How did Mike founded it?

Join the Team Dstra first Treasure Hunt game.

Treasure Hunt for 500 dstra coins, free for whomever want to claim them! The 500 coins are located right here https://blocks.dstra.io/address/DFoGNVw7zDT1xGEmD7ygnHNJ6CuBKmjEUZ

Very simple, but not necessarily easy game. Find the hidden private dstra key in dstra logo image. Import the key in a wallet, and run with the treasure – and I do mean run – transfer it out of the wallet quickly! Some will find it easy, while others will find it near impossible. The point of the game is to get the treasure, by any means necessary. Nobody says you have to do everything the “correct” way. Everything is a go. The game requires you to interact a few times via the blockchain. Come on over and join the fun!
Read more on Dstra discord https://discordapp.com/channels/417469579804147715/424546210964307978

You seem to be the only one who has said anything about "tropic."

Evolution is a hoax, yes or no. Anybody can say a simple "yes" or "no." But simple yes or no isn't much of a discussion. In a forum we have discussion. That is why I bring in reasons to show that evolution is a hoax, and you attempt to bring in reasons to show why it isn't. Don't you even understand this about a forum, yet?

You have defined what a hoax is. Then you say that scientists believe. If a scientist believes something, isn't it true that he doesn't know? If he knew that evolution was real, he wouldn't have to believe that it was real. He would know that it is real.

Now, here is where the hoax part comes in. The scientists only believe. They don't know, and they know that they don't know. But they proclaim that evolution is real when they know it isn't. That is the hoax. The hoax is not knowing, but proclaiming that they know.

Since scientists don't know and yet hoax that they do, when the hoax is discovered, don't honest people start looking for the thing that is real? Then they see that the "higher power" idea fits the whole operation of nature far better than the evolution hoax. So, why suouldn't people start looking at the "higher power" idea?

The programming (C&E) stuff shows that evolution theory evolution (ETE) is not real. ETE doesn't talk about C&E in nature, but all we see is C&E in nature. Science knows that everything operates by C&E. But they don't seem to realize that there isn't any C&E in ETE. In other words, they don't want to recognize that ETE doesn't exist, as proven by C&E.

Are scientists that stupid? NO, of course not! They know that there isn't any C&E in ETE. They also know that the whole operation of nature works by C&E. So, they are hoaxing us when they say that ETE is real.

Evolution is a hoax.

The ancient Greeks and Egyptians knew of electricity.

The whole point isn't about accepting something other than evolution. The whole point is finding a reason to accept evolution.

There are so many things against evolution as it is expressed in its theory, that the whole theory should be scrapped. The evolution story keeps changing because it is make believe. In fact, we can't even imagine a form of evolution that would fit the facts of reality.

The point is, if you want evolution to be real, find some way to formulate it that makes sense and fits the facts. If you can't, drop it, and find what is real. Evolution doesn't fit the facts, and hasn't even been proven to exist, once. All the talk about evolution is simply talk without proof.

Evolution is a hoax.



EDIT: Do you see what you and Astargath (in the previous post) are doing? You can't answer the questions that I asked, scientifically. So you bring my religion into it. By bringing religion into it, rather than answering scientifically, you are showing what you really think evolution is. To you, evolution seems to be a religion.

There was a swap? I've been away for too long 

I dont think that satoshi is a one person , I think they are group or satoshi is made of many people. Well, I dont have an idea how many satoshi bitcoin holds.I little bit curious about your question, i read some of this thread post so that i gain more answer. Thank you for this.

So I am finally shaking the foundations of your evolution religion! Good. You just might come to reality and realize evolution is a hoax.

Where is your example of beneficial mutation? Just because a bunch of people think that a mutation might be beneficial, do we take a vote to see who is right? How do we know that a critter thinks that the change is beneficial?

If a fish grew legs via evolution, where did the legs start? They started as nubs, or even less. No benefit in nubs. Do you think the fish foresaw that one of its descendants thousands or hundreds of thousands of years later would benefit from legs?

Where are your DNA samples for any of the fossils that are considered missing links? Without them, there is no way to tell that all the so-called missing links were not their own animal brought about by some non-evolution method that we don't understand yet.

What about the fact that there are multitudes of fossil creatures that just appeared, fully developed, without something to have developed from?

Where is your proof of even one pure random happening, so that we can see that there is a possibility that things were not programmed to exist as they are? After all, physics doesn't deviate in producing results. If it did, nobody could expect to ever get the same result from the same scientific experiment.

Where is natural selection? After all, nature has made multitudes of fantastic forms of life. Scientists and engineers can't make even one. And nature has fantastic reproduction in all its life forms. Scientists don't even entirely understand how it works. Why is nature so smart beyond all scientists and engineers?

When you look at the answers evolution people give to these and many other questions, you don't even realize that the answers skirt the questions, rather than answering them. But that is all right for you. You need to keep your evolution religion intact, right?

Evolution isn't just a hoax. It's a complete fabrication.

Here's a challenge for you genius, why don't you google the earth is flat.  You will find loads of really stupid reasons why the earth is flat and why the globe earth is impossible and rebuttals to "globe earth is impossible" are so faulty that they only rebut themselves.

See Evolution is a fact backed by peer reviewed science, I mean you can get all your info from the part of the internet that is opinion based which would lead you to be able to believe the earth is flat and it was created ~6000 years ago OR you can get your information from peer reviewed, repeated, provable experiments and discoveries.

Whats the matter? Can't you even do an Internet search? Can't think critically enough to see that your bible is wrong about everything, literally EVERYTHING especially young earth creationism, one of the stupidest of all the stupid religious ideas LOL!  Why do you need some sky daddies approval for anything, think for yourself and not what some stupid fucking book from 2 millennia ago tells you.

Your only source of data is one stupid book, science on the other hand has decades of data and experiments and 100's of thousands of man hours, gee I wonder why evolution is a fact and not the bible lmfao.

Sniff sniff I can smell a DSTRA dump is coming...
But who knows, maybe nobody will actually dump and the price will moon instead We will soon find out, for sure.

A hot summer ended and a cool autumn greeted.
However, DSTRA is still hot!
How! A new wallet has been released!
The address also became a new address starting from D!
Operation and holders are still active hotly!
Let 's work together as soon as possible!
Chances are still to come!

How in the world dense are you. Nobody knows how many electrons, other particles, and energies were created at the same time. We don't know if there was a first electron or a second one. But it seems that you are way to dense to understand that I was giving you an example of the C&E way electrons and everything else works in the universe.

Because you are like you are, I am really going to throw you for a loop with this: Everything absolutely is predetermined except for predetermination itself.

As far as anything meaning something, you don't understand what you are too ignorant to understand. Study and think a little more, so you can finally start to talk intelligently about the thing you are blabbing.

The laws of physics determine the way C&E works. How do we know? Because if the cause acted slightly differently, the effect would be slightly different. But since the cause acted as it did, the effect became what it became. Remember, every cause is simple the effect of whatever it was that caused the cause it to act the way it did, before it became the cause of something else that was its effect. All of it acts exactly the way it was pre-programmed to act at the time of the Beginning.

Because of this, the thing that is called evolution was pre-programmed. Because it was pre-programmed, it doesn't fit what evolution theory says it should be in random mutations. In fact, evolution theory is self-contradictory in its ideas of natural selection and random mutations. Why don't evolution theorists use proper wording to keep the theory from being self-contradictory? They can't. Why? Because evolution doesn't exist.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

You fully agree? Who are you agreeing with? Nobody has been talking about bumping any electrons exactly the same way twice.

The thing that is being talked about, is how one electron bumps another. The way the first electron bumps the second electron determines how the second one will act. This is a progression that goes all the way back to the beginning of the first electron being set into motion.

The way the first electron was set in motion determined how it bumped the second. And how the second was set in motion determined how it bumped the third... etc. right down to the present. If the first one had been set in motion slightly differently, it would have bumped the second one differently, etc.,... right on down to the present, and things would be different.

There is no random activity. Everything acts exactly according to the way it was caused to act by whatever caused it to act that way. That's exactly how programming works.

Because the laws of physics don't change, there is and can be no pure random. The thing that we generally call random is simply a word for our inability to see and understand the super-complex programming of the universe.

As far as there being more intelligent beings out there, anybody who can program a universe as complex as ours is, certainly has to be way more complex than we are. What are you trying to say? That you believe that God exists?

Everything is programmed. Because of this, the thing that some people call evolution is programming, not evolution.

Evolution is a hoax.

Actually, if an electron bumped the next electron a little to the left of where it bumped it, the second would bump the third a little differently. but the reason the first bumped exactly where it did was, it was bumped in exactly the way it was bumped. If it was bumped differently, then it would bump differently.

We see nothing else in nature or the universe. Cause and effect act exactly as they were programmed to act - EXACTLY - with nothing (like random) making a difference in the way they acted. The whole thing was programmed.

Why do you think that some tremendous numbers of cause and effect are too many to keep them from being pure random? Just because computer programmers work like crazy to make computer programs work right, why do you think that there can't be an Intelligence that is farther above us than we are above a microbe? Just because you feel like thinking that way?

Everything is programmed. Since this is against evolution theory...

Evolution is a hoax.

That's what you call breeding, even if it is done by nature.

Evolution is a hoax.

Actually, even though the question of random may be philosophical to some people, it is also a reality question that falls into the realm of scientific non-philosophical investigation.

When evolution theory talks about random, it is not talking about fake or false random.

The billion factors are a billion examples of cause and effect action, not of random. Multiply that by a billion years and billions of species and you have just proven no evolution. How? Not one example of non-C&E action has ever been found, factually. All actions that are not known to be C&E factually, are expected to be C&E, simply because of the trillions of C&E actions that have been found, without even one pure random action ever having been found.

Our computers are extremely limited when compared with the computer-like action performed in all life in nature. Computer action or lack thereof, has nothing to do with random. It has everything to do with C&E... since all computers act through C&E, while random in computer action is only artificial random simply because complex C&E looks like random to people. Why? Because of the inherent weakness of people to observe such complexity clearly.

When evolution theory evolution says "random," where does it ever say "artificial random?" Since the question of what ETE means by "random" seems to be appearing now, evolution is truly not known to exist. Why? Because if true random is not what evolution is talking about, then ETE is talking about artificial random, which is C&E operated. C&E acts perfectly, according to the laws of physics. This means that evolution is essentially programmed if it exists. But ETE doesn't talk along the lines of programming at all! So, evolution doesn't exist, even if pure random exists.

In Japan there have been simple robots built that can reproduce themselves if given the right parts for reproduction. It's all C&E done. Nature that has no true or pure random, is C&E programmed to reproduce way beyond current understanding. So-called examples of evolution are simply examples of super-complex programming on a scale unimaginable.

Why would you think that I think C&E eliminates randomness? We have billions or trillions of examples of C&E, but none whatsoever of pure random. They don't necessarily eliminate each other. It all revolves around what exists. How can you eliminate something that you can't find, i.e., random? It isn't there to eliminate?

If "you have to have the exact same causes, under the exact same circumstances," all you have is the exact same physics working with the exact same C&E. Nothing goes on in evolution, because evolution only exists in the minds of people who think it exists. We have no example of evolution in nature. All examples of evolution in nature are examples of adaptation or like-begets-like. How do we know? Because adaptation or like-begets-like fits the examples better than the evolution fiction. How do we know this? Because evolution says "randomness" in part, but C&E in as many things that we understand C&E in, without finding even one proven instance of pure random, shows that random doesn't exist probability-wise.

No random means no evolution, because evolution theory says that there have to be random mutations. All mutations are C&E actions.

What this all means is that C&E continues to work with physics laws to make large of varieties of "things" by the programming that C&E is. Or can you show us one proof of something that came about by random without being the effect of one or more causes?

Further, all the scientists know that C&E works in everything. How do we know that they know this? Because that's all they do in their observation or experimentation. Even a scientist who looks for pure random does it by using all kinds of C&E to find it. In fact, the scientist, himself/herself, is totally made of C&E.