Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »
|
energy is not one item of outlays in Bitcoin mining...
|
|
|
Bitcoin Could Make Banks Obsolete, it'd be right.
|
|
|
Tom Lee was totally wrong with Consensus 2018 predictions he loaned from one of the Reddit user and boasted as he's invented it. Double mistake.
|
|
|
... since all people who will learn Bitcoin has already did it. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
In 2014, Bitcoin suffered the worst correction in its history, dropping by 90 percent and remaining in a low price range for several years until 2017. the 2011 correction was worse, dropping by about 94%. i wasn't around, but it's much more brutal looking than 2014 from looking at the chart. Woo emphasized that in 2014, the correction of Bitcoin was intensified by the bankruptcy of Mt. Gox, the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange that had complete dominance over the Bitcoin market.
At the time, Mt. Gox handled 90 percent of BTC trades in the global market with extremely poor internal management systems and virtually non-existent security measures. this is totally over-exaggerated. gox didn't have 90% of BTC trading volume, lol! it's funny, every time i hear these claims about the dominance of gox, the % of global volume they supposedly had gets higher and higher. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) they maybe had 90% of "western" trading volume (compared to bitstamp, btc-e). but i'm not sure about that either. gox was only averaging ~200k volume per week at the end of 2013! btc-china alone did more than half that volume, and i believe huobi was more prominent than BTCC at that time. and to me, it really felt like china was fueling the bubble, not gox. and this was years before the volumizer bots came around. also, just compare gox's volume between april 2013 and november 2013. between those two bubbles, gox lost lots of volume to other exchanges. by 2014, there is no way in hell they controlled anywhere near 90% of the market! probably a good deal less than 50%..... The same case is now: we don't know exactly how much the OTC crypto market is.
|
|
|
In a Bitcoin News exclusive, Bitcoin Venezuela founder Randy Brito reveals a wealth of ideas about how cryptocurrency can be used to combat the effects of extreme hyperinflation in Venezuela right now. He takes us on an insightful journey on the ground in the South American nation, uncovering deep skepticism from Venezuelans of both the Petro crypto token and an uncorrupted future for local cryptocurrency exchanges. What is really happening in Venezuela?Hyperinflation is hitting Venezuela hard, with consumer prices increasing 82,766% last month compared to July last year. What does this mean for the people of the country? Randy described the scene in the streets as near chaos; workers desperately try to spend their wages as soon as they are paid on whatever they can find in the streets to store value, later trading their goods with others who have the products they need. People need to bring five bags of cash with them just to buy their weekly groceries. Yesterday, he said, with the new rates only one bank made their new ATM limits public at one million bolivars – nearly enough to buy one-third of a cup of coffee. Enter BitcoinAs Randy sees it, cryptocurrency could provide a solution to at least some of these problems: ”Bitcoin could be a common currency denomination… it already has an international market traded against currencies. Bitcoin could create frictionless trades.” It is also a way of getting around bank transfer limits. As of yet, however, it is difficult to find vendors or service providers willing to accept cryptocurrency payments. This is predominantly because people do not understand how the payment methods work but many more issues surround adoption. Too early for airdropsThe Bitcoin Venezuela humanitarian aid project began around two years ago, initially raising funds of around USD 200 per month in cryptocurrency. Randy is trying to increase this substantially now, as they are currently feeding over 2,000 Venezuelans a day in their soup kitchens. While he would like to send cryptocurrency directly on the ground to citizens, the current climate does not allow for that. ”People have old cheap phones because of the crime. That’s what is safe to take out on the streets,” he said, referencing the lack of proper tools people have to access cryptocurrency. To read the full feature: https://bitcoinnews.com/inside-venezuela-no-trust-in-government-rejecting-petro-and-feeding-2000-daily/Why do we must believe that this "reality" is 100% real reality?
|
|
|
As far as US Congress tries figuring out US Coinbase faces enormous outflow of investors.
|
|
|
I believe CZ said there is no price list, but I believe it could charge such a value for risky projects. While projects that prove to be safe and future and demand could be listed for free. Now, that power that certain exchanges have is something very bad for decentralization. Even more so in projects that have PoS. We need decentralized alternatives right away. That offer quality, speed, and anonymity for traders.
you're right, and so Binance Denies 400 BTC Listing Quote titel is misleading one since CZ may probably charge more than 400 BTC for listing if a project is very risky.
|
|
|
Arthur Hayes of BitMEX believes $50,000 of Bitcoin until the end of this year.
|
|
|
His thesis needs to be more elaborated...
|
|
|
There is right statistics since the most trade of gold is trade of "paper gold" the same as it's going with "paper oil".
|
|
|
How do cooperation between Ripple and Saudi central bank go?
|
|
|
the same approach wait and see is everywhere
|
|
|
It means that in relative measure we witness Bitcoin growth and secondly there is no substantial correlation between Bitcoin and altcoins movement.
|
|
|
ETF approval by itselg matters not so much, more important is a demand.
|
|
|
Fundstrat expects that Bitcoin may touch $4,000
It won't, that's just some wishful thinking by the FUD crowd. why? It seems that institutional investors may play such game as Soros like
|
|
|
Fundstrat expects that Bitcoin may touch $4,000
|
|
|
It is no wonder the SEC dropped the Winkelvoss twins application into the trash can, there are bigger players in the industry and they will get "priority" treatment. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) It is going to be a long wait for people until November. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) I have a lot of mixed emotions about this news... On the one hand, I want Bitcoin to go to the Moon, but on the other hand, I hate the fact that fiat masters will come into the Bitcoin scene and all the damage that they will bring with them. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) It just highlights that Winklevoss didn't hire an appropriate lobbyist (GR-manager) for to reach its goal.
|
|
|
I see that a belief that integrating Bitcoin to classical exchanges will help crypto market to get a momentum feels not right.
|
|
|
|