Thanks, but your Bytecoin pool is not available.

Bytecoin was added to Treefunder Exchange voting list  https://treefunder.co/voting#BCN

Yes, we all are waiting for it.

Contact support (at) cryptsy.com with the request to add Bytecoin to the voting list. I've done it before, but there's still no answer.

Are you from CryptoNote team? 

I've asked mprep (moderator) why he had moved our thread to announcement section. He said:

Ok, I'll do it. Thanks for the info.
But you also may contact them yourself by email (contact@bytecoin.org) or IRC (#bytecoin-dev)

As far as I can see it's kind of utility classes set, not web wallet

The process of setting up the media fund is well under way.
Currently the marketing strategy is being developed. The next step is going to be a communication channels analysis within which the best practices to reach and appeal to our target audience will be explored. The media fund website is under construction now and as little of free time that we have at the moment is devoted to getting it online. Although no exact dates can be announced at this point, the media fund launch is something we all look forward to.

If you feel like giving us a hand, it would be duly appreciated.   

As far as I know, next significant BCN update will be released in a week.
While waiting for it, you can help us with community website maintenance. We have recently added two new guides: how to start pool mining (http://bytecoiner.org/pool-mining/howto.php) and how to buy BCN at Poloniex exchange (http://bytecoiner.org/poloniex/howto.php).

And we need your feedback.

Can you elaborate on this? Did you send any transactions during the process?

UNTRACEABLE PAYMENTS



The ordinary digital signature (e.g. (EC)DSA, Schnorr, etc...) verification process involves the public key of the signer. It is a necessary condition, because the signature actually proves that the author possesses the corresponding secret key. But it is not always a sufficient condition



Ring signature is a more sophisticated scheme, which in fact may demand several different public keys for verification. In the case of ring signature, we have a group of individuals, each with their own secret and public key. The statement proved by ring signatures is that the signer of a given message is a member of the group. The main distinction with the ordinary digital signature schemes is that the signer needs a single secret key, but a verifier cannot establish the exact identity of the signer. Therefore, if you encounter a ring signature with the public keys of Alice, Bob and Carol, you can only claim that one of these individuals was the signer but you will not be able to pinpoint him or her.
This concept can be used to make digital transactions sent to the network untreaceable by using the public keys of other members in the ring signature one will apply to the transaction. This approach proves that the creator of the transaction is eligible to spend the amount specified in the transaction but his identity will be indistinguishable from the users whose public keys he used in his ring signatures.



Untraceable transactions
It should be noted that foreign transactions do not restrict you from spending your own money. Your public key may appear in dozens of others' ring signatures but only as a muddling factor (even if you already used the corresponding secret key for signing your own transaction). Moreover, if two users create ring signatures with the same set of public keys, the signatures will be different (unless they use the same private key).



UNLINKABLE TRANSACTIONS



Normally, when you post your public address, anyone can check all your incoming transactions even if they are hidden behind a ring signature. To avoid linking you can create hundreds of keys and send them to your payers privately, but that deprives you of the convenience of having a single public address.



CryptoNote solves this dilemma by an automatic creation of multiple unique one-time keys, derived from the single public key, for each p2p payment. The solution lies in a clever modification of the Diffie-Hellman exchange protocol. Originally it allows two parties to produce a common secret key derived from their public keys. In our version the sender uses the receiver's public address and his own random data to compute a one-time key for the payment.
The sender can produce only the public part of the key, whereas only the receiver can compute the private part; hence the receiver is the only one who can release the funds after the transaction is committed. He only needs to perform a single-formula check on each transactions to establish if it belongs to him. This process involves his private key, therefore no third party can perform this check and discover the link between the one-time key generated by the sender and the receiver's unique public address.
An important part of our protocol is usage of random data by the sender. It always results in a different one-time key even if the sender and the receiver both remain the same for all transactions (that is why the key is called "one-time"). Moreover, even if they are both the same person, all the one-time keys will also be absolutely unique.


More at http://bytecoin.org/about

Bytecoin is on Facebook now: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Bytecoin/703864806353100

Oh, sorry. My bad.
There is no way to see your transactions recipients after reset . Reset works just like wallet.bin delete.

Yes, you may do it with list_transfers command again.