Bitcoin Forum
July 04, 2024, 05:47:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 »
41  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision on: May 27, 2019, 11:00:15 AM
And there you have it, the new leader of the BSV thread.

Everybody give a round of applause for your new captain, jbreher.

BSV isn't gaining ground on bitcoin -- its price proportional to BTC has been steadily falling since its inception. The trend is down. The effect of Wright's most recent stunt will prove to be a short lived affair.

The only thing BSV accomplished thus far was effectively diminishing BCH's price relative to BTC as well. There are now two forks lead by egos and totally dependent on the success of the real bitcoin to have a shot at tricking new users into believing that they are the "real" bitcoin.

"Unbroken lineage" = a copy, which anybody can do. I could do it right now if I wanted.

You should have learned from Ver and BCH already that nobody wants to use a coin built on a foundation of dishonesty and deception.

Can't believe I took you off ignore just to read more of the same refried propaganda.


Trading price In BTC increasing.

Given the multi billion dollar marketcap you cannot say ‘nobody’

You are still the leader of this thread nutildah, you post the most here. To ‘protect’ people.
42  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision on: May 24, 2019, 12:19:01 PM
The only problem is your coin in itself is the biggest troll job currently happening in crypto.

It used to be BCH, but you claimed the title after your dev went back to his fraudulent claims that he is Satoshi Nakamoto.

BSV is a coin that champions itself on sticking to old tech. There is nothing new happening here other than another con artist is attempting a money grab with a somewhat novel ploy. If it didn't keep insisting that it was "the real bitcoin" and Wright was "the real Satoshi," we wouldn't care.

Most people can see through the scam, and the market has been treating it accordingly by gifting it with a much smaller market cap than Wright (or his investors) ever imagined it would have.

Wright's nonstop antics are proof that there is nothing behind this coin besides ego. He needs to keep up the attention-grabbing game because he knows his coin doesn't have the technical merit to stand on its own. We already saw this happen with BCH and Roger Ver...

Really, all BSV managed to do was divert the big blockers into two camps, both when combined do not even equal the former strength of BCH. This project is a failure, and it will only get worse from here on out. Watch and learn.

If you TRULY believe this.

Why do you spend countless hours writing about it? How many posts have you made in the Bitcoin SV thread?

Seriously. Why would someone pay so much attention to something they speak so terrribly for?

WHY?
43  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision on: May 21, 2019, 04:59:52 PM
So nutildah you lost your troll promise? You see how proven it is!

Yes I see. Not at all. Anybody can file a copyright claim for anything that is not already copyrighted.

Pretending a filing constitutes proof is pretty low level trolling. There's a chance you're just ignorant about how the copyright process works, so I forgive you if that's the case.

If you bought SV yesterday, congratulations, I commend you on your bravery, and my honest recommendation is that you sell now. It's not going to get any better than this.

The Creator is the one who registered first, and Craig Wright did as I advised  Wink

https://twitter.com/Aleksan00743929/status/1130833092367736833

Wow, did you just dox yourself? Nice follower count.  Roll Eyes

Guys, Nutildah is a graduate of Iowa State University. He cannot be wrong, that’s impossible. He paid tens of thousands of dollars to attend this school out of state so he knows very well how to make an investment.

Anyone can be granted a copyright Registration for the Bitcoin whitepaper by the US government. It’s as easy as 1, 2, 3 and no one has done this in bitcoins 10 year lifespan because it’s not important whatsoever. The Us government is not important and do not take their copyright registrations seriously.

Actors like Peter McCormack and the genius ‘Jameson lopp’ (founder of the node that plugs into itself), and other directly competitive companies to BSV are absolutely right about their rebuttals after 10 minutes of research following the release of this news.

BSV is going to zero, just as nutildah said last month, the month before that and the month before that. It’s so useless that 5 posts after this news was released was completely necessary to prove his point. People spend that much time proving points they regard as useless!

I can assure you he’s above 5 feet tall and not insecure about the state of BTC!
44  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: EOS - Asynchronous Smart Contract Platform - (Dan Larimer of Bitshares/Steem) on: May 11, 2019, 06:53:45 PM
The EOS votes to burn $167 million in tokens in preparation for drastically reducing inflation should it increase the eso price or the amount is too little to affect in a positive way eos' price?
If they are that desperate, this shitcoin is determined to fail.

If lauda says it will fail, it has to fail. All hail the almighty ruler of Bitcointalk!
45  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees on: May 11, 2019, 11:44:16 AM
Bitcoin Cash is near it's $300 resistance level, will it break it? Read more in this technical analysis:

https://coincodex.com/article/3551/bitcoin-cash-price-analysis-bch-faces-tough-resistance-can-the-bulls-break-300/

Lately it takes roughly a 5% rise in BTC for BCH to go up 1%, so if BTC goes up by another 15% or so, then sure, it can break $300. I find it to be incredibly overpriced at the moment ($100/coin is closer to fair value imo) but markets are irrational.

You better trust these numbers guys, Nutildah went to Iowa STATE University. There’s no way he could be wrong!
46  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SYS] SYSCOIN [Unofficial] - Due to censorship & secrecy on Official thread. on: April 30, 2019, 06:14:04 PM
I don't think that syscoin will survive 2019.

There's a chance it will survive, it all depends on when BCF go down & how much damage they do to SYS in the process. BCF will continue to cash in their SYS in a desperate attempt to get themselves out of debt & save themselves from insolvency, but it's too late I think, the damage was done long ago. Whatever happens, SYS will still be there because the code will still be there, but it will be worthless - as is the way of most masternode shitcoins.

There's a flurry of activity on github now as sidhujag desperately tries to get the long overdue v4 wallet working & released in an effort to stop the price collapse, but even if it does get finished & they manage to hold the price slide it will only be temporary, as BCF will just get a better dump price.

ROI on 1 masternode is currently 11.5 years & growing by the day......

Syscoin is dead and will not survive 2019. No further comments from you Iconfirm. Cash in while you can.
47  Economy / Reputation / Re: Faketoshi. How did Craig Wright end up like this on: April 30, 2019, 04:46:26 PM
How fucking stupid are you? Im on the Bitcoin SV side, as is Craig Wright.

Are you just going to resort to name calling as your last refuge or will you actually be bothered to defend your master Craig Wright here? I'm curious to know why exactly you still support him despite the evidence presented above, which makes him look like a total fool.

I have no problem refuting these claims one at a time. None of those claims are new to me. You need to give me more time as I respond to each of you.
48  Economy / Reputation / Re: Faketoshi. How did Craig Wright end up like this on: April 30, 2019, 02:47:40 PM
Name calling may not be an argument but you are a sick and twisted little bitch. A pussy keyboard warrior. You’re likely 5 feet tall with sausage fingers you miserable pathetic dictatior. 

Your comments on this forum are sexist, insulting, disgusting, childish, course & completely uncalled for. Your attitude towards women on this forum is from the middle ages & I have reported your disgusting rants to moderators.

You are the reason this form has died. You are the reason this form has lost all credibility.

Then please leave.

Gender is completely irrelevant to dictatorship and suppressing people’s opinions. Grow a sack.
49  Economy / Reputation / Re: Faketoshi. How did Craig Wright end up like this on: April 30, 2019, 02:19:57 PM
He's a mentally sick conman. There are many clinical cases that you can read about this behavior[1]. At this point even if he manages to get a hold of satoshi's keys (i.e. steal them assuming Kleiman was the real deal), it won't be sufficient proof as the personality/writing/etc. does not match (not even remotely).

[1] Therefore, this thread is a waste of time.
Coming from yourself, someone who has completely abused the trust system on this form, using your power to suppress opinions. There is nothing definition as to what legally constitutes bitcoin in any country on any planet. Name calling may not be an argument but you are a sick and twisted little bitch. A pussy keyboard warrior. You’re likely 5 feet tall with sausage fingers you miserable pathetic dictatior. You are the reason this form has died. You are the reason this form has lost all credibility.  
You can cry me a river of tears later when your scam cash version of Bitcoin goes to near $0. Kiss Someone's gotta open source that spam generator that was used by the very same people promoting BCASH and BAB. Roll Eyes

How fucking stupid are you? Im on the Bitcoin SV side, as is Craig Wright.
50  Economy / Reputation / Re: Faketoshi. How did Craig Wright end up like this on: April 30, 2019, 12:57:22 PM
He's a mentally sick conman. There are many clinical cases that you can read about this behavior[1]. At this point even if he manages to get a hold of satoshi's keys (i.e. steal them assuming Kleiman was the real deal), it won't be sufficient proof as the personality/writing/etc. does not match (not even remotely).

[1] Therefore, this thread is a waste of time.

Coming from yourself, someone who has completely abused the trust system on this form, using your power to suppress opinions. There is nothing definition as to what legally constitutes bitcoin in any country on any planet. Name calling may not be an argument but you are a sick and twisted little bitch. A pussy keyboard warrior. You’re likely 5 feet tall with sausage fingers you miserable pathetic dictatior. You are the reason this form has died. You are the reason this form has lost all credibility. 

51  Economy / Reputation / Re: Faketoshi. How did Craig Wright end up like this on: April 30, 2019, 11:32:36 AM
The evidence speaks for itself. Most notably was his editing of a blog entry to make it appear that he invented the term "cryptocurrency." If there was any sort of actual evidence that demonstrated Craig was responsible for inventing bitcoin he would have presented it by now. Instead he just fabricates evidence and gets caught every time he does it. There's no reason to believe hes suddenly going to produce actual proof after all this time of just producing lies.

Hes obviously motivated entirely by reasons of finance and ego, which renders him the exact opposite of what the actual Satoshi embodied.

What’s the advantage of outing yourself as satoshi?
1. Paying a zillion dollars in tax.
2. Having every central bank and government wanting to kill you and your family.
3. Earning Nutildahs respect.

52  Economy / Reputation / Re: Faketoshi. How did Craig Wright end up like this on: April 30, 2019, 06:54:19 AM
Mate, name calling is not an argument.

I'm not name calling so much as stating an observable fact. You are, without proof, claiming a known liar/hoaxer purchased the bitcoin.org domain before the release of bitcoin.

Let Craig have his day in court, it’s not up to me to present the proof, it’s up to Craig. Calling Craig a fraud now is simply ‘premature’ and against all legal precedent. If this backfires for you, you are liable for defamation. But if you truly believe your claims, just wait for Craig to fail. You’re no better than he is claiming that he is a fraud before he even attempts to verify his claim in a truly civilized precedented matter.

Craig Wright is a fraud. Hes proven himself to be a fraud on several occasions and this latest stunt is just another instance of fraud in a long string of con jobs. Craig is not Satoshi. After this long winded hoax is finally put to rest you will owe us all an apology for putting up with your insufferably misinformative dialog.

If you are going to argue Craig Wright is a fraud, use This format:

Craig Wright is a fraud because________________ (insert supporting fact here).
53  Economy / Reputation / Re: Faketoshi. How did Craig Wright end up like this on: April 29, 2019, 02:49:24 PM
I was watching some of his presentations the other day on youtube and its easy to see why people are persuaded by this guy.  He does appear extremely intelligent and can be a charming person.

There is no doubt that Craig Wright was around during the early days of bitcoin, the truth is no one really knows if Dave was Satoshi or someone else was.  The early private keys may have been destroyed or lost so just because someone can't sign them doesn't mean a thing.

Craig is relatively scatter brained and very difficult to interpret. But the news surrounding him is really just unprecedented name calling and alternative facts in the court of public opinion from what seems like valid evidence.

Ex: when Satoshi said ‘I am NOT a lawyer’ on this form. Craig Wright wasn’t a lawyer until 2012 yet that information was not public. He is currently doing his doctorate in law at Leicester.

This place is toxic, full of bots with one liners to persuade the average human. Look at a YouTube video comment that says ‘Craig Wright is a fraud’ or ‘faketoshi.’ The account often belongs to some sort of bot, but then the ripple effect plays in when you flood all the content with those one liners and alternative facts, The average human just believes it without their own research.

That wave of actual retards who came in during the December 2017 bitcoin bull run literally just jumped ship on the ‘faketoshi bcash LoL’ train without any knowledge of the space.
54  Economy / Reputation / Re: Faketoshi. How did Craig Wright end up like this on: April 29, 2019, 02:22:04 PM


This is what you're talking about right? So what in your mind does this prove? There's no dates, no names, no information about anything that would substantiate your or his claims. If you had more reasonable evidence you would have presented it.

Now we're going to play a game called "Stupid or Liar." In the game we guess whether you are just plain fucking stupid or a god damn liar. My money is on liar. The fact that you would think this image constitutes truth... Well I really hope you're a liar or else it means you are absofuckinglutely retarded.
 

Mate, name calling is not an argument.

Your court of ‘public opinion’ does not overrule a court of law in a commonwealth jurisdiction. That image does not constitute proof, that’s not proof whatsoever, but there is proof published on the internet that he made that claim. There is proof that that image exists. Now why would he incriminate himself so close to his date in court unless he was certain the proof existed? What would his motive be?

It’s craig who is sseeking remedies against McCormack, Vitalik, Hodlonaut etc. You must believe he’s bluffing pretty hard.

Let Craig have his day in court, it’s not up to me to present the proof, it’s up to Craig. Calling Craig a fraud now is simply ‘premature’ and against all legal precedent. If this backfires for you, you are liable for defamation. But if you truly believe your claims, just wait for Craig to fail. You’re no better than he is claiming that he is a fraud before he even attempts to verify his claim in a truly civilized precedented matter.

Sit back, relax, enjoy the show.
55  Economy / Reputation / Re: Faketoshi. How did Craig Wright end up like this on: April 29, 2019, 11:40:11 AM
He had countless of chances to save his face. He never stepped back. There is only one explanation to his situation: He is a sociopath.

Bingo. In the past his critics said he was just under immense pressure from his financiers to keep up the illusion that he was Satoshi but his actions of late go one step beyond that.

I agree that if Craig is a fraud he’s facing some SERIOUS penalty.

Congratulations. This is the most common sense thing you've ever said.

Craig is only facing a cvil suit with the Klieman estate to recover the 1.1 million bitcoins (which cannot be recovered until 01/01/2020).

Ok you're taking a step backwards here in presuming the trust holding the bitcoins actually exists. As of now there is no evidence that it does.

And why the hell was the bitcoin.org domain registered and paid for on Craig Wights credit card prior to the release of bitcoin?[/i][/b]

This is part of the forged documents mindtrust was talking about. You've now completely slipped back into the baseless, zero credibility, zero respect for reality mode you got tagged for. Thats a shame. Just when I thought we were seeing some progress.

Banks are required to keep statement records for 25. Bank statements will be provided directly from the bank, NOT from Craig, and therefore not subject to forgery.

The domain information will be provided directly from the service provider, as will the VPN payment. The email will be revealed as well. None of these documents will be provided directly from Craig.

Sure, you can deny the trust exists. I guess both parties and the court system really wasted their time if that’s the verdict.
56  Economy / Reputation / Re: Faketoshi. How did Craig Wright end up like this on: April 29, 2019, 10:33:28 AM
He had countless of chances to save his face. He never stepped back. There is only one explanation to his situation: He is a sociopath.

After his first time which he declared himself being satoshi, If he had stepped back, We would have laughed and forgotten everything about him. But no, he wanted to go all the way down.

He is either going to end up in Jail or in a mental hospital if he keeps going. I am not a lawyer but I believe going to a trial with forged documents is a serious crime.

I agree that if Craig is a fraud he’s facing some SERIOUS penalty. Craig is only facing a cvil suit with the Klieman estate to recover the 1.1 million bitcoins (which cannot be recovered until 01/01/2020). Craig is now going after various trolls in court by which he plans to prove he is Satoshi for all the ‘alleged defamation’ he’s recieved.

Shouldn’t it be the other way around if your claims are true?

And why the hell was the bitcoin.org domain registered and paid for on Craig Wights credit card prior to the release of bitcoin?
57  Economy / Reputation / Re: Faketoshi. How did Craig Wright end up like this on: April 27, 2019, 10:24:38 AM
https://youtu.be/uVtOkE5vHbY
58  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision on: April 26, 2019, 05:48:25 PM
Lastly I want your personal information or I will not take this bet.

Hahaha you're nuts man. First of all, why? Second of all, what does that have to do with anything?? Man you really are a complete wuss. Ok fine you're wussing out because you know Craig doesnt stand a chance. That's a shame because it could have been your best shot at getting rid of me.

Because if I win I can also take you to court after for defaming me.
59  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision on: April 26, 2019, 05:31:10 PM
I thought it was pretty obvious I was talking about the Wright initiated lawsuit against Peter McCormack.

Its pretty simple to understand. Wright loses, you leave. Wright wins, I leave.

Except for the fact 98% of civil suits settle before trial.

Theres a strong chance Craig will withdraw the suit on the advice of anybody sane or rational but in the meantime it sounds like you're pussing out.

Exactly more of a reason why there needs to be complete terms to the bet you goddamn retard. How does you’re ‘withdrawal’ situation fit nto a ‘win or loss’ situation? This isn’t a football match mate. Bets are issued on the terms agreed upon by both parties. What am I agreeing to and how am I a pussy for not agreeing to something I don’t even know of? I’d be pretty stupid to enter such a contract.

Obviously it's a tie if the lawsuit never goes to trial and neither of us has to leave. This is the third option in a football match btw. It seems to me like you're just stalling because you're a giant pussy. Just man up and accept the bet or not.

This is what pussies do when they get scared. Just like how you all weaseled out of answering the question of whether you believe Craig is satoshi or not. This is the official bsv thread and not one of you clowns will come out and say you actually think Craig is satoshi. Pretty pathetic.

Lastly I want your personal information or I will not take this bet.
60  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision on: April 26, 2019, 05:13:13 PM
I thought it was pretty obvious I was talking about the Wright initiated lawsuit against Peter McCormack.

Its pretty simple to understand. Wright loses, you leave. Wright wins, I leave.

Except for the fact 98% of civil suits settle before trial.

Theres a strong chance Craig will withdraw the suit on the advice of anybody sane or rational but in the meantime it sounds like you're pussing out.

Exactly more of a reason why there needs to be complete terms to the bet you goddamn retard. How does you’re ‘withdrawal’ situation fit nto a ‘win or loss’ situation? This isn’t a football match mate. Bets are issued on the terms agreed upon by both parties. What am I agreeing to and how am I a pussy for not agreeing to something I don’t even know of? I’d be pretty stupid to enter such a contract.
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!