 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »
|
Credits is in a infant shape still. Until Credits proves that it could solve crypto currency problems like speed, scalability, transaction fees, security, easy to implement in the future...then it will have its right place. Lol infant shape but they claim they have been developing it for over 3 years. Do you realize what can be acomplished in 3 years time? They are seriously fucking with everyone's brain by making a crap product to pretend like they are on their way to delivering an outstanding product. They are all about the hype and ignorance around it, people who know nothing about the tech can be fooled easily, while all this looks pretty embarrasing to the others. And this logic works because if you look at any other project you can see a slow development, no pointless articles or claims or tests or paid shillers. So people get an idea that Credits is by far better than others who take so long to develop a product. Look at that speed, look at their constant delivering lol. What a shitshow really. Great way to do the marketing because the world is full of idiots |
|
|
|
I heard a source that the CS might be listed on binance in April and this could happen because I believe this project has a very good development strategy and they have the support from all over the community Cryptocurrency. I am considering investing more CS because the price of CS is very cheap
Binance does not list scams. Credits will never moon because people who buy this coin does not have the money to buy it up. If they had the money, they would not buy this coin. HAHA, that's an overstatement  Or a lie, whatever suits you. With pre-Beta Credits have shown that they're not a scam, there is a product behind it, which is functional, though they logically still have a few bugs. But they should eliminate most of them for Beta and certainly until the main-net in June. The question is how many transactions per second can they achieve, but we need to wait for a proper test with enough transactions. Right now there's not enought transactions to view that. It doesn't matter how much Sebastian and therat can FUD the project, they at least have something to show unlike most of other ICO projects. I am still waiting for the code to see if they are really legit or just another project, who claim to be ETH killer without a substance. In the beginning the paid shillers and most of the pathetic investors here were saying that they have the code but they wait to "patent" it. Now they all wait to build that code. Here you can check their claims that they work on the project from 2016. But somehow they have nothing ready and they build it now.  Is this FUD too? Here everyone can see Sebastian the fudder does not know anything about software development and cannot read and write properly. Credits looking beautiful even in a bear market. Glad I invested. Lol. A classic, mildy shilling comment. You clearly know they are shit but you don't care.You are glad you invested and that's all you care about. As long as this shitcoin lasts you will be safe. You tried to sound smart by bashing someone and claiming he has no clue about the code, he can't write and stuff like that. Are you 15? Absolutely irrelevant stuff in order to turn this around and make some hilarious arguments. What is relevant tho is the amount of shit those communists have come up with. "Those communists" nice how old are you, 80? Pointing out the mistakes of illiterate uneducated fudders is not bashing. Its educating with style. Credits price rising as we speak, gotta check my screen, later. Lmao. Try educating those poor bounties and other mindless people still holding this shitcoin for you. Not that you have any intentions doing that tho. Man's gotta earn some money, better go spam some telegrams with those Credits gifs. Yeah, they do act like communists with all the propaganda, censorship and worshipping, constantly brainwashing everybody. |
|
|
|
I heard a source that the CS might be listed on binance in April and this could happen because I believe this project has a very good development strategy and they have the support from all over the community Cryptocurrency. I am considering investing more CS because the price of CS is very cheap
Binance does not list scams. Credits will never moon because people who buy this coin does not have the money to buy it up. If they had the money, they would not buy this coin. HAHA, that's an overstatement Or a lie, whatever suits you. With pre-Beta Credits have shown that they're not a scam, there is a product behind it, which is functional, though they logically still have a few bugs. But they should eliminate most of them for Beta and certainly until the main-net in June. The question is how many transactions per second can they achieve, but we need to wait for a proper test with enough transactions. Right now there's not enought transactions to view that. It doesn't matter how much Sebastian and therat can FUD the project, they at least have something to show unlike most of other ICO projects. I am still waiting for the code to see if they are really legit or just another project, who claim to be ETH killer without a substance. In the beginning the paid shillers and most of the pathetic investors here were saying that they have the code but they wait to "patent" it. Now they all wait to build that code. Here you can check their claims that they work on the project from 2016. But somehow they have nothing ready and they build it now. Is this FUD too? Here everyone can see Sebastian the fudder does not know anything about software development and cannot read and write properly. Credits looking beautiful even in a bear market. Glad I invested. Lol. A classic, mildy shilling comment. You clearly know they are shit but you don't care.You are glad you invested and that's all you care about. As long as this shitcoin lasts you will be safe. You tried to sound smart by bashing someone and claiming he has no clue about the code, he can't write and stuff like that. Are you 15? Absolutely irrelevant stuff in order to turn this around and make some hilarious arguments. What is relevant tho is the amount of shit those communists have come up with. |
|
|
|
Your right, I should stop, its a guilty pleasure.
These guys don't have a clue.
Wonder how long this fud will last, 10$, 50$,300$?
Impossible to Fud if the price goes over 500$
We are wondering too for how long you are gonna act like paid shillers and pathetic investors. "We are wondering too for how long you are gonna act like paid shillers and pathetic investors." WE!!!So there is a group of you that are creating fake fud. I knew it. Yeah it's the fucking cartel. lol |
|
|
|
|
Code is at 'teenage 2 month online course' level and there is no point discussing anything related to that shit with you shillers.
I love how you left that part about the partnerships out. Can't really come up with anything to sound remotely smart about that I guess? Not that other arguments are less garbage but I will let you be proud of youself coming up with such mindless statements. "cheap according to what" "what is a successful blockchain, have you written a rule book?" lmfao give me a break idiot
|
|
|
|
All we seem to here is credits bad code this and credits scam this when the facts are:
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
Again some positive preachers trying to sound smart. No one is paid to explain why this is a shitcoin. However, people are paid to shill this all over the place if you haven't noticed already. They said they are developing this garbage for 3 years. That should be enough to realize how bad it is. Looking at your last bunch of posts. All fud aimed at credits just like Sebastian. I am not trying to sound clever, Credits is showing promise. I can see by the way you write you are biased based on nothing more than your own agenda. Your opinion means nothing without facts. The fact is there is working code and tests to prove it. Here is a fun fact for you: even the "visibility of working live testnet" doesn't work. It just doesn't. They spent a lot of time already to make it look like it is working, but it still shows some mocked stuff. Untill today there was no proof whatsoever, that they actually have somewhat working blockchain behind all this. And by blockchain I mean some verifiable by consensus data structure. Also there was no description, even vague, about how exactly their "algorithm" works. They just keep pouring out a set of modern terms and abbreviations with the explanation what they actually mean, just like wikipedia Omg, so now when companies release code its automatically assumed to be fake. So when crypto companies release a alpha/beta/testnet, then you say fake. When crypto companies release software you say fake. When crypto companies establish partnerships you say fake. In summary no matter what crypto companies do they are fake. Are you reading your own sentences. Your logic is completely upside down. And if this is you Sebastian under a different name, you tricks will still not work. Their code is shit, their product is absolute shit. Their approach is beyond cheap. Their marketing is everything they got. Their partnerships are laughable, non existing or scams. That is the exact logic behind it, let's act like we are doing everything a successful blockchain would. This must be legit then. You don't even need to look for other people's opinions when you see some blatant and obvious shit they have come up with. It's just insane how they do their business |
|
|
|
All we seem to here is credits bad code this and credits scam this when the facts are:
- Live test shown ( Most other coins have not done this)
- Good code/Bad Code ( That is the dumbest thing I have ever heard, your code can have the best flow structure, recursive code, dynamic code generation
methods and let me tell you that is all bullshit. What counts is fast code especially at Alpha/beta level, make your code fast, as long as the final result is fast then
the rest is bullshit which will be improved upon just like the bullshit wallet problem that everyone seems to focus on)
- Code reviews ( Bullshit again at this point, its so easy to look at written code and rip it apart, show that O, yes I could of written this method better or
structured that class better.
Writing code from scratch in a completely new field like Blockchain which is still in its infancy is super hard. So before these
so called super coders rip the Credits code apart, stop and realize that Credits have written their own code from the bottom up. Should they follow best
practice, of course. Is there a best practice in Blockchain programming, I don't think so. Continuously pointing out negatives and not positives is a bullshit
review. So many stupid pompous reviewers who should be taken with a grain of salt.
- Working product ( Continuous and prompt delivery. Working, working, working. These guys are hustling every day to bring out something revolutionary that works.
Careful when investing in crypto, its a risky market. But more importantly watch out for all of these paid fudders spreading negativity. Crypto/Blockchain is big business and there are many people trying to suppress it.
Again some positive preachers trying to sound smart. No one is paid to explain why this is a shitcoin. However, people are paid to shill this all over the place if you haven't noticed already. They said they are developing this garbage for 3 years. That should be enough to realize how bad it is. |
|
|
|
Hi all, this is my first message here. At first I was very positive about Credits (I got some...), but then I begin to follow this dev third party analysis: https://medium.com/@suchi.blackwing/cryptocurrency-code-review-credits-cs-beta-29-03-2019-5ffce7313a38Iam lost out here...how is possible this so critical analysis about the code, and the Credits team claiming that the will deliver state of art tech? Am I missing something here? I look to guarantee qualifed teams (ADA, QTUM, ETH, EOS, etc) and look like they are keeping pushing hard to get to their targets, that don't looking so ambitious as Credits. So why should I expect Credits will suceed? Iam thinking about selling everything... Thanks in advance and sorry for the no so good english. :-) ... that guy is a charlatan who knows a little about development, and he did a few embarrassing reviews also of other BC projects, reviewing "code" when there is basically nothing that can be, or should be reviewed, because none of these projects are stupid enough to release actual core code to public and competition. He is doing this "for those without any knowledge", but its pretty clear he is very limited in his understanding, and he more than clearly has his own agenda. funny shit really. so you are saying that everyone pointing out this garbage code are charlatans? cheap talk really, almost as cheap as credits guys. please explain to us how great the code is. instead of this constant 'it's fud it's lies' talk. |
|
|
|
As they disabled comments, they are automatically labeled a scam in your messed up world. Just shows you the amount of nonsense you come up with. If you want to talk conspiracy theories. Are you and your scam group employed by the Syndicate that tries to keep market prices down? As i'm reading through other crypto threads I see the same behavior you are showing here. Very interesting stuff. You and your people cannot keep cryptos down forever. Lol like that's the only reason. Cmon dude. https://www.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85rd9g/fake_and_scam_partnerships_the_cringe_with_this/?st=JFFXR655&sh=ca2a1547How awesome is this? Pretty much the best cringe this year. |
|
|
|
Russia is out to prove dominance in the crypto sphere and Credits is the perfect way to do it.
If this were to be a scam I think it would reflect very poorly on Russias reputation and would make Russia the laughing stock of
the crypto world. I dont think that is about to happen.
Credits is serious about proving a point.
One more serious representative of credits here with 1 comment. Probably this guy is Smitten_Semi_Cameroon's brother. Credits is a scam and russia doesnt need more scams to show anything. You have no idea who I am but I can see you have some serious issues with Credits which has done nothing wrong up and till now except irritate the hell out of you. Be honest, are you Bizarro Suppoman? LOL I'm not in collusion with anyone, except my own self interests. I got into the Pre-ICO before Christmas, and even bought my parents Credits for the holidays. At first, they were wondering why, but now they're so happy. Just block Sebastian, he's a hired gun by one of the competing projects. They're scared, and for good reason. Credits will wipe most of them out, I expect, as they're already moving ahead by light years, literally. My Russian theories here are reasonable, but they're just theories, generally. I have no evidence to support any of the ideas I've proposed, other than the curious timing of the Russian election, coupled with the release of the 400k transaction video. That signaled to me that the Russian Federation will support this team, and why not? It is a matter of national pride, or should be. Say what you want about the Russians, but they are brilliant when it comes to programming. Just look at Vitalik Buterin, who is Russian by birth. He's a genius too. They hacked the U.S. elections in 2016. What more do you need to know? I don't agree with all Russian activities, but don't say they're not smart people, and highly advanced in this realm. I give Credit where credit is due, and in this case, it's highly reasonable to expect great things from this team. Speaking of strength under pressure, just look at how Credits holds up under pressure from the broader market. This is a strong coin in the face of winds moving in the opposite direction. You're crazy not to buy any dip, as the order book on KuCoin has been lopsided almost since the beginning the coin was listed, with far more demand waiting in the wings than supply. I've seen the order book shrink to a tiny fraction of available sellers, and the green buy book exploding at the same time, on numerous occasions. The supply is so limited, unlike so many others with billions in circulation, with no hint of a prototype. Look at how it's exploding upwards today. Why? Because word is spreading far and wide that this is the digital currency of the future. If even half the Star Trek and Star Wars fan buy even $10 worth, it's going to be worth a fortune to early investors, and with Comic Con coming this summer to San Diego, I expect the word of this coin will spread even faster. I cant block Seb, his comments are too funny and its so obvious what he is all about. I agree with you, I think the Russian government is watching Credits closely especially with Russia about to legalize crypto. Credits are not about to make Russia the laughing stock of the crypto world, thats for damn sure. No doubt Credits will tap into the Russian programmer market to further improve their product. I can't really imagine an experienced programmer seeing the code they did and keeping a straight face lol. He would probably think somebody is fucking with him saying that people are investing in it thinking it's a revolution. Even some basic reviews absolutely smashed their coding skills. https://np.reddit.com/r/coinjudge/comments/8440es/credits_red_flags/https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85btx8/commentary_of_credits_second_alpha_test_post/
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1167657;sa=showPostsYes, Credits is a scam. Thank you for pointing out. |
|
|
|
Russia is out to prove dominance in the crypto sphere and Credits is the perfect way to do it.
If this were to be a scam I think it would reflect very poorly on Russias reputation and would make Russia the laughing stock of
the crypto world. I dont think that is about to happen.
Credits is serious about proving a point.
One more serious representative of credits here with 1 comment. Probably this guy is Smitten_Semi_Cameroon's brother. Credits is a scam and russia doesnt need more scams to show anything. You have no idea who I am but I can see you have some serious issues with Credits which has done nothing wrong up and till now except irritate the hell out of you. Be honest, are you Bizarro Suppoman? LOL I'm not in collusion with anyone, except my own self interests. I got into the Pre-ICO before Christmas, and even bought my parents Credits for the holidays. At first, they were wondering why, but now they're so happy. Just block Sebastian, he's a hired gun by one of the competing projects. They're scared, and for good reason. Credits will wipe most of them out, I expect, as they're already moving ahead by light years, literally. My Russian theories here are reasonable, but they're just theories, generally. I have no evidence to support any of the ideas I've proposed, other than the curious timing of the Russian election, coupled with the release of the 400k transaction video. That signaled to me that the Russian Federation will support this team, and why not? It is a matter of national pride, or should be. Say what you want about the Russians, but they are brilliant when it comes to programming. Just look at Vitalik Buterin, who is Russian by birth. He's a genius too. They hacked the U.S. elections in 2016. What more do you need to know? I don't agree with all Russian activities, but don't say they're not smart people, and highly advanced in this realm. I give Credit where credit is due, and in this case, it's highly reasonable to expect great things from this team. Speaking of strength under pressure, just look at how Credits holds up under pressure from the broader market. This is a strong coin in the face of winds moving in the opposite direction. You're crazy not to buy any dip, as the order book on KuCoin has been lopsided almost since the beginning the coin was listed, with far more demand waiting in the wings than supply. I've seen the order book shrink to a tiny fraction of available sellers, and the green buy book exploding at the same time, on numerous occasions. The supply is so limited, unlike so many others with billions in circulation, with no hint of a prototype. Look at how it's exploding upwards today. Why? Because word is spreading far and wide that this is the digital currency of the future. If even half the Star Trek and Star Wars fan buy even $10 worth, it's going to be worth a fortune to early investors, and with Comic Con coming this summer to San Diego, I expect the word of this coin will spread even faster. I cant block Seb, his comments are too funny and its so obvious what he is all about. I agree with you, I think the Russian government is watching Credits closely especially with Russia about to legalize crypto. Credits are not about to make Russia the laughing stock of the crypto world, thats for damn sure. No doubt Credits will tap into the Russian programmer market to further improve their product. I can't really imagine an experienced programmer seeing the code they did and keeping a straight face lol. He would probably think somebody is fucking with him saying that people are investing in it thinking it's a revolution. Even some basic reviews absolutely smashed their coding skills. https://np.reddit.com/r/coinjudge/comments/8440es/credits_red_flags/https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85btx8/commentary_of_credits_second_alpha_test_post/ |
|
|
|
Do you think that you can completely replace banks and similar institutions? Is the market ready for you?
REPLACE BANKS REPLACE BANKS REPLACE BANKS How do you even come up with this shit? Is there a list of buzzwords that you are supposed to use or? You have no idea what you are writing lmao |
|
|
|
I read that Credit can reach 1 million transactions per second. Others have been able to get high transaction speeds by modifying code & removing constraints in a closed environment but CS team has been able to show they are able to approach these numbers in their test.
See, this is how shilling is done. Completely false statements and intentional lies. Both their test and test report is being manipulated. They even abandoned their proposed dpos and used bft. https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/85btx8/commentary_of_credits_second_alpha_test_post/ |
|
|
|
Continue acting dumb. Binance will never ever consider listing them. And now this has been reported to SEC.
Good luck with this shitcoin.
And what you think SEC do about something that is a) not a security and b) not based in US? Going reporting to SEC is just going to waste their time and annoy them. Be careful you dont annoy them too much they may want to broaden their reach - you want that for all cryptocurrency? No worries, SEC is just the beginning. It will be dealt with properly everywhere. Lol, are you for real with this statement? |
|
|
|
False, it`s a GOAL for them to x times in 3 years why is that illegal? It`s the same as in 3 year we will be the number one blockchain.
dreams without goals are just dreams and they ultimately fuel disappointment. Have dreams, but have goals, life goals, yearly goals, monthly goals, daily goals.
Continue acting dumb. Binance will never ever consider listing them. And now this has been reported to SEC. Good luck with this shitcoin. |
|
|
|
When Credit will trading in Binance?
Kucoin is charging 3 Credit coin for withdrawing into my Cold wallet. Any idea of low withdrawing fees exchange for credit coin
Did you put credits in MEW
Dunno you never know when Binance will list a coin because they will keep it quiet. But with number one volume on Kucoin most of the time I don`t think it takes long to list Credits
https://np.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/86iwzr/credits_is_now_doing_illegal_marketing_showing/ |
|
|
|
For instance, I remember seeing this being posted by You (Therat) and Sebastian a few days ago, but ever since the author added that update commending credits for not being just hype (on the 19th) I haven't seen it posted since. You mean this? "For now this is just a very clever marketing video, since most people will be too frantic about the TPS, and not actually read the article. That’s why I am actually impressed that they published the article, it shows that they aren’t just marketing hype at least." Don't understand your point really. He maybe figured he was being too harsh so he did not want to jump to any more conclusions and insult them. They certainly are hype, with some kind of a product. So to explain what kind of a product is, I was pasting this in here: https://www.reddit.com/r/credits/comments/860gua/ethereum_scaled_to_15_mil_tps_for_fun_how_is/It's actually the same guy that wrote a review. Here he explained how pointless all this really is. Indirectly pointed out where they are going with all this... Were you trying to say that we are somehow filtering the 'good' news or something? What is really good news here I don't know. Nothing has really changed. |
|
|
|
If I were Dev or part of the team, I would completely ignore these guys and concentrate on my work and the project to be developed.
In every thread and coin of success here on bitcointalk arrives at a certain point 2-3 agents of the fud and go on for a few months, until they are totally ignored by all the others and the coin follows its path, and the team demonstrates and respects the promised roadmap with deeds.
You just need to ignore and wait a few more weeks ... after we have more money and fudder will choose another coin to attack.
Says a guy promoting "Multiversum- The 4th Generation Relational Blockchain." Great stuff, absolutely amazing. Looks kinda like Credits, a proper shitcoin. How many of those will emerge in following months? |
|
|
|
|
