Hello I have a problem.
I have two computers, one of them is airgapped
I have downloaded and runned Myetherwallet locally on an airgapped computer.
In the other computer I made the on line transaction
But here comes the problem:
I have on my pc connected to internet both the addresses to wich to send the coins from and to
You know that when you run MEW LOCALly you have to put an on line form and an offline form and then put the signed transaction in the on line form
The problem is that a pontecial attacker could have:
1) the address which I am sending the coins FROM
2) the address which I am sending the coin TO
3) the signed transaction.
With all those information, is it possible to recover the Private key whith some kind of tools?
|
|
|
The price is skyroketing. This project has been under the radar for so long time The reason is that people keep on buying Litecoin in 2018... Distribuited computer is the future. Blockcchain serves this role perfectly
|
|
|
Great news, now I understand the reason of such grow (+43% on current moment). Daily trade volume was also increased. Eh, I hope I will be alive when they release final version of product On may 29 they should release econd version. I think price grow more. Realy tothemoon token. Obviously the actual price is a bargain. Imagine how much could save Cloud compunting companies, using a network of connected PCs around the world, to provide the energy necessary to perform calculs, calculation, time to market, genetic analisis Iexec is one of the fewer survivors of the great 2018 catastrofer. Blockchain is self evolving and it is becoming more and more sofisticated
|
|
|
iEx.ec blockchain-based distributed cloud https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1746241.0https://medium.com/iex-ec/intel-and-iexec-collaboration-privacy-preserving-offchain-computing-198bd6799c36"Intel and iExec have started a collaboration on privacy-preserving offchain computing" added for voting, proof and forecast on YEENOT TODAY https://yeenot.today/catalog/news/253do you see demo on Consensus 2018 ? EEA’s Offchain Working Group Led by Intel and iExec iExec, the leader in blockchain-based decentralized cloud computing has been making efforts to deploy several mechanisms to improve the security of the iExec decentralized cloud. Intel SGX technology fully meets the security requirements of the iExec decentralized platform. iExec is the first company in the cloud and blockchain industry to leverage Intel SGX technology. This collaboration was initiated in the context of the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance (EEA), iExec and Intel both being members of the Alliance. The two companies have launched a new EEA working group focusing on off-chain capabilities. Privacy has been a long-running issue in the development of the blockchain ecosystem. iExec and Intel’s collaboration is one more step towards the full adoption of Ethereum blockchain for businesses. Consensus 2018 — EEA Workshop On May 16, 2018 Intel has presented the project at Consensus conference in New York during the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance workshop. This is one of the most important international meetings related to blockchain technology. iExec will perform a demonstration of an application running on the iExec decentralized cloud and integrating Intel SGX technology. https://coinmarketcap.com/it/currencies/rlc/Circulating supply 80 millions Price 2,36$ Utility: It's able to get off chain computer power and to transfer it on chain, to power Apps and the Ethereum internetwork Competitors: SONM Team is made of PHD, scientists, matematician french and chinese (big market)
|
|
|
Broadcast means it has been submitted to the network to be included in the next available mined block so just be patient Once the transaction is confirmed you will see the tokens have been transferred No, an attacked cannot gain access to your private keys that way In future increase the amount of gas you use (gwei) for a faster transaction You can find out how much gas is best to use here: https://ethgasstation.infoI have put both the addresses in the on line form of Myetherwallet and the signed transaction Can't an attacker get the private key?
|
|
|
I MADE A MISTAKE
I have filled both addresses (address from sending coins, and address to send the coins to) IN THE ON LINE myether wallet, I HAVE PUT BOTH ADDRESSes IN THE ONLINE FORM of MYETHERWALLET.COM
Then I tried to send the transaction, but the nounce wasn't set properly, so it said to me ''Try to adjust the nounce''
So I have put ''100'' as nounce
and the transaction went trougt
it said to me: ''The transaction has been broadcast to the network. That does not mean it will be mined or sent..'' and so on
I am worried.... I just checked on Ether scan and my tokens did not move to the address... they are in my old address... so why it said to me ''the transaction has been broadcasted''?
I am also worried about the mistake of putting BOTH ADDRESSES (the one to which send coins to, and the one to send the coins from) IN THE ON LINE MYETHERWALLET FORM OF THE WEBSITE
WHo mined this transaction?
Why it says it has been ''broadcasted''?
Can an attackker with 1 address, and second address + the SIGNED transaction recover my private key?
|
|
|
Can I put safetly the signed transaction (made in MEW off-line in an airgapped computer) into a compromised computer?
there is a remote way to recover the Key using the signed transaction made off line in Myetherwallet?
You can safely broadcast a signed transaction as it does not include the private key. Just be sure that you only export the transaction. However this transaction should be written by hand because USB Flash drives and storage media after all can get infected. Or use a scanner. There is no way of deriving a private key from public key or transaction hash known for now. I MADE A MISTAKE I have filled both addresses (address from sending coins, and address to send the coins to) IN THE ON LINE myether wallet, I HAVE PUT BOTH ADDRESSes IN THE ONLINE FORM of MYETHERWALLET.COM Then I tried to send the transaction, but the nounce wasn't set properly, so it said to me ''Try to adjust the nounce'' So I have put ''100'' as nounce and the transaction went trouht it said to me: ''The transaction has been broadcast to the network. That does not mean it will be mined or sent..'' and so on I am worried.... I just checked on Ether scan and my tokens did not move to the address... they are in my old address... so why it said to me ''the transaction has been broadcastes''? I am also worried about the mistake of putting BOTH ADDRESSES (the one to send coins to, and the one to send the coins from) IN THE ON LINE MYETHERWALLET FORM OF THE WEBSITE WHo mined this transaction? Why it says it has been ''broadcasted''? Can an attackker with 1 address, and second address + the SIGNED transaction recover my private key?
|
|
|
Since its already been clarified and answered better to lock this thread.
Quite glad to see that you are really cautious into things even myself in first encounter i was bit skeptical into that file and figured it out on my own.
I have another question, please Can I put safetly the signed transaction (made in MEW off-line in an airgapped computer) into a compromised computer? there is a remote way to recover the Key using the signed transaction made off line in Myetherwallet?
|
|
|
But I want to use it local... there will be no internet connection. Why to use metamask
|
|
|
Thank you very much,. I have suspected it was not harmful
JUst to be safe, I have asked
Anyway is it possible that hacker could corrupt gibt hub?
I always check the sig file but it's the safest way?
with gpg
|
|
|
OK, I'm not sure why you downloaded a file. You don't have to download anything to send use MEW offline. You simply need to go here to do it: https://www.myetherwallet.com/#offline-transactionI think the one you just visited is also legit, and that is for running offline wallet (sure you want to do this)? your source looks ok, but no clue what's inside that html. Should be safe to view it, what's the content inside? I want to rund MEW locally, so you HAVE TO download it in order to run it locally I don't understand that ''phishing.html'' file... because into the pics in the example it has been not shown
|
|
|
Hello, I know this place is for bitcoin core But I have a question Is it possible that the Github documents have been manipulated? I have downloaded the MEW OFFLINE from github here : https://github.com/kvhnuke/etherwallet/releases/tag/v3.21.11And between the files I have (index.html, embed.html) I have found a file called ''Phishing.html'' In the ''how to run MEW offline'' guide there is no mention of this file https://kb.myetherwallet.com/offline/running-myetherwallet-locally.htmlThere are ''index'', ''embed.html'' In the images, there is no ''phising.html'' file SO my concern is : Is it possible that the gibhub has been hacked and that file has been put to stolen private keys? Can someone explaine what is this ''phishing.html file?
|
|
|
Hello, I know this place is for bitcoin core But I have a question Is it possible that the Github documents have been manipulated? I have downloaded the MEW OFFLINE from github here : https://github.com/kvhnuke/etherwallet/releases/tag/v3.21.11And between the files I have (index.html, embed.html) I have found a file called ''Phishing.html'' In the ''how to run MEW offline'' guide there is no mention of this file https://kb.myetherwallet.com/offline/running-myetherwallet-locally.htmlThere are ''index'', ''embed.html'' In the images, there is no ''phising.html'' file SO my concern is : Is it possible that the gibhub has been hacked and that file has been put to stolen private keys? Can someone explaine what is this ''phishing.html file?
|
|
|
I'm sure that IOTA will bring big profits to investors, the developers are doing a great job and the partnerships are amazing.
Just hold for 2-3 years.
Was UCL website hacked? If it was hacked and the hackers spred false FUD this is a bullish signal Was it hacked or the UCL really don't want to collaborate with IOTA?
|
|
|
Hello, I was asking what is the point of making private smart contracts
Not FUD, just genuinly willing to know why private smart contracts can be great and which uses of case may they have in the real life
Can you share some uses of case ?
|
|
|
What about the problems with UCL? Why did they stopped the collaboration with IOTA?
|
|
|
huh, now i see what a hard job to mine some dero now my ip banned from http://pool.dero.live... used port 7777 with 1 vega (2 Kh..) so just don`t understand why.... Try port 5555 and pm your wallet/ip if still having issues. Hello Capitan Dero what are possible use cases of DERO? Possible uses case of private smart contract? I am talkikng about real life use of cases Can you name some example? Off shore companies hiding profits?
|
|
|
generalizethis what is POC for IOTA?
Proof Of Concept--it's basically a demo meant to show how a technology will work in the real world. So for IOTA, https://data.iota.org/ would be a POC. I don't know much about POC. Basically how does it work in a sistem where there is no revenue for who is running a Node?
|
|
|
|