No problem Ebenezar64. It took my quite some time to figure it out myself. I think it's important to share.
Also I feel the best way to test my own point of view, is to try to explain it to others who have critical questions. It forces me to really go more in depth. I mean, I've got money on this so, better dubble check myself right? 
By the way, check out the QRL discord channel. The QRL team is most active there.

No, you don't get it. I did not say it can be done. The question if a blockchain can be made quantum proof by forking is a different discussion, but is not relevant. Why? Because it would be useless even if it COULD be done. The point is this, and I will try to explain again below:
ALL existing crypto with coins or tokens out (ERC20 or the final product), can NEVER quantum-secure all their existing coins/ tokens and will therefore be at risk of having coins hacked and mass sold when quantum computers are in full function.
So let me rephrase that for clarity: even if they could upgrade their blockchain to a quantum secure blockchain, they can’t automatically secure the coins people own. These coins can still be hacked after a quantum proof update.

I’ll try to explain again but I’ll have to start at the beginning, so don’t blame me if it sounds basic:
A crypto has coins (or tokens). These coins are stored in wallets or on an exchange. As an owner of these coins, you want to be the only one to be able to access the coins and move them if you wish. So to protect your property, your coins are stored on an address: your public key. Your private key gives you the authorization to move them to another address (on an exchange it’s different because you don’t have the private key there yourself, but the result is the same: if someone cracks the main private key, they can steal your coins). Your public key can be known by others and is public, but your private key obviously not. If anybody gets your private key, they can get access and steal your coins.
Now how do you get these public and private keys? If you get a public key (address), the blockchain gives you the private key that comes with that public key. If you lose the private key, you will be locked out of the public key (the address) and you will never be able to get your coins out of there ever again. Blockchains can’t just email you a new private key, because the only way a blockchain knows you’re the owner, is if you show the private key. So if you lose it, you can’t prove anything, and your locked out for good. That is why blockchains are so secure.
So the only access to your coins that are stored on your public key, is through your private key. Private keys can not be hacked by normal computers. But quantum computers can hack the normal private keys. Now if a blockchain is quantum proof, they give you a public key with a quantum proof private key. So this private key can not be hacked by a quantum computer, and your coins are safe in that case. Now you think “ok, so if a blockchain upgrades to a quantum proof blockchain, the problem is solved”. But the problem is, if a blockchain already exists, there are millions of coins out there that NEED to be accessible by their owners after the fork or upgrade.

To understand why that is a problem, and why that can’t be solved, we need to understand how a fork works: so how can a blockchain be upgraded and still give the owners of the coins access to their coins.
After the fork, everybody needs to have the exact same amount of coins they had before the fork. So there will be a 1:1 tokenswap. Everyone who owns an amount of tokens of the old blockchain, will own that same amount of tokens of the new blockchain. To accomplish that, you will NEED to keep the old private keys active until the owner moves it’s coins to a new address: a public key that is accessible only through a new quantum proof private key. (Maybe another option would be that you wouldn’t need to move your coins to a new address, but the old private key would be de-activated after you claimed your new quantum proof private key. I don’t know if this last option is even possible, but if it would be possible, it would still mean that your old private key needs to be active after the fork until the owner uses it and actively de-activates it.)
So: 

- The blockchain "knows" the amount of tokens you have at that specific time, and thus the amount of tokens you are entitled to, by looking at your public key. (Like for example etherscan does.)

- They can only send these tokens to its rightful owner, by sending them to that exact public key (address). That way it is guaranteed that only the rightful owner can access them, because only he has access to that address (The old private key and old public key). So then the new coins are on you old address, that is still accessible through your old private key. Now, even if it would technically possible, the blockchain can't erase the old private key or replace it with a new one, because then the owner would not be able to access his coins. Remember: he doesn’t HAVE the new private key. It’s not like you can get your new private key by email. So the blockchain needs to allow you to enter with your old private key, even if they just upgraded itself to a quantum proof blockchain. So your coins are NOT protected by that blockchains new and improved quantum proof private keys. Not until you have accessed your coins through your old private key. Then you would need to move them, or de-activate the old private key to lock your coins up in a way that it’s only accessible with a quantum proof private key.

So what you need to understand is this: after a blockchain is upgraded to a quantum secure blockchain, ALL coins are still accessible through the old private keys, and therefore still hackable by quantum computers. So even though this blockchain can claim to be quantum proof, their coins are NOT until the owner accesses them and takes action.

Now we come to the next point I wrote before, where you will see why a big amount of the coins of an upgraded blockchain will never become quantum secure:

- Not all owners of coins will take the necessary action. That’s just human nature. (People don't read, or read half, don't understand, postpone, don't care, don't know how or don't see the point in any other way)

- There are a lot of coins without an actual active owner: the owners lost their private key, their password or got locked out in another way. It happens a lot. So especially with coins that exist for a while like BTC and ETH, there are a lot of coins that nobody even CAN move to a new wallet. Don’t underestimate the total amount of these coins. All these coins will still be accessible through the old private key after "quantum proving" the blockchain because the owners need to move them, or de-activate the old private key to lock your coins up with a quantum proof private key.

So lots of new quantum proof coins, will not be moved away from the old private key and be accessible through both their old private key and their new quantum proof private key. It’s like when your house has a cardboard front door anybody can walk through. And to fix that, your make an new unbreakable door and install that as your backdoor, while leaving your front door as it was. As long as you don’t build a brick wall where your cardboard door is, people can still walk in your house and steal your stuff.
So the only conclusion can be: Even if you could upgrade an existing blockchain to a quantum proof blockchain (and wether or not that is possible is still open for discussion), then still, a big part of their circulating supply can be hacked. Is that a problem? Yes, even if you move and secure your own coins, if others are stolen and sold, your coins will drop in value dramatically, and panic sales would be all around.

I compare tokens with shares in the sense that it's an incentive for the team to make the value rise. That's a relevant comparison.

Wheter you agree with the % they hold or not, they have been open and clear about it from the start. So it's not really fair to complain about this afterwards. You knew what you bought in to.
And I wouldn't worry to much. I just saw their share is not part of the circulating supply. So they can't sell anytime soon, it's contractual limmited. It happens a lot. Check NEO, EOS, Qtum, OMG, everywhere you see total supply instead of max supply next to circulating supply at coinmarketcap.com. All successfull coins.

And I agree with you, I believe in Alis too. They will do great.

As to other already existing cryptocurrencies forking into quantum proof crypto, there is a huge problem that's worth mentioning: even if they successfully fork their blockchain into a quantum proof crypto, their old coins can still be hacked as if they where not protected by quantum proof cryptography. Here's why:
Whether you hard-fork like BTC and end up with 2 coins like BTC and BCH or whether you hard-fork like ETH where you end up with 1 coin: after the fork, your coins or coin will be where you had your old coin: in a wallet or an exchange. This means it’s still accessible through your old private key. This old private key is NOT quantum proof, that's simply how forking works, you can't just make the old private key disappear. If the new coin wouldn’t be connected with the old private key, how would it end up in your wallet/ exchange and be accessible for you? So to finalize the quantum proof update, you will need to move your quantum proof coin to another wallet. That way you leave the old private key behind you with the old wallet. Your coins in your new wallet will only be accessible with your new quantum proof private key. Simple right? Guess what:

• Not everybody will do that. That’s just human nature. (People don't read, or read half, don't understand, postpone, don't care, don't know how or don't see the poin in any other way)
  
  
• There are a lot of coins lost or unaccessible because people lost their password or got locked out in another way. It happens a lot. So especially with coins that exist for a while like BTC and ETH, there are a lot of coins that nobody even CAN move to a new wallet. All these coins will still be accessable through the old private key after "quantum proving" the blockchain.

[/li]
[/list]
So lots of new quantum proof coins, will not be moved away from the old private key and be accessible through both their old private key and their new quantum proof private key. It’s like when your house has a cardboard front door anybody can walk through. And to fix that, your make an new unbreakable door and install that as your backdoor, while leaving your front door as it was. As long as you don’t build a brick wall where your cardboard door is, people can still walk in your house and steal your stuff.

You are wrong. That should NOT have been burned. It's as agreed on in advance: it was clearly stated in the whitepaper they would own 50% of the circulating supply of the tokens. (They and their stakeholders. see page 12 of their whitepaper.) There is a  contractual limit for them to sell.
They also made clear here what the situation would be after the burn:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nJUUe-BZjDfQ1pX9xk-P0xGnXShqT25ilaQxhAnbUNg/edit#gid=0

Offcourse they own a tokens, all projects have a share and own tokens. Just like any regular company has a majority in shares. Which is a good thing, because that is the biggest incentive to make the project successful and make the value of the token rise.

Apparently lots of people thought burning a shitload of coins would make the price skyrocket. Lot of that was floating around on twitter.
That's why it was goin up fast before the burn. Now people sell again because they figured out it didn't influence the price. Don't worry, price will go up again. End of December they already have a first sneak-peak of the actual product.

It's not a social media network in the sense of facebook. It's a social network where information will be fact-checked and verified. So information you will read through Alis is not a hidden advertisement, stealth marketing campaings or clickbait. Alis targets Japan. Apparently in Japan news and informational articles are usually collored and biased.
Checking info through blockchain is also done by Lunir and Steem. Steem is already up and running. Pos. 31 in coinmarketcap so actually doing pretty good. Scince Japan has a different language, it's an open market, Alis jumps in here.

Well you haven't changed much either I see. You on your period all year round?

QRL will be PoS and you can stake after main net launch. Staking can be done with pretty much anything, even raspbery Pi3. There will be no minimum ammount needed to stake.

QRL can perform great from day 1 after the launch of main-net. Even if quantum computers won't be a threat till after 10 years.
Look at the list of things below of things to come, and keep in mind that the base of these things is 1 of the most secure cryptography around, if not THE most secure, and therefore the most safe there is. People put their hard earned cash in crypto, safety is for most one of the biggest priorities. And not just the safety of your money has quantum secure cryptography as protection, AL of the below has this high end security feature:
- PQ secure digital identification
- Blockchain based ultra secure digital ID.
- Leveraging Ephemeral messaging layer with off chain services:
PQ secure data channels,
PQ secure comms,
PQ secure messenger services,
PQ secure VOIP,
maybe even in the future PQ secure VPN.
- PQ secure provenance and proof-of-existence services.
- Feasibility of smart contract integration.
- PoS with no minimum amount needed to stake. Also possible on low cost, low energy device like Rasp Pi3.
- Ledgerwallet

Quantum resistance is such a mythical thing apparently, that people don't look what else QRL got to offer. QRL will lift off somewhere next year, and when it does, and people start to actually see the other qualities, unexpected things can happen for those who dozed of after reading the word quantum.

IBM just reached 50-Qubits. Only for 90 microseconds, but it's a huge milestone. So supremacy racing around the corner might help QRL value a lot.
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/609451/ibm-raises-the-bar-with-a-50-qubit-quantum-computer/

Man, I've seen a lot of people trying to FUD a coin into a dip to buy low, but you must be one of the worst I've ever seen. 

LOL, so you trying to say you sold because you believe he sold 1 mil. QRL at all time high? So you saying he sold in june, made about 2 mil. and now still works as a doctor to cover up his riches and pretending he still needs to work besides managing a blockchian project?  And you sell now.. Months later. You quick to react man hahaha. You full of shit. You were never in the ICO. If so, you would have a closer eye on the project and know what they up to the next year. If that becomes common knowledge, QRL will explode. Everybody zones out now as soon as they read quantum. Very few people know what QRL is about besides being QR. But people who know won't sell now. Sure as hell not because of Jomari FUD that's months old now.

Discord is very active. Go check it out:

https://discord.gg/BheKAZb

Lakeluke_again, why don't you put your QRL on myetherwallet?

Altcoiner555: Finally we agree. And my compliments, it takes a great deal of self knowledge to make your own diagnose. You are convinced the QRL team is shit and lie, yet you don't sell your QRL. Classic case of cognitive dissonance. All you need to do now is tell everybody you didn’t want to sell your QRL anyway.

I don’t know if any dev sold some of his coins or how much or when. Don’t care either. Putting your own money in your own project? Maybe he did. If he did, he must have great faith in the success of his own project. The delay is a fact and it won’t be the last one, get used to it. Happens to a lot of projects as mentioned above. This is the closest you will get to actual rocket science level tech. It’s hard, it takes time and needs to be thorough. If you got money in this thing, be glad they don’t just goof around and release prematurely.
The biggest indicator of the success of this project is the actual product they working on. So unless all we do here is discussing a soap about doctors and self reviewing psychology and people being bummed out they're still no millionaire because of some delay, maybe we can focus on the technical side of QRL and the development. If you don't know what's going on in the testnet (open to everybody), or you don't have the skillset to understand whether or not it's any good, don't judge.

He knows him personal and he trusts him. Good for him.. But he didn’t say he trusted his coding skills for being a doctor. He trusts him not to be a liar and a crook.
If you don’t trust their coding skills or progress, you just show you don’t even try to do some research on them. QRL is so easy to follow. You can even join the testnet and see for yourself if you have the skills that you try to downtalk for QRL. At what project is joining the testnet so easy as with QRL? In a few days its even easier to join if your skills are not good in that field, because they will have their web-wallet up in their testnet. Just go tho their discord which you obviously have not done yet. Ask for directions and you will be guided to Github. Also check their coin gecko score for development activity. Shit, I can’t believe I need to explain this to you. You really shouldn’t have such a big mouth for someone with so little knowledge.
You just bitching or trying to create a dip to buy more. Not weird they think you Jomari. Even though I don't think you are, you obviously are the one with the double agenda here. You the crook and spreading FUD in a pathetic attempt to create a pump-and-dump. Go try that with some shitcoin, we don’t fall for your bullshit.

His first post and right away he makes more sense than all your posts combined.
You say you such a genius to have predicted there would be a delay, but a delay is more common than not. That's common knowledge. If people just want in for the pump, they should know better.
Anybody with real interest in the project can just sign up to their Discord. They real open and in their #code and #alphetesters you can follow the progress. Just sell your QRL and gtfo if you don't believe in the project. Let's see who's the genius 1 year later.