I think that bitcoin will never be known to the whole world. He will remain popular only among some people. And this percentage of the population is not very large. Therefore, bitcoin will not become a global currency

Everyone were dream to be rich in any ways, even using bitcoin or not. They want to become rich because they want provide the thinks that they want. However, some of them were make bad to others to earn and to become rich.

My wosrst decesoin about bitcoin is when i ignore about bitcoin before.
That if I grab bitcoin earlier I may have a vehicle now too.
Now I know for the coming future,i'll try mmy best not to do worst fhing again to bitcoin.

I don't think the word "corruption" can be used in this kind of ecosystem, why did I say so? because we all know cryptocurrency such as bitcoin works in a decentralized structure so no one is in control when you look at it in the  bigger picture but if you look close to specific services then corruption might be use as a term but I bet to disagree I rather say its a tactical move to gain profit within a specific service offered to earn bitcoin and if you look at it is in a proper way because it is not compulsory taken out to anybody who holds bitcoin, it is more like a voluntarily move.

All investments that are moving very slowly are alright. Your investments don't have to be skyrocketing every single day and I don't think there is really an investment like that. If someone says that the investment scheme he is on is like that, he's probably lying and is trying to scam you. As long as your investment is moving uphill, then it's okay even if it's moving very slowly (maybe not ridiculously slow though). An increase is still an increase.

Bitcoin has already garnered the much needed global prominence. There is no gainsaying the fact that it is an already entrenched international currency. What is now needed is for governments and nations to make efforts towards making it a local legal tender. The rate at which Bitcoin is gaining relevance and the level of transactions that are been carried out with the crypto currency suggests nothing but a possibility of a global acceptance. At the rate at which Bitcoin is gaining popularity globally, in no time, we may begin to see framework that would make it generally acceptable.

I have to say, I am considering liquidating my position... However, the optimist and dreamer in me wants to hold tight for an ETF approval. BUT, I would hate to miss out on selling at 1k and buying back at 500, you know? Too much like gambling to me, and I do not do well at gambling...

Stable or not, Bitcoin will always be popular.  First it is the first mover to the decentralized blockchain.  Second, with its userbase that does not include only traders, with the stability of Bitcoin price will welcome Bitcoin to its new community and much wider scope of usage.   This will cover a bigger audience and more interesting party will join to Bitcoin due to the merchants that are accepting Bitcoin in exchange of their goods.

The price does matter because that is the representation of its value, if the price is high that simply mean that the value is high. I believe that bitcoins will become more valuable in the near future that is why I am slowly saving a little of it in my wallet.

Not quite. My question was, if I don't want to give up my land, would you come and get it from me venturing a fight (like retards) over it in the name of humanity? I don't want to be superficial here, just wondering how you see the path of evolution towards a RBE.

Also, a more realistic question is, whether it is better in the name of progress to fight over resources. One fact is, besides basic human necessities, economically more efficient ideas tend to take over. Although managing shit intelligently is probably a better strategy in the long run, I'd like to hear of ideas about how to get to a point where it could take over before resources are already depleted.

The second question is, what if having exact same rights isn't intelligent? I'm saying this because you stated two goals. One is equal rights and the other is resource depletion. What if these two conflict? Or, a better question is, what can these rights be if we want to reach dynamic equilibrium. And of course, is there a way to enforce these without conflicting with these two goals.

They say it because the value was very low and that was of course not good. But it will always change so now it is stable.
And that is very good. I hope of course that the value will rise and rise more in the future, and that we can sell it with profit.

Yes the rate of people adopting bitcoin is much faster, everyday thousands of people are getting awareness about bitcoin and adopt it. As the future is the time of bitcoin currency. People all over the world like it.

Sad thing if bitcoin gets banned then we will not be able to trade the coin anymore since it will be against the l;aw.

Any country is good for bitcoin businesses since Bitcoin is created to become a currency and might replace fiat in the future.

It will be best of you will do both, if you have the funds available better to save fiat and invest some on crypto currency.

I first knew about bitcoin on a website. can't remember the name of the site but during that time bitcoin was just around $50 didn't took it seriously, really
regretted that decision.

IS this only for United States or can be used in other countries?

if i am going to eat human flesh (for survival's sake only), it should be cooked first. 

do you accept escrow?