I meant it too.Apparently, you did not understand me.
Of course, much depends on advertising.No wonder such large corporations spend several million dollars or even billions of dollars a year only on advertising.
Market conditions play a large role too. Major correction could kill even a decent product with large advertising budget. Today the market with the price of bitcoin goes up and as I understand all your words right, that’s good sign for project. The market has a good perspective mid-term, but many sources speak about correction in short-term. So, like always in crypto - wait for x's, but have yor stop-losses ready)) |
|
|
|
I meant it too.Apparently, you did not understand me.
Of course, much depends on advertising.No wonder such large corporations spend several million dollars or even billions of dollars a year only on advertising.
Market conditions play a large role too. Major correction could kill even a decent product with large advertising budget. |
|
|
|
Of course, what's the point of hiding your funds from a cryptocurrency exchange on which you enter your username and password and pass the KYC verification ?
I don't like to be the pessimistic person here, but let's be more realistic, shall we. Masternodes don't mean price growth. There are many projects with mn's way under ICOs. |
|
|
|
Wow. Looks promising. Organic growth, not simple pump, judging by the candles |
|
|
|
How many profiles could we make in one account in that trading app?
Nice idea, by the way. Multiacc support may come in handy for people who are into ICOs, airdrops and stuff. I mean an option to work with many accounts on one exchange simultaneously |
|
|
|
People were waiting for it two years, it’s time to bull run!
)) Only one year and five month. And even if bear-market ended - we are not so far from the dip. Judging by past BTC dynamics - it should be a year before real growth - if it starts. |
|
|
|
In what DEX your tokens have been listed for today?
The coin is sort of traded on Crypto bridge, which is considered a decentralized exchange. Whay about Etherdelta, I saw good volume there... Isn't Etherdelta for ETH tokens only? Onex has it's own blockchain, if I'm not mistaken |
|
|
|
|
I doubt it. Crypto is in it's early days. We have already seen bear markets and 80% crashes before 2017. But in 2017 everyone was getting into market. With adoption the situation will repeat.
See it that way - right now it's 2016. We survived the crash, grow began, but it's not fall-2017 yet. When BTC hits $20k, people will run in crypto without a doubt and we will see another 2017.
|
|
|
|
What advantages has this project in front of, for example, kucoin trading app for smartphone?
I As for me, the main advantage is ability for masternodes creations and multiply funds. Single exchange intarface vs. an instrument for trading om multiple exchanges simultaneously. Why the hell do you need multiple exchanges in one app? Imagine BTCUSD 7500 on exchange A and 7800 on exchange B. Arbitrage. That's all about it. |
|
|
|
Great news! BTW you mentioned mirror-trading before. I don't quite get one thing. Let's say user A follows trader B. Let's say B gets drunk or mad and starts trading recklessly, endangering both his and A's funds. Isl there some instrument like stop-loss that gives A an opportunity to set amount of losses that causes immediately unfollowing B in auto-mode? |
|
|
|
As for me, mining with masternodes is better and more profitable as Proof of Work.
I can not agree, this type of mining does not require the same initial costs as a POW, but it requires constant monitoring of the VPS and correction. It is in fact, and many people recently understand this. At this stage, liquidity is most important. And it is better to mine something that is easy to sell on several exchanges than to buy a large amount for masternodes and find yourself with useless tokens. Liquidity is important, yes. But I don't see so much difference between masternodes and POW here. I mean - when shit really hits the fan it's too late to do anything in both cases, don't you think so? Either you have a bag of oversold coins you can sell only in loss or a bag of useless masternodes and tokens you can sell only in loss. In first case you may have a small chance to reactin time, but chances aren't really big. |
|
|
|
I think you are not completely right. Both EOS and ADA had technical part right on start. Maybe not fully covered, but whatever - they had something real.
ONEX has something real too, so that's at least one reason to be slightly optimistic about it
At the end of the ICO at the EOS, there was nothing. Mainnet, they have launched much later. Yes, my mistake, you are right. Still EOS whitepaper was solid enough in tech part, no? No, it was all very naughty. They positioned themselves as decentralized system, created high, and then it turned out, chtio all centralized with multiple vulnerabilities... Hmm. As far as I'm aware off - EOS's centralized nature became obvious only after start of mainnet. On whitepaper stage everything looked legit, no? )) |
|
|
|
I think you are not completely right. Both EOS and ADA had technical part right on start. Maybe not fully covered, but whatever - they had something real.
ONEX has something real too, so that's at least one reason to be slightly optimistic about it
At the end of the ICO at the EOS, there was nothing. Mainnet, they have launched much later. Yes, my mistake, you are right. Still EOS whitepaper was solid enough in tech part, no? |
|
|
|
I planned to look at the situation on the stock exchange. Participation in pre-sales,provides a higher profit in case of success, but the risks are very high.
Still a highrisk bet since not all project are able to deliver a good working platform. A good example is next.exchange where are they now? they are still in beta mode and way beyond their roadmap. The best investment is those ICO's that already have a working product even a beta version of their platform. If there's none then you are just investing on an idea that most of the time will never materialized. I agree that investment is always a risk, especially as proven, official products are also often scam. I may add that there were many ICOs with working products that dropped below ICO price. There are also many products that were successfully made after ICO - but their coins are still as good as dead. It's not about scam, or it's not only about scam. In crypto you are investing more in future potential, idea and PR than in product itself. You are right, a lot of projects gives profit to investors after years. Well, I didn't mean that. Actually I meant quite the opposite. There aren't many projects in crypto that gave big profits in long-term without mooning on start. And to moon on start, as we may see, you don't necessarily need working product. You need potential, PR and idea. Look on EOS, on ADA... I think you are not completely right. Both EOS and ADA had technical part right on start. Maybe not fully covered, but whatever - they had something real. ONEX has something real too, so that's at least one reason to be slightly optimistic about it |
|
|
|
May someone explain me why a trading terminal needs masternodes and blockchain in first place? What benefits gives it to user? I hope there will be no problems with tx speed...
I think that the trading terminal does not relate to masternodes, it is a separate way of making money. This is indeed a way to make money. But guys, let's look at the other side of the coin? Team ONEX -after all, people too, right?They also need money.Do you think application development is free? And server rental? And advertising?And a lot more something about which we do not even guess. Therefore, I understand them. This is understandable, just people are worried that they will deal with the coin unnecessarily, and the platform will not pay enough attention. I understand some of the problems, but I think that users themselves will determine which is better, and choose what they should choose. Personally, I would like the list of exchanges to be more expanded. And it's too early to talk about a coin-the market will show the true price. It's never to early to speak about the coin. For example REQ devs didn't thought about use-cases and marketing for the token as hard as they should - and what now? Fully working product and price wa-a-a-ay below ICO. And that counts not only for REQ. I hope, devs will remember such cases when developing a coin infrastructure) Who are REQ devs? That's another coin project with masternodes or another exchange terminal? Hmm. It seems my English wasn't good enough. I tried to give an example of a project with unreasonable role of coin in infrastructure. Example - req. But how DatchRoem said - there are many working products with dead coins. Take DADI for example. I hope ONEX devs would learn from their history and won't underestimate the role of coin use-cases in price. |
|
|
|
May someone explain me why a trading terminal needs masternodes and blockchain in first place? What benefits gives it to user? I hope there will be no problems with tx speed...
I think that the trading terminal does not relate to masternodes, it is a separate way of making money. This is indeed a way to make money. But guys, let's look at the other side of the coin? Team ONEX -after all, people too, right?They also need money.Do you think application development is free? And server rental? And advertising?And a lot more something about which we do not even guess. Therefore, I understand them. This is understandable, just people are worried that they will deal with the coin unnecessarily, and the platform will not pay enough attention. I understand some of the problems, but I think that users themselves will determine which is better, and choose what they should choose. Personally, I would like the list of exchanges to be more expanded. And it's too early to talk about a coin-the market will show the true price. It's never to early to speak about the coin. For example REQ devs didn't thought about use-cases and marketing for the token as hard as they should - and what now? Fully working product and price wa-a-a-ay below ICO. And that counts not only for REQ. I hope, devs will remember such cases when developing a coin infrastructure) |
|
|
|
|
May someone explain me why a trading terminal needs masternodes and blockchain in first place? What benefits gives it to user? I hope there will be no problems with tx speed...
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm. Seems that this programm needs some functional for arbitrage in one-click, no? Multi-exchange system is just made for such type of trade. If user will have a special interface for that it may come in handy.
|
|
|
|
Do you plan to implement some simple algorithm-building system to compete with terminals with bot-support? Such measure seems logical and useful.
In the market of bots is high enough competition That's the question for application developers Onex.Maybe you can develop a protection against bots? I think it is really possible to solve the problem. Bots and automatization in trading is not some foul play, it's part of the game, like it or not. Professional traders on NASDAQ and NYSE don't trade manually, you know |
|
|
|
|
What about Binance DEX? And why only these 8 exchanges (practically 7, because Bitfinex is as good as dead)? There are so much more interesting exchanges. Gate.io, Coinbase...
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
