|
@MiSKLaCH a sextant measures a distance of 3,000 miles to the Sun and Moon and this somehow makes me stupid? Go fuck yourself clown!
|
|
|
|
The distance to the Sun and Moon as measured by a sextant is about 3,000 miles. While some pictures and video I've seen of clouds behind the Sun and Moon hint at them possibly being closer, this video doesn't exactly do a very good job of presenting its hotspot argument. I feel this video is probably controlled opposition trying to attack and drive a wedge between FE researchers. |
|
|
|
Praise Kek!
The Kek is strong in this one. What's Kek?   |
|
|
|
^ Clown is fucking clown.  |
|
|
|
And what exactly are we looking at in this video? Ice being melted by the Sun and a claim that the Sun only has a narrow beam of heat? Where's the thermal camera to show the heat map coming from the Sun? All I got from this video is ice melts when in direct sunlight. Could have done that experiment at the beach while grabbing a drink from a cooler. Well no surprise, your mind is totally programmed to a globot zombie. Even a almost blind man can see flat earth reality from this video. Hard evidence proof, globe is dead and case is closed. The difference between you and I is that I look at everything presented objectively while you look at it subjectively. Anyone who doesn't agree with you will be labelled as per your reply, even though you know nothing about them or their upbringing. The almost blind man you refer to would be able to see light and dark but nothing more from this video, let alone be able to conclude that the Earth is flat from it, but you'll see exactly what you want to see. The only hard evidence this video provides is that flat Earthers are more gullible than I first thought. Yep! The only difference between flat earth and Nigerian emails is, those who promote, and those who fall for it.  The hotspot is empirical in nature; it's not possible to get any more objective. You guys are fucking clowns. |
|
|
|
Are we actually discussing rocket science here? I can address half of the posts that I've seen while skimming through this thread. That said, I haven't been able to tell if they were a joke or not since sarcasm really doesn't translate well through plain text without. Before I spend an hour writing how thrust/motion/momentum/etc works from a current and theoretical standpoint, figured I'd ask if anyone is actually interested, or if this is a joke.
I'm well on my way to getting a PHD in Nuclear Physics. Its not quite Rocket Science, but theres a good deal of overlap with quantum mechanics/dynamics/etc.
FYI Earth isn't flat, rockets do work in space, gravity/light/inertia are really strange subjects that are just best current models and are subject to change.
The Sagnac Experiment. Here's a video presentation: https://youtu.be/SWmlimH7laY I'll start by saying, no one really knows what light is. Everyone including Einstein knew that Relativity is not 100% correct, there are a number of experiments that find fundamental flaws in relativity, however the degree of error is so minor, they haven't be consequential to physics applications thus far. Relativity is currently the closest model we have today, but there are some pieces that we are missing about light. Relatively doesn't account for light having momentum but no mass, no mass, but being effected by gravity, etc (relativistic mass aside). The current theory that light is a photon is to some degree wrong. The Aether theories are pretty fundamentally incorrect though. The vast majority of them were based on the classical physics assumption that light is a wave and therefore requires some medium, like sound to travel. Classifying light as a photon states that its some sort of "mass-less particle that exhibits some wave behavior" which rejects the need for a medium. Though I theorize that light does have some amount of mass, just to an inconsequentially small degree. Neutrinos which share a pretty high rate of similarity with light (minus the wave behavior) were discovered in the 1990s, so the laws of physics are still changing to minor degrees. Both are quazi energy emissions from the sun's fusion reactions. Neutrinos approach the speed of light, but have mass so likely don't exceed the speed of light (though thats been a subject of study for a while). My point being, there are a ton of topics that haven't quite been proven yet, but that doesn't mean our existing understanding is wrong. Hell, look at magnetic monopoles, there is absolutely no reason that they don't exist, but no one has yet proven their existence. Throw some irregular electric fields into the equation, and that might correct the 0.000000000000000000000000000001% error that exists in current mathematical projections, and solve all of the experiments that had strange conclusions. I've heard Sagnac's theory mentioned before when talking about orbits/satellites, but I had never looked in depth about it. It has applications within relativity that it wasn't trying to create. From what I read into it (on both sides of the argument pro and against) it looks like a frame of reference experiment. I found that this page pretty well described the experiment and what can be drawn from it, without bias. http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htmThe Sagnac Experiment is irrefutable empirical proof of the aether, I highly recommend and in-depth look at it. Then check out Airy's Failure Experiment, it uses a water filled telescope to slow the speed of light from a star and it empirically proves the Earth is motionless. Finally the Michelson & Morley Experiment corroborates Airy's Failure in providing empirical proof that Earth is motionless. |
|
|
|
So you're saying human trafficking rings involving societies power players i.e. teachers, lawyers, doctors, politicians, celebrities, etc, meeting and performing satanic cult rituals involving various combinations of pedophilia, torture, murder and cannibalism isn't true? Nothing to see here folks, please move along?  |
|
|
|
|
If you know the Earth is flat motionless plain within an enclosed system like me than this concept of global warming is just plain old hell on Earth. Fortunately man's output is equivalent to a volcano and um, wait a minute I'm living next to a mountain that's actually an atomic bomb? Fuck... maybe chemtrails and geoengineering will make hell freeze over before that happens.
This concludes my brief rant.
|
|
|
|
Are we actually discussing rocket science here? I can address half of the posts that I've seen while skimming through this thread. That said, I haven't been able to tell if they were a joke or not since sarcasm really doesn't translate well through plain text without. Before I spend an hour writing how thrust/motion/momentum/etc works from a current and theoretical standpoint, figured I'd ask if anyone is actually interested, or if this is a joke.
I'm well on my way to getting a PHD in Nuclear Physics. Its not quite Rocket Science, but theres a good deal of overlap with quantum mechanics/dynamics/etc.
FYI Earth isn't flat, rockets do work in space, gravity/light/inertia are really strange subjects that are just best current models and are subject to change.
The Sagnac Experiment. Here's a video presentation: https://youtu.be/SWmlimH7laY |
|
|
|
This was posted to 4/pol/ and reddit a few weeks ago during a massive DDoS, it was then deleted by the crooked admins: Key Dump
eta numeris 392D8A3EEA2527D6AD8B1EBBAB6AD
sin topper D6C4C5CC97F9CB8849D9914E516F9
project runway 847D8D6EA4EDD8583D4A7DC3DEEAE
7FG final request 831CF9C1C534ECDAE63E2C8783EB9
fall of cassandra 2B6DAE482AEDE5BAC99B7D47ABDB3
echo "392D8A3EEA2527D6AD8B1EBBAB6AD" > eta-numeris.hex echo "D6C4C5CC97F9CB8849D9914E516F9" > sin-topper.hex echo "847D8D6EA4EDD8583D4A7DC3DEEAE" > project-runway.hex echo "831CF9C1C534ECDAE63E2C8783EB9" > 7FG-final-request.hex echo "2B6DAE482AEDE5BAC99B7D47ABDB3" > fall-of-cassandra.hex
openssl enc -aes256 -in eta-numeris.hex -out eta-numeris.key openssl enc -aes256 -in sin-topper.hex -out sin-topper.key openssl enc -aes256 -in project-runway.hex -out project-runway.key openssl enc -aes256 -in 7FG-final-request.hex -out 7FG-final-request.key openssl enc -aes256 -in fall-of-cassandra.hex -out fall-of-cassandra.key
for w in $(ls .aes256); do for k in $(ls keys/.key); do echo "$w, $k, $(echo "$(openssl enc -d -aes256 -in $w -kfile $k -bufsize 8 | xxd -l 8 | sed s/00000000://g)" | cut -c 1-23)";
done; done;
wlinsurance-20130815-A.aes256, keys/7FG-final-request.key, 6f46 30e1 c6f3 385d wlinsurance-20130815-A.aes256, keys/eta-numeris.key, f22d 7304 8224 8ad6 wlinsurance-20130815-A.aes256, keys/fall-of-cassandra.key, 07d6 db54 f3c2 7d4a wlinsurance-20130815-A.aes256, keys/project-runway.key, da46 2913 216c 9a0d wlinsurance-20130815-A.aes256, keys/sin-topper.key, 48ab b7eb ceda f42d wlinsurance-20130815-B.aes256, keys/7FG-final-request.key, fde0 5ea5 34a9 c372 wlinsurance-20130815-B.aes256, keys/eta-numeris.key, 52f3 436e 82db 1fde wlinsurance-20130815-B.aes256, keys/fall-of-cassandra.key,ca1c c808 dfbd 0d23 wlinsurance-20130815-B.aes256, keys/project-runway.key, a10a 3571 a17b 8898 wlinsurance-20130815-B.aes256, keys/sin-topper.key, b1a0 64d4 0004 8865 wlinsurance-20130815-C.aes256, keys/7FG-final-request.key, 998a f677 3d20 33da wlinsurance-20130815-C.aes256, keys/eta-numeris.key, 5aec a6e6 5de9 dfdb wlinsurance-20130815-C.aes256, keys/fall-of-cassandra.key, 197f 378d 63b0 3e54 wlinsurance-20130815-C.aes256, keys/project-runway.key, acb3 a582 a477 75c6 wlinsurance-20130815-C.aes256, keys/sin-topper.key, d0f1 6154 a193 8905
edit: I've learned that "A" has possibly been partially decrypted and an unknown binary file extracted. |
|
|
|
|
How secrets are kept folks.
|
|
|
|
|
I raise #twittergate #pizzagate awareness and get called a pedo by fucking faggots, how original.
#spiritcooking anybody?
|
|
|
|
|
@BobLawblaw Fuck you faggot pedophile shill.
|
|
|
|
Why does air pressure effect thrust if thrust is caused by transfer of momentum like the liars at universities/NASA/TV claim? Who's the fucking moron here, me or the fucking livestock just waiting to be turned into pizza that believes this propaganda? edit: You'll probably make some nice dogs too.  |
|
|
|
This theory OP concocted is highly improbable. If the earth was flat how do you explain planes flying back and forth and can go around the world and be back to where they came from? It's really stupid in my opinion.
They'll tell you that the planes are all covertly set up to lie to you, and that even the pilots don't realize what is happening. Of course, they can't explain how thousands of technicians can have the wool so pulled over their eyes while they are doing their maintenance jobs. I see that the post right above this one, completely bypasses the details, and goes right into picking on you ( Gotottack) without anything to back it up. He's calling me stupid you piece of shit, I don't have a right to defend myself? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
