 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »
|
|
I think with that amount your best bet would be to crowdinvest in a casino built by someone else. This way you can gain from the house edge but don't have to operate a casino yourself, which typically needs an investment of at least 6 figures.
|
|
|
|
I think that XVG Could will reach $1 soon  lol lets break 100 first and stay there for 3 mo At the current pace 100 could come really soon. And last time it was above 100 sats it was very stable over 100. |
|
|
|
Shift has already broken 2$, this is going very steep. 90% up for the day so far |
|
|
|
All Alt currencies have been plummeting since June/July. Any ideas why?
Until mid July everything went down because of fearing a Bitcoin split in August. Since August 1st Bitcoin skyrockets, so people need to liquidate alts to buy Bitcoin, which makes alts drop. I think the best for an alternative recovery would be Bitcoin going sideways or slightly correcting like yesterday. |
|
|
|
|
It seems like you are posting a bit too often about Viacoin if you are completely uninterested in buying some.
Could it be that you missed the cheap prices and want to create some FUD to dump the coin and buy in cheap?
|
|
|
|
It is normal if so few wallets have nearly all coins?
I think this is normal because each exchange has one wallet with the coins people leave on them. |
|
|
|
|
At least shift is coming from a 30M market cap just five weeks ago, which is about 4x the current market cap.
So it transformed from a child of a giant to a baby giant, don't know if that can be reversed soon. But I also don't know why it was dumped harder than most other alts.
|
|
|
|
Getting 96% rebate on the pre-ICO sounds too good to be true.
Normally early investors get some discount because they have a higher risk.
Does that mean that the risk here is very high or why is the rebate so huge?
Dear counterplay, The risks in getting NIMFA tokens on pre-ICO and ICO neither less nor more than in any other project. If it's too good to be true just pass by our pre-ICO with 0,0008 ETH per 1 NIMFA price and wait till the ICO in August, 29-31, with the price at 0,02 ETH per 1 NIMFA. There's no catch here. It's just our team's decision to make pre-ICO attractive. Max, Founder & CEO at Nimfamoney This doesn't make much sense, why should I buy at the normal ICO for a price which is 25 times the pre-ICO price? I think the high discount may be good for the pre-ICO but is really bad for the motivation to buy this coin during the ICO. |
|
|
|
|
Getting 96% rebate on the pre-ICO sounds too good to be true.
Normally early investors get some discount because they have a higher risk.
Does that mean that the risk here is very high or why is the rebate so huge?
|
|
|
|
|
It might be possible but is not very probable since you are not skilled in trading yet and 200x is a lot.
I think you should take your 25$ and try to learn trading the next months.
Don"t be too results oriented during that period.
Check possibilities to get coins for free with signature campaigns or air drops etc.
Maybe you can save a bit more money meanwhile because when having the skills to 200x the money it would be too bad to start with just 25 bucks.
|
|
|
|
|
I would invest 50% in large caps (>100m), 30% in mid caps (25-100m) and 20% in small caps (<25m).
This way you have some of the big players and some high potentials in your portfolio for a good risk vs. reward mix.
Choose for each section 2-3 coins which YOU like best (not someone else told you to buy).
|
|
|
|
I know this is a Verge thread and will probably get biased views, but what does verge do that monero/dash/pvix/etc can't do? When I read through the various reddit forums, I see that verge is frowned upon and the more popular cryptos do anonymity/privacy aspects better. Maybe no one truly understands the tech between the various coins?
The coins you listed have a way higher market cap than Verge. Why should Verge do worse than these coins? First, is Verge's tech actually better? What does Verge do that the other 3-4 major players in privacy/anonymity can't do? Second, they have first mover advantage with bigger teams, better marketing, etc. Look at bitcoin vs litecoin. Litecoin is a copycat with better tech, but it's no where near the MC of bitcoin's since bitcoin was the first one. I agree that there is some first mover advantage but I think it is mostly there because these coins have the possibility to invent faster due to their bigger team. If they don't do that the better technology and usability will win the race. And I think that Verge has a quite nice innovation speed despite having a small team. |
|
|
|
I know this is a Verge thread and will probably get biased views, but what does verge do that monero/dash/pvix/etc can't do? When I read through the various reddit forums, I see that verge is frowned upon and the more popular cryptos do anonymity/privacy aspects better. Maybe no one truly understands the tech between the various coins?
The coins you listed have a way higher market cap than Verge. Why should Verge do worse than these coins? |
|
|
|
Bittrex is one place you can find a lot of low volume coins being pumped these days. Your guess is as good as mine which one will be next.  I think it would be better to look for coins not yet listed on Bittrex. Getting listed there might be the first step to achieve a 100x return. |
|
|
|
You should check out anything that doesn't in Top100 in Coinmarketcap if you want at least 100x. Top100 list has coins over 25 million dollar marketcap. If you pick the right one in the 101-200 list you become a millionaire next year. It's %80 detailed investigation and %20 luck. Even great idea projects have hard times collecting money sometimes.
How do you determine which coins are worth investigating? How much time do you spend on average investigating a coin? Do you decide wheter to invest following specific criteria or your gut feeling? |
|
|
|
|
Do you have any experience in mining?
Which coins do you want to mine?
How much do you pay for electricity?
Do you take any fees for hosting the mining?
|
|
|
|
|
The most important thing is that you stick to your buy and hold plan. Even if your selected coins falls below the price you bought it for don't sell it. Rather buy coins when they are cheap.
|
|
|
|
I have most of my coins between LBRY SHIFT XVG I don't know exactly why I bought them though, still a beginner in this stuff I guess because marketcap is not too high yet and there are some prospects. |
|
|
|
Ich habe mir das so gedacht: Ich habe 2500€ reingesteckt und 2500€ wieder rausgeholt ... 2500€-2500€=0€, also kein Gewinn ... natürlich habe ich ja noch die 0,3 BTC (als Gewinn) aber die kann man doch zu dem Zeitpunkt eigentlich nicht als Gewinn berechnen, da die theoretisch am nächsten Tag 0 € wert sein könnten oder verschwunden sein könnten usw. ... wirklich ein Gewinn wird das doch erst wenn man's zu Geld macht (Fiat), hätte ich jetzt mal so gedacht ...
Wenn Du einen Teil der Bitcoins verkaufst, wird Kauf und Verkauf dieses Teils und der Rest als unabhängige Fälle behandelt. D.h. mit dem Verkauf hast Du erstmal den Gewinn für diesen Teil zu versteuern, und der bezieht sich natürlich auf den Kaufpreis für diesen Teil. Wenn Du später mit dem Rest einen Verlust machst, darfst Du diesen gegen den erzielten Gewinn verrechnen. |
|
|
|
1. Warum sollte das ein Missbrauch sein? Ich kann doch Aktien die im Minus sind auch verkaufen wie ich lustig bin. Insbesondere um Gewinne gegenzurechnen.
2. Das muss m.E. nichtmal im selben Kalenderjahr geschehen. Man kann Verluste soweit ich weiß auch bei privaten Veräußerungsgeschäften ins Vorjahr rücktragen bzw. ins Folgejahr vortragen.
Unter Missbrauch iSd. § 42 AO sind zu Verstehen (Zitat von Dejure.org) "(2) 1 Ein Missbrauch liegt vor, wenn eine unangemessene rechtliche Gestaltung gewählt wird, die beim Steuerpflichtigen oder einem Dritten im Vergleich zu einer angemessenen Gestaltung zu einem gesetzlich nicht vorgesehenen Steuervorteil führt.
2 Dies gilt nicht, wenn der Steuerpflichtige für die gewählte Gestaltung außersteuerliche Gründe nachweist, die nach dem Gesamtbild der Verhältnisse beachtlich sind."
Wenn ich das richtig interpretiere, darf man dann nicht so argumentieren, dass man den Coin verkauft hat, um Steuern zu sparen, sondern muss einen anderen Grund nachweisen. Ich würde da eher so argumentieren, dass die Position in den Coin mit Verlusten geschlossen wurde, um nicht weit höhere Verluste zu erleiden. (Und den Gewinn und die Steuer noch weiter zu verringern.  ) Das klingt für mich sehr schwammig, ich kann mir doch immer außersteuerliche Gründe ausdenken, warum ich so gehandelt habe. Zumindest scheint es, als ob das direkte Verkaufen und wieder Kaufen des verlustbringenden Coins zumindest nicht unbedingt empfehlenswert ist, aber ein Wechsel in einen anderen Coin sehr gut argumentierbar ist. |
|
|
|
|
