Now I remember that I have seen that GitHub issue being mentioned on the forum in the past. I totally forgot about it, but I will make sure to keep it in mind. So, they don't support recovering an Electrum wallet from seed, but if you have an Electrum-native wallet file, Sparrow will recognize its format and let you recover it in its app.

Good to know, thanks!

Sve zavisi šta želiš i preferiraš.

Imaš opciju da prodaš taj monero nekom P2P i uživo primiš cash na ruke. Nema tragova od transakcije i ne moraš se brinuti hoće li banka i ostali dušebrižnici postavljati pitanja, ko, šta, gdje, kako?
Ako ti ne smeta KYC i centralizovane mjenačnice, možeš svoj Monero tamo prodati za fiat. Npr, Kraken i KuCoin podržavaju monero i sredstva se mogu povuči na banku.
Uvijek možeš monero zamjeniti za bitcoin, npr na https://exch.cx/. Lakše ti je onda sa bitcoinom raditi i prodati ga.
Bitcoin možeš i bez KYC prodati na Bisq ili preko Peach Bitcoin aplikacije.

Kao što sam rekao, sve zavisi kojim putem želiš krenuti. Hoćeš li da radiš KYC i koristiš CEX ili da ideš nekim alternatvnim putem? 

Wait, are Electrum-native seeds supported by Sparrow wallet? I know that Blue Wallet is compatible with Electrum's seed format, but their greatest focus is on their mobile wallet. They have a desktop version as well, but only for macOS. There is sadly no support for Windows and Linux.

eXch has a slow and free plan if you swap alternative coins like Litecoin and Ethereum into Bitcoin. Exchanges that go vice versa will cost the traders something in mining fees. Their free plan is not talked about enough, but I think there should be more emphasize on it. Of course, the 0.5% fee is still there (as it should). At what fee rate did eXch send you the BTC that you swapped for? 

I would rather have a better functioning and more private Bitcoin than being forced to use other altcoins because of their privacy features. I like Monero for everything it has brought to the crypto world, but it's a ticking timebomb of negative news waiting to happen. Where will it be delisted next and what FUD will come out about its use. What will the nation-state enemies decide to do next. You might say, why would you care, they can't take your coins from you anyways. No, they can't, but their decisions can drive the price down 30% or more in a short time-period which isn't pleasant for holders.

That's also why I have mixed feelings about privacy features being added to Bitcoin on a protocol level. It would be nice to see it happen, but at what cost!?

We now have multiple wallets that have already introduced this privacy feature or have signaled that they are working on implementing it. I like where that is going. But wait until the US government finds out. They might try to bring more democracy to Bitcoin and its developers.

Kruw will now tell you that the reputation of an individual doesn't matter because everything is open-source. He might also mention that it can't be a honeypot because the wallet doesn't collect any information. Did I mention it is open-source? Finally, if you are not running your own coordinator then you are a pussy.   

Foundation Passport has also announced that they are planning to introduce support for BIP351 and Silent Payments. They plan to integrate it with both Envoy and the Passport hardware wallet in the future. Of course, it's not added yet, but just something for you to keep an eye on.

It can be just a matter of time. You might have been lucky this far, but it doesn't mean you always will be. Also, your use of VPN will remain on their record. If they ever decide to perform a deeper check, they will see it. We shouldn't suggest to other users that it's an ok thing to do because they will get the wrong impression.

One more thing. Be careful about multiple accounts in the same household even if they are registered to different names. It's especially important if you play with bonuses. One account per household is a common rule on online casinos.

Based on the limits you saw on Sportsbet, I take it that you are not betting on popular leagues, but perhaps some second/third division teams. It's quite normal that bookies and odds providers limit how much you can bet on such games. Have you checked the limits on Blackjack.Fun for the matches you like to bet on?

Btw, don't play on Stake with a VPN and try to bypass their restrictions. It's a sure way to get yourself into trouble and have your winnings and perhaps even deposits confiscated.

I have heard of the Bitget exchange, and know it's one of the partners and sponsors of Juventus football club. You can see its logo on their sleeve. I have also seen the exchange being advertised in Serie A matches. The Bitget wallet is a companion app of that exchange. I have never heard of anyone use either of the two services, but it's surprising to me that there are scam accusations against them. It wouldn't be the first time, though. 1xBet (connected to 1xBit) is also a sponsor in the Italian football league, but anyone who follows this forum knows about the awful reputation of 1xBit. 

But that newly added passphrase isn't going to add any extra security to the coins on your initial non-passphrase enabled wallet/addresses. Are you going to move your coins to new addresses on your Tangem that take advantage of the passphrase feature or will you leave them where they are and add extra security to addresses funded in the future?

I understand what you are saying and I agree that it needs to be fixed, especially since it shouldn't be difficult for their developers to change that workflow. But I repeat that it isn't a bug that hinders you from using the signing device with all its current capabilities. Foundation should just leave the name alone and not add any timestamps to the signed transactions because the device is missing an internal clock.   

Very confusing post Sonia. Let's break it down.

It doesn't. Address poisoning scams aren't common on the Bitcoin network. They are more common on alternative blockchains, but even then the two addresses aren't exactly like. Only a few characters at the beginning and the end are the same.

No one types addresses out character by character. You copy them. However, you don't copy them from blockchain explorers and transaction histories. You do it from the receive tab/receiving feature of your wallet.

I assume you mean characters. Remember that you said that addresses involved in poisoning scams look exactly like your bitcoin address? Now you are talking about the last two "wallet numbers" only a few sentences later.

I just noticed that with the latest firmware version you released a few months ago, a new device has become compatible with the Krux DIY hardware wallet. It's the Yahboom K210 module. It's a touchscreen device that runs on Linux and has a touchscreen. It's cheap and can be bought for $50 to $60 at Amazon.

http://www.yahboom.net/study/K210-Developer-Kit

It's not a serious bug. As long as you aren't keeping multiple PSBTs on your microSD card, you won't find yourself in a situation where you don't know which signed transaction you want to broadcast.
The easiest fix would be to just not rename the file at all, and add a "signed" prefix or suffix to it. 

I guess you set it up using the Advanced Setup mode. The standard and assembled (non DIY) Jade has a beginner setup and advanced setup. The latter one creates a stateless signing device that you can use with SeedQRs. The beginner setup feature creates a standard wallet with the information stored on the device like with any other hardware wallet. You also need to set up a PIN. Like I said, this is for the normal Jade. I can only assume it's the same thing for the DIY variant. So, go through the beginner setup, not the advanced one.

Stack Wallet's interface reminds me of that of Blue Wallet. Both use that swipe left to right feature to switch between different wallets.

I don't think dkbit98 should be added to any lists because he is a person, not a Taproot-supporting wallet. Pun intended.

OP can always compare his information against the software wallets shown on the Bitcoin Hole. The Taproot feature is one of the points mentioned on the site.

Perhaps it will let you start the exchange, but then to actually finalize it, you will have to submit your documents. Maybe it's one of those typical "we don't require KYC unless it's necessary", and it always turn out to be necessary.

Here is just a small part of their Privacy Policy dealing with the AML and KYC procedures that confirms identity verification is necessary:

https://www.transfi.com/policies#aml-kyc-policy

32 - Pmalek
45 - Pmalek

Thanks