Week № 3 (6/07-12/07)
Facebook profile link: https://www.facebook.com/moe.fisher.94
SpreadSheet number:1956
Like,Share and Comment links:
https://www.facebook.com/moe.fisher.94/posts/141346003422502

Week № 3 (6/07-12/07)
Twitter profile link: https://twitter.com/BOUNTYICOBOUNT1
SpreadSheet number:2100
Like / Retweet:
https://twitter.com/BOUNTYICOBOUNT1/status/1017019963025121281   
https://twitter.com/BOUNTYICOBOUNT1/status/1017435489123688450   
https://twitter.com/BOUNTYICOBOUNT1/status/1017737624633729029

Привет народ! подсажите какие-нибудь ресурсы с отборными ico или рейтинги проектов. спасибо)

Заинтересовался проектом и хотел инвестировать но увы сайт не работает!!! как так?!

Всем привет! подскажите есть ли ограничения по рангу биткоинтолк или все могут в баунти участвовать?

наше государство залезит в карман к каждому гражданину!

не поддавайтесь паник сэйл!!! я свои монеты буду держать... тем более объемы пошли в латинской америке и канаде рекорды бьют)

Может на этом фоне биток подростет. посмотрим...

Be careful, there are a lot of scammers

не тратьте время)

Это сложно. Мой папа решил сначала, что это аналогично МММ.
А вчера своим объясняла про баунти компании, дак вроде даже заинтересовались 

There is a transfer feature on PokerStars for site funds.  Looking to trade my btc for money on there.  It's the largest poker site in the world.  People who play poker will understand.

I'm looking to trade btc for pokerstars.  I've done one trade already but the guy I did the trade with has been busy and not responded to my messages.  There is pretty strong demand from if people could make these types of trades.

No real lenders on this site.

READ WHAT I WROTE.  I said that investors could choose to take a .75 percent return as a FIXED amount over the POTENTIAL return of 1 percent of all bets.  The investors that didn't take the fixed return would get any weekly return that exceeded .75 percent.  In losing weeks the investors that didn't take the fixed return would pay the return out of their investment to those that had.

In this way with with an overall theoretical return of 1 percent for all bets taken on the site, the investors that didn't take the fixed return should gain 1.25 percent on average over time. 

I have come up with an idea for the site that can help solve investor problems and trust issues with the site.

There are some investors that want to take larger risks than other investors.  One of the ways you tried to address this was to possibly allow some people to risk more of their bankroll than others.  

I've come up with a much better solution that will allow some investors to take more risk while lowering variance for other investors who don't want it.

The answer is to allow some investors to choose a fixed percentage return of .75 percent.  For instance, let's say the profit of the site averaged 2 percent for a given week.  The investors that choose the fixed percent would get paid .75 percent and the ones who took the rest of the downside risk would get 2 percent plus .25 for paying the fixed percentage.

In weeks the site has a loss the investors that took the fixed percentage of bets would get paid .75 from the investors that didn't.  In this way some investors can lower their variance by giving up some profit and other investors can profit from that.

This is a +ev decision for the investors taking more risk because it ups their longterm returns to 1.25 percent.  

I've been watching the site for two days now I think it's an elaborate form of scam.  The game is provably fair for the players but that simply means they have a -1 percent disadvantage. 

The key is the edge on the site has not and will not approach 1 percent for investors.  I believe they are using big bettors to hammer the site when it's up and take off big chunks of money all at once.  Then the little bettors build the profit back up and they hammer it again.

There really is no need to have a site that allows someone to win 187 bitcoins in one roll of the dice.  The major reason it's needed is so that the mysterious big players can come in and bet obviously insane amounts per roll and walk away with a big win. 

The names of the players seem like they are taken out of a name book to make them look legit and random.  He even admits that it's not fair for investors without ever saying if he is taking advantage of that unfairness to make himself money.

I think what is happening is that the market is proving the viability of bitcoin by making the cost of mining the coins more than what could be gained from the coins produced.

If people are willing to invest money into mining bitcoins even when it's unprofitable it proves that those people believe that the coins will be more valuable than their current cost of mining them.

For instance, let's say the price of bitcoin moves to 2000 dollars per coin.  Those people who had been mining all along will get the full benefit of that profit because everyone else for certain will have quit.

Someone investing in mining bitcoins causes the price of bitcoins to go up because their investments increase the utility of bitcoin both information-ally and directly depending how they purchase the equipment to do the mining.  If they buy their gear with bitcoins it increases the utility of the currency. 

The most important part to remember is that mining difficultly increasing is not an indication that mining is not profitable.  It is an indication that the future price of bitcoin is going to be a lot higher almost always. 

Miners that have the most invested will have the largest edge.  As far as the efficiency of the individual mining itself that's an entirely different thing.  In theory if you could find a way to get a bunch of free electricity and computing power that was cheaper than the super high-tech miners it wouldn't matter what equipment was used to mine the coins.

What about using the coins in cold storage to invest in an ongoing, or start a bitcoin mining operation? 

It's about 20 million in equipment that could be bought to mine.  You could just lower the maximum profit on bets since the amount is rarely being tested anyway. 

An 80/20 ratio seems reasonable.  That should allow for very fast compounding and gives investors three layers of investment.

1.  The 1 percent edge
2.  The mining
3.  The bitcoins themselves