessarily mean that they personally can get away with it.

But yes, if no one is going after them, then they will get away with it. Because where is no prosecutor, there is also no judge.

Source?

"You heard of Class action law suit before? You know what that means don't you?!"

Of course: https://game-protect.com/full-flush-poker-litigation/

"Claimants don't pay a fucking dime for services rendered the state where they are filing it against do!"

In the Unites States not, but abroad yes. And all those cases are outside the US.

"Why would I who lost money in these fraudulent actions from this corporate conglomurate with Cloudbet who is failing and falling now(they are at their weakest point act now or else it will be too late, they run away to tax haven hideaway!) and this Ezugi casinos even want to put any more in the toliet with this bs situation?"

You don't know how much money cloudbet has, you don't know how much money the liable owners of cloudbet have.

WSEX also closed business owing over US $1 mio, but the responsible founder is still millionaire:

http://game-protect.com/wsex-haden-ware/

Why?

How is Costa Rica related to cloudbet?

I currently investigate the Ezugi Blackjack live dealer scam and found something interesting.

Please let me know if askgamblers is also investigating this case?

I would have interest to check your website with 1 day free trial, to see the outcome.