 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3]
|
I think I found out why tx's were bugging out and not being relayed. Turns out two of the seed nodes crashed and got stuck downloading new blocks, so we've been running without 2 of the seeds for a little while. I've fixed some p2p protocol errors as well, and upload a new version of the src with newly compiled daemons. It's recommended that every person running a high demand node (such as a pool) upgrades to this new version. I also added in to say an error message when blockchain rejects a transaction when the fee is too low. https://github.com/iridiumdev/iridium/releases/tag/v1.01https://github.com/iridiumdev/iridium/I've re-compiled from the latest v1.01 master, irdpool .tk is now up to date. |
|
|
|
Does anyone know of an open source block explorer that works with cryptonote? I wonder if https://chainradar.com/ would be willing to add IRD. PS. the dev might wanna put up a bounty for a logo |
|
|
|
I'm happy to see about half the recent blocks being mined by others now, it's not longer easy to do a 51% (from my understanding you actually need a lot more than 51% in practice). This is a healthy sign for the network as the hashrate continues to grow  |
|
|
|
I have been trying to pool mine with Claymore, but It won't accept an address starting with "ir", such as ir49TFZzxPB3KG5iqsVjoj3ZRj8JuQA3M1FgqTnrW8GQ5VpAsWXD6rYGL1mB6CBmjfGcVAGgzVH3o9o rcJnbdmiR2j4JReUhs The miner will accept 49TFZzxPB3KG5iqsVjoj3ZRj8JuQA3M1FgqTnrW8GQ5VpAsWXD6rYGL1mB6CBmjfGcVAGgzVH3o9orc JnbdmiR2j4JReUhs, but that does not work with the pool it seems. Catch 22 :-) The error I get: Error in server response
: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"invalidaddressusedforlogin"}} BTW: I did not have much luck mining my iridium sunglasses, but the CPU miner worked well Make sure you're not using a WorkerID, this pool software doesn't support it. |
|
|
|
I would be willing to stand up an Iridium pool, but I don't see the info I need to create a coin file to start the pool.
Maybe IRD-PoolOperator would be willing to provide me his coin.json?
Below is the only real modifications beyond the obvious stuff like setting your wallet address "coin": "Iridium",
"symbol": "IRD",
"blockUnlocker": {
"enabled": true,
"interval": 15, // lowered for testing, probably not good for production
"depth": 20, // this is the actual important change
"poolFee": 5,
"devDonation": 0.0, // shouldn't work anyways
"coreDevDonation": 0.0 // shouldn't work anyways
},
"payments": {
"enabled": true,
"interval": 45, // massively lowered because of transaction issues
"maxAddresses": 1, // prevents transaction size errors
"mixin": 0, // prevents transaction size errors
"transferFee": 10000, // I don't think a fee is even needed
"minPayment": 1000000000, // 10 IRD
"denomination": 1000000 // anything under 0.010 IRD gets truncated and remains pending
},
Also make sure you set coinUnits in config.js otherwise the website (and only the website) shows the wrong decimal placement var coinUnits = 100000000;
Installation of node requires a specific version, and may cause dependencies issues on your server depending on distribution. I'm accepting offers in my PM for system administration work, including setting something like a pool up. how to mine this coin？ Hi，guys， you release a new coin but doesn't give the miner.
I see the github code, do i need to compile the code, and then mine it?
does there anyone success mine this coin?
Any Monero miner will work if you use a pool. I recommend xmrig or xmr-cpu-stak for CPU and ccminer-cryptonight by KlausT (I think xmr-stak-nvidia is fundamentally a repackage of this). xmr-stak-amd exists but I've never mined on an AMD GPU. Otherwise you can attempt to solo mine in the node itself, see earlier posts in this thread. |
|
|
|
|
I've lowered the fee since everything seems to be running smoothly now. I was gonna do this earlier but my entire block lost power (not mining related)
That said I am personally concerned about how my mining pool has absorbed basically all of the hashrate. Nearly everyone who was solo mining is no longer doing so. Before I begun this I thought only GPU miners would be interested in using the pool. I'm in a position to 51% the network, I am the network. This is a call for another pool to be opened by another operator to compete with me. If this doesn't happen I may be forced to raise the pool fee to economically force people off of it. We're still very early, so I've lowered the fee to make this a fairer start for everyone while my future competition gets to work.
|
|
|
|
There's still one miner who hasn't been paid out due to his ever increasing payout and the limit on the network right now. If you're this miner you should change your wallet address so you can get smaller payouts while you wait for the network to catch up to your transaction size. I have your IRD on reserve, I could offer to manually pay you out and try to dig into the pools database but I'd honestly rather avoid mucking about there. Though, if IRD were suddenly to be listed I definitely would get your coins out to you ASAP even if it came to bringing down the pool for a bit. I may have double paid the pools miners when resetting the pool (perhaps it didn't get written to the database?). There's one miner with a large payout that's having issues. The wallet balance is rising and that miner should get paid out. There is a lot of locked balance on top of that but that's technically future payout for other miners.
Assuming this is true (I haven't confirmed this, I just want to keep everyone in the loop) I will eat this double miner payment as a loss but I've increased the fee to help me be able to payout that one miner sooner. (I guess this is what they call socialized losses)
This has nullified any profit I've made off the pool fees.
Edit: we're now net neutral on wallet balance, that one miner is still not getting paid out due to the transaction size issue described by the developer.
I sent another 500IRD your way to help out with the losses. I also added your pool to the main post.  |
|
|
|
|
I may have double paid the pools miners when resetting the pool (perhaps it didn't get written to the database?). There's one miner with a large payout that's having issues. The wallet balance is rising and that miner should get paid out. There is a lot of locked balance on top of that but that's technically future payout for other miners.
Assuming this is true (I haven't confirmed this, I just want to keep everyone in the loop) I will eat this double miner payment as a loss but I've increased the fee to help me be able to payout that one miner sooner. (I guess this is what they call socialized losses)
This has nullified any profit I've made off the pool fees.
Edit: we're now net neutral on wallet balance, that one miner is still not getting paid out due to the transaction size issue described by the developer.
|
|
|
|
I had to split up transactions to single addresses, I was getting {"code":-4,"message":"Transaction size is too big"} when my server tried to pay out multiple addresses. There's currently one address that is still failing, I'm investigating. If this is your address, you might want to stop for now. I found this so far: https://github.com/zone117x/node-cryptonote-pool/issues/169UPDATE The payment has since go through on an automatic retry, I'm still investigating though. 2017-09-06 09:24:13 Payments failed to send to {"amount":4500000000,"address":"ir2s784jijCXDnuPQxcqTWQ8J6LnXgMeBR8ttZ8USqx1UEidx9GxsnZ3NAfnEKDQaEMfjb9Xz72PZBDwRnkSJ6c42zsMYujRo"}
2017-09-06 09:24:42 Error with transfer RPC request to wallet daemon {"code":-4,"message":"Wrong amount"} I keep seeing this error, but it always seems to get sent successfully on the next try. I checked the pool wallet and it's balance is fine. I'm trying to tweak some settings, sorry for blips on the pool. |
|
|
|
World's First Public Iridium (IRD) Mining Pool: http://[Suspicious link removed]/ // Edit: irdpool _dot_ tk (mods if my mining pool site is a problem re-edit my post I guess, I assume this is because of the free .tk domain name) Regular cryptonote miners will work just like they do with Monero. Just point it at the different address. This includes GPU miners like ccminer and node-less CPU miners like xmrig and xmr-stak-cpu. I've successfully confirmed my mining pool is paying out ( http://[Suspicious link removed]/#payments ), although I had to set the mixin to 0 because I was getting the following error: 2017-09-06 07:31:42 [payments] Error with transfer RPC request to wallet daemon {"code":-4,"message":"Transaction size is too big"}
2017-09-06 07:31:42 [payments] Payments failed to send to {"amount":27600000000,"address":"ir3yCXAoBndKKjawRYUj49aVqyrKAWbSxf4wvLy5xgGkFPrcFiCuK1W4LDN9a8oZ7m9RGGMhyBkAs6Q65Prm9Cp81rzQeQL4M"}
On another note when I try to send from my desktop I get this type of error in simplewallet (this is the official linux binary, the mining pool runs from the master github branch) [wallet ir3yCX]: transfer 3 ir3FDQTKd1Z7Kg1GPcJZreUrX1CBcyiPtPjsJeSXSj1YeHbsaz3twFg1aF4x1sGBJbKWt2yo7UVn9aq63fK1p63m2DmZiUaGP 3
Error: Internal node error the node says "TX Accepted but not relayed" (related? https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/58brfx/tx_accepted_but_not_relayed_what_happens_to_these/ ) I'm not sure if the node was just waiting to relay the transactions or not, but I ended up deleting my node's blockchain to clear them (no command to do so in the node?) and used simplewallet's reset command. It was quick because of how small the chain currently is but that'd be a pain on a larger blockchain. Developer, please pay out the bounty to: ir3yCXAoBndKKjawRYUj49aVqyrKAWbSxf4wvLy5xgGkFPrcFiCuK1W4LDN9a8oZ7m9RGGMhyBkAs6Q 65Prm9Cp81rzQeQL4M Update: First payment sent out to people who weren't me! Success! I lowered the minimum payment to 10 IRD, I might raise this again later. I imagine these blocks are pretty empty at the moment so I don't see the harm. |
|
|
|
I've started a mining pool and I'm currently testing with my own miners. I want to verify block unlocks and reward payouts before I start actively posting a link to my site. =the pool in action=   I'm not sure why the block rewards are being displayed incorrectly on the website. help me get a domain name for it: ir3yCXAoBndKKjawRYUj49aVqyrKAWbSxf4wvLy5xgGkFPrcFiCuK1W4LDN9a8oZ7m9RGGMhyBkAs6Q 65Prm9Cp81rzQeQL4M What is the current hashrate?
just over 10kH/s according to my pool software =some blocks have been mined, waiting for maturity=  |
|
|
|
|
