|
The new token model is quite interesting, but this seems to be a bit like the IMO model (Initial Model Offering), it's just that the IMO duration is shorter and unfortunately now there are many projects using the IMO model that exit scam because their volume has disappeared and the price has dropped 10x from the initial price.
|
|
|
|
|
I did not follow bounty agate, but it was confirmed if the listing on exmarket the problem on this exchange was volume because usually in a few weeks after listing, trading volume there was still very quiet and I think the token burn was not too influential enough.
|
|
|
|
ICO's are illegal in Korea, so that is not possible. No plans for ICO.
That means you have your own funds to finance this project? With 3M users, I think you are already earning good profit here. So the purpose of the airdrop is for your platform's exposure? And with your partnerships, I think this project will definitely take off. And 3M users are only from Korea (cmiiw, because I read it on the first page of this thread) if later ludena has been released globally I'm sure this project will be more successful, coupled with partners from several gaming platforms. But unfortunately the rating on the Playstore is a bit unfavorable because it doesn't reach 4. It doesn't matter because there are only a few users who do the review and it seems like if the platform is released globally I think it can be improved, maybe it can raise the rating to 4 or fewer it's just that right now they haven't focused there. |
|
|
|
Hey there everyone,
Just a curious question on the perception differences between a regular ICO and one that was run by an accredited lawyer - would that make a difference to you as in investor?
In the past, at the height of the ICO investment craze, I know that name dropping companies and "respected" individuals as advisors would almost be enough to convince investors who didn't know better.
Moreover, now there's a greater shift towards IEOs for scam prevention purposes with counter-party checks.
Just a curious question! Share your thoughts!
P.S. Yeah, I was one of those who invested in an ICO project called JET8 that currently has an ROI of -99.8% haha shoutout to anyone who flushed their money down this way.
It seems like yes, because in the past I saw projects using accredited lawyers were more enthusiastic and also they could finish hardcap a little faster than regular ico, except that I had never tried an ico that had an accredited lawyer and only chose regular ico and fortunately at the altseason, the ico that I invested in the price of the token was crazy and I got 10x from it, but this time the project was dead and not listing on any exchange |
|
|
|
|
Good news for curio token holders, hopefully with all the efforts that exist in this news update can increase the price of tokens and trading volume because this project has been sinking for quite a long time.
|
|
|
|
|
in terms of the concept in my opinion, and also their staking is different from other tokens so this might cause their score to reach 100x but it is doubtful whether they can maintain their achievements? , or whether in the future it might return to the initial price again?
|
|
|
|
If you wanna be in safer side then I would suggest you to avoid ICOs but you can join IEOs from reputable exchanges. Personally these are my favorite exchange for joining IEOs
1. Binance
2. Bittrex
3. Huobi
4. KuCoin
You can try them.
Bittrex is good, it's just that the ones offered there project mostly fail and when compared to binance, houbi, kucoin. Bittrex is in the lowest position, I suggest to follow another launchpad. |
|
|
|
However, I admit that binance is better than all other exchanges. But I have used Bibox exchange before and am still using it. I never saw the bad side of it. I think Bibox is a trusted and pretty good exchange.
some people in this forum say bibox is scam exchange you can check on Scam Accusations sub and their evidence is quite strong, I myself have never used that exchange at all. |
|
|
|
|
This is not over yet, and for Blockburn and Spyce I am not surprised because they are listed on the exchange which is not good, for imo itself they are smart because they make special token utilities to fool the bounty hunter and also apply a very long locking system (a year) and can be ascertained after waiting for a year the volume of tokens that their exchange will definitely be gone and also dumps are definitely happening, this can be a lesson and don't give up because I think there are still some good listed bounty projects in future.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks interesting, it's just that the roadmap doesn't seem to be running smoothly because I haven't found a windows wallet on yoda-x, and it looks like you have to provide an English whitepaper because I don't understand Russian Language at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
