|
HI everyone, sorry for my ignorant questions, have been busy for a while to track news. How is AMD doing with DAG problem? Any official fix? While it was hardware level problem they made some workaround?
How much MH/s 570/580 BIOS modded/not modded can push at the moment?
|
|
|
|
|
HI everyone, sorry for my ignorant questions, have been busy for a while to track news. How is AMD doing with DAG problem? Any official fix? While it was hardware level problem they made some workaround?
How much MH/s 570/580 BIOS modded/not modded can push at the moment?
|
|
|
|
|
Any obsservations how fork when it happens will affect ZCL?
|
|
|
|
You cannot compare hashrate reported by the pool so precisely.
It is calculated with the actual shares that you send.
Therefore, it vary depending on the day you mine, the difficulty, the number of miners, the pool hashrate, network congestion, the latency, luck factor, and so on...
Better run your own tests... Lots of smart words put in one sentence but have no meaning all together. |
|
|
|
lul thats stupid man.
ewbf = 3049
dstm = 3099 - 2% = 3037
Why use DSTM if earning less ? Makes no sense. And yes, --fee 0 works in EWBF.
Lul, guys here were right you are pretty stupid. Not stupid but actually dumb  3099 is actual numbers from pool. But of course brain dead people does not read or actually try something, they just whine all around  |
|
|
|
I actually advocated EWBF earlyer, but sticking with DSTM now Test ended with average 3049 EWBF vs 3099 DSTM. 50 free hashes? Sounds good for me... --fee 0 didn't helped EWBF. And at least in my case i still see 2% less shares then reported by miner. And even some say they see 1% reduce it still does not save EFBW. And this is GDDR5X cards witch presumably should have worked better on EFBW. P.S. I am not related to DSTM or EFBW in any way, long time used both but recent discussion in DSTM thread pushed me to do a test myself. Believe me or not, this was exactly same machiene of 6x1080 (non ti) not tweaked in any way for one or another miner, and it was not even restarted during test period. https://imageking.eu/images/dstmcompar.png large image  So for us miners it is actually bad, DSTM does not have competition and would get out even with 3% fee.... |
|
|
|
I actually advocated EWBF in DSTM thread, but sticking with DSTM now Test ended with average 3049 EWBF vs 3099 DSTM. 50 free hashes? Sounds good for me... --fee 0 didn't helped EWBF. And at least in my case i still see 2% less shares then reported by miner. And even some of tou say you see 1% it still does not save EFBW. And this is GDDR5X cards witch presumably should have worked better on EFBW. P.S. I am not related to DSTM or EFBW in any way, long time used both but recent discussion in DSTM thread pushed me to do a test myself. Believe me or not, this was exactly same machiene of 6x1080 (non ti) not tweaked in any way for one or another miner, and it was not even restarted during test period. https://imageking.eu/images/dstmcompar.png large image |
|
|
|
So here is the first part of report, i have run EWBF with --fee 0 for ~28 hrs. on 6x1080 rig. Little exploanation: On the right there is flypool stats with highlightet 24 hrs window start, below is miner screen at earlyest time i was able to scroll to (2018-01-28 ~11:00) On the left same flypool but end of test highlighted + screen from miner at test end. Dont look at miner heading it is coming from bat file naming istance, so i just forgot to change to flypool. So even with --fee 0 real hashrate is ~2% less then reported. Now DSTM will run for good amount of time and i check it somwhere on saturday. Screen:  It is big screen actually, so i leave full link https://imageking.eu/images/ewbfcompar.png |
|
|
|
So here is the first part of report, i have run EWBF with --fee 0 for ~28 hrs. on 6x1080 rig. Little exploanation: On the right there is flypool stats with highlightet 24 hrs window start, below is miner screen at earlyest time i was able to scroll to (2018-01-28 ~11:00) On the left same flypool but end of test highlighted + screen from miner at test end. Dont look at miner heading it is coming from bat file naming istance, so i just forgot to change to flypool. So even with --fee 0 real hashrate is ~2% less then reported. Now DSTM will run for good amount of time and i check it somwhere on saturday. Screen: It is big screen actually, so i leave full link https://imageking.eu/images/ewbfcompar.pngBTW --fee 0 or --fee 0.0 switch is working? I mean --fee 0 could not work? Or it is working but miner trottling de to --fee 0 is used? |
|
|
|
Can anyone share a real testing results? What miner is better for ZEC on 1070?
For me all of them look the same: 460-480 sols after fine CPU tuning.
Sols "drawed" by miner can be fales, you'd need test actual results on some pool that provides enough infomation about your hashrate, i am trying some testing on flypool. Though i am not sure it gives correct numbers, but at least difference should be seein if there are any difference. |
|
|
|
So specially for you take a look at this:
"I DO hope you can get it working under Windows 10. Cheers"
as a reply for:
"Here its a working program for fee remove"
I dont care about fee removal, all my statements related to GDDR5X performance on DSTM vs. EWFB, if you do not even have rigs with this cards just pass my posts. And as i said iam currently doing some tests to confirm or deny feckers words. And after ~30 hrs i will be able to provide results here. |
|
|
|
Charging 2% here from all profits is just ridiculous , this guy is making millions monthly yet he hides behind anonymity and brilliant "customer service" (yes, you are paying him).
This pretty much. I DO hope you can get it working under Windows 10. Cheers  Any 1080 (Non-Ti) users here??? How about your hashrate when using DSTM miner???
Yes, standard 1080 FE, running 0.9V(85% TDP), can get ez 2000MHz, but doing 1974MHz, watercooled, keeping it at about 37C, XOC bios(may affect sols in a negative way), +550 on mems. Doing 570Sols with EKWB. DSTM is not good for GDDR5X cards(1080, 1080Ti). If you can do 570 with EKWB with 0 fee, why would u do 570 x 0.98 (2% fee)= 558.6 with DSTM? Doesnt make sense. Fecker, don't you wanna get the "feck" out of here, please? And oh BTW, it is not EKWB, it is EWBF miner you are using, so use it and stop bitching at DSTM thread about fees again and again... EKWB is company that makes watercooling solution. Quote specially for you mind disabled fella @Atronoss - dude stated some facts and calculations about his rig and observation on GDDR5X and here you jump in telling him what to do. |
|
|
|
So:
yes, you can turn the devfee off.
yes, if you do, you will mine slower. reason - IAW the devfee string log, it will mine in the dev's pool. It just will not deposit the coin.
at the end, we didn't make the program. Give credit where due. if you don't want to pay the dev fee, then try to learn to write your own.
I have no issues paying a fee. I think 1% is more reasonable, but im not a coder and can't complete with them.
Hey, this "discussion" has started from GDDR5X card performance on DSTM vs. EWBF, and one of the users stated (and was instantly insulted by a dumbass in this thread) that in current DSTM performance state EWBF outperforms it on GDDR5X cards + you can turn off fee or set to 1% if you see it is more reasonable. From my side this was not question about fee itself but performance, and why someone must pay fee on less performing miner... Currently i am running 6x1080 rig on flypool on EWBF for 24 hrs and will switch to DSTM to check real situation in GDDR5X EWBF vs. DSTM Fee or not to fee is not the question, though 1% to me also would be prefferable, if you make 100K or 50K per day i dont see big difference, i would live with 10K per day.... If dev see that this is his lifetime opportunity to build a "fortune" that is his choice. We as users still have choice of different miners/algos/pools etc. |
|
|
|
EWBF Clearly stated it under the option.
It is so sad so many dumb people got into mining these days... EWBF dont have "-nodevfee" option, EWBF does not made any statements about 5% less hash... It is sad some people are dumb enough not to distinguish one miner from another but "smart" enough to buy a pack of GPU and call themself miners... Its so sad people like you try to use invalid arguments. The 5% is approximation made by the users that used -nofee on EWBF. Here is a link for your illiterate dumbfuck https://cryptoyeti.com/ewbf-zcash-cuda-miner/ or read his readme, --help Are you disabled or what, maybe you have some text understanding problems? If you are dumb enough again to use "--nofee on EFWB" and expect there will be no fee - go ahead Where is that users " The 5% is approximation made by the users" in the link? Who is that users? What they "approximated"? |
|
|
|
EWBF Clearly stated it under the option.
It is so sad so many dumb people got into mining these days... EWBF dont have "-nodevfee" option, EWBF does not made any statements about 5% less hash... It is sad some people are dumb enough not to distinguish one miner from another but "smart" enough to buy a pack of GPU and call themself miners... |
|
|
|
I have the same question Hi, first sorry for the question, i'm sure a lot of people asked it before but i can't found it with a nice explanation.
Sometimes algos like Skein are very profitable for 5-10 minutes, it's worth mining that time?
Is it profitable because the price of the coin is going up or because of coin difficulty changing? If that's the case, until the coin get auto exchanged it will drop the value again probably and it will not be very profitable right?.
Thanks in advance!
Could be: 1. Diff drops a lot for some time (all algorithms jumps in after some delay, as you said 10 min) 2. Price climbs up for some time (and same here, all algorithms jumps in) 3. Combination of that Thanks a lot for the answer! So just in the case of 1 or 3 should be profitable right?, because in 2 the price will drop so until the money get auto exchanged it will go down again, i'm right? Yes, if you are the first to jump in the diff dip train you will get some easy coins, but probably you will loose more by jumping 2-3 times to different coins and probably loosing some shares. |
|
|
|
Fecker, don't you wanna get the "feck" out of here, please? And oh BTW, it is not EKWB, it is EWBF miner you are using, so use it and stop bitching at DSTM thread about fees again and again... EKWB is company that makes watercooling solution.
Whats your problem stupido? Did he insult someone? He stated the truth, EWBF performs better or at least the same on GDDR5X cards, but takes no fee... Who is whiner here? |
|
|
|
Any 1080 (Non-Ti) users here??? How about your hashrate when using DSTM miner???
6xGigabyte 1080 auorus, very slight OC 1900/4950 GPU/MEM 70% limit  |
|
|
|
I have the same question Hi, first sorry for the question, i'm sure a lot of people asked it before but i can't found it with a nice explanation.
Sometimes algos like Skein are very profitable for 5-10 minutes, it's worth mining that time?
Is it profitable because the price of the coin is going up or because of coin difficulty changing? If that's the case, until the coin get auto exchanged it will drop the value again probably and it will not be very profitable right?.
Thanks in advance!
Could be: 1. Diff drops a lot for some time (all algorithms jumps in after some delay, as you said 10 min) 2. Price climbs up for some time (and same here, all algorithms jumps in) 3. Combination of that |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
