And, a good portion of what we call science, as well. 

Good point. Semantics. Ever heard of "legalease?" That's where the legal industry has changed the meanings of common words that we all think that we know. When you get into their courts or other jurisdictions, you might think you know what you are talking about. But you don't. Not even if you have studied their dictionaries and encyclopedias.

In this case, the behind-the-scenes point is, was SHE a hoax? If it really happened the way the official reports go, why won't government answer a whole lot of legitimate questions surrounding the incident?

Whatever the truth is, something fishy was/is going on with SHE. And the real point is to find out what it was/is.

If we can keep this thread going long enough, we'll be able to wish you a happy birthday next year. Of course, you can always start a new one then.

 

If the answer will determine your ability to get medical help, you might be need to fill out the form. "Beggars can't be choosers." Check out local laws about the requirements to answer certain private questions on the form.

What does it matter if you own bitcoins or others?

If you don't want to appear that you own any, but you have some, get rid of them before you sign the paper.

Is this question being used to accumulate statistics? Or is it being used to determine your ability to pay? Maybe it is for insurance purposes.

These questions are rhetorical, but they should give you some ideas about what other questions you might ask.

Not incoherent. The O.T. focus is simply from the standpoint of a theocracy ruled by God. That theocracy dissolved when Jesus came and did His work. Why? Because now He has taken up rulership of the whole world, through His Spirit for now, and personally when He returns.

Customs of the people may be different in Bangladesh. You must be careful of our responses in this forum. The things we do may not be the correct things for you to do.

People of Bangladesh are lucky. The British introduced English common law while they were running Bengal (Bangladesh). English common law is a two-part kind of government.

The first part has to do with all kinds of laws that the government makes.

The second part has to do with the customs of the people. It's called Queen's Bench.

If a person can get into Queen's Bench in the courts, the laws often don't apply.

Karl Lentz is a guy who is helping people in common law countries get back into common law. He has a Talkshoe program on Saturdays at http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=127469&cmd=tc. One of the guys who hosts that program is a guy from India named Bali Maan (India is a common law country for the same reason Bangladesh is).

Get on Karl's Talkshoe program and talk to Bali. He might even understand your Bengal language.

Go to Youtube at http://www.youtube.com/ and search on the words "Karl Lentz Bali." You will get some interesting videos about how this works.

Perhaps you know several languages. Take a look at b4basit in this thread. Somebody from Bangladesh who has almost mastered the English language. The people of Bangladesh are waking up.

If Alex Jones and Prison Planet - http://www.prisonplanet.com/ - are only 1% correct, but 99% wrong, we are so screwed.

The point is, we don't always know what the truth is. Certainly the media doesn't always report it. And conspiracy theorists are wrong at times, as well. The moment we start taking everything at face value is the moment we are lost.

Because the evidence is way stronger. The Bible came to us through methods that were impossible to have happened. It is improbable to the point of impossibility that something like the Bible could have happened in the way it did. Yet, the Bible is here. To understand this, one needs to examine the history of how the Bible came into being. The point is, Something or Someone very powerful must have guided the Bible into existence.

The rest of the religions are too vague, or else they don't have the strength of Bible text. For example, the Quaran is extremely contradictory. It has a lot of good ideas at different points. But it doesn't match the reality of life overall, whereas the Bible does. Same said for all the various evolution theories that have come and gone over the years, so that the only thing that evolution scientists can agree on is that evolution happened. Other than that, they have nothing that cannot be attributed to multitudes of other theories right along with evolution.

If someone who has studied decides that he doesn't want to accept the Bible as truth, he doesn't have anything else. He can truthfully say, if he doesn't want to accept the Bible, that we just don't know.

Never saw Private Ryan.

The soul is the essence of man.

I don't know what the queen teaches. I am being as sincere as I can.

It is difficult to explain things thoroughly without doing a lot of writing. It's a fault of mine, I guess.



EDIT: Just to place things in time, how old is Edinburg Castle?

True. and not only a separation from animals, but even life itself. I mean, any of us that loses the Holy Spirit completely for some reason will die. The animals, since they don't have the Holy spirit, show that they can live without Him, because that is what they are doing already.

The point? Don't resist the Holy Spirit to the point that you force Him out. If you do, you will die.

Problem is that any little piece of guilt, if not washed away in the blood of Jesus, is enough to condemn the guilty person to an eternity of Hellfire.

Attractive. Simply a way that God has placed into nature to get men to make more kids.

Even the purgings of Stalin couldn't wipe out the race.

Oh, WOW! I was wondering if you could ever get to a point. And you seem to have done it here. I appreciate you for that.

It's difficult to understand exactly what you are talking about. And, you are making it so, intentionally, because you happen to want to play a little. So, what is there really to talk about, since all you want to do is play?

There are two major groups in the camp that is called Christians. There are the people who are truly, sincerely religious, believing in God for ideals of peace and salvation. Then there are the wicked people who simply want to use the name "Christian" for evil purposes, or as a method for making money at the expense of others.

It is similar in your society, that is, in the group of people who adhere to the basic, general ideals that you adhere to. Some of the people are sincere, sincerely believing the things that they are attesting to. Then there are the crooks, people who sit in your society with the idea of making money, with the idea of harming others.

What's interesting is that often all the people in both your society and mine make mistakes. The good people make mistakes, and so do the bad people. The only reason the crooks in mine might have made more harm for people is that my society has been around a lot longer than yours.  It is only in the last 300 years, and particularly in the last 100 years, that your society has been able to overcome the natural knowledge about the existence of God in the formal, outward way that it has.

This is where my society is bringing about more benefit for at least some people than yours. My society is the one that prepares some of its people for the resurrection from the dead. Yours cannot do this. This means that if your society lasts for another 500 years, it will be sending thousands of people to Hell, whereas mine will be saving thousands... even some of the bad ones in my group.

Now, here is the most important part of this post. Your society has been around for almost as long as mine. It is only in recent years, because of entropy in the general health of the people, that people can't think as clearly as they did in the past. This has allowed for the charlatans of old age earth and evolution - your society - to pull the wool over the eyes of so many of the people in recent years, blinding them to the truth of God. Remember, way down deep you know that God exists. And - no malice intended - it will go bad for you in the resurrection if you do not change and submit to God, worse if you bring others to follow your way.

Bitcoin and gold do NOT compete with each other. Neither do silver and the commodities (corn, beef, wheat, etc.). The only thing that competes is people.

The idea of Bitcoin and gold competing has to do with people trying to reap investment benefits from the people who work without doing work themselves.

Both Bitcoin and gold, along with fiat, should be used for making trading and bartering to be easier to do. The free market should be the thing that determines value relationships - automatic pegging. If there is manipulation through pegging, all it does is to steal wealth and freedom from people who think that they have a good medium of exchange in the particular "currency" that they use.

You are goofy to think like this.

1. The only evil threat that Bitcoin poses at this stage of the game is, it is a threat to the banking system. It is the banking system that is doing all those things that are evil, way more than Bitcoin could ever think of doing at this stage of the game. Bitcoin is one of the few things that might be able to stop the "terr'ists wannabes" that are using fiat to do what they are doing.

2. The "terr'ists wannabes" are being used by the bankers who run the banking system to do all the terrorism that they do, or attempt to do.

3. The reason that there is freedom in the places like Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom, more than in many other places, has to do with the freedom of the people. Bitcoin is increasing the freedom of the people. If you stop Bitcoin, you slow freedom for the people down.

Let the people become educated so that they can stand up and free themselves from every oppressive government that is trying to take away the freedom of the people!