As long as there are still people without access in electricity, cash will still remain. Actually I don't think we would ever go full digital in paying for transactions because first, not all people can afford to buy a phone (there still are in third world countries) and lastly, the dependecy on the Internet would be extremely high and that is not a good thing.

That is good news really. Delisting shitcoins in exchanges is the first step in shaking off those in the market altogether. This will essentially redistribute the dominance of coins in the space. Imagine if more shitcoins died, its volume will go back to other more solid coins.

In this market, you should very well know that all your actions are solely your responsibility. In that logic, it wouldn't be wise to base your decisions on these "experts" since they wouldn't be liable to the repercussions of your act. It's good that you realize this now, as for the people who still believe in them [the experts], I hope they follow in your footsteps.

Those people who blame bounty hunters solely for price dumps are dumb. The typical bounty pool are very small compared to the allocation for the pre-sale and main sale. Investors have absurd bonuses too that are technically free coins so if there's anyone who should be blamed, they are it.

When I look for alts to invest in, the first impression of the idea must be good otherwise I skip it. If somehow it catches my interest, I'll read they whitepaper and decide if it is viable. The second parameter would have to be the team. It is important since they will be the one to facilitate the growth of the project so they need to be strong. Third would have to be the community. A strong community is a good asset for a growing product.

Funny that you blame only the bounty hunters for dumping of prices whereas they only have a small portion of the total supply, typically 1-2%, and the ICO participants have bonuses as much as 50%. Besides, bounty tokens are distributed 3 months after the ICO so if the coins were to be listed before then on exchanges, the prices would still dump because of the pre-sale investors.

Stability also make more investor venture in this market since it has less volatility now. IMO, it's much better if the price grows at a slow and steady state so that it matches the actual level of adoption;take this time to bump up the tech behind it..

Most of the digital currencies are decentralized, so you might think that there's no way for the gov to regulate it right? wrong. Since cryptocurrency has a value, a person must cash it out somehow. The government will impose laws and rules on exchanges so they can control the crypto in and out of the country. This is only one way, there are many ways for the gov to do it.

I don't exactly see electronic money being dominant in the future rather I see it being used enough by a much larger audiences. After all, bitcoin was not created to be a replacement for fiat rather an option for the people to use depending on the task they want to complete.

Ang Buying.com  ay isang rebolusyonaryong paraan para sa mga tao na mag-ship sa pamamagitan ng pagturing sa mga garahe bilang isang distribution point. Iba pang mga impormasyon dito! https://t.co/cXw38dh8qf

It will survive with the help of the people who believe in true decentralization and its ideals. It can increase its fangs through increasing adoption, which of course happens with the continuing development of it. Same can be said for alts which have fairly good ideas.

Bitcoin isn't even an investment tool since we cannot be sure that it will definitely appreciate in the future unlike gold which is tangible and is actually naturally rare so there's always demand for it. The statement was a little absure since bitcoin wasn't meant to replace anything; it was meant to be an option.

I honestly haven't encountered people which compare those two for a long time (last was I think a year ago). Anyway, really, those two are meant different things(btc for store of value, eth for smart contracts). Better yet, use one or the other depending on your own preferences.

Telegram Username: @hachiman13
Participating in:  Signature
ERC-20 Address: 0x97d9da5296b1650c5792cb110e6d4ad26f1322f8

#Signature WEEK "9"
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=20285;sa=summary
Telegram username: @nebiki77
The Row in Spreadsheet: 149

I doubt the government will create something that is highly volatile and risky. Many factors will be considered by the government to implement it.  For one, the cryptocurrency they will issue should be utilized by all people. This is where the problem is at; crypto isn't for everyone.

Ang epekto ng digital na salapi ay hindi maitatanggi ngunit ginagawa ba nitong magandang panirahan ang ating mundo? https://t.co/S1loxeU4Iv

I think it would have some minimal effect on the market. Most of the investors are not aware of this and will buy/trade crypto regardless of the result. IMO it will be rejected again. Not that I think negatively, its just that cryptocurrency have no enough credibility to be accepted yet.

I hope he also showed or at least even explain his basis for such statements otherwise its all just a scheme to control the market to me. There are many gullible investors who follow the words of these crypto celebrities so they should be elaborate.

Stop giving a damn what people say even if they are "authorities" in this field because they won't replace your money if you end up losing it. What you ought to do is to research and make your own decisions.