Its not that bad.Actually its good enough for $1 only.Pretty good.
Wait, are you saying I've been scammed?
|
|
|
I see a bunch of people in a temple worshiping onions which shoot fire out their top.
Yeah that's pretty much all that happens in Brighton.
|
|
|
shittyDraws delivering her first shit drawing to you sir! That's a cool-ass building I just butchered. https://i.imgur.com/Uln9DLp.jpgI did it all in one line on the back of a Five Guys menu with a sharpie. I hope you didn't have big plans for this thing. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Holy moly that's spot on. I'd buy that for a dollar. Oh wait, I just did.
|
|
|
Experiencing how net forums work is way more useful than seeing how Bitcoins work ;-) Good on you though. As a parent of a 3-year-old, the important part is just getting them used to it.
To the next generation!
|
|
|
Quick bump as a reminder, plus important update - we're now meeting from 6pm onwards, as there's a bit of a clash with a charity gig later in the evening. Phil who runs the club and is taking Bitcoins should be around to chat as well. If the music is too loud (or too quiet) we may move - will leave directions at the Blind Tiger if so, but will probably be the Fountainhead if we're not there.
Drop me a PM here, or get in touch with me @6loss on Twitter, if you're lost/confused...
|
|
|
Just to check, have you looked in the "Backup" group if you have one? My KeePassX certainly has one, but not exactly sure what it saves or how long for.
Yup. I've looked there but with no luck. It's so strange that while the modified date says December '13 on the KeePassX file, some January '14 entries are still available in the file and others just disappeared with no trace. Yeah, the date stamp thing is odd. Is there any chance you opened the same file twice at the same time? KeePassX locks the file and warns you if it's already open, but you *can* ignore the warning, at which point there's a risk only passwords from one of the open files get saved, and the other gets overwritten.
|
|
|
Just to check, have you looked in the "Backup" group if you have one? My KeePassX certainly has one, but not exactly sure what it saves or how long for.
|
|
|
and copy and paste "I've done a bit of blockchain exploring. The block in question where all the bitcoin days were destroyed is this one: https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000048445e1220a78e53de15c74160ffbe4dad0b52099560e045fAbout 120,000 btc were moved. There are many transactions in this block in the 4,500-5,000 btc range. I followed the source addresses back in time. The ones I've looked at all trace their heritage to this monstrous transaction from 27 January 2011: https://blockchain.info/tx/8f8210694d3631a88ff410c573d80caf57db1d8af397bd47687aa4e4c1802464A single transaction moved 400,000 btc to a single address; this one: https://blockchain.info/address/1AYtnRppWM7tWQaVLpm7TvcHKrjKxgCRvXSo whoever made the transaction yesterday had 400,000 btc in a single address in 2011. If it isn't Satoshi, who the hell is it? Note that that 1AY... address had some transactions on 26 November this year; shortly before the ATH on 28 November. A huge whale, perhaps the biggest single holder of btc in existence, is stirring. The question is, why? EDIT: 400,000 btc in early 2011 was almost 10% of all btc in existence. In a single address. Wow." Nice tracing. I followed it from there a bit. From that 400k transaction there's one address sending 25k - 1AxP9ex3rm2LpsdM5NZ4ed3qT4asVX6E72. This in turn gets funded by 16GJ6iK1S2R8XV4tjwbRzvThUUQTXYqrhW on 2010-10-16, which previously got 25k coins from 1CRZpkKKAt7G5uiK4JPBjBJGnozgiatFAs. This last address actually pops up on the forum in July 2010, in the first post from NghtRppr at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=30.msg2452#msg2452 : http://bitcoin2cash.com/For every 5000 bitcoins sent to 1CRZpkKKAt7G5uiK4JPBjBJGnozgiatFAs you will receive $1.00 USD in cash by mail. ... (bitcoin2cash.com now redirects to localbitcoins.com) Looking back, NghtRppr was doing a few trades at that time. A few months later, in September 2010, the coins start to get sold to a few people: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1303.0Working back up the chain, 1CRZ sent to 16GJ6 in this txn at 2010-10-15 22:14:28 (according to blockchain.info), although the 45k got split into 20k and 25k - I guess one of those was change. Looking through NghtRppr's thread at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1303.0, there's a post from jimbobway at 2010-10-16 01:54:56 (I'm assuming my timestamps are all syncing up, but...) saying he got coins through: I have finally received my bitcoins from bitcoin2cash. Thx!!!
Perhaps not much evidence beyond timing coincidence to directly link the two, but TBH, it's kind of just fun digging into it. The 25k in 1GJ6 then got moved completely in one transaction later on the 16th to 1AxP9, and then into 1AYtn on 2011-01-27. Most of the transactions since then are on 2011-03-01 and 03-02, looks like maybe someone running a mix on the coins at this point? But there are one or txns getting in the way between that and the 1AYtn address, so still no real direct link.
|
|
|
Thanks Scotjam - mine came through today. Comparing them to the Casascius coins, obvious differences are they're slightly smaller, but a bit heavier. They also don't have the public key available on the coin itself, so keep a backup of the key that gets sent along with it...
Have to admit I couldn't resist taking one out of the case. Does feel pretty good in the hand, nice weight and good shine.
Cheers again!
|
|
|
I'm very glad I stumbled across this thread as my 2nd bank account is a Barclays one (and I have PingIt setup too.It's tied to my Barclays one).I don't use it as my main account so nothing gets lost if it's closed. The reason I'm concerned is I've done several trades with BTC involving my barclays account (all exchanges from BTC to GBP) but does the act of using Mt Gox or a private seller like I've done recently (as Mt Gox is taking a long time to verify my ID) affect my Barclays account at all? Or am I worrying a bit too much? I'd appreciate some clearer guidance on this.Thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I think the main thing to remember is that bank accounts aren't kept open purely for your benefit (as a customer) - they're more just a way for banks to look after and use your money. Defending against fraud is more important to banks as it affects their actual bottom line, rather than whether a few people decide to "like" their bank or not. From what I've seen, there are 2 things to look out for - firstly, risk of "infection" from accounts involved in fraudulent activity, such as money laundering. And secondly, "abnormal patterns" which flag up "unusual" activity against an account. Setting up an account recently, I noticed they ask a few questions about expected incomings/outgoings, so it may be worth asking in advance about this, to avoid going outside expected bounds. A bit like telling them you're going to be using your card abroad. Whether you actually have any control over either of these is another matter, natch.
|
|
|
Not yet... Maybe we can persuade them as part of the evening. Thinking of running a QR code for drinks though - open booze pot?
Having a "bunch" (what's the collective noun for bitcoiners?) of bitcoiners there would be the perfect opportunity. Imagine if half their customers that night kept asking "do you take bitcoin", "I'm only coming back when you take bitcoin"? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) A hash of bitcoiners? We'll work on em, but suspect pubs in the centre of Brighton don't feel too threatened by a small group of geeks walking out ;-)
|
|
|
Also heard a slightly odd tale of someone sending a small wooden disc through the post, only to have it replaced with a circle-shaped hole on arrival. No idea if that it was a deliberate heist or some other effect, but strange all the same.
Sounds very weird - do you mean it was replaced by the postal service? scotjam No idea - didn't manage to get a photo. Almost sounded like it got "intercepted" (badly, no envelopes being steamed open) while on route. (The one sent to me was fine.) Always good to disguise coin-shaped thing sin the post, I guess.
|
|
|
Not yet... Maybe we can persuade them as part of the evening. Thinking of running a QR code for drinks though - open booze pot?
|
|
|
Some time ago, a few of us tried charting the entries on the wiki page: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=35083.0But over time, a) the wiki got cleaned up so counts were all over the place, and b) I suspect the page became less updated and relevant anyway, so not as much use any more. Go with gut instinct, I reckon.
|
|
|
Has anyone proactively asked their bank about their stance on Bitcoin? FirstDirect seem very happy to chat generally, but not sure how much control over the account they have, given they're backed by HSBC. Might give them a call some time anyway. (And has anyone had any issues with using an HSBC/FirstDirect account for trading?)
|
|
|
Cheers for the update. Hope the delivery goes through OK - I know Casascius Mike funds his coins *after* they arrive, so they don't have value on import.
Also heard a slightly odd tale of someone sending a small wooden disc through the post, only to have it replaced with a circle-shaped hole on arrival. No idea if that it was a deliberate heist or some other effect, but strange all the same.
|
|
|
Playing around with the bitcoin: protocol, and noticed that when I scan an NFC tag with a "bitcoin:..." value using an Android phone, blockchain.info opens with a screen to send money, but doesn't then pre-populate the target address. Is this a bug in the app, or am I using the protocol wrongly, eg should it be "bitcoin://..." instead? Link works in a different app OK.
|
|
|
|