Are you trying to solo-mine or pool mine?

Try both just to be sure it's not the wallet.

Opt 3-3-8 is working well for me, but I am a windows user so it could just be differences in compilation. Try a couple of different ones, let me know what works so I can update the dev and have him add it to the OP.

I actually think this is an awesome idea. Have you gotten musician buy-in at this point?

The miner you are using doesn't have non-sanitation factors in place. The checksum value of loading the input doesn't match the checksum value of the output. In short, look for another miner.

Which one are you using?

//edited for legibility.

Pallas gave us a price, 1 btc. He also offered to add support for the RX series provided someone will give the poor guy a card to debug with.

Don't be concerned with the current price of BOAT, everyone. Just panic sellers trying to bail out. Buy them while they're cheap and stake them until all the riff-raff has moved on to something else.

Pallas has graciously offered to update his miner to support the Polaris series (RX family) for a fee, but until then you're not going to get anything but hardware errors because his current build predates the release of the RX series and doesn't know what to make of them.

I could have cashed in on a couple of bounties, but our poor dev is being bled dry. He can't survive on rum alone.

Might I just say, this has certainly been the most entertaining launch I have ever taken part in.

I don't think anyone here is going to complain about the clutter, it's keeping the thread at the top of the list and we get a fishbowl of how you deal with your issues. Good stuff so far.

In defense of the exchange here, they hadn't accounted for the .1 boat transaction fee when they initially set it up and had to manually credit me with the boat i tried to withdraw out of their own pocket. They did this very quickly.
I can't say for certain whether this is a fishy exchange or not because the admins did quickly resolve the trouble I had. I want to give them the benefit of the doubt because this may actually be a legitimate attempt at starting an exchange and I would hate for our bias against new things to destroy what *could* be something worthwhile.

If we can find someone to update a miner or two and give us a price for their work, I'd be happy to contribute to a bounty.

Hey guys!

I'm sure most of you have noticed there's no support for the RX series of graphics cards using sgminer. This is because the cards were released after the sgminer was released, and since we had NO idea what the architecture of the cards was going to be, or how the drivers worked with them, naturally they don't work. I'm doing some digging to find out how easy it would be to use an existing version of cgminer that does recognize the cards, and add support for hmq1725. I'll keep you updated.

Normally I wouldn't have to ask that question... but...
http://prntscr.com/e5kfmy

http://prntscr.com/e5kd62

Where again? >.>

Follow-up:
Deposit went smoothly, as expected.
Withdrawal requires administrator approval.
2FA works, e-mails are instantaneous when account-related actions take place.
Fees for withdrawals.
Fees for transactions.
Fun stuff.

Hold all deposits. Sent a pittance of BOAT just to see what would happen.

I get that. Let me see if I'm reading the code right.

void init_blockindex(leveldb::Options& options, bool fRemoveOld = true) {
    // First time init.
    filesystem::path directory = GetDataDir() / "txleveldb";

    if (fRemoveOld)
        filesystem::remove_all(directory); // remove directory
     
   
    filesystem::create_directory(directory);
    printf("Opening LevelDB in %s\n", directory.string().c_str());
    leveldb::Status status = leveldb::DB::Open(options, directory.string(), &txdb);
    if (!status.ok()) {
        throw runtime_error(strprintf("init_blockindex(): error opening database environment %s", status.ToString().c_str()));
    }
}

Pseudocode translation:

Find the block index.
You're going to look for the txleveldb directory to find it.
If I've specified that you need to get rid of the old directory, go ahead and do that.
Make a new directory.
If you run into trouble, panic and tell me about it.


I'm sure you've gone over this a thousand times, and I have no doubt you're more skilled at writing code than I am, but a fresh set of eyes never hurts. If I am reading the code wrong, please feel free to enlighten me. If nothing else, we'll bump the thread back up and keep it in the public eye.

Just from the snippet you posted there, it looks like at the point it would be trying to pull the block index, it has been directed instead to clear out everything in the /txleveldb directory. When you set it to false, you're essentially telling it the block index simply doesn't exist, because it's coded to launch into clearing /txleveldb.

In other words, you've specified that the location of blockindex is to check and see if you need to remove the location of the block index.
If true, it has been found, and it will proceed to wipe out the directory as instructed and start the vicious cycle over.
If false, it no longer knows where to look for blockindex and gives up.

I understand this may not be the simplest explanation, but it's late and it made sense to me at the time.

Well, the only two seeds for the wallet have been offline for a few days. If anyone has any extra nodes to throw into a .conf file it would be extremely helpful.